|
does Mt Gox withdraw to OKPAY still works? If you are not in the US, I guess you can wire money to BTCE now that option's available. They are Russian so should be outside of US sphere of influence.
|
|
|
|
|
The shocking thing is - there are bids for it.
Maybe ASICMINER should embrace ebay / amazon, etc. As part of the expense has to be paid in fiat anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Good to hear about next gen chip. Any rough projection on timeline?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure on the crackdown, btcchina platform seems to be up. There are still post in the Chinese section of the forum.
It seems the TV in China is still reporting about BTC as of last week.
Those would be easy target if a wide crackdown is in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone has experience with MtGox wire transfer withdrawal (non-SEPA)? What's the typical delay like?
|
|
|
|
Burnside and Ukyo must be loving all the action, they're getting 0.2% and 1% of all transactions respectively...
I get the MTGOX vs BTC-E BTC/USD discount. But I really don't get major discrepency between the BTCT vs BF passthrough - however, that does allows one to profit handsomely, even double dip on the dividend on occasions. |
|
|
|
if you sell there, buy them back on havelock at .0200 a share  make .0030/share profit not many people know about asicminer just yet, as people learn more about it, and how it can be more profitable to hold asicminer shares than wait on an asic, the shares should rise, dividends might be low this week because of btcguild having issues, but the solo mining may however make up for that small amount of time, it looks like there is plenty of demand, so prices should be stable and continue to rise, anyone else care to explain it better than me? I'm not sure about that, I only hear about Bitcoin in January - and did my research and very quickly see potential in ASICMINER, ought to say I love BITCOINS and ASICMINER. |
|
|
|
Agree in that there are other optimization to do, NMC / BTC dropped a lot after ASICMINER shows up in bitminter. Solo mining provides
1) No operator fees
2) All transaction fees (which have been consistently rising since Bitcoin started)
3) Less risk from pool owner trust
4) Less risk from pool downtime and DDOS attacks
At a cost of
1) More variance (who cares when you have significant hash power) and 2) No merged mining. This is important because, according to Dustcoin, Namecoin currently adds 6.42% ( BTC60.6 or $7410.17 a day) to 21TH of mining. That's not chump change; perhaps Friedcat can buy merged mining software from Dr. Haribo or doublec. ASICMiner cannot merge mine will all 21TH or it will destroy the alt coins, both in terms of theri network hash rate (exceeding 51%) and in terms of exchange value (thats a lot of coins now being insta sold). So yes, a portion could go to DEVcoin and IXcoin, and namecoin, but not all or even most of it. In other words, its not going to be +6.42% It might be something to explore, but right now I think Friedcat has much more profitable optimizations and expansions to pursue. |
|
|
|
|
I PM you with the instruction on share transfer. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
New to yacoin, is the changing of N factor base on a pre-determine process (like difficulty in bitcoin)? Or is it because a 'new version' is released?
|
|
|
|
|
It's over, I think the last couple of bids didn't make it base on forum time. Will wait for the official tally.
|
|
|
|
|
just want to clarify, 150 @ 1.95 replaced 125 @ 1.92
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have an updated list of current winners?
|
|
|
|
|
Payment sent to John K escrow address - see pm
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
