c. I believe that writing an actual agreement using language with legal meaning and signing it myself has greater enforceability than putting an unsigned line in the OTC order book.
Iirc you can only put lines in the orderbook if you're id'd with gribble, which means everything in there is actually signed. True, and effectively true. |
|
|
|
|
The point is to socialize violence out of the unlimited authority class (government, which uses various types of "immunity" to do absolutely ANYTHING evil and never suffer immediate or even lasting punishment). Once everyone has the ability to defend themselves equally without infringement, the self-preservation instinct kicks in all around, and you have true peace instead of a half-assed police state where tyrants and criminals are the ones committing all the aggression with every weapon known to man, and the innocents are left with just hands and feet.
|
|
|
|
- Running a Bitcoin client requires quite a bit of work to make sure the client is updated, it doesn't die, most of the BTC is held in cold storage, etc.
- I don't want anyone to use the forum as an E-Wallet. That's not the forum's purpose, and there might be legal risks associated with doing this.
These sound pretty solid. On the other hand, anyone who wants to be tipped in BTC can put an address in their sigline. As you can see, I stuck it under my avatar as personal text, so sig & avatar hiding doesn't work. Even though it's longer than the table column, double clicking it selects the obscured part. |
|
|
|
http://twitter.com/CriminalsUnion LOL They can thank the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals... actual ruling here. “We are disinclined to engage in another round of historical analysis to determine whether eighteenth-century America understood the Second Amendment to include a right to bear guns outside the home,” Judge Richard Posner wrote in the court’s majority opinion.
“The Supreme Court has decided that the amendment confers a right to bear arms for self-defense, which is as important outside the home as inside. The theoretical and empirical evidence (which overall is inconclusive) is consistent with concluding that a right to carry firearms in public may promote self-defense,” he continued.
“Illinois had to provide us with more than merely a rational basis for believing that its uniquely sweeping ban is justified by an increase in public safety. It has failed to meet this burden,” Posner wrote.
“The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment therefore compels us to reverse the decisions in the two cases before us and remand them to their respective district courts for the entry of declarations of unconstitutionality and permanent injunctions,” he continued.
“Nevertheless we order our mandate stayed for 180 days to allow the Illinois legislature to craft a new gun law that will impose reasonable limitations, consistent with the public safety and the Second Amendment as interpreted in this opinion, on the carrying of guns in public,” Posner said. Illinois has two probable responses; either appeal to the US Supreme Court, or make a new law that effectively bans the right to self-defense in contempt of the court ruling and perjure up and down that the ban="reasonable limitations". Considering Chicago's stranglehold over the IL legislature (maintained by rampant election fraud where corpses and incarcerated felons' "votes" put them, and keep them, in office), we can expect they will ensure any law will not have a trace of constitutionality and that it continues enabling criminal safety above all else, by keeping innocent victims defenseless with "gun control".
|
|
|
|
|
Decode my avatar for sending cash in mail.
|
|
|
|
If you are beating a child in public then you will be treated exactly the same as a violent criminal, because THAT is what you appear to be. Your logic dictates that we should assume all rapists should be viewed as consensual lovers of their bruised, bloodied, torn clothes, screaming "no" victims in dark alleys by default. BULLSHIT.
My logic assume no such thing. This is why it's best to call the cops, even if you are an ancap, and let the agents of the state hash things out. Under no conditions am I obligated to intervene at all. Of course it doesn't. If "the cops" exist, I will call them after there is probable cause for an arrest, and it will not be after I allow it to escalate to murder or attempted murder. Under no conditions are the cops obligated to intervene at all, merely fill out crime reports and perhaps transport arrestees to jail, presentment to magistrate. If two people are having sex in public, then the 1st (rolling video, then yelling) and 2nd Amendment (mere visibility of arms, then active use thereof) force scale gives them a chance to stop and explain themselves when I shout "hey, what are you doing?" at them. Then if the rapist/victim gives me probable cause (rapist covers mouth, I see a weapon being used by either party, victim screams rape, help, etc...), and "step away from each other and lay face down with your arms above your head" doesn't work, then the actual intervention and liability begins, which as a human being I must oblige, even in the total absence of a practiced religion. You do realize that your ongoing rape strawman situation has next to zero to do with this topic right? Myrkul=/ me, analogies=/strawmen. It's telling that you chose not to respond to: Yes, because real life is a MMORPG, where you have a tag hovering over your head constantly that says Parent and all children have a Child tag hovering over their heads that indicates they are within striking distance of their Parent. Because your rationalization is absolutely irrational to the rest of us who can't tell who Parents and Children are in relation to each other, in public. All we see is AN adult perpetrating violence against A child. No fracking identity tags, ZERO evidence that the child has any relation to the adult WHATSOEVER. Unless you believe that any adult perpetrating violence against any child makes that child "belong to" or "be in lawful custody of", the adult. |
|
|
|
If you are beating a child in public then you will be treated exactly the same as a violent criminal, because THAT is what you appear to be. Your logic dictates that we should assume all rapists should be viewed as consensual lovers of their bruised, bloodied, torn clothes, screaming "no" victims in dark alleys by default. BULLSHIT.
My logic assume no such thing. This is why it's best to call the cops, even if you are an ancap, and let the agents of the state hash things out. Under no conditions am I obligated to intervene at all. Of course it doesn't. If "the cops" exist, I will call them after there is probable cause for an arrest, and it will not be after I allow it to escalate to murder or attempted murder. Under no conditions are the cops obligated to intervene at all, merely fill out crime reports and perhaps transport arrestees to jail, presentment to magistrate. If two people are having sex in public, then the 1st (rolling video, then yelling) and 2nd Amendment (mere visibility of arms, then active use thereof) force scale gives them a chance to stop and explain themselves when I shout "hey, what are you doing?" at them. Then if the rapist/victim gives me probable cause (rapist covers mouth, I see a weapon being used by either party, victim screams rape, help, etc...), and "step away from each other and lay face down with your arms above your head" doesn't work, then the actual intervention and liability begins, which as a human being I must oblige, even in the total absence of a practiced religion. |
|
|
|
Not sure how acting as human shields and using our backs with arms up in the air to block adult violence against children counts as aggression, but I guess that's the absolutely fucked up world that we live in and take offense to.
Well, for starters, simply making the deliberate act of seperating a child from their parent in a public space is an act of aggression. But as I have already noted, that's not the same strawman that Myrkul started with, although that's the one that he would have prefered once I hit him with reality. Even still, his odds of making through such a confrontation without harm are higher in my presence than most, and still not very high even if he didn't intend to cause harm. His actions would not have been interpreted that way, even by someone who was rational. Anyone less than rational is unlikely to have interpreted his actions in any way more favorable than I anyway. Yes, because real life is a MMORPG, where you have a tag hovering over your head constantly that says Parent and all children have a Child tag hovering over their heads that indicates they are within striking distance of their Parent. Even in your world where child abuse isn't violence, that's fucking irrational as fuck. If you are beating a child in public then you will be treated exactly the same as a violent criminal, because THAT is what you appear to be. Your logic dictates that we should assume all rapists should be viewed as consensual lovers of their bruised, bloodied, torn clothes, screaming "no" victims in dark alleys by default. BULLSHIT. |
|
|
|
|
Who pays for ANY kind of porn?
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure how acting as human shields and using our backs with arms up in the air to block adult violence against children counts as aggression, but I guess that's the absolutely fucked up world that we live in and take offense to.
|
|
|
|
|
Everything seems to be outlined already, except for that unfortunate escalation earlier in the thread where you said you would use deadly force as soon as Myrkul started yelling at you in public.
Revised=
Myrkul: "Hey! Quit beating that kid!"
Aggressor: /keeps beating kid
Myrkul: "Stop!" /bodily interposes himself between victim and aggressor
Aggressor: /pushes past Myrkul, keeps beating kid
Myrkul: "I said stop, god damnit!" /lays hands on the aggressor, likely a grab from behind to stop the kid's beating
Aggressor: /whirls around, backs up to draw gun, shoots Myrkul, goes to prison for claiming "self-defense" is justified against people who try to stop child abuse
|
|
|
|
|
iPod replacement earphones sold out?
|
|
|
|
|
I did this once before, can I again?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
