The question is, do some casinos even want a provably fair system or do they just want you to think that they have one? I think it's the latter. They declare that they are provably fair knowing very well that for must players that will be enough to trust them with their coins. If they get caught, they will just think of something else. It's not like casinos with bad reputation go out of business. The fact that you are wearing a signature of one such site proves my point. 

No, sorry.

Hashrate is correct, cross shard isn't.

I edited post #2 and the post that announced that Round #6 had begun. I think no one posted in the meantime so I didn't want to make a double-post. But you are right, I should have probably done so either way to announce it properly.

---

One word remains in this round. I just revealed another letter for it.

Assuming you still know your PIN code. You will need the PIN to unlock the wallet and move the coins to a different wallet whose seed is properly backed up.

Actually, you should never try to remember your seed and rely on your memory. The seed is supposed to be written down on paper or engraved in steel. You make several copies and store them in safe places.

That right there is the problem. They aren't suggesting that POW mining firms shift towards renewable sources of energy and abandon fossil fuels, they want POW mining operations banned altogether. They have a problem with the algorithm (Bitcoin) and since they can't compete against it, they prefer China's way of dealing with problems. Sweden is also considering releasing a national cryptocurrency (the Swedish e-Krona or something like that), or maybe they already did it. Maybe that's part of the motivation behind at attempt to ban POW, aka the biggest competitor to the success of the national digital coin.

I am sure there are rules that campaign managers follow to prevent that from happening. But even if there weren't, I am sure such a participant would be asked to adjust his sig and get rid of the warning. If someone is willing to advertise a scam site, it seems paradoxical to have a piece of info that says "be careful when playing on this casino because they might scam you".

Here is rule that ChipMixer has, for example:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.0

They are sponsoring the Italian Serie A as well. Just open the official site (https://www.legaseriea.it/en) and before it loads, you will see an ad for 1xBet for a few seconds before you are taken to the homepage.

They received crap! Man U paid Ronaldo around €15 million. The transfer took place 3 days before the deadline. Everyone already knew that Ronaldo wanted to leave. Information like that brings a club in an unfavorable position because the competition knows they are forced to sell below the market value.

The second part of the problem is that once he got sold to Man U, the other clubs know that Juventus is in need of a new few forward. That again puts the club in a bad spot because the asking prices increase when you really want to buy something.

Allegri! There was very little time to make a decision. They had to settle with Kean unfortunately.

All three guesses are correct!
Seems like it's another round sponsored by cygan

Cold storage, flippening, and halving are all words that cygan already posted. Generally it doesn't make sense repeating what others have already written. If the prediction is correct, the person who was first to post it gets the point.
"Cross chart" is not correct.

---

We still have two more words in this round. Anyone?

Those defensive problems are also connected to the weak midfield. Mistakes made with passing the ball around, lost balls 30 meters from your own goal, and things like that. With a stronger and more compact midfield, few balls would go through for the defenders to deal with. 

You probably meant that they have to take advantage of the winter transfer market. It will already be late to wait until summer, and that's the end of this season.

One possible addition that was mentioned in the past is Rudiger from Chelsea. His contract is expiring at the end of the season and he already featured in Serie A for Roma. He knows his way around. Chiellini has unfortunately gotten old and injury prone. Rugani is useless for a team of this caliber. They are basically relying on the duo Bonucci and de Ligt alone. That simply can't work.

Yeah, they apparently don't consider such tags as valid reasons why a member should not be allowed to participate in their signature campaign. I have seen warning messages posted in scam campaigns recommending that members shouldn't apply and wear the signatures, otherwise they could get tagged. If people see those warnings and apply anyways, they only have themselves to blame for what happens next. 

I think that adding that user to your distrust list is the maximum that should be applied in such a situation. Neutral and especially negative feedback is excessive in my opinion. If people were to do that, than where does it stop? Everyone has different experiences with wallets, exchanges, and other services. Punishing someone for having had a good experience because you had a bad one doesn't seem right.   

That's really something that only their campaign manager can answer. I remembered that part regarding negative feedback when I read the campaign requirements. It could be that they don't consider those tags as valid reasons for that member to be excluded. Or they simply don't care and only made that rule to sound more professional than they are.

Mislim da će uskoro krenuti navala na Best Change kampanju pa samo da vas pripremim za to.
Izgleda da je nutildah dobio temp ban na forumu. Kako sam kaže, i bez toga je namjeravao napustiti kampanju i pokrenuti sopstvenu.

Razlozi su nebitni ali koga zanima nek prati Metu, bit će vjerovatno svega u ovih par dana.

Ko razmišlja o promjeni kampanje nek prati šta se dešava u Best Change-u jer možda se uskoro otvori upražnjeno mjesto.

I can't say that I don't do that as well, but for other reasons. But when it comes to engaging them in a discussion or answering questions such users might have, I don't really pay that much attention to their trust score. Positive or negative, they can still have a valid point and know what they are talking about. Someone brought up Quickseller, and that's a good example. You can talk with the guy, but it doesn't mean you need to trade with him or do any business together if you don't trust him.

One of the exceptions of their campaign is that they don't accept users who are negatively tagged, but they do accept those who got tagged just for wearing their signature.

It could be because it's a brand-new channel and people aren't yet sure what to expect from it. People usually follow and subscribe to those whose content they like, Bitcointalk still has no content. They have a teaser announcing something that will be released in the future.

Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to consider sponsored Facebook ads, for example. Not sure if YouTube and Twitter offer such packages as well. I keep seeing ads for some scammy Squid token sale all over the place. It might be fun to have them replaced by those of Bitcointalk.

Yes, that's right.
One solved, five words to go. Congratulations on your 50th merit!

---

Newbies, Jr. Members, and Members are still the only ranks who can guess the terms. When I get back home tonight, all other ranks can start submitting their guesses after I update the thread.   

It's always positive to see that casinos are adjusting and lowering the minimums for their players.
The minimum withdrawal amount has been adjusted and I have also added Dogecoin to the list of supported altcoins. There is a notification about DOGE on the deposit page though which says that the asset is not yet available through the app.

I appreciate the update.

The next round starts now!


1.   cold storage
2.   hashrate
3.   chain reorg
4.   flippening
5.   merkle root
6.   halving  


* Only Newbies, Jr. Members, and Members can guess the terms until I update the post to allow other ranks to take part in the game.
*Members of all other ranks can now start guessing!
* I might repeat terms from previous rounds.

Please follow the rules in OP and Happy Guessing!

It could if the seed OP had was in fact a 2FA seed. In that case, Electrum would recognize it as such and not as a segwit seed, which is currently the case due to the version number that pooya87 mentioned in his reply.

I agree. He is not just paying TrustedCoin to "allow" him to transfer his own coins, he is also paying more in transaction fees due to the multiple signatures and more complex script present in a multisig setup.

A few questions about your web design services.

Do you have a lot of clients? Do you work with multiple clients at the same time or do you take one project from one party, work on that, and once you finish, you do something else?

RickDeckard suggested BTCPay, and there is nothing wrong with that suggestion. It's the most recommended service provider you will hear around here. However, if you work with one client at a time, you really don't need third-party payment services. You could just purchase a hardware wallet, connect it with Electrum, and send each client a new address to pay to. The hardware wallet safely stores the private keys for you, and you use Electrum's addresses tab to copy addresses were you will receive your payments.

However, if you are working with multiple parties and you have colleagues who do the same, opting for something like BTCPay does make more sense.   

That part of their TOS has nothing to do with OPs case. His account was not closed because they suspected he is a gambling addict. They closed his account because he didn't complete the KYC verification in the time stated in their TOS and or/email that was sent to him.

They should have, I agree with that. But they don't have to. Like I said in my previous reply, you are expected to know the rules and terms of the platforms you use because you agreed to them when you created your account. it's the same way with the rules on Bitcointalk. If you get banned, saying I didn't know I couldn't do that won't help. You should have read the rules that explain what to do and what not to.

I am not trying to sound harsh, and I don't think your account should have been closed because you didn't complete the KYC in time. But that doesn't matter if their TOS (that you agreed to) state that exactly that can and will happen. 

Have you posted in their ANN and contacted their forum representative like I suggested previously?

The stats that you included about the top 25 countries in terms of YouTube views don't mean much for Bitcointalk's channel. Those stats show all possible content that is shown on YouTube. We need to know how many of them watch crypto-related videos, or more precisely, which countries are interested in the content created by Bitcointalk.

What do you mean unpin the device while you are trying to send? The hardware wallet needs to be connected to your computer when you are sending. It needs to sign the transactions with the private keys that are kept in the secure element on the Nano S.

So what did you do to make it work in the end?

Since you will be using a Trezor, I highly suggest you extend your 24-words seed with a secure and long passphrase. 6-8 different words is enough for a passphrase according to several experts. You can always include special characters and combination of small and uppercase letters.