Latest posts of: Timelord2067

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 [360] 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 ... 487 »

7181

Other / Meta / Re: Farmed Accounts TM - Searching for... 19 November 2013

on: December 12, 2016, 11:45:12 PM

Hi @rizzlarolla, I have a strong feeling that these three UID's: 19 November 2013, 02:47:49 Date Registered: Anixs u=163265 http://archive.is/QVXgN 19 November 2013, 05:43:15 Date Registered: Wendigo u=163375 http://archive.is/Ds15V 19 November 2013, 19:37:12 Date Registered: WhiteyZ u=163888 http://archive.is/Ql4eY Are either Alts, or, at the very least are Farmed Accounts ^TM in either case I was wondering if: Using these three as templates, can you trawl through their post history and compare their posting patterns (ie once per fortnight, same day ie Monday, that sort of thing) and then if their patterns are similar over a period of time, then using that pattern to sweep for other UIDs that are also farmed?

7182

Economy / Currency exchange / Re: (WTB) ~5 BTC

on: December 12, 2016, 10:35:30 PM

This is from today in the [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone thread: http://archive.is/l5HmP#selection-8743.0-8828.2 Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 12, 2016, 10:17:57 PM Quote from: Wendigo on December 12, 2016, 07:04:19 PM Nice findings everyone. As I frequent the Gambling section I have noticed that members of the FortuneJack campaign post one after another in the same threads and the posting patterns are suspiciously similar and in the back of my mind I have always thought something fishy is going on but couldn't put my finger on it and now everything is revealed and nicely laid out for everyone to see. I don't think such ravenous and brutal sockpuppeting should be allowed. I totally agree. 19 November 2013, 02:47:49 Date Registered: Anixs u=163265 http://archive.is/QVXgN 19 November 2013, 05:43:15 Date Registered: Wendigo u=163375 http://archive.is/Ds15V 19 November 2013, 19:37:12 Date Registered: WhiteyZ u=163888 http://archive.is/Ql4eY This is the third UID in a month to have a Date Registered: 19 November 2013 to join a conversation unexpectedly that I've been in. When did you buy your account? They've all signed up for coinroll too...

7183

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 12, 2016, 10:24:06 PM

Quote from: hilariousandco on December 12, 2016, 06:35:36 PM I messaged FortuneJack about it and they said they're going to relaunch the campaign: Quote from: FortuneJack on December 12, 2016, 06:21:39 PM Hello, Thank you for messaging us. We are aware of the issue and we will announce today that this campaign is closed New campaign will have stricter rules and we will control the posts thoroughly. There's probably a few more users on the FJ campaign with numerous alts that are not related to the above ones. The 777 signature campaign is another breeding ground with two separate threads running concurrently (at least they were the last time I looked) Both should be locked (to prevent editing etc) and a new single one started with stricter rules.

7184

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 12, 2016, 10:17:57 PM

Quote from: Wendigo on December 12, 2016, 07:04:19 PM Nice findings everyone. As I frequent the Gambling section I have noticed that members of the FortuneJack campaign post one after another in the same threads and the posting patterns are suspiciously similar and in the back of my mind I have always thought something fishy is going on but couldn't put my finger on it and now everything is revealed and nicely laid out for everyone to see. I don't think such ravenous and brutal sockpuppeting should be allowed. I totally agree. 19 November 2013, 02:47:49 Date Registered: Anixs u=163265 http://archive.is/QVXgN 19 November 2013, 05:43:15 Date Registered: Wendigo u=163375 http://archive.is/Ds15V 19 November 2013, 19:37:12 Date Registered: WhiteyZ u=163888 http://archive.is/Ql4eY This is the third UID in a month to have a Date Registered: 19 November 2013 to join a conversation unexpectedly that I've been in. When did you buy your account? They've all signed up for coinroll too...

7185

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 12, 2016, 12:23:43 PM

Quote from: Killimanjaro on December 12, 2016, 12:06:13 PM report rajasumi3 and rajasumi2 Miiike 's beaten you to it I'm afraid to say: Quote from: Miiike on December 12, 2016, 10:02:25 AM Quote from: rajasumi2 on December 12, 2016, 05:19:29 AM Quote from: rajasumi2 on December 12, 2016, 03:54:37 AM Quote from: rajasumi2 on December 12, 2016, 03:53:47 AM Quote from: rajasumi2 on October 20, 2016, 05:50:08 AM Name-rajasumi2 Posts-252 Activity -126 Member -full member Bitcoin address-1242KoW4oeRYYFpjv5vvoUJvf5GZe6gur6 I would like to join .plz accept me .thank u its me .in ur spreadsheet its name is written as rajsumi2 .but thats wrong . Quote from: rajasumi3 on December 12, 2016, 09:21:27 AM Dear secondstrade please update my bitcoin address as i have given it wrong . My btc address is 1DWzYNxq9exJbrz5oWEynCV4Gurw6uJH1P Wait . . . . are these altaccounts? If it is, you just put yourself into a big trouble by self-admitting altaccounts under same campaign. Admin, your call. (archieved for further reference)

7186

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 12, 2016, 12:21:06 PM

Quote from: dustboy on December 12, 2016, 10:44:29 AM I'm not so sure if Opal Wallet can be used as a proof, but I just wanna share it : boopy265420 use Opal address Quote from: boopy265420 on February 24, 2015, 07:38:41 PM Opal Address: ocpkMdkqmHuDFMm5qV3Cb9wMYHZ4zJvP7k buddu Quote from: buddu on February 24, 2015, 08:49:25 PM My OPAL = ocXBvW8aj1f3baKegMq91eWFjpYMvZsDFY trafficolaa Quote from: trafficolaa on February 24, 2015, 08:50:52 PM My Opal Address: oVvTbVM9vDqHJCewd9fb5Z2CYbQ2QLkXKh All posts Archived Part of opal wallet : https://chainz.cryptoid.info/opal/wallet.dws?18498.htm IF IT CAN BE USED TO PROVE THAT THEIR OPAL ADDRESSES ARE FROM THE SAME WALLET THEN THE CONCLUSION IS : (Snip) All above accounts + boopy = managed by 1 person only ? IS THIS FOR REAL? NEED Timelord2067 or other experts on this to crosscheck.. On the surface it looks like they are from the same Wallet. Code: ocpkMdkqmHuDFMm5qV3Cb9wMYHZ4zJvP7k 0.0 ocXBvW8aj1f3baKegMq91eWFjpYMvZsDFY 0.0 oVvTbVM9vDqHJCewd9fb5Z2CYbQ2QLkXKh 0.0 oQdsj7L7AqKnuSVV3RykjUJ7fNhWbeXGWj 0.0 oHJ5gvuU3fhRd4g9m41VsLGbD4jvD8Z8dL 0.0 However, we have to take into consideration: Quote This feature is very experimental, inaccurate and not updated in real-time I didn't know chainz.cryptoid.info did this kind of thing... I managed to find a paper wallet I have for an Alt coin and as expected, it shows the incoming transactions but not an expected wallet, nore other Wallet Addresses... It seems to be correct, - I'd need to dig out some old Alt Coin Wallets that haven't been updated in a long time and see if it displays correctly for other Alt Coins. Thanks for the info.

7187

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 11, 2016, 11:23:45 PM

Quote from: Chris! on December 11, 2016, 01:21:36 PM Idk how the hell you do this. That's insane. I started to scroll down, my jaw dropped, then I kept scrolling... and scrolling... Wow. I'll have a look through it but I'll have to start when I have some time haha. I'm still doing everything on my phone until I find a laptop that I like so I'm a little slower than I'd like to be. I knew there would be a ton more alts when I saw the connection to the ~12 you had already found. Part of it is to go through every thing. Certainly start with Wallet Addresses; they can't be fudged. Move onto anything such as Twitter and Facebook profile names that are used. Other Alt coin Wallet Addresses, or claiming in a signature campaign. Then go through every post via their post history, at 20 (or is it 30?) posts per page, you can scroll past text until you find what you are looking for (make sure you have a list (and check it twice ) before you look to see if they've ~~been naughty or nice~~ scammed. Archiving is what slows things down. Archive as you go; not after you've got everything in place, you'll forget to archive something. Here are the codes to properly display [BTC]onFIRE and [btc]onfire1 Code: [nobbc][BTC]onFIRE[/nobbc] [nobbc][btc]onfire1[/nobbc] Oh and having a text file open to occasionally save your work to is handy in-case you get logged out or there is a power failure. (and preview your work as you go - it acts as an auto save and you can spot those mistakes as you go) On a personal level, the Level of awesomeness seems to be per post, not per Alt identified, so both of our posts concerning [BTC]onFIRE will count as just one on the awesomeness scale. Regards,

7188

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 11, 2016, 11:09:06 PM

Quote from: shorena on December 11, 2016, 07:56:08 PM Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 10, 2016, 10:25:22 PM Quote from: shorena on December 10, 2016, 04:38:49 PM I stated a few posts back that I will not accept a link to that page as proof for connections between addresses. Id like to be able to verify the information. Linking to walletexplorer makes it easy for the accuser and tedious for the verifier. I prefer the SHA-2 way, difficult to find, easy to verify. Others on DT might see this differently, its just my personal view. You mean like how two Alts will create PGP Keys withing days of each-other as proof they are Alts? That kind of thing? I wouldnt not accept that either, yes. "But of course you would say that." I'm sorry you feel my work isn't up to your own high standards. Without the proof of Wallet Addresses being in the same Wallet, or such things as coinciding dates, you've set yourself a pretty high bar to hurdle, and I'm kind of stumped what you would accept as proof?

7189

Other / Meta / Re: Account hacked

on: December 11, 2016, 10:58:28 PM

Quote from: Clement Kaliyar on December 11, 2016, 02:06:33 PM @Timelord2067 That is one hell of a detailing my dear friend. I know you have spent an aweful lot of time investigating this scam or fraudster .You are indeed a scam buster and hats off to you and my question is is it possible to file an FIR against these individuals for fraud as i have seen an FIR being logged recently in India for scamming 1.5 BTC. I am not sure about how the end results will be but in this case the admins does have their IP address and i expect them to hand over the IP address when there is a police complaint. I wouldn't say exactly that the forum is turning a blind eye to such goings on, but they are leaving it up to the forum's participants to self monitor and dish out a kind of retribution in the form of trust, either positive, neutral or negative depending on the transgression. There's nothing to stop retaliatory negative trust, or indeed false trust from an Alt to give the allusion of trust where non exists. Most of the scams are for a couple of dollars so people aren't likely to go to the police for that kind of coin. Unfortunately, all we can do is build up a profile of the scammers and mark each one accordingly with Red Paint ^TM and hope that punters in future are clued up enough to read the trust trusted, or in my case untrusted, and hope users make an informed decision about what is written.

7190

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 11, 2016, 01:14:03 PM

Quote from: Chris! on December 10, 2016, 02:21:43 PM Accounts connected: [BTC]onFIRE, kompeni (snippy snippy) Hi Chris! I took a different path to yours after that PM we were both sent the other day, my results for [BTC]onFIRE are over Yonder: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179091.msg17148774#msg17148774 if you'd like to cast an eye over my results? There was about a dozen Alts I was able to identify to add onto the nearly 20 others I'd previously identified: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14394021#msg14394021 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14404685#msg14404685 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14404849#msg14404849 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg14405568#msg14405568 (I'll get around to tally up all the UID's etc shortly)

7191

Other / Meta / Re: Account hacked

on: December 11, 2016, 12:38:39 PM

7192

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 10, 2016, 10:25:22 PM

Quote from: shorena on December 10, 2016, 04:38:49 PM I stated a few posts back that I will not accept a link to that page as proof for connections between addresses. Id like to be able to verify the information. Linking to walletexplorer makes it easy for the accuser and tedious for the verifier. I prefer the SHA-2 way, difficult to find, easy to verify. Others on DT might see this differently, its just my personal view. You mean like how two Alts will create PGP Keys withing days of each-other as proof they are Alts? That kind of thing?

7193

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 10, 2016, 10:23:09 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 10, 2016, 09:13:26 PM Quote from: Lauda on December 09, 2016, 08:41:32 AM Quote from: LoyceV on December 09, 2016, 08:23:50 AM Quote from: Chris! on December 08, 2016, 08:04:07 PM I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes? As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet. I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this. Wrong. You can't derive a list of all addresses from a HD wallet unless you have the master public key/xpubkey. FIFY http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FIFY Quote acronym used in message boards, meaning "Fixed it for ya". Most often used in quoting another posters work and slightly changing it. Poster 1 "I really enjoyed 'Brokeback Mountain!'" Poster 2: "<Poster_1>I really enjoy gay sex with cowboys!</Poster_1> FIFY! So obviously the Alt calling itself quickseller has modified one of the posts above, (but that's not to say they don't like gay sex with cowboys...) ...not that there's anything wrong with that - Seinfield...

7194

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 10, 2016, 01:10:45 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on December 09, 2016, 08:23:50 AM Quote from: Chris! on December 08, 2016, 08:04:07 PM I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes? As far as I know, you can't see if addresses came from a HD wallet. The addresses come from the private key, and it's the private key that is created in the HD wallet. I'm no expert, so I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong on this. I think I've missed a couple of posts, are we talking about these types of wallets https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/4bd7a02ff825365c/addresses not being proof enough of connections?

7195

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 08, 2016, 05:52:23 PM

...then again, this is in chixka000 trust: Quote ALT Finder 0: -0 / +0 2016-08-20 0.00000000 ALT OF darklus123 http://archive.is/Nisad http://archive.is/OtAYx#60% *Giving +ve trust to alt account Original Comments: From chixka000 to darklus123 Thank you for helping me sir especially for guiding me in signature campaign

7196

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 08, 2016, 05:49:03 PM

Quote from: chixka000 on December 08, 2016, 04:24:37 PM Well as i have stated above just consider it as a null void if you are not satisfied by the basis, It is my way of conducting an investigation tho (if denied by most of the agents then no problem at all) chixka000 - You are an Alt of Alaki because you both have the letters "A" "I" and "K" in your user name. It's obvious, I don't even need to offer proof. Name: Alaki Posts: 748 Activity: 266 Position: Sr. Member Date Registered: 15 July 2015, 00:56:58 Last Active: 22 June 2016, 12:36:58 Location: Earth (Behind You) As you can see, Alaki registered on a Wednesday, and.... Name: chixka000 Posts: 1556 Activity: 238 Position: Full Member Date Registered: 11 April 2016, 01:12:51 Location: A smart one does not under estimates other persons capability. <<<------ eArth - get it? You registered on a Monday... The hit song "I don't like Mondays" was a hit by the Boom Town Rats and as you can see Alaki was last active on the 22nd of June which was a Wednesday... And then there is "E-A-R-T-H" HIDDEN IN PLAINT VIEW IN YOUR LOCATION. !!! !!! !!! Of course if I really wanted to make comparison's I'd use things like Wallet Addresses / TX / not just stuff above. Which means I haven't really proved you're an alt of Alaki, I was just yanking ya chain...

7197

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 08, 2016, 05:32:54 PM

Quote from: Chris! on December 08, 2016, 01:20:06 PM Update to my last find. I was going through each account's trust and Timelord2067 already tagged sorlunjo. They're all alts of the (in?)famous Engg.Chaks. That obviously warrants a negative in my books. Quote from: Lauda on December 07, 2016, 06:23:49 PM Just how many does this guy have? The plot thickens... New accounts connected: Jog4444, sorlunjo, christinalorine, chr_sty, marlboroza, sporadic06. These are all alts of Engg.Chaks. See this link for Timelord2067's connection to Engg.Chaks and more: Other accounts connected: dio, hothtszho, Engg.Akrepi, hosumfu, louise123e, yingbb0301, sun64986161, kenshi222, williamho, diodio1, retes1234, kovaa, summer11, bank2, banklunjo, retes4321, diodio5, godzerosonic, retes43210, retes12345, Engg.Chaks, y02723942001, sun64986, yinghacked, summer111, summer116, Deacidifyingbbas, sorlunjo, kenshi2121, kenshin77, kenshin_8513, d161616, Engg.Chalks.Returns, chakchaks ~~Working on links to profiles arm~~ Done. This was a bit nuts to stumble upon as you can imagine. If I find connections that link two accounts (ie Alts) then I will mark them neutral, if they are scammers, I will give them Red Paint ^TM - but, I shouldn't have to be the only one who marks them. If someone else finds a connection, they should also mark the Alts. I'm not saying all of them, but certainly the ones they have connected. Chris! How are your finds connected? You haven't said.

7198

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Hackahammer defaulted loan

on: December 08, 2016, 11:06:29 AM

I'm impressed how much stress and grief has been caused by a whole (correct me if this figure is wrong) a whole three dollars and eighty-four point one cents in USA dollars. Really? This is me slow clapping people. FUDsters and the like are eroding this forum for a whole $ 3.841 USD and we're debating the merits of tagging a defaulted loan collateral as though a college trust fund were hanging in the balance? I have no problem Red Painting ^TM a defaulted loan collateral (and the loan defaulter to target two UIDs at once) if it whittles down the number of Legendary or Hero accounts to a handful who are genuine UID's who engage in the community. True, people might fall on hard times, but $ 3.841 is a quick fix for a gambler, not some-one needing to pay the rent. You wouldn't put your dick in someone elses mouth for $ 3.841 would you?

7199

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 07, 2016, 04:46:50 AM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on December 07, 2016, 03:49:17 AM Supposedly, the Cloverdale account was sold and no longer owned by stiffbud. Can you copy / paste the URL included in the message please?

7200

Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

on: December 06, 2016, 10:28:35 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on December 06, 2016, 09:46:46 AM Quote from: Lauda on December 03, 2016, 10:55:57 PM If we decide on more colors, then I'll be sure to expand this. I think that red and purple will be sufficient for now. As a more intuitive way to display, I want to suggest ~~Banned~~. That way, you can combine the two too: ~~Banned and red~~. Quote from: MICRO on December 06, 2016, 12:56:04 AM Yes, we do run IP matching checks after we have final list from bitcoin talk. Can you post the matching accounts here? The purple might be borrowed from where I used it in the Spambots (backlink spam and whatnot) - ie Zombie Accounts TM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1660106.0 thread for those accounts that had not just been Nuked, but also deleted. Perhaps another colour to denote banned such as orange or even teal?

Pages: « 1 ... 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 [360] 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 ... 487 »