Bitcoin Forum
August 05, 2024, 11:08:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 [345] 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 ... 661 »
6881  Other / Off-topic / Re: How are you earning BTC? on: February 23, 2017, 03:33:22 PM
Signature campaigns are a good alternative to faucet sites for earn BTC. We spend a lot of time on the faucet sites and earn BTC's by making one constructive message here.

But with signature campaigns, there are not very high gains. If you are already active in the forum, signature campaigns are advantageous. I am a person who already posts in the forum. At least I earn BTC against it.

You can't compare signature campaigns to faucets as there isn't anything that justifies the time you put into faucets for the insanely low rewards you get as result. If you look at how the current price has been affecting faucet payouts (negatively of course), then it doesn't come as a surprise that even people coming from less developed countries start to see it as a waste of time. Assuming you are accepted to participate in a signature campaign, then a Member account can earn like 0.0001-0.00015BTC per post. Put that against faucets that pay you out 0.000002BTC per hour. And that's still considered to be a "decent" hourly faucet payout... There is no comparison.
6882  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-02-23]Bitcoin’s Transaction Backlog Hits All-Time High on: February 23, 2017, 03:03:18 PM
It's not the first time, and definitely won't be the last time without a proper solution to this whole discussion about block sizes. I don't rule out that the increased price may also play an important role as to why the transaction volumes have increased so massively, but there is definitely manipulation going on as TraderTimm also points at. It's ridiculous that someone who is claimed to be a high level Bitcoiner that people used to look up to, is now doing everything to make Bitcoin look bad for its own benefit. Eventually he will see that it is no longer viable to continue his trolling rampage as it's just a big waste of money.
6883  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin or gold? on: February 22, 2017, 07:43:04 PM
Though I still don't understand why you should keep a master key which, as you say, you still can't use to restore the private key directly and thus should use a second hardware wallet (which adds risks if these are no longer available) if you can just encrypt your real key from this wallet and keep it in absolutely the same way as your master key. In this case, you wouldn't need a second device at all with risks being even lower at that (if someone steals the master key he could restore the private key using his own wallet). Basically, with these hardware wallets you are making your life unnecessary complicated, especially in the case when things go awry

I'll admit that it's indeed odd that you always need a Trezor device in order to recover your keys (which means that Trezor indirectly is still somewhat of a central authority here), but people prefer this hardware wallet for numerous reasons. Best thing is that when you transact with people, it basically doesn't matter whether or not you run everything from a clean cumputer as there is no way malware could affect anything. I think this is what gives people an ultimate form of condince.
6884  Economy / Speculation / Re: THE DUMP on: February 22, 2017, 07:13:36 PM
this comes from the mentality that these guys think their spam here has any significant effect. and to be honest it may have some effect but it would be only on some newbies who want to either enter with a tiny amount (less than $500) or have that tiny amount and panic sell. and in a market as big as bitcoin these newbies are nothing and their shorts will never be filled.

- that is my speculation Cool

Their target is definitely to make newbies fall for their worthless gibberish, but I think their intention isn't exactly to trigger a wave of panic sellers that will dump the price down. I am sure they know their efforts won't have any effect in that regard. I think it's more a trolling attempt to push people into losses by making them sell at a loss, where they after that buy back their coins at premium prices. It's trolling from the lowest levels. How deep can anyone sink to try push others into losses. This is regarding kwukduck and his army of shill accounts.
6885  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-02-21]The Bitcoin ETF Will Be Rejected According to Prediction Markets on: February 22, 2017, 06:56:15 PM
It doesn't say anything. Even if the market was predicting that it would be approved it wouldn't say anything. Only thing that matters is what will happen on March 11 next month. I guess it's more an attempt to make people less confident about the potential ETF approval, as the price is going up in advance just because of this event. Such artcles being pushed online before important events have a specific reason...

That is right. The ETF will not be very significant.

That's not what I said. I was more targeting this article to be written just for the purpose of lowering the fantastic sentiment in the runup to the ETF approval data. Good thing is that the fantastic sentiment doesn't allow itself to be dented by such articles as the price is still heading up.
6886  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin or gold? on: February 22, 2017, 12:53:39 PM
And if you have only one such device and it breaks, could you buy a new device and use it to restore the keys? If this is not possible, then we are basically back to square one, i.e. having the wallet irreparably broken effectively means that you lose your coins

I think you didn't really understood what I meant when I said that it's adviced to have 2 Trezor devices. In case of one device getting corrupted (breaks), then you will have to other (clean) Trezor device, which you can use to restore the keys from the corrupted device so you won't lose anything. That's the purpose of the recovery seed. If you just have one device, you must buy yourself a new one in case your device corrupts. If you just have the recovery seed, but no device, then there is no way you can recover your keys, and thus you have nothing. Having a second device as backup is recommended for that reason.
6887  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-02-22]Bitcoin Price Moons as ETF Decision Looms on: February 22, 2017, 12:27:44 PM
This reminds me of when the whole block halving happened and the aftermath of all those holders who were disappointed once it did happen nothing changed - in the price - as they expected it too.

No doubt that there were certain people with over-exaggerated hopes that the block halving would result in a price far beyond what's possible, but these people only thrive on unrealistic hopes and fantasies. If you look at how the price increased in advance of the block halving, then that already was a more than enough increase for that time period. People hoping for more are just clowns.

I am just seeing that same scenario take flight this time around but with this ETF bearing all the burden of relying on everyone's hopes and dreams.
But with dire consequences on those that bet the farm on it making them multi mega millionaire rich in one day.
Which in reality is just a fallacy of what bitcoin can make anyone over night. Everyone knows it takes time and hard work to get from $1-$10,000 and it can not be done just over night unless you are doing something illegal (silk road) or committing a felony (stealing investor's funds a'la mt.gox).
There is not a way to get straight from point A all the way to point Z. That is not how the natural scheme of things work out when it comes to money so why would it be any different with bitcoin?

People mostly focus on happenings when it comes to price increases, and in this case it's well justified since the potential ETF approval is quite an important happening. But it's a fact that Bitcoin isn't a get rich quick tool anymore, which is exactly why people need to stop treating Bitcoin as such. From this point every price increase will be a heavy one - the higher the price goes, the lower the eventual increases will be in percentages.
6888  Economy / Speculation / Re: THE DUMP on: February 22, 2017, 11:27:42 AM
Just sold my trading stash. Price is climbing too fast. Short  positions prepared at 1140 USD. Lots of them...

Some times I get the impression that you have so much in common with kwukduck, but you seem to be a whole lot less rebellious. Price is climbing as people are anticipating on the ETF that may or may not get approved next month. Until that day I am sure that we'll keep seeing the price increase to perhaps $1200 and who knows a tiny bit higher. In case it does get approved, you'll be finding yourself in a bad position since your shorts have been timed inappropriately. Only time will tell...
6889  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Egad. 81,000 + Transactions Unconfirmed. Again. Ugh! on: February 22, 2017, 11:12:03 AM
It's pointless to complain each time mempools are stacked, because it's a certainty that it will happen again, again, again and again. Nothing will be done until the egos of certain pools are being put aside, where they start signalling support for Segwit. It's either to include a proper fee according to the situation so your transaction gets confirmed within a block or two perhaps three, or simply don't complain.
6890  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-02-22]Bitcoin Price Moons as ETF Decision Looms on: February 22, 2017, 10:36:55 AM
Although I have a miss feeling about treating bitcoin as a stock and mentals as this will undermined it value as currencies.

Nothing undermines Bitcoin. Bitcoin will always function how you want it to function. This ETF is nothing more than an entry point for high level investors that were avoiding Bitcoin previously. It won't change anything in how people use and see Bitcoin. That being said, due to block halvings pools will more and more depend on income through fees in order to make it worthwile to continue mining. It's inevitable that the currency aspect will play a less important role as it basically doesn't offer anything over what fiat is offering. Especially when you look at how fiat related payment and banking platforms have been improving.
6891  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin or gold? on: February 22, 2017, 10:19:06 AM
And how is that different from using a web wallet?

Or does it mean that they won't be able to restore the key without the seed? If so, I still don't see much sense in all this hassle with hardware wallets. Could you restore the key yourself without Trezor sticking around? If you can, how is this hardware wallet essentially different from a paper wallet and why all this fuss then? If you can't, what will happen if this company is gone for good? If device breaks and Trezor is no longer available, your coins will be lost?

The recovery seed (which happens to be a long string of all kinds of words with a space in between each word) is some sort of a master key that includes all your private keys. In order to put your recovery seed to action to gain back access to your coins, you must do that in combination with a Trezor device. Without a Trezor device it's not possible to make use of the recovery seed. That's why it's adviced to have 2 Trezor devices, where 1 functions purely as a backup wallet.
6892  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-02-21] Bitfinex Comes Under DDoS Attack After Bitcoin Goes Above $1100 on: February 22, 2017, 09:56:12 AM
The article doesn't mention whether there were any ransom demands. It is kind of pointless to do a DDOS without any ransom demand (unless you are an unethical competitor). In any case, they have got cloudflare now. It is a minor irritation, but better than not being able to access the website.

Point is that people don't believe anything that comes from Bitfinex anymore. It's a sensitive spot as people have not forgotten yet what has happened. Back then before Bitfinex announced they were 'hacked' they went offline a couple of times. If the website is inaccessible, then it will bring up bad memories for a lot people here. Another possibility might be that an entity is trying to scare off people by taking down Bitfinex and then to push fake news articles into the net to get the price down. People will do everything to get the price down.
6893  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Difference between Bitcoin and real money? on: February 21, 2017, 02:57:39 PM
I don't think it's easier to store your money in bitcoin when talking about huge amount

The amounts basically doesn't matter if you purely look at how Bitcoin can function as store of value. However, if you move large amounts of money to an exchange for example, it may raise suspicions in which the exchange may force you to hand them over whatever proof they think is needed to verify it's not money coming from criminal activities for example.

Besides it's full of risk store value in bitcoin , it has limited supply

Risk in using Bitcoin as store of value comes from the volatility side, and not from the fact that Bitcoin has a limited supply. Limited supply is an advantage and not something to fear. Wink

Which means there is no guarantee your money will stay in the same value

Uh, since you somewhat understand that the risk comes from the volatility side, I don't understand why you mention the limited supply of Bitcoin?

It could dropped half or even worse, as long as bitcoin not yet adopted evenly i doubt on it, a lot of difference that have to explain.

It could, but we are not in 2013/2014 anymore. With that I mean that the market is maturing, where the further we progress, the lower the chances are that we will ever see such insane dumps again. And what do you mean with 'as long as Bitcoin is not yet adopted evenly'? If you're referring to that wealth in Bitcoin should be more evenly distributed, then it's nothing more than a fantasy.
6894  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] | 🔥 Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign 🔥 | Earn up to 0.035 BTC/week on: February 21, 2017, 02:33:40 PM
Hi is there a vacant slot here?

There most likely is; you just put the signature on, and then type in your UID -> https://bitmixer.io/signature.html It will tell you whether or not you got accepted, or that the campaign is full.

Also just to clarify, the max post per week is 50?

You can post as many times as you want, but it will only pay out 50 posts per week (assuming they are in for payment eligible sections).

What do you mean by having to post in multiple sections? I usually only post in the Bitcoin Discussion and Economics sections since those are the sections I read anyway. Will this require me to post in other sections?

This campaign requires you to post in several sections of the forum instead of only in one or two sections. It's basically to give Bitmixer more exposure throughout the forum and prevent people from posting everything in one section for the sake of easiness.

We do have a local language section in this forum, would that count? Is only Indonesian banned?

It just depends on the quantity of your posts there, but Lauda is the one that checks the posts from each user. If he considers that it's fine, then you are good to go. But just in general, prevent to make the majority of your posts there.

Finally, would this require me to register at and use Bitmixer? I've heard about the service but have never used it before.

Only thing you have to do is fill your UID in the signature page, and that's it. https://bitmixer.io/signature.html
6895  Other / Archival / Re: Do you agree with idea "Bitcoin bank" ? on: February 21, 2017, 12:54:36 PM
Yes I think the idea is not good because who will mange this?

Those behind the service that happens to calls itself a Bitcoin bank.

And how it will be controlled?

By those behind the service that happens to calls itself a Bitcoin bank.

We have already things as coin base that allowed us to "keep" our money so I think it will be useless.

More competition between services is always a good thing for the customers. It forces these services to up their game and improve where needed in order to not fall behind. As long as it benefits the user at the end, then it's of course not 'useless'. It's basically the same when it comes to regular banks, it's not useless to have more options to choose from. Wink

if it's really a bank

It is not, and never will be.
6896  Economy / Speculation / Re: Tea cup pattern.. on: February 21, 2017, 12:27:22 PM
Bitcoin itself doesn't need an ETF. Money can use other ways to get invested into Bitcoin.

Institutional investors have a hard time to take positions into Bitcoin worth multi millions without ETF's at this point. Current exchanges are not an option for them, peer to peer trading isn't that convenient either when it comes to multi millions. That's why this ETF comes handy as this will help attract money that we need to push the price to the next level. On top of that they get what I consider to be a fake level of feeling secure due to the SEC "guarding" the market.
6897  Economy / Economics / Re: Do You Think Bitcoin Will Replace Dollar Soon? on: February 21, 2017, 11:35:55 AM
For the near future, certainly not possible. But if bitcoin can last up to 25 years, I believe that bitcoin will replace the dollar. users of the bitcoin is always increasing, and certainly had a strong chance to replace dollar.

Bitcoin is nothing more than an alternative to fiat and other assets, what's so difficult about this to understand? Nothing beside the governments themselves have the ability to force through changes, and perhaps even replace it (which I don't think will happen in the coming decades). In order for Bitcoin to at least make a chance to reach mass scale adoption, it at least has to perform well as currency. Exactly that is something that it doesn't do (in the way that it doesn't outperform fiat when it comes to the currency aspect). Why would the average people then ditch their fiat currencies and hop over to something way less convenient as daily payment tool? Doesn't make any sense.
6898  Economy / Speculation / Re: Price of BTC - up about 150% in the past 12 months. Reasons? on: February 21, 2017, 11:07:36 AM
Current price and sentiment are partly being driven by the ETF that might get approved next month. It's a big deal if it turns out to get approved since this might be the thing that we needed to bring institutional investors on board. That's why I expect the positive upwards movement to continue till March 11, where after that we'll see what the outcome is. If the ETF gets approved, we may see a decent peak at that exact day, where after that we'll continue going up like we have in the last days. If it doesn't get approved, then I expect the price to dive below $1000 again.
6899  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Money laundering via BTC on: February 21, 2017, 10:51:35 AM
A good article about money laundering through bitcoin. It actually explains that is really not that easy as it seems..... “It’s difficult to push large amounts of Bitcoin secretly through mixing services. It’s extremely noticeable no matter how you do it. If you catch a dealer with drugs and cash on the street, you’ve caught them committing one crime. But if you catch people using something like Silk Road, you’ve uncovered their whole criminal history. It’s like discovering their books.”  Here"s the link https://cointelegraph.com/news/laundering-drug-money-why-mafia-cant-hide-behind-bitcoin

It's utterly stupid for anyone to pump large amounts of coins through a mixer. The blockchain is basically an open book that everyone can look into at any time. I am sure that there are several agencies scanning through the transactions every day in the hope to discover potential black money trails. Those that at least understand how not anonymous Bitcoin really is, will always prefer to mix their coins in very low quantities and in a very slow manner. It's a very time consuming procedure, but it at least lowers the chances of you raising suspicion.
6900  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin or gold? on: February 21, 2017, 09:57:22 AM
I don't quite understand how this system works. If you can somehow restore the keys when your hardware wallet gets destroyed, at least two questions immediately come to my mind. First, if you can actually do that, why would you ever need a hardware wallet at all? And, second, if you can restore the keys without the wallet, why can't someone else do essentially the same without having access to the wallet (i.e. steal your coins)?

What am I missing in this "grand scheme of things"?

Everything has a certain risk involved, but it's simply impossible for Trezor as company to just discard the recovery seed and rely only on the device when it comes to the security. If something happens with the device, and can't get repaired, then the coins are gone, so something has to be done to recover your coins. Otherwise people won't bother to buy it, which I can of course understand. I would never put my entire trust in a single device that at any time could corrupt or just stop working. Once set up, the advantage is that you can use your device to transact with others without having to worry about any form of malware and stuff. As long as you just stick to writing down the recovery seed on a piece of paper, and hide it somewhere (offline) so that no one other than yourself can find it, it's probably one of the best security measures.
Pages: « 1 ... 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 [345] 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 ... 661 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!