then what is the point of giving him a vouch copy if you can't get him to comment on your thread? this is as stupid as giving satoshi or theymos a vouch copy knowing they will never review it and still use their name as a marketing tool in your thread. even TMAN was very careful with his words , never ever said he vouched for your method, yet you still insist on using his name as a vouched member.

as told you in the pm ,i am still waiting for a mod to confirm the ban date, likely i'l remove the current negative, but i  might "very likely" still tag you for manipulating the vouching story.

i am more flexible than suchmoon, you don't have to get malevolent to comment on your thread, removing his name from your thread, as well as taking TMAN permission to use his name as a "TURSTED VOUCH" will suffice, if TMAN says no , they you need to get rid of his name on your thread along side with malevolent.

what is the link ? asking for a friend.

while this can be effective against spam ,it will give much more power to scammers on the market place for example, they will just put every scam buster on their ignore list and allow their alts and fake vouchers  to bump the thread with fake vouches . as long as self-moderated topics are allowed by newbies on the market place this would create a worse situation than already is, i hope this feature would be added on certain boards tho.

this feels like soviet union vs allies all over again, i wonder , would there be the same drama if a Russian member started this topic ? almost every Russian member is taking the Russian side blindly, while i do not agree with how TMAN described the situation here, i totally find funny that some people would include known scammers and people who are far from trusted just to appose current DT members trust lists. the current and the previous DT members are far from perfect, in fact i would rate them at 5 over 10 but i am pretty certain that with all the flaws ,the forum is much safer with them than without them.

having said that, i still stand by my opinion that at least every local board needs a local DT member/s to help protect that board, but those people have to get to DT in proper and fair manners.

if by 3gb you mean the VRAM size,then have a look at this > https://investoon.com/tools/dag_size

on windows, the system needs to use a good amount of your gpu's too, so even though for eth dag file is less than 3 you will not be able to mine eth on windows with less than 4gb, you may however use linux and technically it should work.


if you want to mine btc , get an ASIC, if you want to get paid in btc rent your power to nicehash or anything alike, or just mine and sell the coin for btc.


there is nothing as NAT does the firewalling , never been and never will, i don't know how you getting this mixed up,  anyway moving your rig to dmz will not help, it will still face the same rules.


there is no need to do so, just watch your firewall log, see what packets are being dropped when nicehash starts, once you that you can just make a new rule to let it slip.
----------------------------------------
also i still urge you to download lagecy as it could fix your problem without all the hustle.



welcome.

indeed , it's a lie just had to try out myself  

you have not, quote it , and stop editing your posts.

anyway, stop wasting my time and yours, get the proof and the tag will be removed.


it's not done on my side, until a trusted user confirms the method worked , you will probably need to start another thread about me abusing the trust system again.


non of your currently alleged vouches qualify as a vouch , unless you mean another word, then you have to use that word.

good night.

this is the first time you send me this image, if you posted somewhere else that you expect me to dig for, sorry ain't got time for that.



i am not, i am replying to your posts.

---

The picture you just sent, is no proof that your account was LOCKED when you made the new account, the date on the image is 18th , your new account was created on the 16th , prove to me that you original account was LOCKED before you created the new one, then my whole argument about you risking other members to get scammed will be invalid as you were certain that nobody could have used your SOHA account to conduct any scam.

i am not sure if there is any public data on when an account was banned, but it's your job to find out. prove it and i'l remove the tag.

but we still have to go through the vouched stuff anyway. so i kindly request from you to reconsider your words, as i still think you are "manipulating opinions to vouches" intentionally or unintentionally doesn't matter.
 
btw, i am going to sleep, sorry for not going to reply you till tomorrow.

you did not send me anything, when i asked you  the first question related to the account issue this was your reply



yes you worry about your business but not worry about the possibility of others getting scammed


i simply said


which i still stand by it , can any of the members you mentioned take full responsibility of their "vouch" ? is anyone of them sure that your method will work for the next buyer? if yes, problem solved , if not then i still think you are manipulating people's words making them sound like VOUCHING.

so please get those members to confirm that what they said is actually a vouch  and not just something that you manipulated from an opinion to a vouch in order to sell your method.
 

simply because the account might have not been hacked in the first place , the user wanted to keep it clean to perform whatever scam plans he has in mind,without having to take responsibility for it by saying " i mentioned it on my other thread that was started by me using my new account".

while this may not be the case, i gave him the benefit of the doubt and asked him why, he did not defend himself, he just got into attack-mode and started accusing me of wanting to spam and get post count, if he gave a reasonable answer, things would have been solved by then



while it's not the reason for the rating,  it's also not about the validity of his method, it's the term " VOUCH" he uses when not a single trusted member actually vouched for his method. it's misleading to say the least, and some people might find a good reason for a tag.

there is nothing to argue about , your method needs to be tested to confirm it's integrity,  did either TMAN or malevolent say yes this method makes you "UP TO $185/DAYa" ?

if not, then that's not  a vouch and you don't have the right to use their names and relate it to the TRUSTED VOUCHED verse of yours.
i am not sure how you define the word vouch.

anyway this was not the reason for the tag, so there is no point discussing it YET.

i personally find you suspicious and scammy to say the least, and the explanation is giving in my feedback to you, but again i am open to other's inputs, maybe someone will "correct" me if i am wrong.

edited : typos

this is one part of the b.s vouch story he has, which i did not tag him for YET. he falsely claims that people vouched for his thing when they have not tried it and confirmed it actually works, then he keeps insisting on mentioning malevolent name and making it look like a vouch from him , might as well send a copy to satoshi and say

a vouch copy has been handed out to
satoshi

ok , so my account gets hacked, i go tell my grandmother about it, then someone uses it to scam people on the forum , when someone get's scammed and blame me , i saw no " i told my grandmother how didn't you know about it" . really ?

the proper thing to do was to post on the original thread,  there is no guarantee anyone was going to see the new thread before the old one , you made a new account, bought a Copper Member, started a new thread, bumped it a few times, even quoted some posts from the original topic , but never bothered to post a warning about the account being hacked ??



  

i asked you a simple question, if your account got hacked, why haven't you stated so in the original thread to warn others ? and this was your answer

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093954.msg49301960#msg49301960



wrong , I did not send you a pm, you did , i was just nice enough to respond to you.


^^this was your message after the tag.





i confirm the above message .

---

 it's funny how you edited your posts now, when i was asking you a simple question, you were accusing me for spamming and wanting to get more post count, and that you will do as you please, indirectly stating that you do not care about your previous account being used to scam other which was my initial concern, i wasted a good amount of my time giving you the chance to explain a simple matter but you chose to be rude and ignore my question, that was certainly not the reason for the tag as i stated previously, i don't care how much of an asshole you are, it's just the likely-hood of attempting to scam that what got me to tag you.

it's also strange that a member who was been here since 2014 > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=400742 does not know how to use the trust system, and give me a  positive retaliatory feedback for giving him a negative one.

just disable the firewall .



packets from NH software use the same gateway to send both CPU and GPU packets , but each goes to a different destination, it's very possible that your router blocks only those GPU traffics.

3- use a different version of nice hash, try Lagecy.
Well, there you lost me completely I'm not familiar with the different distros... hence me being super greatfull for the help. First help I 'm getting beside Rinoa Super Genius and FAQ's - a lot of them..


yes that is not the Legacy version. try to see if Legacy solves your problem.

if all fails, then probably you need to change driver. also make sure you have all algo's enabled.

how do you expect everyone to read the your "other thread" ? you must have warned people on this thread, what if anybody got scammed after sending a PM to the hacked account?


this thread is differently not trusted vouched. refer to my first post.



warning about potential scam is not staff action, it's  member's moral responsibility, and everything about this thread looks suspicious.

oh this topic was bumped 2 days ago, if you think this is "old" then that's your problem.



I not obligated to follow every thread on the form, it is certainly not my job , i came across this topic and that says TRUSTED VOUCHED when there isn't any trusted vouched, my comment was directed to this post and to the OP. i do not know if you are the real SOHA or an impostor, and whether the real SOHA is to be trusted , i pointed out a single point which says  TRUSTED VOUCHED.

also it's funny that you have not commented on this topic to warn others that your account was hacked, it's not self-moderated therefore the "hacker" has no way to delete your comment.

this is pretty questionable, you only showed up now after my comment !
 

This is a general misunderstanding that the majority of the world have , it really isn't a newbie thing. even some large trading channels on telegram/FB who been trading crypto for years post shit like  " 20 billion $ left crypto today, where did it go ?"

your tittle is misleading, you do not have any trusted vouch.

1 member is not trusted.
1 member did not vouche and said your your method works.
1 member did not even post on the topic.

therefore by saying it's vouched i say you are lying, or simply acting dumb, which does not make much different in this case.

I am giving you 24 hours to edit your tittle, remove the word "vouched" until you get a vouch from a trusted member, or i will have to tag you.

sir, this could be considered as merit begging, something you get negative feedback for, then not even a 100 merit will benefit you sir. also the post which you have posted was deleted sir. please learn to post quality posts that are not off-topic so they won't be deleted.

Good luck.