Again cryptofrka,  I don't see how I'm the 2nd most beneficiary of free points.  Most people in division 2 got 6 free points,  like 3 -4 persons if I'm not being wrong. I don't know how you counted Kanapka match as free point to me  when I literally won that due 6-3,. Matter of fact,  that game put me on goals disadvantage because 3 goals was deducted from me because Kanapka disqualification.

Problem kod untraceable assets je što predstavljaju trn u oku svim regulatorima. Vjerujem da je Binance upravo zato i odlučio delistati XMR da im regulator ne bi mogao prigovoriti da trguju s untraceable kriptovalutama. Taj "trn u oku" me uvijek odbijao da uložim u XMR ili neku sličnu "anonimnu" kriptovalutu jer ne znam kakve su mogućnosti zabrane od strane regulatora. Jasno mi je da ne mogu "zatvoriti" Monero ali možda mogu nekako zabraniti korištenje i držanje. Nisam se nikad previše pozabavio istraživanjem kako Monero radi te što se može, a što ne s njim pa zato i nisam siguran kakve su mogućnosti njegove zabrane. Evo jedno konkretno pitanje... Zašto svi autori crypto-lockera traže otkupninu u BTC, a ne u XMR? BTC je traceable, a XMR nije. Sumnjam da ljudi koji rade crypto-lockere to ne znaju.

...

So I don't really get this. Maybe, I would now recommend to rule out any possible questions that settle within 5 hours of deadline. If truely we care about people with timezone difference, this is the most fair.

Yes, that was the one!

And I was on the wrong side of it because I didn't see and apparently someone even posted the news on this thread, but it was not voided. I don't even remember whether or not I lost the round or not because of the question or not, I really don't care about that. I really just want a one house, one accord stuff as usual here, not having people pointing one finger out with 4 circling back and all that, it's a great job folks are doing here and if we start having people throwing double standards accusations, we won't be here for longer than we have been.

This makes the most sense to me then, of course I'd agree that it doesn't happen often.

However, I understand how hell a of tough job CRO2 is doing, and I don't undermine that, but possibly if we can eliminate this kind of scenarios all together would be better going forward ? Scenarios where the first game doesn't get started or have half of it settled before the deadline, because I'm there are a lot of cases when the first question is a H2H question and then there is about 1-2 question settled of a possible 4 or 5, it still put us in a situation of having a few with an unfair advantage especially if they can make the most of it and their time zones still permit them to submit just in time before the deadline.

The time for the match was already set when the questions came, so this scenario should have been known by everyone who did the job of checking the match.

This was a chance Cro2 took even though they knew this could happen, but with only 2 rounds left, all the questions are very important that we can't have questions that become void (although there is always a chance of that) but this question should have remained.

I first took South Korea to score 4 goals or more, then I changed it to 3 goals or less then finally I changed it to NO and sent in my answer😂

Before or after the questions were posted, everyone who read the questions would know that South Korea had two games, and one was definitely bound to end before the deadline, which means there was already a possibility of answer coming before then, we can't be voiding questions because a question doesn't fit into a time zone when the deadline already itself would surely have some people on the rope, and Tennis after football is our second most sport here and the time zones are never static, I remember missing a question where my candidate had even pulled out of a tournament before the deadline, and was replaced and the questions was never voided, I would never say that was preempted, there are just some scenarios with grey areas not just black or white and we'll always have them in an as much these are circumstances beyond our control.

In my candid opinion, I don't think this question should be voided because of time zones and the nature of a question of we've had American and South American questions and from my time zone none of have been earlier than 1 in the AM, I threw in my answers early with a Yes, because I felt that was the best, and my cls63 my opponent answer came in according to spreadsheet around when the match is almost 85+ mins, and answered Yes, I don't know if he also used a VAR card, but if he didn't, that means what we are trying to prevent is not going to be possible because there are some answers here that most of us don't even bother to look up, to be honest what with question is almost a scenario we've had always in some Tennis, Handball or Waterpolo questions where vast majority of us needed to wait for a possible scenario before submitting, I would ask if South Korea had won the game today 4-0, would the question had been voided if everyone with a no answer decides to call VAR because all South Korea would need left is to win the finals by any means necessary which would have a more probable than not answer ?

I'm pretty much fine with void call to be very honest, as it is a generally fair decision, but it also kinda eliminate the needs for VAR all together because this was one of the scenarios that brought about it's implementation to begin with.

I don't know why this should be voided,  if we didn't void answer for option when I player is on bench and later didn't play the match or even when a player wasn't even in the lineup and not on sub aswell,  like the case of last question when Jesus wasn't even played and its was counted,  why void this one . What then is the advantage and lucks we are talking about.  This question should never be voided for any reason since it was played .

I have to say though, didn't we have questions in the past where big seeds didn't even make it past deadline, and people who put them in anyway still had their picks marked? Not complaining at all, of course, I 100% support it being fair to those who're even asleep now to see the result.

P.S. Say no to Cro2 free points!

P.S. Playoff question has Girona instead of Granada

That question was also labelled as "require answer" to submit form, even though it was explicitly stated that it is solely for Div3. I had to enter a random answers to submit the form. Not a big deal anyway. Just saying Cryptofka should stop sleeping on duty.

soory, I was entre My answer, can you delted My answer if there are problem for us

You made a minor error on question #9 between me and @dbshck, mine should be marked with red colour while his should be green but instead both of us were marked with yellow but the point calculation is correct though with both currently at 3 points

I just checked and the only confirmed teams with a Double GW for GW25 is Man City and Brentford. Liverpool and Chelsea do have a blank week after that though.

This disqualification means only 3 relegation slots left in Division 2 and no relegation playoff right.?

Damn you Bayern. Leverkusen led twice in the "most goals scored" side-race but Munchen got the final say. Well done Slissy, you really have the advantage now. Just need Liverpool to smash tomorrow and I won't care about this round's results.