Wohlgemerkt Hyper-deflation-, also warum soll ich mir heute etwas kaufen, das morgen weniger Wert sein wird und mir dann mehr davon kaufen könnte. (weil BTC steigen) So ganz falsch ist das nicht. Es könnte der Punkt komm an dem kaum noch jemand verkaufen will..... Das ist eine Frage des Preises. Das Problem kann lediglich sein, daß bei hohen Preisen keiner mehr kaufen will ("price stickiness"). Höre öfters mal Aussagen wie: "Bitcoin kann ich mir nicht leisten, zu teuer". Was natürlich quatsch ist, wiederum eine Frage der Menge.
|
|
|
Those transaction costs seem high: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1ZM9NCbl.png&t=663&c=SJImTQnHgMjv2g)
|
|
|
The last few posts made no sense to me at all. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Does it look good or bad? good. not because of what was talked in the last couple posts. That was just a technical "mystery" explained.
|
|
|
There has been talk about optimizing tx prioritization in bitcoind for quite a while. I can now see why it would make sense to have a high-fee tx (such as these 2) "pull in" the no- (or low-) fee inputs. I kinda thought this was the case already.
|
|
|
Does anyone have any theories as to how it is possible that the most recent two transactions to 1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy are still confirmed after several hours despite each including a massive 0.1 BTC fee? +1 for some reason the network propagation for both transactions is below 5%, why are nodes not relaying them? and why does blockchain.info list "blockchain.info" as originating IP for the transactions? EDIT: piuk, you should probably change your avatar. People (at least I) got used to the new logo.
|
|
|
Aqoba is simply acting as a partner realizing the segregation of funds between Paymium's funds and the customers deposits. Unlike many other exchanges, Bitcoin-central (and paytunia) offers the same protection to depositors as any other payment institution. Your bitcoin-central account or paytunia account is a full fledged payment account (soon to be linked to a debit card and a unique IBAN number).
Nice thing to have all things considered. It's only for the balance you have in EUR. There are absolutely no guaranteed protections for BTC's Then let's just hope my buy order didn't come through.. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Interesting question: when did trading stop? I was going to pull some sell orders when I saw the message.
|
|
|
[Apr-1 10:30 CET] Bitcoin-Central and Paytunia update: Our customer's bitcoins and euros are safe and will not be affected by the security breach. We have taken the websites off-line for proper investigation.
The address 1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy is under our exclusive control.
Now that's some good news! These guys know how to build the suspense yep good to know finally! thanks!
|
|
|
guys, should I lock this thread and show people over to the pretty much identical topic in thread Instawallet Security Breach for simplicity?
|
|
|
unconfirmed! quick, double spend and mine them FAST!! that, my friend, would be amazing. don't know if bad or good though.
|
|
|
It is a vanity address, not big deal. Bitcoin Central COLD. I have a few which start from 1Vladimir How is it no big deal? If it's vanity for Bitcoin Central COLD and the other large tx to the same address 1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy is indeed instawallet cold (as marked on blockchain.info) then we're looking at either the "theft transactions" or some transactions made by davout and team to "further secure the funds". I somehow think the latter is unlikely, since cold store should already be secure and they might've considered telling us "funds secure, don't worry" by now.
|
|
|
31BTC at central and many times that in €
sheesh.
at least the € should be insured by the cartel, right?
|
|
|
my bro just found on reddit, thought I'd share here. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFBt8M7X.jpg&t=663&c=IuIERMVDfQI1fQ)
|
|
|
The price, being a little fluffy at the moment, is susceptible to bad news. Bitcoin Central and/or Instawallet getting raided and losing everyone's money would cause a news splash and a crash, especially since it throws cold water on the "move your money out of banks and into Bitcoin" theme that the media is running with. It would be a great buying op, could take us down to $60. Otherwise, we're likely to continue this meteoric rise.
Unless the hypothetical thief dumps all his coins at once I doubt we'll see anything to crazy. The fork issue was a MUCH larger test of bitcoin than this. I'm not sure, this may be true for us in the know how bad a double spend is. I doubt the general population can even relate to what that problem is. They can however relate to "BITCOIN HACKED UNSAFE SELL!" as we've witnessed before. I still doubt a large effect, though. EDIT: journalists own coins ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Second wave successfully started.
Bids still at 10mil mark, asks never went up past 50k and beginning to falter again.
I think a big wave down is coming. Based on PWT, of course. At some point this is getting ridiculous. Of course you will be right given enough time and enough leeway to interpret the term "big".
|
|
|
In EvE Online if you "whelp" your ship/fleet it means you died/lost in a horrible embarrassing manner. Hopefully people keep their bitcoins in a cold wallet, not on some exchange. I mean, srsly? If you want to trade on that exchange you kind-of have to, no?
|
|
|
well now you have a simple question to ask them. Do they or do they not control private key to that BTC address?
The second question I suppose would be if it is in instawallet and in google yet.
Yeah, they might've used instawallet for the "cold" wallet of bitcoin-central.... lol.
|
|
|
|