|
OP , i have the guide from Soha, i would request from you to send me your copy of it so i can compare them.
no information will be revealed, I will just ensure that you "both" are selling the same exact thing, which if turns true, then your claim would be taken more seriously.
feel free to deny this, or ask another member who would be willing to do this to you two.
|
|
|
|
سيرفر DNS شركات الاتصال المحلية (مزود الانترنت) اتسائل هل هي امنه ؟
لقد تم التطريق لهدا الموضوع في الموضوع الاصلي. ولكن بشرح مختصر. ال dns الخاص بمزود الانترنت ليس بالضرورة ان يكون اكتر امننا من قوقل.. بل الاغلب هوا العكس تماما.. لكن قوته تكمن في "عدم معرفة المخترقين به اصلا". هدا الشي يصعب شرحه لكن اوصفه لك بمثال .. فرضنا انك تريد نقل مبلغ كبير .. الحل الاول ان تاخد معك سيارة حراسة ,, الكل سيعرف انك تنقل شيء ثمين لكن من الصعب عليهم سرقته .. الحل التاني ان تضعه في كيس " قمامة" عافاك الله وتنقل به بكل ارياحية بين الشوارع والمجرمين.. ان عرفو مايوجد بالكيس سرقه ستكون اسهل لكن نقطة القوة تكمن في انه لا احد يعرف مافي الكيس على عكس ان تنقل المبلغ بحاراسات وتجدب الانتباه. هنا تكمن قوة ال dns المحلي الخاص بك . في العادة لا احد يعرفه ولا احت يكترث لاختراقه اصلا. ارجو ان اكون وصلت المعلومة رغم اني اعتقد نفسي من اسواء الناس في شرح المعلومات حتى لو كنت فاهمها جيدا. |
|
|
|
شكرا لك على الترجمة والمشاركة الطيبة
هل هذا يعني ان المنتى اكتفى ولم يعد يحتاج الى مشتركين جدد!! لان هذه القوانين مجحفة بحقنا!!!!؟؟
يمكن لاي شخص التفاعل والتعليق وانشاء مواضيع جديد.. ترقية العضوية هوا شي خاص فقط بالدعاية وايضا العامل النفسي لبعض الناس... يوجد كتر من الناس ذو عضوية صغيرة ولكن اداء مبهر ومعلومات مفيدة..والعكس صحيح طبعا.. نصيحتي لا تهتم بنقاط الجدارة والرتبة.. فقط حاول ان تستفيد وان تكون مفيد لغيرك.. الرتبة سوف تاتي مع الوقت بدون الشعور بها.. بالوفيق. |
|
|
|
أود أن أعرف ما نوع الاختراق الذي قد يتعرض اليه جهازي بسبب هذا و ما الذي يمكن أن يتم اختراقه بالضبط؟
أقصد ان كانت هذه الثغرة تمكن مستغليها من الولوج لبياناتي الخاصة على الحاسوب و التحكم بها أم فقط بامكانه اختراق المتصفح و التطبيقات المرتبطة بشبكة الانترنت كأن يقوم بسرقة كلمات السر المخزنة على المتصفح أو تاريخ التصفح و باقي البيانات الخاصة؟
هناك عدة اشياء ممكن ان يتم اختراقها باسعتمال هده الثغرة...اما بالنسبة لاخر اختراق تم تسجيله كان على محفظة mew الموجودة ع الويب. طبعا الاختراق تم بهده الطريقة ال dns هوا عبارة عن معلومات طريق الوصول للمواقع .. يعني مثلا عندنا تكتب www.google.com وضيفة ال dns انه يعرف هدا الدومين مربوط باي ip address وكيف يوصله.. طبعا كل dns يختلف في وصفه لطريق الوصول للمواقع. الهاكر نجح في انه يغير بيانات dns العامة وغير المسار لموقع خاص به هوا .. يعني مثلا الطبيعي انه myetherwallet.com > DNS > 45,67,34,108 من اليسار لليمين.. سير البيانات من حاسوبك لخادم المحفظة.. الرقم الاخير هوا عنوان خادم المحفظة الصحيح.. عندك الاختراق يحصل الاتي mwithewalet.com > Hacked-Dns < 11,44,55,66 من اليسار لليمين. البيانات تخرج من جهازك.. يقوم ال dns المخترق بتوجيهها للخادم الخاص به ,, كل شي يبدو طبيعي لك.. عندما تدخل ع المحفظة يكون قد فات الاوان. وهدا يعرف ايضا ب phishing لكن باسلوب امهر. _________________________________________ طبعا الهاكرز يعرفو جداول وخريطة ال dns الشهيرة والعامة مثل قوقل لدلك التركيز دائما يكون عليهم.. لكن عندنا ماتستعمل ال dns الخاص بكل مثل الشرح الموجود في الاعلى.. فسيقوم جهاز باستخدام dns الشركة المحلية الخاصة بك (مزود الانترنت) وبطبعية الحال هم اقل عرضة من الاختراق مقارنة بال dns معروفة وعامة. |
|
|
|
قمت بنشر هدا الموضوع مسبقا..والان اقوم بترجمته.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3458297.msg35990380#msg35990380 ماهو الدي ان اس ؟ هوا (نظام أسماء النطاقات) الكتير منا يستعمله ولا يعرف ماهو. في هدا الموضوع لا يهمنا ماهو..يهمنا كيفة استعماله. لكتير من الاسباب نقوم بتغيره عن طريق الدخول لاعدادات الشبكة  في الخانتين المشار لهم باللون الاخضر.. المربع الاول من فوق: يعني النظاق الاساسي المربيع التاني: النطاق الاحتياطي في حال استعمال نطاق مثل نطاق قوقل وهوا 8.8.8.8 فانت تعرض نفسك للاختراق بشكل كبير. لدلك يجب تفعيل الخيار التلقائي لكي يسعتمل حسابوك نطاق الاسماء المحلي وليس العام عن طريق تفعيل خيار obtain dns server address automatically عندها تختفي الارقام الموجودة في المربعين وتصبح معتمة باللون الرصاصي.. اظغط حفط وانت الان في امان اكتر ان شاء الله. |
|
|
|
all posts prior to this have been evaluated, only 1 merit left. Can you explain briefly why are you used nonsense color on your thread which discourage me to read it.
indeed, the colors are disturbing to say the least,if i wasn't kind of "obligated" to read the post "which happens to be informative IMO" i would have simply ignored it. the colors, the symbols, the font size everything about it keeps you from reading it, it's probably why he got no merit for it. mikey, I believe that thread like this are disallowed if they are rewarding merit to posts that were created after this thread was created. This is so that there can be no misconception of incentivizing posting in any way. Consider implementing this into your rules  everyday we learn something new, but are you sure there are any rules related to that matter? if there is i think they are unnecessary, if threads like this are going to bring more quality posts to the forum, what's wrong with that? thanks for the input Bill |
|
|
|
as the tittle says , this is IMO the best website to use to determine what gear you should buy and what to mine when you have it. The different thing about this website, is that you don't have to enter the hahsrate or know the algo or the coin to mine, so if you are a newbie or you just don't know what ASICs are out there and their hashing power. this is probably the best option for you. https://www.apanel.com/it lists all known miners from most profitable to least profitable  by clicking on any miner, you get the specs related to it, such as Algorithm,Hashrate,Consumption,Efficiency, Dimensions and an image of the miner and coins to mine based on most to least profitable.  it even lists the pools that you can mine on. ( but it's missing some pools) * you should never count on only 1 mining calculator website, use a few of them, compare and always DYOR.
* i am not responsible for anything on that website, use it at your own risk.
|
|
|
|
if you don't mind , i added the % that represents the amount of the sent merit from left user to right user out of the total sent merits. only those who sent more than half (50%) of their merits show on the list. for example , number 137 sent 100% of his sMerit to that user. |
|
|
|
Update: jackg suggested to add Merit sent (in green) and received (in red) to put things into perspective.
you mean received in green sent in red? |
|
|
|
I’m allowed to sell excess solar energy back to the grid, but I am not allowed to sell grid energy back to the grid at higher prices that I’ve stored in the battery. What is happening now is that instead of selling excess energy back to the grid at off-peak prices, it stores it and then uses it on-peak.
the only issue with this is consuming the battery lifespan, which in some cases can be less efficient than selling energy back at off-peak-prices. |
|
|
|
ok here are a few things you need to know 1- Fork.lol shows only BCH(ABC) hashrate , SV has almost the same hash rate so they in total have about 2 to 3 EH ( which is not minimal at all) at the time of typing this check it here > https://cash.coin.dance/blocks/hashrate2- There is a tremendous amount of SHA256 hashing power for rent on places like NH , so that power moves very fast between BTC and other Sha256 based coins, many guys who rent the power use some bots to mine the most profitable coin at any given time. 3-there is a good correlation between price and hashrate, seems like some large farms have their circuit breakers connect to some arduino box that triggers off-on based on price ? no solid proof but very possible , i am aware of farms who cash out btc to fiat like instantly so that they don't take any risk should price fall, so it makes sense to instantly turn off the miners once they are not making enough money to pay for power and bring them back on when the price is up to x. price hashrate notice, price drop on 20th, so does hashrate , price spikes on 22nd so does hashrate. they are not 100% correlated but to a good extend they are, you can compare them using these sites. hashrate > https://www.coinwarz.com/network-hashrate-charts/bitcoin-network-hashrate-chartprice > https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/BTCUSD/there are of course many other factors, but i think these are the strongest. |
|
|
|
|
I used to report scammers topics and my accuracy is pretty bad, simply because scams are not moderated, they are on topic based on the board rules, and the funny part is, my comments on their threads " provided they are unlocked- not self-moderated" get deleted after the scammers report them to the mods.
|
|
|
|
Can ICO's work? No, the ICOs can not work because behind there are people who come to the conclusion that the money collected is their property, until this is not corrected, and understand that they are managers, the ICO will not work.
ICOs actually work, they worked before, many tokens made it, the majority did not. IMO this is not mainly due to how the team manages they ICO or the road-map, it is simply because the market is over-saturated, there is almost nothing that can be added to whatever there was last year or the year before. even the best team now will have a very hard time carrying on their project, early developers took the big slice and that's all about it. what is left out there is too small, competition is ATH therefore if you have 5 spots available, when 100 teams release their ICOs, 95% will fail. which is what happens now a day, let alone the scammers whom their initial plan is to take investors money and run away. these are the main reasons for ICOs fail and not just bad management. I end by asking for more control over the ICOs that are published, for the good of the investor, the bounty hunter and the forum, control that is very simple, request identification documents from those people who initiate the ICOs, telephones and any other documentation that force to fulfill the promises they write. who will do this work ? you realize this is a lot work that needs to be paid for, so who will pay for it? then if blockchain coins and tokens are to be anonymous why ask for all those documents? this is not feasible. nobody can do this, it's the investor's duty to do their research before throwing their money away. I do not write this thinking in any ICO in particular, I participated in about 160 ICO in one way or another during 2018, and the truth, 95% of them, leave much to be desired, although I have been paid. this is another problem i have with people who say, "i only participated in the campaign i lost nothing when the ICO was pure B.S". well, you lose time and efforts that could have been spent else where and gave you better rewards. unless you really know nothing in life that can make you money, then ICOs is a waste of time IMO ..................................... that was a very nice article, by the way, keep up the good work. |
|
|
|
These statistics will add more fuel to the fire. i expect a few new threads are coming soon, using these number to continue a war that has not yet finished. suchmoon you are in a trouble  |
|
|
|
|
what is your rated voltage? it's very important specially in your case, as the numbers are very tight.
ok, just so you don't have to keep asking for every other miner you get, here is how to do the math.
you first need to know the miner consumption in wats, for S9 , it's about 1350w.
secondly you need to know how much can your circuit breaker take which is done by calculating amp * volts.
i will assume that the voltage at your house is rated at 240v so the equation goes like this
amp * volts.
13 *240
= 3120 wats
now at stage you are going full load, which is not the best thing to do, also keeping a lot of margin is bad , you want to stay in a very close range so that you don't overload the breaker and you don't allow much "unused" current because then your the circuit might never break in case something goes wrong.
just like HagssFIN mentioned, except that i do not agree with the number " it might be the number in the books" but to me 0.9 has been a good enough rule for years.
so you take the result from the above equation, and do multiply it by the 0.9 factor
3120 * 0.9
= 2808 wats
you can safely run 2 S9s on that breaker, provided your volt is 240.
but to be even safe, let's make it 230v . so we get thsi
13*230*0.9
= 2691w
2 s9 will need 1350*2 = 2700w so it is still some how "safe" to run 2 s9s on a 13amp circuit breaker with 230v, but it's not advisable, there is not much room for error , should the voltage drop, things will get hot and ugly.
so the best practice would be this, calculate how many miners in total you want to have on that breaker, and get another breaker. you mentioned you getting two L3s, so you can actually safely run 1 s9 and 1 L3 on the this 13 amp cb. and get another one for the other l3 and s9.
|
|
|
|
do you hear yourself? common sense, it is safer to tag an account even for 1% possibility of it being hacked. this is called " better safe than sorry" . assuming the guy who reached out to me on telegram was a random out of the blue " which indeed was not the case", but just for the sake of this argument ,what do you think the right decision would be? 1-tag the user, save poor souls , wait for him to prove the opposite ? 2-collect more evidence, risk people's money waste everybody's time? The damage of no 1 is very minimal , DT remove their tags and story is over. sadly you can't undo number 2. providing evidence " the way you want them" is nothing under my obligation, let alone the time needed for screenshots and the stuff you asking for, by the time i get all those stuff, the hacker would have already finished what he came for. also ,why are you assuming that i am angry? never, it's the way i reply to non-sense B.S. sorry nothing personal tho. thanks for your input, highly appreciated. Do you want me to tag an account just because you said so?
I have not asked anybody to tag the account. i also have no desire in going on with this discussion with you. i don't want to lock this thread for obvious reasons. but sure thing i won't be replying to any of your non-sense here. Milkz if you have any problem with the tag, start your own thread. good luck. edited : thread unlocked upon request , a user said he has some more information to post related to the subject. @mdayonliner : if you have anything to oppose the tag, please start your own thread. |
|
|
|
OK smarty-pants , so i do not tag the user, i do not warn people about it, take all the time in the world to do the "Sherlock Holmes" thing. let 5-10 people get scammed trading with a green trusted account that is possibly hacked ? when the party is over i come back here with my evidence ? is that what you are suggesting? brilliant. one thing i know for sure is that only someone with access to Milkz account could have reached out to me on telegram, so be it him or the hacker makes no difference, the account is now hacked, and that's all about it, if you have any doubts still, ignore all the negative feedback, go trade with him. if the original user still has access to this account he can simply reply here and prove me wrong, and tags will be removed. |
|
|
|
There is no way to get a "head start", since you can only start mining once the previous block has been solved, since its hash serves as an input for the next block.
well you can actually get a head start, by starting to mine the next block before announcing the hash for the for the current block"if you found it of curse". in theory this is possible, in real life it's not, because if you hold on for a split second , someone else might broadcast the solution before you do. so it makes no sense, it makes every sense to mine an empty block rather than trying to get a head start when everybody else is only a few steps behind. With today's difficulty, is there a website or something where I can see how long it will take to get the hash function output that is valid? Will it take > 10 minutes on most personal computers?
the average laptop nowadays will need "46,745,721 YEARS" to solve a block " luck not included" you can use > http://solochance.com/ to find out the time you need to solve a block based on how many trials 'hashes' you make per second. |
|
|
|
are you on 110-120 volt or 220-220 volt? for APw3++ on the former the output would be about 1200w so it's a NO , on the second the output would be 1600w so it's a yes. so if you plugging it into a 110-120 v, don't even try it. unless you going to underlclcok your miner. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
