Possibly, it might be some language response error I assume because after I had finished chatting with the customer care service, I was not really okay with the response not until this last update given which made me sceptical about the casino.  I had a second thought about it and I became more curious about the casino based on my enteraction with the casino customer care and here we are their representative have not been online for some days now to reply to questions and inquiries about their casino which makes it more difficult to deal with.

I will start by congratulating you on the success you have achieved in putting this material together. I know what it takes to work on things of this nature when it comes to academics or something that involves research, the compilation of different materials, and writing to achieve the goal of publishing a book. I must say that you have gone a long way in putting things together for the sake of the bitcoin community, especially the newbies to having a material of this nature. As you have said, this would be a very good legacy you have left here, and the community would forever be happy about what you have done. This book would serve as enlightenment material which would educate bitcoin enthusiasts more about bitcoin and its inception, the founders, and how they began the bitcoin journey into the world. It is remarkable that a book of this nature has finally emerged.
Congratulations once more.

Football, in general, is a popular game that stands as a symbol of unity. It was created for fun and to relieve stress, with moments  worth noting. People do love football for its entertaining nature and the vibes it gives. I believe you can attest to the fact that whenever it is time for football season, their is always unity amongst groups, individuals, etc., irrespective of ethnicity, tribe, religion, and lots more. People tend to unite while watching football matches in support of a particular team as a result of their fan base and the players involved. Although not everybody likes football and it is only those who have that love for it can say it much better.

"Prevention is better than cure," as the adage says. OP, that name sounds strange here, as I have not come across it before. I had to do a search here to verify for myself, but nothing of the nature here. Just like other members have said here, I will also join them in giving you such advice as well. Run away from that site for your own life; otherwise, you stand a chance of being scammed by scammers. You should count yourself lucky to have knowledge about this platform to make inquiries about them. This was a smart move by you to safeguard yourself from stress.

I will request that you make that website known here so we can see for ourselves and take every necessary step and caution to stay clear of it.

Congratulations on getting back your refund! A problem shared is a problem solved. You took a bold step by bringing your complaint here for fast attention, for which you were given a good and excellent treat. This platform has been able to resolve many cases between casinos and their members, with both parties present here as registered members too, and the casinos here know the relevance of this platform in the online casino industry and, as such, would want to maintain their relationship with the platform and the registered members here.

As we all know, there are other aspects of this platform that you would find interesting if you made the time to go through them for yourself. Nevertheless, as your case has been resolved successfully, it would be nice if you locked this thread to avoid spamming.

Reserve Bitcointalk Username: cryptsafe
Jack's Club Username: cryptsafe
BTC Wallet Address:  bc1q2fcj8hnhkeyhstzy9k8fav5ympkfdmafvd56g5

I think you just fell for a scammer here as I finished reading through to see for myself. He probably had played you to test but his assumption on the game prediction did not work. If you had known you should have demanded for an escrow services at first to be very sure that the funds as claimed by the scammer are readily available. Only that would guarantee the genuity of the deal. I must say this is a lesson learnt the hard way.

Proper verification was not done so as to ascertain the genuity of the scammer at first. If OP had taken his or her time to verify the account holder to knowing how genuine what he is saying is, I believe OP would have noted some lapses and taken proactive measures to protecting him or herself.

It is obvious that the representative have not been online for over a month now which shows how neglecting they are and notwithstanding, this is a clear evidence that they are guilty of the accusations against them for not coming forth to defend themselves. I would not be surprised that this is the end of their response to this case a raised by OP.

It would be in your own interest to keep pushing for your justice by constantly updating this thread with necessary information that would require reputable members who are are interested in helping you to resolve your problem with them. I believe you will get a positive results as time goes on.

Going by this report, it is likely that you have been scammed, but we cannot conclude yet until we verify and know if truly your accusation holds water, as there are lots of scams out there claiming to be the real one. Such a demand from the exchange looks more scammy than we could imagine. In situations like this, what should have been demanded by the casino is likely proof or evidence of the source of income, not requesting for the OP to top up his account with 100% of what he has in his account. What if OP has any issues and is banking on the amount of money for rescues?  The exchange would be expecting OP to refill again, which is not making any sense.

Amy exchange that could make such demand should not be taken seriously as they are scammers who want to ripp investors of their assets and do away with it.

Winzo casino so far to the best of my knowledge have been a good casino and there have not been any complaint about them in the past so I am curious as to why this happened. If it is the reason that they got OP country restricted from their casino based on regional laws, then i must say that is the right step they have done by restricting the country so as to safeguard their casino from legal actions and announcing and making a refund to members from those affected countries with their casino was a good move to have been done by them.

As I checked the previous posts I saw some comments with captured clause from the terms and conditions of the casino as to change of policy. That section is quite alright if they had done accordingly to what they have said  by sending email across to all their members for immediate actions as it bother their membership of the casino. Maybe OP had no knowledge about their email or possibly he did not check his or her junk box for confirmation. It is nice both parties resolved amicably to settling their scores and differences.

Ever since I lost my previous seed phrase and wallet, I learned my lesson the hard way. I began to keep a constant check on my seed phrase so as to be sure they are where they are so that if anything happens again, I can be able to recover it easily. Actually, what happened that made me lose my wallet was a result of my phone crashing one night while online trying to download an app. All of a sudden, my phone went off, and I had not backed up my seed phrase anywhere in the meantime.I had some bitcoin in that wallet, and that was how I lost my bitcoin and wallet that night. Ever since then, what I do first after downloading and installing a new wallet app is to write my phrase or keys so as not to encounter what I had gone through again.

I think this aspect of your topic is not really taken seriously by some account holders. People do not bother checking on their seeds because they are too confident that their keys are where they have kept them for safety purposes. Possibly, if they had shifted from their initial place where they are kept, you would have no idea since you are not constantly checking on them, but if you do check on them, you would be able to detect whenever there are changes in the location of your phrase from the initial place where they are kept. So therefore, it is advisable, in your own best interest, to always backup your keys and save them where only you have access at any given point in time.

I would say that such a transaction might have taken place out of error. On a normal basis, the value of such a fee of $3 million is enough to do other meaningful things in the current state of the world economy. Maybe, just like other members have said, this could be a syndicate trying to launder money, and these are what paint bitcoin a bad image in the eyes of the government.

Nevertheless, OP, there is another thread that has this topic already in existence before yours. So I would suggest you lock this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475177.msg63206835#msg63206835

At first, every new innovation takes time to get accepted into society. Although there are some people who are good at first adopting a new technology and becoming early adopters of that technology while watching to see how things unfold about that technology, that was the case with bitcoin. Some were skeptical about it; some watched it from afar. While some just tried it to see how it went, although people never believed that it would be this important and sold off at the early beginning, while some lost their phrase just as the previous reply stated, and some holders are already late without passing their keys to their loved ones, these lost bitcoins would actually make the available bitcoin more scarce and valuable. And in time to come, the price would be higher than it is now, and the adoption rate would be very high enough to trigger a global and massive integration of bitcoin into the government system all over the world.

Banning or no banning, we all know that crypto is all about decentralization and anonymity. Even if Binance gets Russia banned from their platform, it does not affect them because there are other platforms that are ready, willing, and open to welcoming Russia to their platform. This is all about their profit and traffic, so they want to make many gigs for themselves, and mind you, Binance already has gigs and a name for their brand, which is well done without Russians patronizing their platform.

Aside from that, the decentralized platforms are very open and free, and that represents the real purpose of crypto and blockchain, which is for anonymity. I believe Russians would improvise to do their crypto deals without any issues to face, rather than bothering themselves with a Binance ban on them.  So therefore, i think the ban on Russians from Binance platform holds no water.

I will assume that the transaction occurred as a mistake; otherwise, I was wondering what the nature of the transaction could be that would make one pay such a volume of BTC as a transaction fee. People are that wealthy, though, but looking at the monetary equivalent of the volume of BTC paid for the transaction, it is too real to be realistic. Such a mistake is very grave to make. Although people would make such mistakes, not in that tone.

Burst posting is likely a general issue, aside from the old members who are very familiar with the rules and policies of the platform. It is not encouraged but sometimes, some posts that comes in that nature seems to be in tandem with the subject matter which needs urgent attention in most cases. Also those posts can be as educative as we could imagine but the manner at which it was posted is more of a burst post.

Plagiarism is more of an intellectual theft, which is against the laws of intellectual property ownership, and this platform is strongly against it. Plagiarism is a crime in the eyes of the law and is punishable, and anyone found wanting would go in for it. This platform is more of an educational platform; in that course, banning accounts was deemed fit for punishment.

OP,  as far as I know, a debt is a debt, and it would still be whether it is a good debt or a bad debt. As you have said, a loan that does not generate income to me seems like a waste of resources because it is expected that debts are to be serviced, and this means that such a loan must have been able to generate many returns so as to service it properly.You talked about bitcoin and why you should not get a loan to invest in it. I believe you should have had knowledge of the volatility of bitcoin and as such, one is not advised to get a loan for bitcoin investment and also should know that investing in bitcoin with loan is highly risky and not advisable to do because the bitcoin market has no control and can swing to any direction at any time.

I feel this policy is one-sided because not all citizens benefit from these types of policies. The government manipulates the process just to control how people spend. This policy gives the government the upper hand in the control of the citizens, but the same government would steal from the process to enrich themselves.

The idea of controlling the citizens on how to spend their money is another factor that is not feasible, as not everybody would want that, and as such, nobody would want to be controlled up to the point of their personal life and privacy being breached by the government. This would be worse than one could imagine.

She has had no merit for over 120 days to qualify for a campaign, yet the rule was ignored, which makes her possibly ignored by the manager for not reading the rules before applying for the campaign.

After over four years of being inactive, the first thing she could do after waking up from sleep was to apply for a campaign. I was thinking there is a possibility of an account abnormality here.  This really looks suspicious to me as well.

You made a point here, mate. This aspect of plagiarism is what I initially thought the OP should have mentioned or included in his or her post so that newbies who come across this thread would see for themselves and know what is obtainable on the platform. The issue of plagiarism has cost many accounts here, and I must say that even after all this awareness, some would still fall victim to plagiarism. You cannot just copy an article from elsewhere and post it here for no reason without acknowledging the source of the writeup. It is termed intellectual theft, and it is punishable by law. This platform is also an educational platform, and there are scholars here too who might not like it if their work is captured without them being acknowledged. Plagiarism is punishable by law, so in that case, if accounts are banned here for the offense of plagiarism, I would not hold anything against the moderators but rather the poster who copied and failed to reference their copied work.