Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 06:21:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 [357] 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 ... 514 »
7121  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Do private keys remain the same once sweeped? on: December 11, 2017, 03:28:45 AM
I recently sweeped an old bitcoin wallet into electrum and successfully extracted what was in there. I'm now trying to get the bitcoin cash using electron. The old bitcoin wallet has thousands of private keys and it's a hassle to scan them all, but the newly sweeped eletrum bitcoin wallet has a lot less (the active keys from the thousands).
Do these active keys remain the same after being sweeped, or do they change? So far when sweeping the old keys it has not shown any bitcoin cash (they should be there as the the funds existed through the fork).
The addresses/keys in your new Electrum wallet WON'T have any BitcoinCash on them... because you SWEPT... which means you moved the BTC from the old bitcoin wallet keys onto new keys in Electrum.

So you can't sweep the Electrum keys looking for BCH, as the BTC was put onto Electrum keys after the fork. You would need to either sweep or import the OLD keys from your "old bitcoin wallet", but using ElectronCash instead of Electrum.

7122  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: ETH/BTC Exchange UNCONFIRM 3 DAYs on: December 11, 2017, 03:20:02 AM
You probably don't want to contact support and say that a transaction is unconfirmed... they'll just auto respond with that standard response.

Tell them that your ETH/BTC exchange has failed and is not processed.
7123  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Sweep core, cash and gold - which wallet? on: December 11, 2017, 03:17:50 AM
Recommended wallets:
Electrum for BTC
ElectronCash for BCH
Huh for BTG (I use BitcoinGold Core... but thats a 150Gig blockchain download Tongue)


As for fees, when you send transactions, "good" wallets will give you the option to specify what fee (or fee rate) you would like to use. "Good" users will then check https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ and https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx to get an idea of how busy the network is and what sort of fees are required to get their transaction confirmed in a reasonable amount of time Wink
7124  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Claiming Bitcoin Cash and Gold On New Computer and Nano Ledger S? on: December 11, 2017, 03:01:02 AM
If you have a password on your Electrum wallet... then this means either all the sensitive info (like seeds and private keys) inside your wallet file are encrypted and/or that the WHOLE wallet file is encrypted (depending on if you ticked the "encrypt wallet file" box when you created the password).

If a hacker gets your password protected wallet file, then they will need to crack your password to do anything with it.

With a watching only wallet, if a hacker gets your wallet file, they can't do anything other than see your balance and transactions... there are no private keys or seeds stored in a watching only wallet. It is simply a collection of public keys/addresses. You could publish a watching only wallet online with 1,000,000 BTC in it... and no-one would be able to steal your coins Tongue
7125  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [TUTORIAL] How to extract Bitcoin Gold from a 2fa Electrum Wallet [STEP BY STEP] on: December 11, 2017, 01:03:58 AM
The min fees are 1000 satoshis, if you put an amount below nodes will not accept neither relay your transactions, I tried with my bgold client, modified the minfees so it accepts a tx with less than 1000 satoshis and then of course the tx remained stucked in my node (because others just did not accept the tx)
The min fees are 1000 satoshis PER KILOBYTE... which is 1 satoshi/byte

Check this: https://btgexplorer.com/tx/d0edcd2491d5f609125afdd1aa02c6974b9b7c787f98e8f698a2bed57e8ae550

they only paid 0.00000137 BTG or 137 satoshis... it confirmed fine.  Tongue



Quote
- you don't have to sync a full node + wallet (most painful part)
- you don't have to make the complicate cli commands above (painful too)
- you don't have to make calculations for the amount and fees (not very difficult but easy to make mistakes)
Opinion?
You forgot to mention:
- You have to pay 0.78% to the developer Wink

Seriously tho, I can see how this would be a little easier for some folks who don't want to (or can't) figure out how to use createrawtransaction and signrawtransaction... or don't want to wait a few days to download the BTG blockchain (or don't have the space).



See https://github.com/BTCGPU/BTCGPU/issues/238#issuecomment-350555210
Beware, many things are dubious in this tutorial (and in this thread), don't use it or at your own risks
Can you please expand on what you think is "dubious" exactly? It is easy to make such claims... but I don't see anything obviously wrong with this method. In fact, I have used pretty much the same method at least twice to help different different people "rescue" their BTG from an Electrum 2FA wallet.

Or is it just that you're worried you're not getting your 0.78% cut? Roll Eyes

7126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments on: December 11, 2017, 12:01:34 AM
Does anyone else find it a little ironic that you have potential investors claiming that the price of GBYTE is "too high compared to IOTA"... and current investors claiming that the price of GBYTE is "too low compared to IOTA" Tongue Roll Eyes

7127  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Claiming Bitcoin Cash and Gold On New Computer and Nano Ledger S? on: December 10, 2017, 11:42:38 PM
Hi there okay when you say bitcoin qt, i definitely heard of that.  Thats why im confused when you say bitcoin core.
Bitcoin-QT is just one component (The GUI client) of Bitcoin Core... it also has a background service called "bitcoind" (aka "Bitcoin Daemon") and a command line client called "bitcoin-cli"... Collectively, they form the "application" known as "Bitcoin Core".


Quote
So if your transfer your btc to your nano ledger s... even if you don't use electrum and use that ledger chrome... your btc is still on the blockchain?
That is the whole point of blockchains. It is the immutable record of all bitcoin transactions. Whatever your actually wallet software says is irrelevant. The blockchain is the absolute authority on which address controls what bitcoin.



Quote
So your ledger nano s contains a seed, just like how electrum does right? 
Yes... but unlike Electrum, you can't get access to it after it is initially displayed during the initialisation/setup process.


Quote

So when you create electrum to your ledger, that means what shows currently in your electrum wallet is exactly what it would show when you use the nano ledger s with it.  But on your actual electrum program, you basically only have one address right?  Thus the old one from which you transferred the btc from?  Thus there is no 2nd wallet with its own seed? 
Huh

When you create a wallet using a "hardware device" in Electrum... it will read the "xpub" from the ledger. This "xpub" is a Master Public Key. Electrum will then use this to generate identical bitcoin addresses to the ones generated by the Ledger. So, it knows which addresses to monitor the blockchain for. When it sees transactions relating to these addresses it adds the information to the local copy of the wallet.

So, your Electrum "ledger" wallet will contain the xpub from the Ledger and a bunch of bitcoin addresses generated from that xpub... but no private key information. All it can do is "look" at your addresses/coins. Hence the term, "watching only" wallet.

You can continue to have normal Electrum wallets as well if you want... Electrum lets you have and use multiple wallets.



Quote
Can you explain how would you send btc then when this process goes?  Would you be copying and pasting a btc address to the electrum wallet like you normally do?  Then you click okay send?  But once you do that, that will show up on the ledger s nano with the address and btc and then you look and confirm if its right... then you press okay?
Yes


Quote
But before this, don't you have to type or copy/paste the password that you put in electrum right before you send?  And if you do, is this a new password you create since its obviously not the old password from the old electrum wallet?  Its the password you create for ledger nano s right?
No. It doesn't use passwords for Ledger wallets. It relies on the Ledger being connected and "unlocked" with the PIN. There is currently work in progress to allow Electrum to password protect "watching only" wallets.


Quote
What do you mean exactly if someone steals your electrum ledger wallet?  Do you mean the computer or that file?  But if someone gets your ledger nano s, or both it and your computer, i believe they still need both your password to send the btc from nano ledger s and also a pin number right?
The file. If your computer is hacked and the hacker has your electrum wallet file, they can't do anything because they need the ledger device to get the private keys. If they have your device as well, then they need your PIN (3 guesses and it gets wiped).


Also wanted to ask.. what other coins do you keep in your nano ledger s?  Also you are using the trezor as well?  
Yes... I strongly believe in redundancy and backups.


Quote
If so,  do you download wallet for each coin or do you keep it on the exchange?
I don't keep anything on an exchange any longer than it takes to buy/sell. "If you don't control the keys, you don't control the coins" Tongue
7128  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Do Not Use Electron Cash! on: December 10, 2017, 10:33:15 PM
Most likely, yes...

It would seem that your wallet still thinks it has certain inputs which have already been spent on the blockchain, so the server you're trying to send through is rejecting because it can see they're spent.

You might want to check what server you're connected to. Earlier versions of ElectronCash had a bad habit of connecting to BTC servers Tongue If it isn't synchronised within 10 minutes, something is seriously wrong.
7129  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: How to claim BItcoin diamond and BTG?anyone help? on: December 10, 2017, 10:26:19 PM
"claim" is just terminology that become popular from the airdrop stuff where you had to "claim" tokens or coins or whatever by signing messages from addresses to prove ownership etc.

With the Bitcoin forks, you don't really "claim" anything. Like you said, when there is fork, a "snapshot" occurs at the point of the fork and your private keys now have value on the forked blockchain.

A possibly more "correct" term would be something like "access". ie. "To access your BTG you need to install BitcoinGold Core...", "You can access your BTG by sweeping private keys using Coinomi" etc

7130  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Producing a deterministic wallet on: December 10, 2017, 10:19:13 PM
So, say I sell 1 BTC. If I then use the wallet.dat file with BitcoinABC, will the equivalent BCH still be available?
Yes. Like I said... it doesn't matter what you do with BTC AFTER the fork... the BCH remains associated with the the private key/address and will only move when a properly created/signed BCH transaction is broadcast and confirmed on the BCH blockchain.


Quote
The only way I can see this working is if the BTC and BCH details are now both in the wallet.dat file. Is this the case?
No. The wallet really just contains the private keys (technically it does contain some transaction information, but this can be altered/removed). The important data are the private keys. Everything else can be retrieved from the Blockchain.


Quote
Presumably it would be a useful upgrade to Bitcoin-QT if it would show and allow transactions for both BTC and BCH.
No. That would be a mess. It is "slow" enough now having to maintain/scan one blockchain... having the same app have to download/process/validate TWO 150+Gig blockchains would be terrible.

Besides, you'll find that the BCH version (Bitcoin ABC)... is also called Bitcoin-QT Roll Eyes The reasons for this are mostly political. Undecided
7131  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Can we cancel an unconfirmed transaction? on: December 10, 2017, 10:10:48 PM
Replace-by-fee isn't really a double spend. A double spending TX is using already used inputs, creating a conflicting transaction.
Where to properly execute a replace-by-fee you need to have a flag set in the first transaction, which indicates that the fee might be changed in future.
Depends on the individual node's feature set.. Not all nodes support RBF and/or recognise "RBF" as valid... so these nodes will flag the "2nd" RBF transaction as an attempted double spend.

Nodes that support RBF, are designed to drop the first transaction when they receive the 2nd RBF transaction that meets the RBF conditions.
7132  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Ledger chrome app on: December 10, 2017, 10:05:21 PM
That certainly doesn't sound right... Mine updated in less than 5 seconds! Shocked

The Ledger Manager briefly displayed "Restoring MCU..." and then the Ledger device went to the PIN entry screen. Is your device just sitting on the "Bootloader" screen? If so, it seems that maybe your USB port or the USB cable are not working and that the computer is simply not detecting your Ledger. Huh

If you plug the device in, and enter the PIN without having "Ledger Manager" or "Ledger Bitcoin Wallet" open... does windows actually detect the device?
7133  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Transaction pending for several days. on: December 10, 2017, 10:01:11 AM
I've just accelerated this using ViaBTC... hopefully they're find a block or two soon... given they haven't found one in a few hours (prior to the one about 30 minutes ago), they may have quite a queue of accelerated transactions built up... This could mean it might take them a couple of blocks to include your transaction. Still, it should probably confirm some time in the next 6 hours or so (at a guess)
7134  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Segwit on: December 10, 2017, 09:59:25 AM
Like I said... ONLY if your wallet is supporting SegWit addresses properly... You might like to read: https://bitcoincore.org/en/segwit_wallet_dev/

The "native" SegWit address specifications are NOT finalised. But if your SegWit address starts with a "3", you shouldn't have any issues... the network can't tell it apart from legacy "3" addresses used for MultiSig etc... at least, not until you attempt to spend.
7135  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Generating multiple receiving addresses on: December 10, 2017, 09:55:28 AM
View -> Show Console
7136  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin transaction 0.0003616 fee's (help) on: December 10, 2017, 09:46:05 AM
Can't actually find your transaction on B.info, blockexporer, blockcypher, blocktrail or btc.com... I don't think it has propagated very well. Undecided  As such, it is likely that a lot of the miners can't actually see your transaction.

If you can get the raw transaction hex, you might want to try broadcasting it via some of the services listed here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_broadcasting
7137  Other / MultiBit / Re: multibit Classic Password Issue on: December 10, 2017, 09:32:05 AM
So my question is, would that be a password I chose or that Multibit assigned for me? If it's assigned then I think I'm screwed because I can't find anything saved anywhere... if I chose it myself I'll keep trying variations I've used over the years.
Definitely one you chose... MultiBit Classic, by default, creates wallets without a password. You have to explicitly add one to the wallet yourself.

If you have any experience with the command line and/or Python, you might find that btcrecover by gurnec (https://github.com/gurnec/btcrecover) might be of some assistance to crack your password.
7138  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Segwit on: December 10, 2017, 08:25:19 AM
1) OK. But Segwit with Electrum and Trezor should be compatible with other Segwit Wallets?
Trezor is using "3"-type (aka P2SH-P2WKH) SegWit addresses... I'm not sure if you can actually specify if Electrum should import the SegWit or Legacy wallet from a hardware wallet like Trezor or Ledger... I think it will just import the "legacy" wallet "xpub" from the device.


Quote
2) What happens when I try to send FROM "other wallets ("3" type)" to Electrum SegWit ("bc1" type).
Is there an error? Or would I lose my coins? What would happen?
If they support bech32 addresses... it should send just fine... if they don't they will more than likely give a "invalid address" error.


Quote
3) Is there a reason never to use Segwit and stick with the legend addresses? Can this be any advantage?
Any fork that doesn't support SegWit will make claiming fork coins difficult. Also, there is currently no method for signing messages from a SegWit address ("3" or "bc1")... so participating in some ICO's and/or AirDrops could be problematic if you have a SegWit wallet.

Also, it will mean you can only migrate to a SegWit supporting wallet in the future...
7139  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Ledger chrome app on: December 10, 2017, 08:13:42 AM
Ok i have firmware 1.3 but MCU is 1.0 and should be 1.1
i find this article but is not working for me
https://www.reddit.com/r/ledgerwallet/comments/70b1ys/update_to_mcu_firmware_11/

As per the reddit post from "btchip":
"Yes, you can update to MCU 1.1 by connecting the device to Ledger Manager while in bootloader mode (boot while holding the left button) - that's not necessary if your device isn't strangely freezing from time to time though"

In any case, I just tried this and it worked fine.

- Open up the Ledger Manager
- Hold down the "left" button on the Ledger Nano S (on my this is the one nearest the usb port)
- While still holding down the left button, connect the Ledger Nano S to the computer
- Keep holding the button

The Ledger Nano S should start up (you'll see the Ledger logo, then it should say "Bootloader" and the MCU will autoupdate
7140  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Please Help My BTC Transaction Got STUCK :((( on: December 10, 2017, 08:03:19 AM
Acceleration succeeded with ViaBtc, your TX should be in the next block Smiley
You mean... "the next block that ViaBTC mine"

Given they haven't found one for a couple of hours, hopefully they'll get one soon.
Pages: « 1 ... 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 [357] 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 ... 514 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!