Your reading too deep into it if you search through my old posts ull see i asked profmac for his eloipool setup. Well i never go it so created my own. Now ill be distribiting a vm or a github repo with all the scripts etc needed to make a merged mining solo pool automatically. So that way solo miners dont lose out

ADT wallets >   http://www.adt.altcointalk.co.uk/index.php?board=14.0



To receive  10,000 ADT post your ADT address here

To receive  15,000 ADT more join the ADT forum > www.adt.altcointalk.co.uk and post here > http://www.adt.altcointalk.co.uk/index.php?board=5.0




Edit this is valid until the 50,000,000 is gone

Edit if you would like ADT to be on an exchange please vote here > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=285906.0

I am actually making quite a few solo mining.

Post your adress here, 20DVC per person!

Also giving away 2,500DVC every 100th post!

Also, after 7 days you can collect again!

Indeed that was my p2pool which was the last known Bytecoin pool out there. I did take it offline to replace one I was providing for Ahmed for this pool projects. I felt it would not be too terribly missed as I was down to 1 other user other then myself mining on it. I am now running my equipment running solo on BTE. I have been a majority of the network hash rate for quite some time now.

I supported the idea of a merged mining patch so that this chain would see long standing support from miners all over. I fear that if in the last while had I stopped mining it altogether it just may die.. After reading so many comments in this thread I am mostly undecided about it now. It seems this thread has sparked some more hash power across the network, 15+ blocks in the last 24 hours is something I have not seen in a long time.. Where where all you guys before this thread? I could have used your help along the way too ya know..

My biggest fear, should we decide to ditch the fork/merged mine idea (and to be sure everyone is on the same page here, including merged mining into Bytecoin REQUIRES that the chain be forked) is that if we continue to struggle along until finally we reach re targeting and have a new difficulty that better represents actual network difficulty, what's to stop someone or a few individuals with vast amounts of hash power from running us through that next low diff period and then abandoning us once again 2 re targets from now? Please make sure you consider this very possible situation.

We are currently fighting to keep BTE alive because someone choose to attack it, and that could happen again. While I agree forking the chain either in favour of MM or a different difficulty targeting algorithm does in some ways take away from the initial idea and also what drew me into BTE, it does also help protect the chain and any of our investments into the time in securing this network so far. 

I'd like to open more discussion on these topics, either here if Ahmed does not mind or we can start another thread on it. Most of the points here so far are very clear they don't want changes, but I haven't seen much for explanation of why they so desperately wish to leave it as is. I ask you now to weigh the risks, consider, and once again please speak your mind.

DtQiXhrxic1exnYG3UHFpG3N41KP22LHUK