I don't wanna hold it because STO is dead and no more shitscam STO . Desico, bitbond and many more shit STOs are enough to be a proof if STO in crypto is dead. But I feel curious about you said that if the company has a solid revenue and why don't you just conduct an IPO rather than STO? That's more suitable for your company consider you said it has already generated decent revenue and that means your company has a product.  Hear this true, my friend. STO or ICO, they are exactly the same. Projects and leaders who think they can make easy money just because they can sell a product with a smooth whitepaper and a great exchange to back them up. We need to stop giving them money and stop supporting all these no product companies! It is an option to invest in these offerings. We can see through the statistics that some of these are giving good amount of profit, especially IEO. But then if you are not made for a tedious research just to make sure that your investment ends up with the most perfect choice among many, you better not get into it. The risk is very high of course because the market is always full of low quality and scam projects. If you are afraid that you will end up feeding these scams, it is better to just buy the existing top altcoins. |
|
|
|
But why don't you find those beautiful airdrops once, whose only request was to communicate an address to receive the gift?  I guess because after joining almost a hundred airdrops, not a single one turned out legit. We are not running out of airdrops. One airdrop is coming out after another. In fact, in the previous years, the number of airdrops are so many that sometimes one can be so busy by mainly following and joining each one of them. But are all the efforts worth it? Mostly not. |
|
|
|
National sovereignty is one of the main reasons why a single global Crypto currency would fail. Everyone is talking about Bitcoin conquering the world and having a single reserve currency, but that is just a pipe dream in my opinion. You cannot have a single reserve currency and have 200 smaller nations bad economic decisions pulling down the stronger nations, making the good decisions. I see a future where every sovereign country would have it's own government backed Crypto currency or Blockchain based technology.  That is what is going to happen when the fiat system will finally succumb to the new blockchain technology. Even at this point, we can see how the future holds. China is announcing that it will also be creating its own digital currency. But what will not happen is these national sovereigns adopting Bitcoin or any altcoin as their national currency. But it is possible that Bitcoin is going to become a de facto global currency. |
|
|
|
Ok, do you think the complexity of public address affects the economy of a coin or a chain? For example, if bitcoin had an easy to remember the address, would it be adopted more readily? The same question is valid for ETH, of course. People are irked by complex addresses and one of the reasons old folks are not into crypto is because everything is too complicated, as they are not computer age people like us. They like it simple and I tend to think that simpler addresses would help them adapt, and improve the crypto economy. I found this site because a friend recommended it and all I did was enter my email and reserved a good name for myself. I am one of the people who missed the .com craze because I did not care to get a good domain name, although I could because I knew about it, now I am not gonna miss that one. Having less complex addresses is a hassle for you. So use a lesser characters in names to promote much safer and easier transactions. Easy to understand address can prevent loss and provides assurance in the transactions. You'll not confuse yourself about the addresses and also the other people. Simpler address will do and helps develop the crypto community. Simpler addresses do not matter much to the crypto community. So what do you mean by they helps develop the crypto community? In fact, complicated and long addresses protect the crypto community in some ways. Addresses which are long and complicated are hard to remember and copy, unlike simple addresses. And since it is always encouraged to use multiple wallet addresses, or even a single wallet address per transaction, addresses will really get more complicated in due time. |
|
|
|
|
Some of those above-mentioned coins are not anymore sleeping giants. BNB is widely awake in my way of looking it. And the battle of top exchange is always raging. The number one spot is always changing hands. ADA had just went back to sleep. It was a dominating giant when it first appeared and now it is getting weak. MANA is not a project which offers something new. There were already similar projects before and they are now unheard of. By the way, the entire market seems to be sleeping. That includes the real giants such as ETH. BTC, the god, is also asleep.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, this is the role of SEC. They sue and sue and sue and sue. This is endless suing. But such suing will never stop progress. This suing will only make the US an unpleasant country to start an innovative project, or even a country for these projects to operate. These promising projects will be looking for another country which is more friendly and welcoming. This will just worsen the ongoing exodus of brilliant minds and huge companies from the US.
|
|
|
|
No one can tell you for sure when bitcoin will back to 20, it's a waste of time to ask such questions. You invested in wrong time, now you can only wait and be more patient. Need money? Find a job and never rely on quick profit here. It is crypto market, so there is always a risk.
Then it is much more a waste of time responding to a question you consider a mere waste of time. That's ironic. And one more thing, everybody needs money and everybody loves quick profit. Some people are even posting here just for the sake of earning money from the signature they are promoting. Familiar? BTC will be back to $20,000. That is with a 100% guarantee. I just hope that you are all still holding to your BTC when that time arrives. |
|
|
|
Crypto project passing regulations first will at least minimize the rate of scam project. The issue of KYC is quite necessary since some project doesn't allow citizens from China or USA. kYC is everybody whether investors or bounty hunters, without kyc some bounty hunters are ready to run a bounty with multi-account
How I wish there is such a thing as a regulation or a regulating body for all crypto projects to pass through. That would benefit investors, the reputation of the crypto world, and even the bounty hunters. But since there is none, the community should be always vigilant about new projects. KYC is an issue that almost everyone used to be against. But since we cannot help but comply because that is required by law, it is already starting to sink in to everyone that they have to pass through that. |
|
|
|
I hope this is for good. It is glad that they were able to rise up amidst their legal entanglement with SEC. But was their case already settled in finality? That was definitely something that consumed a significant amount of the money they raised during the ICO. Due to SEC's fault-finding role, that money that should have been dedicated to quality development was wasted over quality lawyers instead. On the other hand, the price of KIN was severely affected it already hit the ground gasping for breath. It looks like the project has a lot of recovery to do. |
|
|
|
Thanks for warning people, but I believe that airdrops are in general a waste of time. Furthermore, it is extremely dangerous to provide any kind of personal information for an airdrop, in case it scams, your privacy would be effected.
That is why it is my presumption that if the OP is serious enough to keep this thread updated, the list will continue to grow very long. It is good though that this only lists scam airdrops. If this list will also include scam ICOs, IEOs, STOs, and other kinds of coin offering, this will even grow more than double. But this is really a helpful list. This takes a lot of effort from the OP. Credits for you but you should also be careful because this thread is carrying an accusation that could also be wrong. |
|
|
|
I thought this whole Satoshi Nakamoto identity hunting will just die in due time. But it seems that I am very wrong. Instead of dying a natural death, it even worsens. It includes Satoshi's marital status now. Satoshi Nakamoto was not married nor single because the name was probably referring to a team. If that name was referring to an individual, the marital status is totally insignificant to what the name has left to us and to the whole world. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, coins or tokens do not have to be supported by commodities or FIAT, but in terms of their functions and uses. If it has to be forced, then all coins or tokens will only become stablecoin because the price must follow the commodity or FIAT itself. These developer ideas should indeed be filtered before they launch the project. What will be later, it can be useful or just for mere profit.
I agree, it is not necessary for a coin to be backed by particular commodities or fiat or assets. Coins are made with a certain purpose. They are not made just to represent some valuable property. Others are designed that way, so be it. But it is not required that all cryptocurrencies should have such backing. Some coins are used to support certain type of services, or to be used within a certain ecosystem, or to be simply a general payment alternative. The best backing actually is an innovative, practical, and working product. |
|
|
|
|
Actually when you click on a specific coin in coinmarketcap.com, the rank is already there. You don't have to click on other buttons. You just have to scroll down and look at the coin's statistics. You will find there the market rank. It indicates the specific rank of the coin you are checking. The statistics of the coin is found just beside the short description of the coin and its project, below the chart.
|
|
|
|
Investors needs to have interest in other for a project to survive, once investors lose interest its the end, this is why i think developers need to be serious from now onward, there will come a time that new projects won't see investors investing on their projects and its because we have had enough of crappy projects, if there is no more good ideas developers need to stop building projects
yes you are right the presence of investors in new projects is very important. without an investor the project will fail and die. that's what happens now many ICOs are scams so this makes investors not willing to invest in new projects. they prefer investing in bitcoin and old altcoin. so I hope for the developers to be serious in making the project so investors will trust again. Even old altcoins is subject to what the OP is saying. If an altcoin which is already existing for a long while stops releasing updates, it will be a cause for investors to get curious and ask why. If the project development team is mum about it while the project remains stagnant and without development for a long time, investors will definitely leave it. Even if the altcoin is in the top, investors will not care because it is always to their benefit that projects should be moving forward. It is their money which is at stake. |
|
|
|
I just want to know, about market issues.
1. Reasons that make you survive or still believe in this market?
2. Is this what is called a market cycle, I mean back to the time before bitcoin reached the highest price in 2017? or maybe like 2014, 2015 or 2016? because I'm not there yet.
3. Why has the recent rise in bitcoin prices not affected the market situation for the better or had an impact on the rise in altcoin prices?
4. In your opinion how to overcome the market situation so that it can be stable again?
1. It is my belief in the market and my ability to look forward to the longer future that made me survive in all the worst days of the market. 2. Yes, the market has a cycle. The bears and the bulls are replacing one another in the center stage. 3. Most of the time, when Bitcoin is very bullish, the altcoins will experience bad days. 4. Stability is not what I want. I want an unstable market so that I can make money. |
|
|
|
What is the most reason to buy new token or new coin, to trade it in the market or to spend it if there something to spend it?
I am talking here that token or coin already listing in exchanges.
And not tokens exchanges such as BNB.
What you think?
I do not spend much using my coins. I normally buy coins or tokens for the sake of making a profit out of them. And lately, I am avoiding buying new tokens or coins. I guess I have enough already. My wallet has actually accumulated a lot of shitcoins that are now worth nothing. Some of them retains a little value, but so little that I would not even bother transferring them to another wallet. They don't even worth the withdrawal fee. |
|
|
|
There are ways to regulate something without shutting it down tho. Like they are doing KYC for example, which means if terrorists or people who just want to launder money needs to find bunch of ID's from people and also have bank accounts of those people and send money to those places and then somehow cash them out to their own places. Its literally much simpler to just own a place and make it look like its more successful than it is, car wash comes to mind (thanks to breaking bad).
Bitcoin is already heavily regulated if you want to commit a crime using it, hell you can scam people out of their crypto and be fine but if you scam governments and evade taxes using crypto you will be caught and that is why people won't be using crypto for illegal activities when there are easier methods.
Regulation came out much later as another option. Perhaps that is their new approach after they failed in all their previous strategies. They tried to shut it down and they failed. Perhaps they made countless of attempts, nobody is counting all their efforts. But they apparently failed every time. And here comes regulations by way of KYC, audits, and other processes that involve accreditation, licensing, and permits. These are still attempts to control Bitcoin. They shifted to this approach because they cannot totally shut down Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
India has gone crazier these days, the country's leaders to be specific. It used to tread lightly on the matter, and they made studies about it, and then finally they decided that cryptocurrency is illegal. I don't understand why. Some people are saying that this law is only made under the influence of some powerful personalities and when these personalities' term in office will end, the country's stand on crypto will also change. But this is going to be harder from now on if the laws are already passed. There has to be an amendment made.
|
|
|
|
We're talking about jobs, livelihood and fulfilled dreams What opportunities Cryptocurrencies have created since it becomes very popular
in my case, it changes my life I made a job out of Cryptocurrency by just giving my opinion and doing stuff from other people, so how about you.
I have also taken up some jobs because of the rise of cryptocurrency. I have earned a decent amount also. I have also earned by way of HODLing, a little trading, and buying when the prices are cheap and then selling when profits are made. But more than these personal experiences and gains from our crypto jobs and investment, cryptocurrency has really change the world in a big way. Transparency, convenience, financial freedom, and so many more benefits are given out. |
|
|
|
|
That is what some people are saying. But I don't agree with them as I don't agree with their paranoid arguments. Why should they be afraid of stablecoins when stablecoins are founded on the very price of their own fiat itself? The price of USD falling also means USDT falling. USD dies and USDT also dies.
However, stablecoins such as Libra may really destroy the financial system. But still the fact remains that these coins derive their value from fiat. They share one heart and soul. They kill the system, they kill themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
