All of us have our respective opinions based on one's experiences but these opinions need to be substantiated and covered with definite proof especially if the opinion consists of allegations against the said complaint.
For instance, there are some that complain that bitcoin is a scam DUE to some incurring loss in the process, while others say that bitcoin blessed them with the opportunity of earning significant amounts of money.

It all depends on how we view bitcoin as everyone is entitled to have their opinion or view on a certain matter/thing. But this escalates quickly especially if someone made an accusation against something/someone without backing enough proof.

You realize that this is not really a unique idea? You're just describing arbitrage. Plenty of people do that, plenty of businesses do that, it's risky and you can't guarantee that you'll always be able to pull it off. Surely you cannot actually think that you're the first person who has ever thought of buying BTC on one market/in one country and selling it on another market/in another country?

What gives you an advantage doing that over others? There is plenty of software which attempts to take advantage of these margins - have you developed any yourself? I am guessing that your answer will be a no.

It's difficult to side with anyone here, but one thing I can say is that nicehash's liquidity is so poor that it will take a very long time to get filled on a limit order of 0.78BTC. The very fact that your market order (whether it was a bug or a mistake on your side) caused a pump just shows how illiquid their orderbook is.

This wouldn't happen on an exchange as liquid as Binance, so perhaps a good idea to use that exchange if you're not from a country they don't offer their services to. They allow up to 2BTC daily withdrawals for non kyc users, which is more than enough for most people.

Bitcoin just made a sudden or abrupt rise hours ago and it reached more than $10,000 before settling at around $9000 as of the moment. Now, I am actually so excited and happy for this development as I also have some Bitcoin hidden somewhere. However, i am a little worried that this very volatile move can be bringing some damage to its overall reputation as a store of value and a future global currency.

Is my concern really valid in the face of this ongoing development?

Is it really useful to use this app as your main browser or what can you guys suggest?

you should keep in mind that this is only one of many examples out there where people are either trolling the internet by calling their shitcoin the "real" bitcoin. or they are poor newbies who were fooled into buying a shitcoin instead when they wanted to buy bitcoin! this last case was actually very common last year when bitcoin.com (Roger Ver nest) started calling BCash "bitcoin" and renamed bitcoin to "bitcoin core" and a lot of newbies were buying that shitcoin instead then on forums about why they haven't received it in their wallet!

Mate, I was already fully verfied. That is the point. Please read the whole story and sorry for my bad englisch.
I am happy about every comment, but please catch the full story and content.

And read about BTCe.com / WEX in here (somewhere in Bitcointalk) to get the start and the end.
The first "problems" coming up with WEX and almost nobody was believing in problems (just those who remained from BTCe.com)
4 weeks later ... everybody was ... a believer

Even if everything is just a "bad customer support joke" and they are not in "problems", it is the worst customer support in years and on the edge to be legal (maybe already over it).

In my opinion at least the person(s) who gave the the personal answer and who ignored my answers, stealing my coins or preventing me from using my coins are just BASTARDS.

... and I really hope they try to go to court for that to charge me, because in my country this is a personal statement (opinion) and allowed  
But like the language. I can understand them, but they cannot understand me.
I understand that under USD 10.000 the way to court is easy and short in the U.S.
For USD 2.000 to 3.000 even in every state like I know it (well, like my englisch ... 60% to know is more then 0% ; but U.S.-friends will help)

The support ist arrogant and a shame for all customer supports in the world! With this service it is no wonder that they have to leave USA. Service has to be first for such a business in USA.
In my "first life" without money I was working for customer supports. With this performance I would be fired the day! And that would be the best thing to happen to me!

And with this statement from China's President, we are seeing a good price improvement of bitcoin.
Whatever his intentions are, we are benefiting from it. So not bad at all, right.
And whatever plans they are cooking, without question, the benefits are more on their side.
The mood shift of China towards blockchain is not surprising on my end. Somehow I already grasped the mindset of Chinese people.
You will have that notion also if you directly worked and lived with them. They have different mentality on things.

Thanks for the warning.  I'm just curious as to how these scammers got your e-mail in the first place.  I have a ledger nano s and as far as I can recall I've never given them my e-mail addy or any other identifying information, and that would be because they've never asked me for it.  If I got an e-mail like the one you posted I would know right away it was a phishing attempt, and if it wasn't obvious from that fact I certainly wouldn't expect a link from them to download some tool that sounds like it was developed by scammers. 

That explanation in the e-mail of what they say is wrong sounds like so much technical gobbledygook that I hope nobody falls for it.  There may be some basis for the entropy blah blah blah in how the ledger works, but it just sounds like a phisher trying way too hard to sound legit.

I would like to discuss whether you think this is Xi hidden message to the world that they are able to make a perfect cryptocurrency than Bitcoin?

indeed blockchain technology is not only related to cryptocurrencies, but I think Xi has another intention!!

I have an opinion that this is a very thought-out strategy. Now there is a trade war between the US and China, do you think that public recognition of Blockchain could be a step against the US? I mean, the Chinese president wants to show the world that he is better than Trump in everything, and so on, so what is your opinion?

I wonder if Visa would be able to compensate these unauthorised purchases?

That's what they usually do. But due to the irreversible nature of bitcoin that is involved in the transaction I'm not sure if they stance remains unchanged.

This is one of my primary concerns in regards to bitcoin debit cards - they sound awesome in the beginning but then you realise that you're tying something irreversible to somethnig that be accessed through just typing in a card number and expiry date (and CVV).

Now some people on the Internet predict that bitcoin will hit a new low since 2018. Is this someone harvesting leeks and alarmist? Historically, there seems to be a similar voice every time prices fall. Our retail investors are reduced to leeks every time.

It's better to accumulate bitcoin using another funds and not to convert your alts assets to hold, if you dare doing that since this thread has been
opened surely you regret the move as bears trend hits bitcoin. Avoid to make decisions without supplemental guide or patterned that will lead you
to much lesser risk type of investment, find time to pick or look for good alternatives since the market is red right now.

Alts can bring good bounce if you do research not bitcoin alone but also those quality projects from CMC.

I don't know if this is legally allowed in the United States, but your comment certainly applies in Japan. Over there, large companies should start doing that, but those companies are too conservative even with a law backing it. Only the small, younger start ups and crypto related business enthusiasts have done it.

For most of the world, first they need to address the legality barrier, because the first thing the employer will say, is that its illegal to do so. If the State doesn't even acknowledge bitcoin formally, someone getting paid in that could claim they are not getting any payment at all and sue over slavery and whatnot.

So after you get the law and regulation in place, it comes the really hard part to convince the employers to do so. It means an extra complexity to their management, which they would hardly see any justification spending money to accommodate for that.