You will have to do as you feel. As it tells on the reporting page, you should not worry too much about the accuracy.
The mod will then decide. From what you write here, the topic could deserve to be moved to gambling discussion.

So they've created it, they're promoting it, but they didn't buy at under 1$, or under 200$, or under 1000$, they'll invest now...
Would this mean that until now they didn't believe in the product they created and they promoted?
Does this truly make sense for you? Really?

I am 99% sure it's completely unrelated to Dogecoin and its supporters.
As said, at soon as there is something that can be exploited for FUD, most usual being the longer corrections, the FUD comes up in full strength.
In my eyes it's some entities (even traders) desperate attempt to buy Bitcoin cheaper (every $ matters) by shaking the weak hands and newbies.
It has happened before, it will happen in the future. In the era of fake news, FUD can be seen somehow similar to guerrilla marketing.

Yes, if hash rate drops, the number of mined blocks / day decreases.
The "bidding war" for fees is however there, with or without the drop in hash rate. Those who want their transaction confirmed fast will have to pay more than the rest.


Every 2016 blocks the difficulty is re-adjusted. That is usually at 2 weeks, but of course, when the blocks slow down, this time will be also longer.
At the adjustment we should get back to one block at every ~10 minutes.


Keep in mind that after getting back to normal the number of incoming transactions during week will still be high. So the mempool (the waiting transactions) will clear up only in the week-ends.
Also keep in mind that many may withhold their transactions until "better times" and they may send them after the next difficulty adjustment.
So the mempool will clear up:
* in time, slowly, mostly in week-ends and when there's a somewhat cool down, but also when the price doesn't fluctuates too much
* at some point the Chinese miners will come back online and then the hash rate will rise by a great deal, getting to much faster blocks and should clear up the current mess

This may worth watching. Kimi's car and radio discussion when the crash has happened and all the debris. https://twitter.com/F1/status/1384405723732451332

Also a short summary for last race, looks pretty much accurate 

Also in terms of profitability, it's still apples and oranges. 1 MH/s for one coin will not pay the same as 1 MH/s for another coin and also different from 1 TH/s for another coin.
Find online some profitability calculators, hopefully some that are more up-to-date, and enter all the details, including the coin. Then you'll see how you stay with the profitability.

For the sake of discussion, I'll ignore the fact that you are many years too late and this naming won't change.
I'll come to the fact that your... assumptions... are wrong.

Merriam-Webster doesn't really take country/government in discussion when it defines currency. Even more, it tells that in the past even furs were used as currency.

In teorie sunt de acord cu tine, la orice informatie ar trebui aflat de la cineva stie, in acest caz cineva care a patit-o.

Doar ca:
1. Cardurile crypto sunt inca relativ noi, iar ANAF poate sa vina sa te intrebe de sanatate si dupa 4-5 ani.
2. Sunt destul de putine persoane active in aceasta zona.

Asa ca din pacate ma astept ca raspunsurile pe care le primesti sa fie doar logica si banuieli.



Din ceea ce ma astept, pentru ANAF nu este vreo diferenta intre a scoate banii si sa-ti iei laptop (sau Tesla) cu acei bani, si a cumpara direct cu crypto.

Thanks for this. If I may have been somewhat uncertain about the state of this bull run, now I am sure it's not over. The more this kind of posts the better for my state of mind.

I don't know.. should I pretend you are serious and advise you zoom out the price chart to see the big picture?

Indeed, the remaining miners receive fatter transaction fees.

But those out of business receive nothing. They have a lot of hardware staying unused and getting older with every moment passing. Plus that they probably have people they have to pay, maybe rent for the space too.
That's not profitable for them and I would expect them do their best to get back in business, the sooner the better.

Yes, I am aware that the difficulty period will be about 30% longer than the usual 2 weeks, but on the other hand I didn't also rule out that China could, with some luck, get back to business before that time.
Just after the things get to normal, this mess has to also clear up. That part I didn't really count...

You do have a point, but the older/old school tracks tend to be too dangerous. And especially Imola has it's own dark history.
I won't mind if they put gravel as long as the walls are not too close and the cars don't get totaled.

So you've simply thrown away 9000$ worth of Bitcoin just because you were angry.
No, I don't buy that. Nice story, but no.
I like fiction, I like drama, but no. If you were at least selling those, then it would have been making sense, but as it is now, no.

Unfortunately accidents have happened - read the news - making the network, instead of clearing up, getting even more full. And the situation is expected to go worse for at least one more week. Sorry. It's an unusual situation and you were unlucky.


That ETA is an estimation. And in this case it's far from accurate.

You will have to also (solo) mine a block that contains that transaction and that block will have to be also accepted by the other nodes.
So.. nope.

I would guess that it's, amongst others, for security reasons.
If it's not easily visible then they may spend some actual effort to hide it. And I would expect as part of this strategy, to actually have a bigger number of cold wallets, to avoid having it outstanding in the top richest addresses.

No.
You would have to solo mine and actually find blocks in order to have that working.
And since you'll have only one miner, you may have better chance for winning the lottery...

Actually the free accelerator has to be used first for the parent transaction, which is also unconfirmed and also with 44-45 sat/vByte. Without that being confirmed, afaik the current transaction won't be accepted.

According to Willy Woo on twitter, somebody how was expecting the hash rate issue has deposited 9000BTC just a few hours before the hash rate drop and may be playing now a bear game.
Imho it's as good guess as any, still may worth mentioning...

Din cate stiu, si Dash/Darkcoin a avut premine. Dar povestea e mai nebuloasa si partial musamalizata, din cate imi amintesc. Si nu o duce rau.


Pai na, daca au pus ceva monezi deoparte si moneda a avut success, bingo! Daca nu..
E un pariu. Si e unul riscant. Asa-i cu proiectele de monede noi.


Corect. Problema este ca s-a erodat increderea in ICO/IPO, si pe buna dreptate. Ca au fost unii care si-au scos banii cu varf si indesat, iar apoi au lasata moneda/proiectul de izbeliste.
Si din pacate sunt mai multi care viseaza sa devina milionari decat cei care vor sa faca niste proiecte ca lumea si utile. Si asta face ca si variantele non ICO sa merite o oarecare atentie.


Bine punctat. Mai ales daca il si convingi ca este 5% din.. posibil multe milioane.