You are a cancer. A parasite. NYC IS THE CURE!!! From this point on people should hold you responsible for any money lost in Yobit. I am sure you will be more than happy to recover any future losses (won't happen anyway, since Yobit is such a fine shop, right?). |
|
|
|
Be aware: Bitmark is a SCAM.
We've heard your concerns loud and clear multiple times. May we ask you to move on now? |
|
|
|
why coppercoin blocks chain is stop?
Diff adjustement broken, needs most probably a wallet fix before the chain starts moving again. |
|
|
|
Hello guys! As with a lot of people here I'm brand new to mining. In fact, the ease of the Apollos is what got me hooked. My question is more pool-related and not hardware related. I am pointed to nicehash as a primary and litecoinpool and a secondary. I find that my equipment fails over to litecoinpool just about daily. Is that normal? Is that something on the pool side, or should I look at my hardware?
Unfortunately you cant mix multipools with other pools on bfgminer . What happens is that bfgminer accepts block updates from even secondary pools connected to other coins, so it screws up the main pool while mining litecoin for example. For secondary pools you have to make sure the backup pool is running the same coin your primary pool is running (ie if your running litecoin as your main pool dont have your backup pool connected to a mutipool or some other coin). If you want to run on a mutlipool it has to be the only pool configured (ie no backup pool, and you have to run off donation pool) for it to work correctly. I was in this exact same dilemma with my Apollos which I want to run on multipools and have backups configured for failover. I then decided to give https://github.com/Stratehm/stratum-proxy a try which does a great job for this purpose. On a side note: One of my Apollos crashed regulary (every 4-7days) and I suspected it to be related with the pool going down or being unreachable for short moments (and refused to reflash it out of lazyness). Since I run it over the above proxy I've got zero crashes (right now it is a bit more than 4 weeks without any hiccups). Also I can now just switch between configured pools with a mouse click, no restarts required. The only downside is that you need a separate machine for it (either a little VPS or something like a RPI), I don't think it can or should be run on an Apollo directly. HTH |
|
|
|
|
BUMP
To get a first trust rating and review, I offer one free complete Iquidus installation including coind setup, nginx frontend proxy, LE SSL and all my special bells & whistles on a vanilla VPS.
This offer is valid for Full Members or higher.
|
|
|
|
i ment AUXPOW   would like to see similar LISTS of: SHA AUXPOW multi-algo Scrypt POW/POS SHA POW/POS other POW/POS [i can work on that] [but perhaps some cross links]  Sure, I think everything that helps the AUXPOW chains is good. Though as strictly scrypt-only guy, I am not in the position to compile a list for i.e. sha256d AUXPOWs as I simply have no clue what's out there. As for POW/POS hybrids: I don't think that's feasible, there are just too many out there - many of them dead and stuck since months. I had posted in both these threads in the past, and thought it would be good to have link there for this thread - even though I had to bump age-old threads. |
|
|
|
...
My list was ...
AUX
...
Are you refering to Auxilium? On quick glance I don't think it is AUXPOW as its name might suggest. Though please correct me if I am wrong. Thank you, I have added Graviex as Exchange and added the website. I kept the other website as it is the one listed in the NYC ANN. Thanks for the link, I have added it in the OP. Is the chainid 6 correct? Thanks - no, the chain ID for scrypt merge mining is 2. 6 is the one for merge mining with SHA-256d. Huntercoin was the first coin to be mineable with two different PoW algorithms. Thank you domob, I fixed the chainid and added a comment. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the link, I have added it in the OP. Is the chainid 6 correct? TIA |
|
|
|
It doesn't seem to be listed anymore on Freiexchange or am I looking at the wrong place? TIA |
|
|
|
Since I have always been a fan of merge mine (AuxPoW) coins, as they basically run on free hash I decided to compile a comprehensive overview of all currently active scrypt merge mineable coins. This hopefully encourages pool ops to consider one or the other coin. Please post corrections and additions, I would like to keep the OP updated over a longer period of time and therefor need your help. Scrypt AUXPOW Coins (alphabetically by ticker symbol):
| Coin: | Bitmarks | | Ticker: | BTM (new: MARKS) | | Website: | http://www.bitmark.io/ | | Github: | https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark | | ANN: | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3169983 | | Chain ID: | 91 | | Exchange(s): | Novaexchange, Freiexchange, qtrade | | Block explorer(s): | http://explorer.bitmark.co/, http://explorer.bitmark.io/, https://chainz.cryptoid.info/marks/ | | Block time: | 120s | | Comment: | Multialgo (scrypt*, sha256d*, yescrypt*, lyra2rev2*, equihash*, argon2d*, x17*, cryptonight*) *merge mineable |
Note: Some of these coins are also listed on Yobit, but at all are in maintenance since literally years, therefor I didn't list Yobit anywhere as active exchange. Reference:Tips:If you would like to tip me, please consider using one of the below referal links when signing up to bitvest: Changes:The following changes have been made since posting the OP: - 14. July 2019: Added Huntercoin
- 15. July 2019: Fixed HUC chainid
- 15. July 2019: Added NYC Community websites + Graviex exchange
- 26. January 2020: Updated Exchanges
- 14. June 2020: Updated Exchanges and Block Explorers
- 6. October 2020: Removed NLExch, added Freiexchange for ARG, changed github for CDN
- 21. October 2021: Added EAC, updated CDN exchange
- 2. June 2024: Added MARS and DOGM
Hope this is helpful.
P.S. @mods: I figured this might be at the right place in the Altcoin Announcement board, if mods disagree, please feel free to move it to a more appropriate place, thanks. I see, it has been moved, thanks.
|
|
|
|
Hi, Thanks for taking your time to read this. I am an experienced Linux/BSD System Engineer with a broad range of experience in this field looking for work in the form of tiny jobs upto fixed employment for up to 3 days a week. Over the last 25 years I have been tasked with setting up, configuring, securing and maintaining/monitoring a wide range of servers and server applications on different flavours of Linux and BSD. In this time I have also developed a large number of Shell, Perl and Python scripts to automate tasks, monitor services and bridging applications. Think of it as working at a small ISP, overseeing things. Please find below a non-inclusive list of my areas of expertise to get you an idea what I might be good at and at what not so much. Areas of expertise:Installation, configuration, securing and maintaining of.. - ..most Redhat and Debian derived Linux distributions (i.e. Ubuntu, Centos, Mint, Devuan, Fedora) and all three majos *BSDs (OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD)
- ..Internet service daemons like Sendmail, Bind, Apache, Nginx, Lighttpd, Thttpd, Mosquitto, Squid, MySQL (MariaDB), Postfix, Asterisk, Sshd etc.
- ..Cryptocoin wallets, Block explorers (Iquidus), Pool Software (Yiimp, Powerpool, MPOS), Notification scripts (Alert, Block, Wallet etc.)
- ..Networking gear like Firewalls, Routers, Switches. I have most experience with Mikrotik Routers, OpenBSD Firewalls and iptables, but if your gear has a good manual available, chances are I will be able to work with it just fine
Writing scripts and software for..- ..Python backend services based on Cherrypy (and Flask to a certain degree)
- ..Shell and python scripts for automation, security and bridging/interfacing to other systems/applications
My first education has been in electronics and I have kept that as a hobby over all the time, so I have a solid base knowlegde of electronic and electric systems. I am also able to develop simple firmware for a broad range of microcontrollers like ATmega, PIC, ESP8266/ESP32. I have also a solid knowledge and ~5 yrs experience in Eagle CAD. I realize that the work I am looking for is all about trust and integrity, therefor I will maintain a separate unmoderated thread for people to share their experience with me and my work. I also encourage you to check my trust and post history here in bitcointalk. When I work for you on your host(s), I am ready to record all my sessions with your host(s) for you to inspect, audit and check with the goal of being 100% transparent to you in what I did and how I did it. My strength:- Commitment, persistence, experience, loyality
- I can isolate and spot problems in complex systems quickly
- I know exactly what I can do and what not. If I take on a task, I will be able to fulfill it.
My weaknesses:- Selling myself aggressively, probably too upright and honest for current times when things should like better than they are in fact.
- Using social media, I am not on any social media, except my Twitter account which I mainly used to follow Bitmain for their new miner announcements. Otherwise I look at it as huge waste of time and refuse to use any one of these communication channels, no matter if it is Facebook, Whatsapp, Telegram, Youtube, Discord or what else.
- Making ugly things look good, I am not at all into eye candy stuff. Ascii tables look more appealing to me than a fancy colored, fantastically stylesheeted browser tables. I can't and won't change this, I am into making things work, not making things look good
References, Links:Payment:- I prefer to be paid in one of the following cryptos: BTC, LTC, DOGE but I am willing to consider other cryptos too if you insist. I am happy to use one of the well established escrows like Ognasty or philipma1957 at your expense if you would like to escrow.
- If I will insist on escrow to work for you, I will carry the cost for escrow.
- My prices/offers will be in USD and they will be converted with the exchange ratio of your desired crypto at the day when you place an order for my offered services.
- Payment is due within 48hrs when the offered work has been fully delivered to you, for larger jobs I might ask you for a partial upfront payment to an escrow.
- For jobs totalling in more than USD 50 payment you will get a legally valid, tax deductible invoice from me.
Some words of caution:- If in doubt if you're really dealing with me, feel free to ask me to sign something with the my BTC address (19LSKwUh8Ak6PMod5jhCbNTk1mgBmHmjUq) staked in the BTC address staking thread.
- Never-ever send me any cleartext passwords, only exception being they are sent PGP encrypted and that key has been signed by above BTC address and plus there is a very compelling reason for you to do so.
- I will always authenticate to your host with a 4096bit SSH private key, when I send you the public key I will always send it signed with my staked BTC address.
I look forward to receive your questions and inquiries. Feel free to post below or PM me as you see fit. |
|
|
|
NYC's another block reward halving, the job has been done ,as their schedule,at block 5,500,000
and the present block of NYC is over 5,501,839 now.
but the homepage of NYC community still says now 5,499,907 block and 8 hours to go more for block reward halving at 5,500,000 block.
Which one is correct informatoon?
and what about to do NYC holders of Yobit exchange?
As of writing this, my node is on block # 5,501,902 and the halving already happened. |
|
|
|
Would it even be possible for him to make that happen? Wouldn't the large majority of miners have to agree? If there is even serious discussion of Litecoin or any other Crypto including Bitcoin, getting rid of the 21 million limit, I will cash out to USD ASAP. I mean, if that is the case, the jig is up and crypto is simply being manipulated like the usd currency by the Federal Reserve. Again, I'd be so out so fast into USD. Brad That doesn't really answer my question, but what fo you think if LTC would increase its supply significantly? I thought I was kinda obvious my last post. This would be as they say, " A very, very bad thing'  It would be Litecoin's Death, for most folk in HODL mode, it would destroy Litecoin. Without a 'firm amount of Litecoin' and, by increasing the Litecoin coin capacity firm ceiling on the amount of Litecoin over 21 million, well, Litecoin would be no more! I'd dump it all on finding such out the same day. Folks would probably then go back to Bitcoin with a 21 Million Cap on Coin. No one is that stupid to hold a pow coin, where they raise the coin cap after the fact! This would be bad. Very Bad. Brad I agree with you, but still I thought it is probably impossible to increase the supply because you would have to convince the miners. That's unlikely since they would have to undermine their own business to some degree. That would be on top of the other LTC Miner difficulties of well, of course, the hash-rate difficulty that eventually kills their dream and then, of course, the halving..which rips out the LTC Miner's heart every 4 years. You add on doubling the amount of coin allowed to exist, there would not be enough microwave towers for the miners to jump off of! (Just saying: This would be a a bad thing, increasing the amount of coin, 'cheat' changing the rules in the middle of the game after years, folk would beyond freak out! Exactly, it is a little bit similar to the Bitcoin rollback that CZ from Binance proposed when they got hacked. However, I saw a video about that and it was said that that rollback would have never been possible in reality. Honestly, I think this is just a click-bait of toshtimes.com. In the interview Charlie Lee said the following: It’s hard to say what will happen when it starts reaching the limit. Right now, the coin is working, Bitcoin and Litecoin are working because the mining reward is paying for the security… When you rely on fees and if the fees aren’t enough because the block size is constrained, then what happens? The security will drop. Is it better to have some small inflation every year and have that fixed and have that pay for the security or can transaction fees pay for security? That is, we are talking about the time when 64 (if I read the LTC sources right) halvings have occured which is when the block reward goes to 0 and is not halved anymore: https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1164-L1167: int halvings = nHeight / consensusParams.nSubsidyHalvingInterval;
// Force block reward to zero when right shift is undefined.
if (halvings >= 64)
return 0; As this is only the 3rd halving coming up now, we have 60 to go, which translates roughly to 96 years to until reward is 0. Honestly, I couldn't care less about that timeframe. (All assuming my first grade math above are not completely off the rails, feel free to correct me if I made a stupid error in my calculations) |
|
|
|
|
Could it not just be that FB wants a) their share in transaction fees on the internet and much more importantly b) to link the browsing habits of ~2bio customers to the spending habits of that same crowd?
I would think that a FB user is worth much more to them if they can combine all the info they already have about a person with a quite comprehensible transaction history?
Meaning the project is actually not really a cryptocurrency project but more a project to track people also financially.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
