There is this biased and obviously unlikely scenario in everyone's minds and Piers Morgan already asked as well, which is a dream come true for a few generations, to be honest but it will %99 not going to happen.
That is why all this talk about Argentina, all this talk about Portugal and Argentina could be the only one that has a realistic chance to win, Portugal really doesn't have that, to be honest, but you never know in this type of tournament stuff, anyone can be eliminated. So we just have to wait and see.
The dream is this;
Portugal vs Argentina World Cup Finals
Ronaldo or Messi becomes a World Cup winner
They play it out for 90 minutes, maybe even extra time to 120 minutes, and they battle it out, and finally one of them wins the world cup before they retire. Imagine how many millions of people would watch that final, can you imagine. I can say as much as it would be the most watched thing on television ever, in the history of television, this would be the most watched thing EVER!
This would of course be everyone's dream and I agree that it would be the most watched thing ever in history, and the highlights of the game on youtube could pass all the youtube videos with tens of billions of views. However, Portugal is not that strong anymore unfortunately :/ they are seen as 7th or 8th or 9th in most oddmakers websites as the likely to win the cup, which means it's lower chance. However, this is football and I agree that it may happen. If it really happens, I would stop whatever I am doing, and make that day a special day, it would be like an "important day of my life" type of thing for so many people, like a wedding, or graduation or something, it would be something I will remember 40 years later when I am an old person, such a wonderful think <3 Anything that has to do with Portugal and Argentina is something that can happen, the speculations could be many, particularly in this case I believe that Argentina may have many possibilities of becoming the biggest favourite, however I think that for now we should not weigh like that They haven't played yet, it's normal that the magnifying glass in the world is on those teams, on the one hand Messi, on the other hand CR7, I wouldn't know who could win there, I think both players deserve it, but for the moment they've been happening I think that for me the one who deserves it the most is CR7, however that does not detract from what Messi deserves either. The case of CR7 is something very particular, I feel that the things he has had to deal with are very strong, in the World Cup you can forget a bit about the problem that exists with the clubs, but it is not a problem to dismiss. Here more or less can be a very brief description of how Portugal can advance to the Round of 16: World Cup 2022:
How Portugal Can Advance to the Round of 16Extremely detailed scenarios describing if, and how, Portugal can qualify for the next round of the 2022 World Cup.  Source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/upshot/portugal-world-cup-scores-standings.htmlWell, the speculations will be above all in CR7, because he is a player who has had a lot of activity in terms of generating news, anything has an impact on him, in this world cup can the ocsa be against or in favor? We don't know, I know that the teams that played him are quite strong. |
|
|
|
I recently came across this site: https://robotscrypto.fr/. I wanted to know if you use crypto bots to help you in your trading? This site has quite a few, and it seems to work well. I would love to have your opinion on this thank you! And if you have any crypto trading bot platforms to suggest don't hesitate! Crypto trading bot can really make a good sense when the market is very volatile and it make one to make fast profits from trading than using ordinary the analog method of positioning a trade by ourselves. There are advance ways we can get to trade coins especially hundreds of coins in the market by doing that with the help if a bot that will keep executing trades for us without much stress. This method can be very effective depending on the type of market we are trading on. Now many offer trading with robots, but what can we expect from it? just profit, right? I prefer what I generate from my own analysis rather than having to rely on robots which if we look at trading with robots also does not guarantee a high success rate. I personally don't expect much more than what they offer with trading robots. And also we rely on that, when are we going to advance? I mean when our knowledge will increase, because by using trading robots we will definitely be more lazy to analyze the market directly. Well, in another thread I said what had happened recently and it is that a bot that I don't remember the name of, was trading for 170USD and that the bot did all the commercial transactions in people, in fact it got into Binance and did everything, but the The person in charge of marketing this bot all went wrong, and he had to raise around 200,000USD to pay the debts to all the people who had trusted him for these techniques, so you have to be very careful about robots, because in any case Moetno things can get out of control, and I didn't have those 200,000 usd, so I had to sell houses, cars, farms, to be able to raise that money. |
|
|
|
I used to be a person who was very confident in excahges, but after seeing that the best exchanges like Binance were really kneeling before governments and police worldwide, this thing of being trusted in them happened to me and I really don't see sure that someone would leave their coins there, neither in Binaance nor in any exchange, for me the safest thing will always be a wallet and sometimes a ledger, the security for our money I think it would represent everything, there is nothing else that can represent more security, it even seems to me safer than a bank, a bank can be corrupt at any time and what you can suffer from is as a citizen.
We are all like that by the time we are still a beginner. We don't care about leaving funds on the exchange or if what type of wallet we are using but what important for us is that we can do a trade or invest but eventually we found out that it was not a good thing to do but it's always safe to pull out fund on the exchange or to the wallet which doesn't let you hodl your private keys with you. The way you store your money will represent if how careful you are. That's kinda true. Security is important here and should come first because what we are dealing here is money. Not just a small amount because the potential of cryptos are very big. We feel how trusting it is to keep assets on the exchange because we used to think it would be easier to trade in any form and easy to make withdrawals at any time, but we are not aware of anything else that exchanges are subject to state laws and regulations whereas we currently own bitcoins. the freedom we want so think about it that ledger wallets are important for storing larger assets because it's the only control over us not from parties when like an exchange so after I base I leave the coins on the exchange and move them to ledger wallet to keep better security for myself. Because no matter how great an exchange is in maintaining user data, there will always be loopholes that can be hacked, therefore I don't want this to happen to me even though I've never experienced it, one more thing I use is an exchange just to exchange the money I need on other coins and for fixed investments in ledger wallets. Well I have a personal theory, when people know about bitcoin and start to operate, governments know that people find out about this information and governments and police entities, banks also have it, so they use regulations to be able to have access to a technology and economy that they can never control and one way to take control or try to take control is with regulations that are useless in the end, it is impossible for them to control people qeu operate with BTC and crypto, the best way to avoid that is to keep our coins, altocins and especially BTC out of the reach of those black hands. |
|
|
|
Don't be arrogant. Don't think that most people here will just give you what you want without precautions and good advice. If that's your demand, don't seek any help here about that because no one believes here in the group or channels providing a signal.
Something like that doesn't exist. There's no way a signal can be predicted providing how heavy the volatility in the crypto-market is.
They are just milking money for their subscribers and seems you are willing to just give free money to them.
It is his own choice if he will follow these signal channels but he should accept the fact that no one can give him the right channel he's looking for. If there's any, a lot will be recommending it to other people. But unfortunately, with those large number of channels dedicating to this kind of service, no one is known to have a very good signals shared to its subscribers. Most are good in providing signals a lil bit late than the supposedly target. That is because, only the owners of these channels are mostly benefiting their signals. Leaving its subscribers screwed because of holding worthless coins. If we think about it this is just common sense, if such a signals group existed and we could verify their claims they can actually produce profits for those which subscribe, it would be to be expected that a great part of the community was already part of such channel long time ago, but since this is not what we see then it is fair to conclude such a channel does not exist and anyone actually looking for a signal channel like that will eventually be disappointed by the results they will get. I have always respected many of the people who decide to go by the signs, it is something that one cannot fight against, but it seems to me that those who pay to be given the signs are much more foolish, because on top of that, the Most of the people who give signals only do technical analysis and technical analysis is not everything, it can help, but what helps the most is the knowledge and understanding that you have about the market, you can be the best technical analyst, but if It does not know what the real situation of the market is, it cannot give exactly what is the best option, because it is proven in some books that the technical analysis fails, and the fundamental analysis also fails, only the combination of both can work. |
|
|
|
One guiding principle, particularly when investing in new ventures.
Don't allow your successes fool you into thinking you are an expert at it. Always pretend to be a novice so that you may challenge whatever they say.
When we are in the dark about something, we love to ask questions back. It is better to be in that position once more to avoid wasting money.
Skeptical.
You were just made stronger by the experience; nonetheless, this does not imply that you have mastered cryptocurrencies.
That's a good lesson and a right thinking there. It's true that when someone got some success investment, they think that they're the best on it and considers themselves as experts. Don't get fooled by that because you'll never know what mistake you may do and it's better to have that side of always eager to learn more new things in terms of investments, especially in the crypto market. I think you have to think about something that is like the basic concepts, and that is, as long as it is about Bitcoin and altcoins, it is known that the King will always be Bitcoin, if bitcoin is doing well, then by nature all altcoins will it will go well, that is something that cannot be denied, for me that is the main one of all the major concomitnos and the other thing that must be taken into account is that many will say that X altcoin rose in price despite the fact that Bitcoin fell a lot, the people should know that these currencies that rise so much are those that survive from large pumps and dumps, that is something that must be taken into account, and that most of the time bitcoin will always have very high ATH. |
|
|
|
In trading, we can make use of fundamental analysis and technical analysis in order to enhance our chances of profit. Besides market is researchable and there are signals that can give hints about the trend of the market. We can also make use of market sentiment.
Evxatcly, having FA and also TA will be very useful for trading. Every trading that is not based on any analysis will be more to gambling, moreover the onr who doesn't know about trading. and as what you said, trading is always risky whatever we do, although we have made analysis, but there will be always the risks. the difference is how we can manage the risks if we are using the analysis. It's true that if we trade without doing research and analysis, of course it's the same as gambling, risk is an integral part of trading and we cannot avoid it completely, By doing an analysis at least it can minimize the risk Well I consider that taking risks is something that everyone should take at some point, in the case of traders they are always taking risks, sometimes they win, others they lose, but I think the main thing is to win or have at least a positive balance after all, if a trader wins even 1 usd, but loses less than 1 usd and makes another trade and wins 2 usd, the important thing is that he is forging himself in a very good way to be profitable and that is something that costs a lot However, the ones that achieve it are very few, I would say that of 100%, 20% is profitable and they live from trading, for me that is what happens. |
|
|
|
I am sure that any analytical tool will do all the work better, faster and more precisely, and even around the clock, than a team of unknown people whose competence is doubted and not trusted. This is a utopian idea, it will definitely not work
Yes, in fact, any analytical tool is always welcome, depending on whether it is technical analysis or fundamental analysis, it is very difficult for all analysts to think the same, I don't know, but sometimes the only one who has total control over this is a robot, but robots usually fail, I know the recent case of a brother-in-law, that he offered me a trading bot and I told him no, that it was a scam, that was a few months ago, and now recently, for the day of Yesterday I asked him and he told me that the person in charge of that had to pay 200,000 USD, and had to sell cars, farms, houses, everything to be able to answer, because he did not have that money and he was the one who made many fall. |
|
|
|
|
There is something that I would like to emphasize, because where I live they have done it and continue to do it a lot, it is the pyramid or ponzi schemes, it is incredible, but many people continue to believe in that, many more people also continue to fall, they have the false belief that if they enter first, they will never lack money, and it could be that way at first, but later it is impossible for a pyramid to be sustained, it is something like what happened with the NFT games, which in the end they managed most of it being a scam, I think that is what people are currently experiencing and they continue to fall, they say deposit 3usd in Bitcoin and after 3 weeks they will receive 300usd.
|
|
|
|
(......)
After thinking this through and through I started feeling like they are doing this to hold me responsible if something goes wrong.
Is my thoughts right? If you are in my shoes what will you do?
It's ok for me as long as they are aware of the risks, they must not hope that everything will go because we all know cryptocurrency is very risky or volatile. Another problem here is some people don't understand this because they are greedy, they only think of easy money. So if there will be something will happen in the future about their investments, like negative or losses, they can blame you, so you need to explain that also to them. I will always weigh the following, when working with family it is something very delicate unless it is of maximum trust and that the other family member never complains if he loses or something similar, in trading there is always the option of losing , and as long as the accounts are clear, I think that is where the detail will be, I have seen how many people trade and show their caputras de patnala what they have done during the day and I appreciate that it is something very good and positive, only So I think that you can become totally transparent, that is the best option, in any case it is advice, but you must be very careful when working with relatives. |
|
|
|
I know there are many crypto casinos on the internet claiming to be KYC free, although they don't even enter this forum, so it's likely they are shady scam platforms that must be avoided, especially for a high roller gambler.
The only trustful KYC free crypto casino I know is freebitco.in. But there you won't find a plethora of gambling games. You will have to stick with dice, lottery and events betting...
Well on the subject, there is something that always sounds good and bad at the same time, he says that he is a high roller and that he needs a casino without KYC, what can be thought of as the first option is whenever he is going to do something illicit, or that he is coming of a money laundering, and that you do not need to leave your data there, I do not know if there are casinos that can lend themselves to that, but in reality I know that when a casino deposits a lot of money that gives them enough category and the traffic is increased, and a casino always cares that they can play there and that they can find a way to give a good bonus to hook the player, so it is difficult to see it from a point of view that is good, one will always think badly of the way it is written the OP Title. |
|
|
|
So, what do you think about this?
As i just talked with one of these cases who got their account frozen, i actually just went and read terms and faqs from few casinos about this and couldn't find anything on how they deal with people who don't deposit anything but use just try to get free money via faucets. At the moment they don't really need to care, as frozing those accounts doesn't even raise any red flags with actual paying customers. It's not like they stole from people who deposited, that indeed would raise concerns, not this. Personally i see this as non-issue, because i see no real victims here, more like annoyance of spending their time doing something bots would do. Well at least they should be upfront and clear about this and update their terms and conditions to to state their policy on these kind of users. Casinos will only use the banhammer on those who do this AND actually gets something from it. Considering how little the amount is that they're giving out anyways, they wouldn't make their platform look so bad by placing things against these people on their ToS. It would have been rather annoying at first but most of the people who does this don't even get anything from the casino anyway, plus the wagering requirements before one can withdraw those amount will be hard to reach. I see that the only platform that allows doing something like this is freebitco.in and they have never raised a problem for it, because the demands are so high that they do not worry if a person is 24 hours a day giving the faucet, because they know that at a certain moment those people will get tired and the effort will be a lot for such a small reward, I think this is something that we all know, I don't know if a casino wastes time freezing an account, because of many bots I don't think it's something convenient Unless there are thousands and thousands of accounts that do something like this, it would take thousands and thousands of PCs with activated accounts without any type of captcha. |
|
|
|
Out of nowhere the name David Avanesyan came. This is one lucky guy. Even if he is defeated in this match, which is most likely to happen, he will definitely cherish the moment that he is facing against the great Terence Crawford. He'll be proud of this for the rest of his life. Of course he could even be the luckiest man if he upsets Crawford. But looking at the odds, it seems nobody is really expecting him to win. He's got 7.00 against Crawford's 1.07.
I don't think he's lucky  it looks like this fight happen because Crawford cherry pick Avanesyan, not Avanesyan itself who want to have a fight with Crawford. This can be an excuse for Crawford to not fight with Spence, I don't know if their fight (Crawford vs Spence) is postponed or cancelled, but if their fight will happen in the future, Crawford is the one who will in trouble since he's not young anymore. He's currently 35 years old, while Spence is 32 years old. Then Avanesyan is therefore luckier. If he is not the one who is trying hard looking for ways to fight the popular and talented Crawford, then it is opportunity that is knocking on his door. He is the luckiest man. Others at his level could only dream of it. Now he is sharing the limelight with one of the best pound for pound boxers of his time. I think Crawford is the one who's more eager to face Spence. It's just that there were problems along the way. I cannot find any reason why Crawford would go for one Avanesyan than Spence. Well, I really think that here the one who has the greatest advantage of doing something good is Avanesyan, because he is a boxer who can make history if he gets a good victory, of course if this happens everything would collapse for Crawford, right now Crawford lop who doesn't want to lose It's gfama, maybe this is such an interesting fight for many, but it can be something important and influential for some fans of world boxing, in particular I even want to see how much Crawford has practiced, I know he has prepared a lot , because he wanted to go all out against Spence, but things didn't happen, somehow it will get his attention. |
|
|
|
Yeah, I guess Qatar would need to be lucky, say win with a surprise 1 - 0 to the Netherlands, or something like that. It can happen, but in my view the Netherlands and Ecuador are the two teams going forward under normal circumstances.
The first group is very unpredictable and has 4 strong teams. Senegal is the strongest team from CAF and therefore we can't underestimate them. Qatar has the home advantage and their recent form is really good. Although I don't think that either Senegal or Qatar may be able to defeat Netherlands, it is quite possible that one of the matches may end up as a draw. And if Ecuador manages to defeat Netherlands, then qualifying scenarios for the next round will get very interesting. And Netherlands do have a history of suffering big upsets in the world cup. Well, I have always seen that the home players always do an arbitration that is not so radical because it is focused on making them look good at home, however the Qatar vs. Venezuela match, Venezuela won them with a wide margin and that is something that should have set off Qatar's alarms, because if that's the case, then Ecuadra can position itself very well, of course the Netherlands is a team with a very high level in terms of football, and I think it could appear and be seen as the strongest team, but Even so, I would classify Qatar as the weakest, Ecuador second, and as another option to qualify would be Senegal and the Netherlands.
Portugal has been in crisis for a long time and is playing badly.
In the qualifiers for the World Cup, they lost at home to Serbia and took only second place in their group, so they had to play additional qualifiers.
Ronaldo also played in all those matches for Portugal, but he did not really help the Portuguese team.
I do not agree that Portugal has been in crisis; no not at all. Yes they struggled during the qualifying stages for the worldcup but you cannot compare that form to now. Why? Now Portugal is going to the worldcup with a complete 11 in view (compared to qualifiers where they chop and change tactics and players as related to available players due to either fatigue form or injuries). In my opinion, portugal have a very solid defense; if they can take their chances, they will have a good run in the worldcup. Same with Argentina, france and the Netherlands Portugal has enough qualified player resources, they have almost complete depth of players on all fronts. it's just that, their problems are on the front lines. yes this is just my opinion, does not determine the real truth. So far, we have only talked based on existing statistics and data. if we observe, Fernando Santos tends to use a 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 formation. only in the trial match against Nigeria, Portugal used a different formation with a 4-3-1-2 pattern. the results are quite effective, despite the fact that Nigeria is not as resilient as it used to be. as @Daniel91 said, Ronaldo didn't contribute too much throughout Portugal's matches in the Nations League or Qualification in the World Cup. throughout our assessment, Ronaldo's performance has really dropped dramatically. not infrequently he always has difficulty performing at his best, we can refer to the statistics when Ronaldo played with his club. this shows that his sharpness has decreased dramatically, plus as he is not young anymore. I hope he can show his prowess again in this world cup event. So, let's see what he can do with his national team. Personally, I'm not sure how much Ronaldo can help the Portugal national team right now. He has not played at a high level for a long time, in fact he doesn't play in Manchester at all, he is in conflict with the club and the fans, and it is questionable how physically and mentally he is ready for this World Cup. I think coach Portugal will make a big mistake if he puts him in the team to play based on his old glory and if he is not fully ready to play. The best players must always play in the team, regardless of the old glory. Yes, it is like that, what apsa is that if he does not get to put it in the headline it will cause more controversy and I think the last thing this technical director wants is for much more controversy to be generated with what has happened, CR7 has many problems for Now, I don't know if they can do something to him at the legal level, but I'm sure they can do something and that is to not get into more trouble, I know that there are many players in Portugal who play for Man United and they have maintained a very good relationship with CR7. to the limit and as not to generate controversies, I think he will be the captain of Portugal and that is something that they must respect, in that case I would not complicate myself, I would put CR7 as his last starter in all games, I would only scar him if asked me, it's really to avoid problems. |
|
|
|
I think the issue here is that the penalty for stealing depends on what the person did with the stolen goods, but I think it shouldn't.
It shouldn't matter if you put the money in the bin or won the lottery with it, the penalty for stealing it should be the same in both cases.
It should be, but it's different because the girl didn't file a police report about her boyfriend stealing her money and maybe she didn't because seeing the profit she would get from what the guy won, people can change a lot when it comes to money moreover if the value is fantastic or at least it can change life. After stealing the money, the girl could have informed the police if she wanted but she didn't do that. Here She shows her emotions towards his friend. But the behavior of that friend was not good to me, if he had given half of the percentage of the money, I would have considered him as a honest, but the behavior of that friend is completely different, he can never be a good person. After all it is true that a gambler's life has changed by the winning. They both did things wrong, both he and she, but the story would have been different if he had lost instead of winning, things were not so good for both of them, well on the one hand it is very bad that he took that money without consent, why, in the event of losing it, how would you have paid for it? this is something that should be considered, and getting $10k is not easy at all, that has to involve a lot of effort and hard work, earning that money means that she has to sacrifice a lot of things and that all the profits go directly to her, and that It's something that sticks, that's what you have to see, even though that didn't happen. |
|
|
|
Isn't it too early?
I'm not from U.S. but I've read an article that Biden and Harris would run for re-election. But as news are showing, his term approval rate is low and is continuously falling on his 12th month as a president of U.S. I cannot really tell. What I am seeing at this moment from my country's end us that their currency is still strong unlike ours wherein its value continues to fall or to be behind other currencies right after the election was finished. Wether Kanye would continue his vision of running as president for people of U.S or not, I just hope U.S. won't suffer what we are currently experiencing in my country. So with regards on betting, I'd probably not bet on this one since I'm not yet aware of the choices as well as odds. I might ask my friends in U.S. if my interests gets high.
The Democrat establishment would like to have Kamala Harris as their nominee in 2024, but then the voters may give a thumbs down. Harris is considered as more radical left, when compared to Biden, who is a moderate. Harris may suffer a washout in swing states such as Nevada and Florida. But the problem is that Biden will be almost 82 years when the POTUS election takes place next time. Already he is showing signs of fatigue and I am not sure whether he will be the right choice for the president of the United States, for the period of 2024-28. This is quite strong, the truth is I do not know how the people of the USA think what their best option may be, nor do I dare to think if the exercise as president that Biden has done can be classified as good or bad, I have seen that Biden has let in Many immigrants and that can help you if you manage to give them nationality, which is what they are looking for the most. However, that is why many people are looking for it, the so-called American dream, which I really do not believe, however, Biden has given a great option on For me, a strong candidate would be Trump, but given his problems, I don't know for sure, but I think he won't be launched then. |
|
|
|
This is the official list of 26 players who will defend Brazil in Qatar  Goakeepers: Alisson (Liverpool), Ederson (Manchester City), Weverton (Palmeiras)
Centre-backs: Marquinhos (PSG), Thiago Silva (Chelsea), Eder Militao (Real Madrid), Bremer (Juventus)
Full-backs: Danilo (Juventus), Dani Alves (Pumas), Alex Telles (Sevilla), Alex Sandro (Juventus)
Midfielders: Casemiro (Manchester United), Fabinho (Liverpool), Fred (Manchester United), Bruno Guimaraes (Newcastle), Lucas Paqueta (West Ham), Ribeiro (Flamengo).
Forwards: Neymar (PSG), Vinicius (Real Madrid), Richarlison (Tottenham), Raphinha (Barcelona), Gabriel Jesus (Arsenal), Rodrygo (Real Madrid), Antony (Manchester United), Gabriel Martinelli (Arsenal), Pedro (Flamengo). Source: https://www.marca.com/en/world-cup/2022/11/07/63694ca2e2704e5d958b4575.htmlAs you can see, there's a lot of attackers, I'm pretty confident Brazil will finally play at the best level as everyone expects, not focused on defense, but with strong attack. I think I'm more confident now to bet on Brazil I was going to comment on the official lineup that was defined for the Brazilian team, but you were faster than me @rdluffy lol @Daniel91, when you and I were talking about some possible players that will not go to the Cup, the official list just came out. And it's true, Lucas Paqueta and Richarlison will defend Brazil in this World Cup. I just don't know if they will be 100% recovered from the injuries they sustained. Well the truth is that the line-up of Brazil is scary, wow pure high-level players, I think there could not be better chosen, I am surprised to see Dani Alves, despite his age I imagine that they will put him as one of the players with more veteran to give a lot of encouragement to his teammates, I saw somewhere in an Instagram post when they said the names of the players that some were celebrating and a player made his marriage proposal, it seemed to me that this is something that gives a lot of joy, and More in Brazil than soccer it is like a religion, I think that is why I would love to live there, and I think the happiness of its people is something that is contagious. Hi everyone, this is my first post on this topic. As we know that tomorrow is the first match of the world cup will take place, and the match will bring together Qatar as the host of the world cup this time with Ecuador. The question is, what are your predictions for this first game? Will Qatar win, or will Ecuador win instead? I intend to place a $200 bet, please give your POV on this.
many people believe that the match will be a draw, I can't guarantee it for your bet too, why don't you make a bet for yourself as well at your own risk, just look at the references in this thread maybe it can make sure your bet on this match, but I prefer not to bet on this match preferring other matches because the host might give an unexpected surprise But I think Qatar will have some advantage in the match between Qatar and Ecuador. They will play with great enthusiasm in their hearts. Qatar has a lot of players in the team, but Ecuador's performance is ahead of Qatar's. Still I think Qatar will win. The truth is that Ecuador comes out the winner, Qatar can be the host but in football I have seen that they lack a lot to be able to have a good performance, however I think that for now what they are doing is playing with everything they have, maybe Maybe they can have refereeing help, but given how they play Ecuador they could even beat the host team, as I see it they could even lose 4 to 0, I don't know if there in Qatar they can reach a moral agreement in which they don't score so many goals, Because Ecuador really plays well when it's in the World Cups and Qtar lacks a lot, honestly, I think it will be an easy game. |
|
|
|
|
I think that all poker lovers will always look for a way to play and play on those platforms where they offer online bullfighting services, now I wonder, if the demand is so good, why not make a platform or software where only play poker? as before it was in betcoinpoker, it was a nice platform, I had a lot of doubts that maybe it was from betcoin, but I think it's not like that, in their thread I asked and they didn't know how to tell me well, of course I asked this a long time ago, but It's a shame because there were free tournaments and the winner only started to win mBTC, of course there were tournaments that were paid, but there were many tables and many tournaments that were generated, I really miss that platform.
|
|
|
|
The conclusion must be taken based on the terms and conditions that apply if Betfury includes this rule then they are on the right side free to do it
But on the contrary, if Betfury does not apply this rule, those who feel disadvantaged can submit complaints, although the Betfury team did not respond at least this would be a bad record and old users or new users can see it in the future. By the way this was not the first time I saw Betfury made a one-sided decision for example in affiliate cases.
Anything outside of the terms and conditions can't be determined unilaterally unless the team has to explain the details of the problem for the purpose of publicizing the reasons why the team should take that decision, but like you said if it's not open to unilateral action then that would add to a bad record so I think if that issue If it can be repaired then the team can use it to minimize problems caused to users. I have a doubt in all this, if they decide to include this in their terms and conditions or not, is it okay? This is something that I cannot see if it is totally correct and legal, although it is included or not in the terms and conditions, I think they will still have problems, right? The truth is that I have been in Betfury from the beginning, but there are certain things that, according to what I have read in the thread, is something that surprises me, and they should fix all the problems, because a casino that has grown so much should do something fast, I I think that a person who has put money in Betfury and they get to block their account, the most logical thing is that the casino allows them to let them take out the client's money. -cut-
the only thing that this FTX collapse could affect on BetFury could be the price of the BetFury coin, but looking at the charts I see that this collapse did not affect the altcoin price, and it is somewhat strange that the price has not fallen a lot. and from what I've seen, there aren't many good exchanges that have listed the BFG Token, maybe this is the main reason that altcoin didn't fall much with this collapse
BFG is somewhat outsider and behaves differently when it comes to altcoins. If a token pays dividends in other coins like bitcoin and usdt, it has value outside from the market speculation, no matter what the other coins do. However as the circulated supply with bfg tokens grows and dividends get smaller, price of those bfg tokens get smaller as well. Even if the market now would go up. So BFG isn't really safe store of value at this point unless they change their tokenomics. Or unless there's going to be huge amount of players in that casino, but can't se that happening without a good reason. It is a very good analysis and I know that there are many things that can be guided by being successful, if there is not much demand how do they make it possible for them to sustain staking? It is something that I have also asked myself, but I see that the BFG topken is only a part of everything that can be generated from a casino, a casino gets a lot of money and that can be used to inject liquidity and thus have on the other hand a way to win in the very long term, what makes the BFG tokens more interesting is that the more the tokens are burned the more a tokenized economy will be forged and something more tending to deflation, but if the supply of tokens is manipulated this process yes It may take much longer, there must be a limited circulation of tokens and there are many, that is what makes it not become so strong and less so in this market with a bearish trend. Gambling sites do not directly tell anyone that you are wasting time gambling on my site. But they arrange their gambling games in such a way that draws a gambler there again and again. Its name is addiction. If it is excessive then it takes a terrible form. So controlling yourself from gambling is a difficult task which is not possible for everyone. And he who can do this is the real hero and a smart guy
That is true on my part as well. I see this as entertainment, which means if I am bored and there is nothing to do then I can gamble, which means I would have a little bit of fun and I would limit my deposit so that I would not lose too much, would be willing to deposit as low as 10-20 dollars just so I wouldn't lose much, and just have fun. But, if I have something to do, a new tv show to watch, a new book to read, a new movie to go see, friends to go meet, anything that I rather do, then I do not feel like gambling at all, it doesn't come to my mind and instead I do the other things. Gambling is basically a method to have fun when you have nothing else to do. I can swear to the truth of it. I view gambling as entertainment, so if I am bored and have nothing to do, I can gamble, which means I will have a little bit of fun and restrict my deposit so that I will not lose too much. I am prepared to deposit a few dollars just so I won't lose much, and I will simply play for leisure. If you have self-control, you are good to go, but keep in mind that creating an addictive behavior is always a possibility. You can use this venue or channel for entertainment, but be sure that you have self-control. This will prevent you from jeopardizing your finances. We have read numerous accounts of people who are gambling addicts who have lost everything as a result of having an excessive gambling habit. The fact of controlling a deposit and only playing with what is available is a very good option for us not to go and spend all our balance and thus avoid huge losses, the game is really made to make us have fun, I think that when one plays to win money, we will have a lot of pressure and if we don't do it, other emotions will enter, such as fear, pressure and stress, they are emotions that should not have a place in our game life, we must experience others such as joy, which the adrenaline is quite dominant and with the reason ahead not to fall into addiction, that is why I see that the game is made, to enjoy. |
|
|
|
Lottery – a game with established rules where players buy tickets for a chance to win cash or other merchandise prizes. Gambling – a game or mutual bet according to established rules whose participants, seeking monetary gain, voluntarily risk losing an amount they have paid in, and where winning or losing is determined by chance, by some event, or by the result of a sport competition. Sports betting - Sports betting is the activity of predicting sports results and placing a wager on the outcome. DifferencesIn a lottery, players compete against other players. A lottery’s prize fund is set in advance and the lottery operator does not participate in the game. In gambling, players compete individually against the gambling operator. It is in the gambling operator’s interest to win against the players. In Sports betting - In sports betting players places wagers on sports that include but not limited to football, basketball, baseball, hockey, track cycling, auto racing, mixed martial arts, and boxing at both the amateur and professional levels. We have an active gambling discussion section and I would very much love to hear the opinions of experienced gamblers on which has better odds, lottery, online gambling, or sports betting? Note: The idea for this post came from reading this article on Quora I prefer sports betting because the sport betting have a better odds if you know well the team participants , In sports betting all you need is to be familiarize aboy the strategies, skills and experience of the team or player. SPORT BETTING gives you entertainment and excitement while risking your own money. Well, there is something we should know, when we make sports bets we are basing ourselves much more on our knowledge about the sport in question apart from what we can look for by investigating and what we intuit, it is a very good way to apply all our knowledge and cunning, to sometimes I make sports bets although sometimes I get some surprises, like the one that Real Madrid lost against Rayo Vallecano, that made me lose the bet, however it was not much, it was not like when you go to the casino and play dice , that if you apply the martingale and it is not enough, then you can simply spend a lot of money and that is something that we should all take care of. |
|
|
|
|
What you say is really interesting, it should be noted that I never focus on looking for the history of some games of chance, and when I started playing in casinos, my first game apart from Craps was Poker and the other was Black Jack and roulette, when I got bored of playing dice, I went to poker and from there to Black Jack, I could hardly ever go to roulette, but in general terms Black Jack seems very interesting to me, and although card counting doesn't apply much anymore, it was a very good strategy and should not be considered as cheating, we are free to think and do what we want, however what you say about Black Jack is very significant.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
