120 OC - is it too much for 1070?
Try to increase the memclock +50 and reduce to +100 on the core core: 2050 mem: 4350 |
|
|
|
Hello. What can it be?
Probobly the core clock that is too high. Too much oc. |
|
|
|
I don't see it reported in 2Miners unless I am missing something...   Exactly. The stale shares reported in the miner window is an estimate. The pool is accepting all your shares so you can increase the intensity more if you want. You are using xintensity 1024, try 4096 |
|
|
|
Do the stale shares that reflect in TBM show up as “accepted” or “stale” in 2Miners?
stales are accepted, but if you click on the worker in the 2miners www gui you can see the staleshare and invalid count.  |
|
|
|
I'm experiencing weird issue , starting from 1.22 (prolly 1.21 , skipped that one) , at some point shares stops validating on cpu , experiencing that on 2 separate boxes.
We have reproduced this issue for NVIDIA cards and fixed it in v1.24. Eth+zil, Etc+zil pools and nicehash users will have problems with 1.20-1.23. We have also added dag validation on every regeneration to ensure that the program exits quickly on dag errors. In the previous versions the dag was only validated once on startup (nvidia). |
|
|
|
|
AMD stats are working in Windows. on linux/hivos we trying to fix it in v1.24
|
|
|
|
Also an error on my mixed rig (6800XT and 1080Ti) "Cannot open shared object file" don't know whether it is causing any issue, just curious.
It's a problem with stats for amd cards on linux. We are working on a fix for this in v1.24
have this running on a mixed rig how do i specify it for different cards. Nvidias are all 3080 but amd are mix of 5700xt and 5600xt.
amd cards(opencl) are listed first, then nvidia. so for --cl_devices [0,1,2] --cuda_devices [0,1,2] --xintensity [8,8,8,64,64,64]
Is there anyone that tried this miner with the old Polaris cards? Any improvements next to Phoenix and TRM?
With --xintensity 60 and hynix memory clocked at 2200-2250MHZ you can reach 32-33mhash  [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
Tried latest version with updated drivers etc on crazypool but still get much higher number of stales compared to phoenix.
stales can be removed by lowering --xintensity. nvidia --×intensity 64 or 128 amd. 24, 16, 8 ? |
|
|
|
|
on 2miners try --xintensity 1024 for amd cards. and --xintensity 4096 for nvidia
kernel 0 is slow on low intensity
|
|
|
|
If there is any suggestions to improve the mining then please let me know.
I see that you have 4% stale shares poolside even though your settings look good to avoid stale shares. You have a high ping to the server 155ms Try to change the server to get better ping asia2.ethermine.org asia1.ethermine.org eu1.ethermine.org us1.ethermine.org us2.ethermine.org Or change to a pool that pay for stale shares. 1080ti works best with --kernel 0 https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/FAQ.md |
|
|
|
Amazing result on the 1080ti epoc 452 with --kernel 0 48.82MHASH. Been a while since I've seen that number on this card.. Default --tweak? The intensity values you are using are better on pools like miningpoolhub, nanopool, 2miners, f2pool because there you get 0 stale shares, and on ethermine you will get around 2-3% stales. |
|
|
|
don't get me wrong boss.. i like more shares even tho stales.. i don mind at all ...the more shares (stales or not as long as not reject)... as the pool say : The pool determines your hashrate based on the amount of shares sent by your mining rigs (workers). This value could be a little bit different from the reported hashrate (in your mining software).
So more shares i get the more hashrate i ve at pool..
Keep it that way and improve it boss... GOOD JOB and thank you
Thanks. I've got PM's from people who earn more now with the Team Black Miner than before the London hardfork. This program works good if you use the correct pool and settings.. Happy mining guys |
|
|
|
|
but what does the log say?
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot access the picture, can you upload it somewhere else?
|
|
|
|
3070 non LHR
hiveOS
TBM 1.23
why doesn't it start?
Upgrade the driver to the latest |
|
|
|
I have issue with teamblackminer 1.23 on RaveOS, it does't see any nVIDIA cards while 1.22 worked just fine.
Any suggestions?
Raveos is using the cuda 11.5 build, so you need to upgrade the nvidia driver to the latest |
|
|
|
rustpool+2miners also nothing work. Tried port 2020 and 8008, but tbm will not start, i get a black console.
I have tested tbminer_rustpool_eth+zil.bat and it seems to work fine on 1 cuda card. Latest driver cuda 11_5 build TBMiner --algo ethash --hostname eu-zil.rustpool.xyz --port 8008 --wallet %ETH_WALLET% --server-passwd %ZIL_WALLET%@eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999@4G --worker-name %computername% |
|
|
|
Nvidia on rustpool, driver 460.89 and 472.12, windows10 testsystem, tested on 2 rigs - both with same problem.
I tried ETC+Zil with AMD on same pool, it abort after start without any error. Maybe wrong driver? i have 19.7.4 running.
You need to make sure that you are using the right port on rustpool. Ethermine is nicehash stratum 1.0 (port 9009) 2miners is ethproxy(port 8008) |
|
|
|
Mining Zilliqa and ETH is not working for me. The miner not switching back the dag. It start normal switch the DAG to epoch 0 for Zilliqa, but after the Zil PoW ended, it beginns to mine eth with zil DAG (you can see it because of higher speed with the zil DAG) and reject all shares.
This has worked before. AMD or NVIDIA? which pool? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
