experienced noobs releasing coins ... you have to love it.

that is some great observation.

And the best part is: shitcoins are dumped, finally!
Been waiting for this turn a long time now. Hope the markets will now be more rational again.

fairest distribution is the good old long term mining schedule.

to Uranus!

Uranus Symbolic Meanings

Art
Science
Eccentricity
Change
Invention
Revolution
Surprise
Originality
Sexual drive
Awakening
Non-conformity
Inspiration
Shock value
Self-Expression

Uranus is associated with Platin too, so maybe the Uran-wallet isn't that bad after all. Am i tripping again?

crypto award: great work, guys!

there is chatter on twitter about a new exchange for uno opening its doors.
https://altmarket.com/about

hope it is ok to post that here before official announcement

current fight bulls vs bears not only in Uno but on most seasoned coins.



i would sum it up: this is the time of accumulation since the bulls will win in the end. Bears had their time. Keep calm and accumulate

If you want a clear picture of what i am talking about look to FTC longterm charts:

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/btce/ftcbtc

that is green. Uno is not much different.

It's going to pop sooner or later. In a couple of weeks people will maybe go "i should have bought more in july to september" and "i wish i could buy for 0.004 again". Now you got the opportunity. Take it.

edit: look primecoin on a 10-month timeframe. There's a signal. Coming days going to be interesting. Will it dump again? Primecoin doesn't behave like it currently. We'll see in a few days. https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/btce/xpmbtc

marketoracle recommending uno:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article47229.html

sounds actually great. I think it's also a kind of charity for those that deserve it most. The award-money will very likely be used for the maximum benefit of humanity. Makes much more sense than funding nascar or things like that. One of the first charities around here that make a lot of sense. I like the idea of repeating it every year and hopefully have it become more advanced each time. A few years down the road 'the blue crypto award'  could be something widely known and respected. Turns out: the idea was really great. Great work you guys are doing.

centralization is always a good idea

if i was a coder there wasn't a need for the thread. Keep unsing wallet.dat in appdata-folder and pretend there is nothing that can be done ...

right but if he doesn't have the vision for the big picture and a clean massadopted coin or he doesn't have that gamechanging new feature then i think his charakter is a fail if he insists on creating one more shitcoin instead of joining an exisitng coin.

"i want because i want" is what children say ... truth is: 90% of times it's a quick buck for them ... get-rich-quick on the expense of everyone else.

I'd look at the coin: is it aimed at being 100% clean and fair and massadopted or if not: does it provide groundbreaking new features (already finished - not only the promise of it)?
If the answer of both questions is: 'no' then i think we can assume the dev is in for the quick buck since he could have joined any other coin but didn't.

I'd really recommend to people to have high standards and expectations from coins.
If they are not works of art and genius they are not worth bothering.

congrats. You won your btc.


agree. People are gullible and the 4-5 keep doing it because they know it works. Seen them on different coins. Same shit different day.

now it's features? Wasn't it usecase a moment ago?
I think the 'it's all about the features'-think is an error. For example: inflationrate of the coin has a larger impact on price and that is frequently overlooked.
Also: features are bugs and clusterfuck in 95% of cases since all that shit is coded badly and introduces more problems.
Features is experiments. Enough wonderful feature-rich coins lie in the dust to reevaluate on that (see many pos-coins, Fluttercoin, Guerilla, etc, etc)

Litcoin doesn't have many new features - still the cap is high. Uno doesn't have many new features still the cap is relativeley high for a long time.

How come fluttercoin never went anywhere? Are there explanations for that? I would have some explanations: features are secondary as long as they are not gamechangers and mayor (happens maybe once a year maximum). Money doesn't need 'features' - money needs 'security', reliability, solidity, stability and userbase/ acceptance. If i want to play a game i go on steam and not into a wallet-software
I use ICQ or facebook to chat - not my wallet ... just a thought

we need no new coins we need more devs getting in on existing coins. Only the newest and most experimental shit needs new coins. Everything else can be done with existing coins. Ironically we have a flood of coins that provide nothing new but if you look for a dev to resurrect an old coin you are in trouble and when looking at existing good/solid coins: they are understaffed.
Many devs are greedy scumbags that exploit the space aswell.


Most coins lost sight and are aimed solely on the pump and dumpers already here. There is very few coins with higher goals of massadoption which are fit for that at the same time.
All in all the mess this space is in comes from low standards and stupidity of the 'investors'. Crap exists because you buy it ... and you bought it because it was new (to come back to topic) because you thought others would buy it too. So a bunch of fools speculating on each others stupidity and from then on it's playing moving chairs and the one holding the bag in the end is the looser. And then people cry about the bad coins but they bought into it just because it was freshly released and they thought it could pump once ... but their exit was too high because the dev dumped before them or the fud kicks in before they can sell since the shitcoin attracts the fud and then they hate the dev and the evil fudders because they themselves failed but can't admit to their low standards.

i think if you have a multi-layer security-system consisting of several independant but interlocking aspects and that would be cracked (working malware becomes known) it should be easy enough to tweak the sytem a little again with very little hassle to counter that new generation of malware. I think it should really not be THAT much hassle to give malware-programmmers a MUCH harder time than they have now.
Currently they can be lazy as. Security is going to be a huge issue once btc reaches higher value and adoption.
The big security-wave lies still in the future. I think demand for more security will spark up as more people get robbed. Shit could have been handled preemtively but there wasn't time for that. Better to keep telling people it was their own fault if they lost coins to malware than actually improving on that, right?
So what i take is: we wait for desaster to strike a large amount of people so security becomes marketable, right?  (provocative, but maybe a little truth in there )

The higher coins are valued the more effort will go into malware and the more urgent the need for more security will be.

currently the wallet.dat is protected by one layer of encryption and that's it. File stolen and brute forced in most cases within halve a day. Can hardly be more easy to steal coins. The most hard part for the hacker is to break into the system. Once he is in there taking the coins is very easy. It is fully automated to send the wallet out. Doesn't even need a rootkit or bigger malware for that. Just the simple command to send that file out and the coins are gone just like that. The malicous code required for that is absolute minimal and i would imagine it only needs halve a brain to creat such malware.

so its safe to say: too bad, too sad
he probably wanted to do something real (if not just dumping his premine) but the charcter probably wasn't strong enough and/or he didn't believ in his own work.
shamefully abondoned coin no. 649 approx.

best coin to invest currently: Uno
why:
-one of the fairest coins around (fair start, no flashmine, no premine, etc)
-one of the rarest coins around (low, low, low inflation)
-solid community
-longterm coin going to stay
-original crypto not playmoney or toycoin
-good distribution which makes good trading and better predictable markets
- a coin to serve the rich, but you are not told that in the OP

and above all: dumped during months by coinex stolen coins which is now over. Coin didn't dump much lower than it is now after those huge amounts of stolen coins have been dumped during MONTHS. So Uno is artificially dumped which is now over. That circumstance explains also why it didn't perform much last months. So it's a good buy now that supply will be much less in the future.

Coins as clean/pure as Uno are not many.
Storing wealth? Hedge against inflation? Uno does that best so demand/usecase is there and already in use for that.
Between us: it's a coin for hoarding hardcore. Community is iron hands, no weaklings daytraders for a quick flip. One of the few coins with real investors-base.
Stability has been impressive during months of bearmarket and dumping of coinex-coins.

Don't say you haven't been told.

Currently not hyped and not pumped. Under the radar of many. Exactly what smart money is hungry for.

Doesn't need to be traded like hot potatoes. 1-year anniversary in october and 2015 we will celobrate aswell. 200 years of mining.
I think it will outlive all of us. Buy a few for your grandchildren. It'll make the difference for them.

Uno is really what most people are searching in this sea of scamcoins and shortlived stuff. It can be up 30x before you realize.

true to some extend. Other question: You are holding cld, right? And you were also buying ETH presale, right? Syscoin bagholder too? You don't have to answer.

I think exchanging/trading is a primary use for the coins including bitcoin. Then some people would say they could/should also be a store of value - but that has been forgotten around here by most ... oh well, the use, the use ... what is it good for? Exchange, send, store money ... that's why premine, ipo, ico, flashmine, etc is never justified because that ruins the real use ... oh well huge offtopic ... could discuss endless.

Thread wasn't about use. It was about how idiotic the pumps on pure novelty are ...

That logic "oh look, the coin is new - it must be pumped"

listing nxt-assets as coins is BS.
Needs option to filter or the list will be useless soon.

you can use any of these coins as much as you can use bitcoin. What does 'use' even mean? ... but that leads off topic ...

sure.
But from observing the markets one comes to ask himself if novelty alone is a thing of value.
I have seen shitcoins traded with higher volume and at higher compared prices just because they were new. That's why i ask if novelty alone is a factor of value.
What we see are a lot of small bubbles based on novelty alone (not real innovation but just pure novelty).