The real reason why QS is far from trustworthy and quite the opposite is because he has a long, established history of flat out lying about things. For years he's been taking personal grudges and turning them into baseless accusations, posting hundreds of times in accusatory threads even after it has been explained to him repeatedly why he is mistaken.

Let's go through some of them:

Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer - completely fabricated allegation based 100% on conjecturing and without real, substantiating evidence of claims

Is theymos okay with Blazed being on DT1 when he refuses to account for x00 btc - another series of unsubstantiated allegations in an attempt to damage the standing of Blazed, lauda, and minerjones

owlcatz dox information - doxing attempt on a user who did not scam anybody, not much more needs to be said

Former Staff member Lauda has a pill addiction - not a single shred of evidence produced by QS in 9 pages of discussion

Scammer TMAN - vindictive nonsense demonstrated to be wholly inaccurate

minerjones backing out of multiple auctions - posted in Scam Accusations even though no one had been scammed, clearly a smear attempt on MJ's reputation

Requesting proof of trade between Zepher and TMAN[Zepher engaging in fake trades - QS believes the lack of blockchain evidence on the forum of a trade between 2 highly trusted members warrants a thread claiming they are engaging in "fake trades"

Dooglus is supporting ponzis - Scam Accusation against dooglus for fixing bugs in a script known to be used by Ponzis (he never scammed anyone, nor said he "supported ponzis")

He does have some insightful threads and posts from time to time, but based on the whole of his behavior over the years, I wouldn't trust QS with a wooden nickel.

We'll keep an eye on them. Funny how the 3 accounts you mentioned above have a total of 1 post between the 3 of them. They were probably created as account squats... Wonder if somebody purchased all 3 or simply created all 3 and failed to sell them.

Oh, LFC and killyou72's advice was also pretty good. Trolling is clearly your end goal because you steamrolled over their advice (and mine).


OK but only if its a no-collateral loan. According to your trust summary you have a "high risk of losing money" and I'm not sure I'd feel safe giving you my collateral.

This is fucking interesting stuff... I'd like to read that whole transcript. Sounds like there is no trust and Craig might still lose in court! So that means that not only would he not be Satoshi but he'd be on the hook for repaying hundreds of millions of dollars as well... Not a good day to be a Faketoshi.

I actually gave you the best advice you're going to get in this thread and you drowned it out with clearly off-topic insults and ranting. Don't know what more you expect. Redemption?

Quoted for future posterity.

Sorry CH, nothing would prevent people from knowing that you are CH -- your ego won't let you hide yourself. Anybody can tell that its you. You praise yourself far too often and go on raving, long-winded rants about the exact same subjects you did with your last account, with an equal amount of futility. You also use the same colloquial terms not shared by other members of the forum. You stand out from a mile away. Theymos didn't have to look at any IP information to know that you are cryptohunter. Neither do any of us.

The best way to test out a flag is to leave it and see if it gets supported or not. Don't use it as an excuse to again air your tired personal grievances. If you know an injustice was committed, post your flag, and see what kind of a response it gets. Don't pretend to be asking for guidance when you really just want to rehash the same old drama in a new context. Nobody is going to help you out here because everybody knows what your end goal is.

Quit dodging the question. Is theymos a liar or not?


No, no I had not considered that. I don't think anybody had considered that you are not cryptohunter to be honest.

Back to the topic at hand, you are free to leave your own flags. You don't need to conduct a "community consensus" on everything that you do or think. Just do it. Meta is no longer the correct section to ask such questions. Might as well move your consensus-building topics to Reputation, and then you can self-moderate them.

So basically you are saying theymos is a liar? He wrote that post on May 2nd, and you've only gotten worse since then. Your lies are now more out of control than ever. This forum has its fair share of trolls, which you are one of. So, have fun doing what you do best, I guess...

BTW, nobody "lurks" since 2010. Your claim would be supported by much greater evidence if you actually had an account that dated back a few years. Say to maybe April 2013 or something...

OK so you're not an alt of anyone (let's just ignore the fact that this is a blatant lie) and your trust history saying you are cryptohunter is just a "poor reflection" of the state of the trust system. Why should anyone care what you have to say about matters that happened well before your time? You're just a Jr Member who has only been on the forum since earlier this year. How did you develop such an ingrained, biased, nuanced opinion of things that happened years before you were a member?

You should let more senior accounts that are far more familiar with the history of forum matters than you deal with new changes to the trust system. Just sit back and... well... do whatever it is that you "do" when you're not bitching about the forum.

Also, I think your thread title needs more question marks.

This makes no sense. All honest projects announce their team members at the time they publish their website.


Yes, Justin Sun did get caught plagiarizing parts of the Ethereum white paper. They got caught and re-wrote their white paper. That's no excuse for you to think that plagiarism is OK. Its just a sign of laziness and lack of dedication or belief in your own project.


Sounds like you should find a new job.


That's not true at all. You're just highly uncreative. You copied an idea and used it as an excuse to market your own product. Then you hired a thread bumping service to generate fake conversation around your project. These are tactics used by scammers.

If you're not a scam, then why do you not have any information about your team? What are you hiding from?

You plagiarized content written by others, you didn't just take their idea. You had enough money to hire a thread bumping service, which was a stupid move, because that's what led me to your project. You hired professional spammers but you don't want to do an ICO... well I'm sure you're attempting to make money somehow or you wouldn't have launched this project.

There's no reason for anybody to invest in an anonymous copy of somebody else's idea. You really should just start over and be more original next time. Also be prepared to be criticized for not announcing your team members. Really what would be best is if you just advertised your project elsewhere.

SCAM WARNING

Now I know why you didn't publish your team: your project is a copy of a previous ICO called Experty.

Your white paper heavily plagiarizes theirs. For example, from your white paper:


From Experty white paper:


You simply put their text through a word spinner and voila! Instant white paper!  

Like really guys. This is cheesy as hell. You didn't even bother to check if the word spinner text made sense (it doesn't).

You should be ashamed of yourselves for being dishonest and wasting everybody's time, including your own.

Let's see:

1. No team.
2. Plagiarized white paper.
3. Hired spammer service to bump thread.

Its safe to say that THIS PROJECT IS A SCAM.


Everywhere you go, I will be there to expose whatever morons hired you as the scammers they are. Your thread bumping service is also a scam identification service. Have fun talking to yourself for a living while you still can.

LoL

The Presiding Council of Esteemed WODTs do thereby motion to Approve said flagitude of one "realr0ach" for forum crimes of fallaciousness, unscrupulousnness, and general assholery, sentencing him to a lifetime of shunning by the community.

So let it be written, so let it be done.

This isn't true. A lot of your team members worked for Bitsane or still work for them, including Bitsane

-co founder
-head of marketing
-business development director
-head of statistics
-senior analyst
-technical director

In your white paper it sounds like the two companies are completely tied together:



Most of the comments on the Bitsane twitter page are from customers who are getting locked out of their accounts and/or can't withdraw their coins.

Here's another recent tweet:


I read through a lot of Bitsane reviews and for the most part it seems like an OK operation, however, if this is how you leave your customers hanging, what would stop you from doing the same thing to Azbit customers once you close that operation?

Because most of the time team members want to remain anonymous because they plan on pulling a scam at some point, or at best they don't want to be held responsible when their project fails, so they don't have to answer to their investors.

Not saying your team and project necessarily fits either of these categories, but it is better to be skeptical than trusting around here, based on the general history of Altcoin Announcements and how their projects pan out.

I strongly suggest you change your approach to listing team members. What you have now is even less effective than not mentioning the issue altogether.

No! It never has! Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. There's a big difference, and that's one of the biggest misconceptions people have about cryptocurrency. Only privacy-centric coins like XMR and Dash offer any degree of anonymity.

Your discord developer probably ended up being a scammer. The reason why devs of most projects want to remain anonymous: they don't want to deal with real-life consequences when they pull a scam on their investors, or if the project should go belly-up for other reasons.

99% of the time the reason a dev wants to remain anonymous is either because they are a scammer or they fear their project will fail and they don't want to reimburse their investors. There is no reason to invest in any crypto-related project with an anonymous team.

Hindi pwede, lol. If I did I would have to use Google Translate, and then you could tell, because it doesn't do a terrific job.

I am, however, great at giving directions.

Deretso lang.
Atapos kaliwa tayo.
Atapos kanaan.
Dito lang.
OK thanks. Keep the change.


Merit sent. Walang anuman.

What's new:

Woke up to "99+" unread messages, thought I was extremely popular for a moment
Discovered Bitcoin SV had finally learned how to delete messages from a self-moderated thread

What's old:

Newcomers arguing with roach
Drama concerning the trust system

It was interesting waking up to see my unread messages at "99+".

But I was sorely disappointed to see it was just because Bitcoin SV had finally learned how to delete messages from a self-moderated thread.

For a second I thought I was just popular.  


The thing is nobody needs to be paid to troll SV. This shit trolls itself.

Gonna be a lonely thread over there from now on, I can guarantee you that.

I welcome their trolls to continue to invade our threads uninhibited. We don't do that self-moderated crap around here.

This is true breher. However, the way the current system is designed, its now much more obvious than ever when somebody is abusing it, so that's a step up.


Still a step up. See how being included in the Great Trust Circle Jerk Club can also have a positive effect on people?