http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/02/10/feds-poised-to-withdraw-longstanding-warnings-about-dietary-cholesterol/The nation’s top nutrition advisory panel has decided to drop its caution about eating cholesterol-laden food, a move that could undo almost 40 years of government warnings about its consumption. The group’s finding that cholesterol in the diet need no longer be considered a “nutrient of concern” stands in contrast to the committee’s findings five years ago, the last time it convened. During those proceedings, as in previous years, the panel deemed the issue of excess cholesterol in the American diet a public health concern. The finding follows an evolution of thinking among many nutritionists who now believe that, for healthy adults, eating foods high in cholesterol may not significantly affect the level of cholesterol in the blood or increase the risk of heart disease. Cholesterol Is Not a ‘Nutrient of Concern,’ Report SaysExperts say this would mean that recommendations are finally catching up with the evidence, which suggests that dietary cholesterol bears little impact on a person’s risk of heart disease. “There have been multiple analyses and meta-analyses now looking at intake of dietary cholesterol and the risk of heart disease,” says Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. “In the general population, there’s really not any strong evidence for a link.” However, a few studies have shown that there may be increased risk in people with type-2 diabetes, he says. http://time.com/3705734/cholesterol-dietary-guidelines/The shameful history of government, health industry, and media vilification of the egg:http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/28/breaking-eggs-not-bad-for-you-and-the-nyt-is-on-it/------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What a week for science! First, no big bang, the universe was always there. Now eating eggs is good for you. What's next? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Official: Houthis take U.S. vehicles, weapons in YemenSanaa, Yemen (CNN)Houthi rebels took all U.S. Embassy vehicles parked at the Yemeni capital's airport and wouldn't let departing U.S. Marines take their weapons with them, a top Sanaa airport official said about the latest evidence of unrest in an Arab nation long seen as key in America's fight against terrorists. The actions come after the United States, along with Britain, suspended operations at their embassies and moved out staffers because of the instability in Yemen. According to the official, the Houthis seized many U.S. Marines' weapons at the airport, and the American troops also handed over some to random airport officials. However, a senior U.S. military official told CNN the Marines disabled their weapons and gave them to a Yemeni security detail, which had escorted them to the airport, because the Marines were flying commercial. The U.S. Marine Corps sharply denied the allegations. "All crew served weapons were destroyed at the embassy prior to movement. None of them were 'handed over' in any way to anyone. The destruction of weapons at the embassy and the airport was carried out in accordance with an approved destruction plan," the statement read. The statement continued: "To be clear: No Marine handed a weapon to a Houthi, or had one taken from him." The previous night, embassy officials burned tens of thousands of documents and destroyed weapons that were inside the Sanaa embassy's storage warehouses, Yemeni employees of the embassy said. http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/11/middleeast/yemen-unrest/
|
|
|
He has every right to sue them, he did nothing wrong and its clear how that "policewoman-trololol" flipped out. I would like to see what her boses are going to say when they see video and loose half a million on her crazy head. It seams that the pepperspray everyone now, with every chance they get. -Land of the free, home of the brave.. Her bosses will not lose any money. That money is tax payer money, money relocated in the pocket of someone who may not have been there randomly, for longer than a few minutes maybe. Doesnt the money go from police dept. funds? It would be insane to just pay idiot things like that from state funds, since it wont stop them from repeating things like that whenever they feel like it. If the 'victim' understands his awarded $$$ could be donated to causes he believes deeply withing his community directly (the tax payers), causes that could impact people positively for generations then that would be great. If only 'part' of the $$$ goes to some groups and organisations but the rest is for shopping and airline tickets, then...
|
|
|
This just shows how much religious tolerance has gone mad, everyone is allowed to believe what they want, but for the love of god, why force others to be a part of it. If there was no religion , world would be a happy place, no wars, lower violence , and no fat monks :]
Don't disagree with you on the latter but not sure how the former was so terrible. They had many students that couldn't attend school in two days. So they decided not to schedule tests or trips for those two days. Seems like a sensible decision to me. Why is this even in a "why islam hates people" thread? This thread's title was inspired by this other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=776096.0If not for the other thread, this one would never have been created ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If, in the future, the link does not work anymore the name of the thread was Why do people hate islam? (Read 17363 times)The OP then wrote: I am here to just say one thing? Why do YOU hate islam? and you should really give a valid reason not a shitty one that says 'Because media' and Yes, I am a muslim for those who ask, just tell me, come out of your shell and say why you HATE it, and I could be here to clarify things to you. Also here is something that most people mistake about islam is that "Islam hates other religions" for this I say, Islam does not hate ANY religion, but it suggests to 'invite' them to islam, as slowly, and peacefully, even if they refuse, you can try and try, until it's their choice, you stop. and for all the wars that happened, it's because the other religions decided to come into war on Islam.
If you need anything clarified, I am here to answer you, don't be scared, I won't be offended by anyone, also haters, you can reply, I won't care ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) My first post was an 'homage' to his post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888757.msg9799822#msg9799822 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
He has every right to sue them, he did nothing wrong and its clear how that "policewoman-trololol" flipped out. I would like to see what her boses are going to say when they see video and loose half a million on her crazy head. It seams that the pepperspray everyone now, with every chance they get. -Land of the free, home of the brave.. Her bosses will not lose any money. That money is tax payer money, money relocated in the pocket of someone who may not have been there randomly, for longer than a few minutes maybe.
|
|
|
State Department's Jen Psaki Explains Why The U.S. Will Trust Yemeni Rebels Chanting "Death to America"Earlier this week the United States and other western powers evacuated Yemen, citing concerns about security in the rapidly deteriorating country. On the way out of the country, U.S. Marines were instructed to destroy their weapons and U.S. vehicles were taken over by Houthi rebels. Now, without a presence there, the State Department is arguing rebel Houthis can be trusted to keep their word and to respect the U.S. embassy until it can be reoccupied. Houthis have been seen on video calling for "death to America," just brought down the U.S. backed Yemeni government and have ties to terrorism. Last night on The Kelly File, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki tried to explain why U.S. officials are taking the Houthis at their word. "Do we want to return to Yemen? Absolutely. That's why we suspended our operations, we plan on returning when we can. The Houthies have said they're not threatening, they don't want to go after the United States, well the proof is in the pudding," Psaki said. Anchor Megyn Kelly pointed out that the Houthis post signs that read "Death to America" at checkpoints and Psaki doubled down on her point about trusting the rebels. "They have said they want the Americans, they want the westerners to have a presence in Yemen," Psaki said. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/02/13/jen-psaki-n1957089?utm_source=BreakingOnTownhallWidget_4&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=BreakingOnTownhall
|
|
|
Yep! I knew it was for the $$$. It always is...
|
|
|
Erdogan Proposes Mosque in Cuba to Celebrate Islam’s Discovery of AmericaThe president believes it was the Muslims who discovered the Americas and he wants to build a mosque in Cuba in their honour.The Turkish president has asked Cuba if he can build a mosque on the Caribbean island. Tayyip Erdogan believes that the Americas were discovered by Muslims and he wants to build a mosque similar to one in Turkey that lies on the European shore of the Bosphorus. At a conference in Istanbul last November, he told a gathering of Muslim leaders from Latin America that Muslims had reached the Americas in the 12th Century – before the European explorer Christopher Columbus did so in 1492. Mr Erdogan made his latest request after talks with Cuban President Raul Castro in Havana. “I presented all the information, project work and visuals regarding the Ortakoy mosque,” he said. ‘We will do this ourselves. We don’t want a partner. If you find it appropriate we want to do this,” Mr Erdogan was quoted as saying on his official website. He told journalists that the Cuban government had agreed a similar proposal with Saudi Arabia some time ago and, in light of that, his planned mosque could be built elsewhere in Cuba. It is not known how Cuba responded to the request.,, …Mr Erdogan’s belief is based on a reference in Columbus’ diary of his voyages to a “mosque-like formation” at the top of a mountain but most scholars say the reference was to a natural mountain feature rather than an actual mosque. http://news.sky.com/story/1426406/turkeys-erdogan-plans-a-mosque-in-cuba
|
|
|
Brian's got a real big problem on his hands now, and so does his network. Except for his loyal die hard brainwashed followers, most reasonable people now are going to be wondering if he's telling the truth on what he talks about or is giving his take on a story as to how he believes it should be understood, even if he has to, shall I say, lie. Not exactly a trusting relationship with viewers. They may have to 'can' him eventually.
To have knowingly protected a serial liar for so long is an amazing problem. We always lose the perspective of how big of a job and how many people are involved when you see the 'news' on TV. Yet people will still believe he was the only one involved, not the crew around him seeing and recording everything. Have any of them come forward in all those years?
|
|
|
Tweeting for Treatment in VenezuelaIt’s a tweet that ultimately fell on deaf ears: “#ServicioPublico Infalgan solution of 10 Mg for injection is needed for Vanessa Chacón.” Sent from San Rafael del Piñal, a small town in Venezuela near the border with Colombia, the tweet was sent on behalf of Chacón, 22, who needed the medicine to survive a severe coronary condition. Unfortunately, it’s simply not available there — and isn’t likely to be anytime soon. “My niece is very sick. We haven’t been able to locate the drug in pharmacies or in hospitals,” says Nelson Jaimes, who’s Chacón’s uncle and, coincidentally, a pharmacist. “We who are inside the pharma business can’t locate the products. What can a regular citizen expect to find?” In Venezuela, several hundred tweets like this go out every day under the hashtag “#ServicioPublico,” meaning “public service.” But few cries for help are answered, and the country is facing a critical shortage of basic medical supplies. The crisis is only getting worse. A crumbling economy and lack of access to foreign currency (worsened by the recent drop in oil prices) means domestic distributors cannot pay their suppliers. That, in turn, has led international medical suppliers to cut shipments and hold back on maintenance of Venezuela’s health care infrastructure. B ills have piled up to the tune of some $245 million — and that doesn’t include money owed to drug companies, maintenance firms or other health careproviders. The consequences are being felt across a broad swath of society. Up to 15 percent of the country’s cancer patients are dying due to a lack of radiotherapy treatment, the Venezuelan Society of Oncology and Oncological Radiotherapy has warned. The situation has become so dire that some professionals who used to work with pharma companies say they’ve cut their relationships because there’s just no medicine for the businesses to supply. http://www.ozy.com/acumen/when-more-isnt-better/4572?utm_source=dd&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=02132015
|
|
|
The universe is actually a multiverse. Billions of systems to form a galaxy and millions of galaxy form a supercluster and millions of supercluster form a verse. And multiverse is compose of this infinite number of verses that is created and destroyed in the flow times like an atom.
As our technology progress we will discover that there are still smaller things to the thing we discover to be the smallest and there are still bigger things to the things we discover to be the biggest. Actually sizes are infinite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi2PPHEqXsw ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
(Phys.org) —The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein's theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once. The widely accepted age of the universe, as estimated by general relativity, is 13.8 billion years. In the beginning, everything in existence is thought to have occupied a single infinitely dense point, or singularity. Only after this point began to expand in a "Big Bang" did the universe officially begin. Although the Big Bang singularity arises directly and unavoidably from the mathematics of general relativity, some scientists see it as problematic because the math can explain only what happened immediately after—not at or before—the singularity. "The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break down there," Ahmed Farag Ali at Benha University and the Zewail City of Science and Technology, both in Egypt, told Phys.org. Ali and coauthor Saurya Das at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, have shown in a paper published in Physics Letters B that the Big Bang singularity can be resolved by their new model in which the universe has no beginning and no end. Old ideas revisitedThe physicists emphasize that their quantum correction terms are not applied ad hoc in an attempt to specifically eliminate the Big Bang singularity. Their work is based on ideas by the theoretical physicist David Bohm, who is also known for his contributions to the philosophy of physics. Starting in the 1950s, Bohm explored replacing classical geodesics (the shortest path between two points on a curved surface) with quantum trajectories. In their paper, Ali and Das applied these Bohmian trajectories to an equation developed in the 1950s by physicist Amal Kumar Raychaudhuri at Presidency University in Kolkata, India. Raychaudhuri was also Das's teacher when he was an undergraduate student of that institution in the '90s. Using the quantum-corrected Raychaudhuri equation, Ali and Das derived quantum-corrected Friedmann equations, which describe the expansion and evolution of universe (including the Big Bang) within the context of general relativity. Although it's not a true theory of quantum gravity, the model does contain elements from both quantum theory and general relativity. Ali and Das also expect their results to hold even if and when a full theory of quantum gravity is formulated. No singularities nor dark stuffIn addition to not predicting a Big Bang singularity, the new model does not predict a "big crunch" singularity, either. In general relativity, one possible fate of the universe is that it starts to shrink until it collapses in on itself in a big crunch and becomes an infinitely dense point once again. Ali and Das explain in their paper that their model avoids singularities because of a key difference between classical geodesics and Bohmian trajectories. Classical geodesics eventually cross each other, and the points at which they converge are singularities. In contrast, Bohmian trajectories never cross each other, so singularities do not appear in the equations. In cosmological terms, the scientists explain that the quantum corrections can be thought of as a cosmological constant term (without the need for dark energy) and a radiation term. These terms keep the universe at a finite size, and therefore give it an infinite age. The terms also make predictions that agree closely with current observations of the cosmological constant and density of the universe. New gravity particleIn physical terms, the model describes the universe as being filled with a quantum fluid. The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitons—hypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity. If they exist, gravitons are thought to play a key role in a theory of quantum gravity. In a related paper, Das and another collaborator, Rajat Bhaduri of McMaster University, Canada, have lent further credence to this model. They show that gravitons can form a Bose-Einstein condensate (named after Einstein and another Indian physicist, Satyendranath Bose) at temperatures that were present in the universe at all epochs. Motivated by the model's potential to resolve the Big Bang singularity and account for dark matter and dark energy, the physicists plan to analyze their model more rigorously in the future. Their future work includes redoing their study while taking into account small inhomogeneous and anisotropic perturbations, but they do not expect small perturbations to significantly affect the results. "It is satisfying to note that such straightforward corrections can potentially resolve so many issues at once," Das said. http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Badda-Bing Badda-Bang!.. At least, global warming is here to stay as fact forever... ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Obama hasn't been doing much arm twisting, on the contrary he's more of a conformist. He's systematically releasing muslim terrorists, while ISIS is shooting their prisoners in the head. I'd like to see him twist an arm of a Saudi sheikh, who finances those Syrian murderers. I'm sure we'd all have a good laugh.
Øbama's lethal arm twisting result...
|
|
|
..... If man were to abandon coal we would have a definite crisis on our hands. No question about it. Millions maybe even billions would die. Ill take a potential crisis in the future that will probably be averted naturally based on predictable trends over a guaranteed crisis today. Though this isn't really addressing things like emission scrubbing. I don't know too much about that, perhaps if all of the externalities were priced into the cost of production than technologies like this would make emissions much lower.
Well, abandoning coal would certainly leave a great number of African villages and towns without power into the foreseeable future, so a great part of the third world would remain third world. Of course a lot of greenies really want that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCPuYvIMKi0Hum... Tire: extracted from the natural, rounded shaped roots of the tirewaya. Plastic bottles: mango like fruits from a tree called the red plastica botolis. Don't use the blue plastica botolis! Its bottled shaped fruit shrinks to the size of a small nut when cut. Aluminum foil: the skin of the famous slumgullion, king of the undergrowth. Yep. 100% greenie compatible. You can cook your food in peace brother...
|
|
|
So it looks like the whole thing was actually a running dispute about parking space. Well his solution does solve his parking problems.
Yep. That would include his parking space too, or lack thereof... If I were the judge I would have awarded him a visitor parking spot at the prison. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) This is one of many reasons no one would ever let me be a judge. That's OK. You can be our judge judy here if you want ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
So 3 human beings, picked up (not elected) by a president will decide the fate of the whole US internet.
Five human beings picked by the president and confirmed by the senate. But, details... ... Details that are hidden now, but in full view for all AFTER the vote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU
|
|
|
... and lots and lots of new taxes:First, President Obama’s plan marks a monumental shift toward government control of the Internet. It gives the FCC the power to micromanage virtually every aspect of how the Internet works. It’s an overreach that will let a Washington bureaucracy, and not the American people, decide the future of the online world. It’s no wonder that net neutrality proponents are already bragging that it will turn the FCC into the “Department of the Internet.” For that reason, if you like dealing with the IRS, you are going to love the President’s plan. Second, President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet will increase consumers’ monthly broadband bills. The plan explicitly opens the door to billions of dollars in new taxes on broadband. Indeed, states have already begun discussions on how they will spend the extra money. These new taxes will mean higher prices for consumers and more hidden fees that they have to pay. Third, President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet will mean slower broadband for American consumers. The plan contains a host of new regulations that will reduce investment in broadband networks. That means slower Internet speeds. It also means that many rural Americans will have to wait longer for access to quality broadband. Fourth, President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet will hurt competition and innovation and move us toward a broadband monopoly. The plan saddles small, independent businesses and entrepreneurs with heavy-handed regulations that will push them out of the market. As a result, Americans will have fewer broadband choices. This is no accident. Title II was designed to regulate a monopoly. If we impose that model on a vibrant broadband marketplace, a highly regulated monopoly is what we’ll get. We shouldn’t bring Ma Bell back to life in this dynamic, digital age. Fifth, President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet is an unlawful power grab. Courts have twice thrown out the FCC’s attempts at Internet regulation. There’s no reason to think that the third time will be the charm. Even a cursory look at the plan reveals glaring legal flaws that are sure to mire the agency in the muck of litigation for a long, long time. And sixth, the American people are being misled about what is in President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet. The rollout earlier in the week was obviously intended to downplay the plan’s massive intrusion into the Internet economy. Beginning next week, I look forward to sharing with the public key aspects of what this plan will actually do. http://www.fcc.gov/document/comm-pais-stmt-president-obamas-plan-regulate-internet The US is far behind the times in regards to the Internet. This is a political victory for a free and open Internet. I'm not sure whether this is bait or not. It's classic bait, a bunch of fear mongering without specifics. Notice if you click through to the source, and read the whole thing, Mr. Pai's letter states that he will provide specifics about why this plan is so terrible at a later time. (OP truncated that part of the letter, he was too busy reposting all the non-specific talking points.) All this letter was meant to do was rile up the base. Let me know when Mr. Pai posts something substantive, not a bunch of conclusions without the evidence to support them. If mr. pai or myself are trying to lie to anyone, why can't the FCC and the people behind those 332 pages be upfront and let anyone read those pages? PDF please, with a search function, not 332 pages of paper toilet scanned at 72 dpi, saved as docx... I understand, for some, the government can do no wrong. Ever. Unlike happy people posting links of news on their favorite forum, links anyone can read to the fullest by checking the whole article themselves. Posting a part of a website here is wrong and bad. Letting the government change the whole entire internet, in secret and forever, is good. I guess some of us already read those 332 pages and know in advance to distrust Wilikon and mr. pai. That is a huge amount of faith on 332 pages called "net neutrality", doublespeak 101... ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) No, some of us read a bunch of conclusions and ask for the reasoning that lead to those conclusions so we can evaluate the merits of the conclusion for ourselves. When they are not provided, then those of us with the ability to think independently dismiss it a useless rhetoric. Mr. Pai's letter is rich in rhetoric and absent of information and reasoning that leads to his conclusions. Apparently, he hasn't had time yet to post anything substantive about why the plan is so terrible, only that it is. I've only come to distrust what you post because it's absent of critical thought. You're a fine parrot for conservative talking points, but you rarely provide anything that justifies the conclusions in the things you post. Rhetoric is what gets politicians elected, so it's very useful to have drones who just repeat that stuff without questioning it. You always seem to mistake that a critique of your rote dissemination of rhetoric is acceptance of the counterpoint, and it's not. The critique of the lack of substance of Mr. Pai's letter is the embodiment of this. He's provided no reasoning or evidence to support his conclusions, and until he does, it's impossible to either agree or disagree with any degree of informed opinion to the conclusions he has presented. Since his letter provides nothing substantive, it's useless rhetoric. I'll be waiting for him to give us the promised details which ostensibly will support his conclusions, so I can at that time determine whether they are justified conclusions or not. Reader's digest version:I know it is useful to trust the government blindly all the time. We should always reject and distrust anyone who is not locked in our political mindset, automatically. The 3 confirmed democrats, people known for their vision in IT for years in the private sector, may have found a way to make the internet a much better technological tool for all of us.
Who has time to read 332 pages anyway...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU
|
|
|
So it looks like the whole thing was actually a running dispute about parking space. Well his solution does solve his parking problems.
Yep. That would include his parking space too, or lack thereof...
|
|
|
|