After throughly explaining him the situation I had encountered with my hacked account
i asked you a simple question, if your account got hacked, why haven't you stated so in the original thread to warn others ? and this was your answer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093954.msg49301960#msg49301960He then pmd me stating he had left me negative trust cause I had failed to post with my locked account that I was moving thread? Like seriously, what the hell? wrong , I did not send you a pm, you did , i was just nice enough to respond to you. You do not own this fórum, so rules are not stated by you, so if I don't want to do something I simply don't unless, you are a dictator.
About vouches, it doesnt require you to try something to verify it Works, hence 3 of the vouches are trusted, I can agree one might not be anymore due to it being a negative one after theymos changes to default trust systems. But it used to be Green trust user.
And I can also agree Malevolents is missing, but hopefuly he'll add soon.
But you don't seem to be a very much active person in this fórum, he had't been on for 2 weeks almost, he messeged me today coincidentaly saying he'd review it soon.
Thanks. And if you happen to be interested , let me know.
Edit; Willing to give you a vouch copy to proove you wrong
^^this was your message after the tag. Exact pm I recieved from him after offering him a vouch copy to proove him wrong ; I am not interested in your method, find someone who has the time to test it, and give it to them, they have to verify that they tested the method and it worked, this is what a vouch means, it's not my rule, this is common sense.
as far as the red trust i gave you goes, there are 4 reasons why any member would give you a negative trust.
1-you being an asshole and troll when you were being asked simple questions.
2-you faking vouches that are not real vouches, they are only trusted vouches according to you.
3-your proof that you are the real Soha was only confirmed by red trust account which is not solid enough.
4- you claim your account was hacked, yet you didn't bother to warn others, probably some people got scammed and u never bothered warning them until i asked you, which only makes me think you planned to use that account scam others and then re-claim it CLEAN saying you "told us" /b].
i am still not tagging you for the vouch thing yet[2], i do not have a proof that you are not the real soha[3], and i do not care if you are rude and an asshole[1], my negative feedback to you was only based on No [4]. i confirm the above message .
it's funny how you edited your posts now, when i was asking you a simple question, you were accusing me for spamming and wanting to get more post count, and that you will do as you please, indirectly stating that you do not care about your previous account being used to scam other which was my initial concern, i wasted a good amount of my time giving you the chance to explain a simple matter but you chose to be rude and ignore my question, that was certainly not the reason for the tag as i stated previously, i don't care how much of an asshole you are, it's just the likely-hood of attempting to scam that what got me to tag you. it's also strange that a member who was been here since 2014 > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=400742 does not know how to use the trust system, and give me a positive retaliatory feedback for giving him a negative one. |
|
|
|
Hi Mikey, Antivirus completely uninstalled. Regarding firewall. Well, I can't disable NAT obviously  But a port forward maybe? What Say You Sire  just disable the firewall . OK, its just that I was thinking that if its possible for it to mine using the CPU, then why not the GPU's?? Same "street" they are travelling at or? packets from NH software use the same gateway to send both CPU and GPU packets , but each goes to a different destination, it's very possible that your router blocks only those GPU traffics. 3- use a different version of nice hash, try Lagecy.Well, there you lost me completely I'm not familiar with the different distros... hence me being super greatfull for the help. First help I 'm getting beside Rinoa Super Genius and FAQ's - a lot of them.. I've got 3 images I want to share with you. Trying to ipload those images to our webserver . It'll appear beneath this in a moment.
yes that is not the Legacy version. try to see if Legacy solves your problem. if all fails, then probably you need to change driver. also make sure you have all algo's enabled. |
|
|
|
Still havent read my thread check new thread or quit talking nonsense, i use same email, Skype and telegram. My account was hacked/locked.
how do you expect everyone to read the your "other thread" ? you must have warned people on this thread, what if anybody got scammed after sending a PM to the hacked account? It is indeed trusted vouched. this thread is differently not trusted vouched. refer to my first post. Now goodluck with your wannabe Staff actions  warning about potential scam is not staff action, it's member's moral responsibility, and everything about this thread looks suspicious. |
|
|
|
Why are you even bumping my old thread that was digged?
oh this topic was bumped 2 days ago, if you think this is "old" then that's your problem. New thread is on Soha 1! But yea probably you didnt know since you clearly don't read whole topics I not obligated to follow every thread on the form, it is certainly not my job , i came across this topic and that says TRUSTED VOUCHED when there isn't any trusted vouched, my comment was directed to this post and to the OP. i do not know if you are the real SOHA or an impostor, and whether the real SOHA is to be trusted , i pointed out a single point which says TRUSTED VOUCHED. also it's funny that you have not commented on this topic to warn others that your account was hacked, it's not self-moderated therefore the "hacker" has no way to delete your comment. this is pretty questionable, you only showed up now after my comment ! |
|
|
|
Can you consider moving this to the newbie/biginners boards, I believe it'll be of more helpful since most of them don't know about this.
This is a general misunderstanding that the majority of the world have , it really isn't a newbie thing. even some large trading channels on telegram/FB who been trading crypto for years post shit like " 20 billion $ left crypto today, where did it go ?" |
|
|
|
|
your tittle is misleading, you do not have any trusted vouch.
1 member is not trusted.
1 member did not vouche and said your your method works.
1 member did not even post on the topic.
therefore by saying it's vouched i say you are lying, or simply acting dumb, which does not make much different in this case.
I am giving you 24 hours to edit your tittle, remove the word "vouched" until you get a vouch from a trusted member, or i will have to tag you.
|
|
|
|
Post review Hello sir I very like about you I very should some merit for join in JR member Please help me sir I be confused about merit system is very difficult to get 1 merit I make post about your post Thank you Link our post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098909sir, this could be considered as merit begging, something you get negative feedback for, then not even a 100 merit will benefit you sir. also the post which you have posted was deleted sir. please learn to post quality posts that are not off-topic so they won't be deleted. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
Have you tried using a different browser or cleaned the cache to completely be sure about the log-in?
also there is a very high chance the custom fw you trying to flush is a piece of shit " as simple as that" . try another bitmain firmware to see if makes any difference.
|
|
|
|
|
cards are never too old to mine every coin out there, the VRAM the 2 posts above talk about the irrelvant to your issue, it's only an issue related to DAG size of ETH.
your problem is most likely to do with security/firewall
here is what you need to do for test " at your own risk"
1- disable firewall/antivrus make sure NH folder is not in any protection mode
2- check your router firewall , if you tell me what is the exact router you using,i may be able to assist you,and easier way to toruble shoot this , would be to use a different router.
3- use a different version of nice hash, try Lagecy.
|
|
|
|
|
Video quality not so great but good enough, very nice set up there, Solar is a great idea, but batteries are the greatest liability of the system. how do you handle such a problem?
|
|
|
|
Every community/board/section would want to have a DT member who will " protect " their members by tagging scammers, if non of the DT members here go to Arabic, Russian or many other boards, how do those local boards benefit from the current DT list? The DT list now is the result of members who trust each other for a reason, if the Russian members feel like they can not trust or benefit from the current DT list they have the right to want someone they trust on DT, as well as the right to exclude DT members they do not trust. I am too lazy to quote anything , but a few of the current DT members were discussing including and excluding some members based on "points" they see fit in this topic > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0 which i see nothing wrong with. while this could be an attempt to exclude every current DT member and take full control of the trust system, it still does not qualify as an abuse IMO. i am pretty sure the new system will have to go through some updates and changes soon. let us just see how things go, after all, manual intervention by theymos is always possible , so nothing major to worry about here. |
|
|
|
1. hash of previous block which I get only once previous block is broadcast. I assume that was by someone else
it's not a hash of previous block, it's more like a record-book for all previous blocks,this is what block height refers to, the number's of previous blocks that are"included in it" which were mined in the past. 2. Some representation of 1500 transactions
this is false, the protocol does not force any min number of transactions in the block, the one who solves the block "chooses" what and how many transactions to include in their block, they can simply boradcast it with 0 transactions ( in fact it's more like 1 transaction if you count the actual reward transaction by the coinbase to the miner), the 1500 transactions is nothing but an average. the last block at the time of posting this had a bit over 2800 transactions. 3. A new hash made up by #1 and #2 which is expensive to get.
the new hash has nothing to do with any of this, it's a whole different new round based on the current difficulty. Now the question is that majority of the miners should somehow reject my block - and that is what I am trying to determine - what is the algorithm that tells them to not accept this block.
ok the easiest way to think of mining is this , you go to a test with many different people, every 10 mins the examiner asks a question, the first to answer it, raises their hand and says the answer. prior to the exam, every question has a reward box with a locker, everyone was given a key that can be reshaped to represent their answer, once somebody" thinks" they have the answer, they will shape their key, go to box, try to unlock the locker, if it's unlocked, he shouts in the exam room and say i found the answer, they confirm that his key opened the locker , and agree to give him the reward. now assuming the first question was 1+1 = 2 everyone now knows the answer, you knowing it before them, makes no difference to anybody as the next question can be, what is the population of china main land excluding everyone from age 1 to 30 and 35 to 100 and those who have a white pair of shows?the person who answered the 1+1 = 2 has no advantage over the other candidates just because he knew 1+1 =2. the only advantage anyone has is the number of answers they can give compared to others which is [HASHRATE] , of course luck plays a role in this, someone might give a million answer in a minute and still fail while a lucky miner says 345345 people and turns to be the correct answer. but chances are those with more trials will beat out those with less. the examiner/teacher wants to maintain a 10 minute window for every question, so after every 2016 questions, the examiner takes the average time it took you all to answer the questions, if it's less than 10 mins, he increases the difficulty of the questions to slow you down, if it's more than 10 mins he gives you easier questions. as stupid as my example sounds , this is an overall idea of how mining works, if you at least understand the this exam "story" then you should understand that your theory won't apply. |
|
|
|
|
all post have been reviewed.
Zurcermozz > well done , you are doing great , but my advice, try to shorten your posts as much as possible, i had to read tons of words just because i had to see if it was a merit or not, if i was just passing by , honestly i would have ignored it. try to sum up as much as possible , without excluding importing points of course.
Good luck everybody.
2 merit left
|
|
|
|
ok thanks of the difficulty spikes .  |
|
|
|
you differently can create a block with your own transactions, you can even create an empty block if you want, this is not the challange that you the blockcoin puts you to, the change is to solve the block before anybody else does , you are confusing yourself a little here. your theory will work perfectly provided that you keep your initial block secret aka " don't broadcast it" , as long as your node is going to broadcast the block you still have to undergo the Pow computation against everybody else. Using my sub-par hardware I still manage to generate the key for the block. Roughly 1500 are needed to make a block. So approximately at present rate a minder starts working on the hash about 300 seconds after completion of previous block. I will start immediately after so I will get several second head-start. Will I not win and with valid transactions?
this is not how it works, you do not get any head start, the "new block" has a whole different new problem to solve, just because you mined the previous block it does not mean you get any head start, knowing the hash of the last block gives you 0 advantage towards the next block. So as soon as a block is added, I take that key and construct a block myself first as it should
what key are you going to construct ? ! you need to hash your way to the block solution , and in order to do this you need to be faster than the rest.
the TL;DR version is this The nonce difficulty to "you" will always be the same regardless of what is in the block, be it your own transactions, mine , anybody else's or not with not a single transaction. your theory is no different from the perpetual motion , if one works , the other will 
No you will not.
If it was that easy to game the system it would be completely broken and useless right now from all the people like you doing scummy things to try and cheat the system
take it easy,he has a valid question, i have thought about this before, nothing is wrong with exploring the possibilities, when mining first started we had no mining pools, now they are completely fine . it's good that people explore and question things, it opens doors to improvements, i wouldn't call this a scam or a cheat. |
|
|
|
|
did this happen after a firmware update or just out of no where?
first 2 things you should always do are
1- reset miner.
2- change/flush firmware.
these are the likely fixes for this issue.
if it fails, then
3- try to reduce the frequency, some boards when over heated and over time tend to only work on certain lower frequency.
4- try another PSU " very unlikely to be cause"
|
|
|
|
i am already consuming well over 150 amps. the link you sent me only applies to USA old Electrical infrastructure. for the the rest of the world ,it's a whole different story. 3 phase means this : you get 4 wires ( 1 neutral and 3 hot/live ) between every N and L you get 220v between every L and L you get 380V so in my case I have either 75amps on 380V. or 75*3 on 220V. depending on how you deal with the cables, you can have both 380v and 220v. so what i did is this. I bought 3 main circuit breakers each has a hot wire attached to it. N wire is shared by the 3 phases. just in case my explanation is hard to get > read this > https://hotkilns.com/what-difference-between-220-volts-3-phase-and-380220-volts-3-phase-overseas-applicationsthey refer to this standard as being used in ... like a lot of foreign countries...
very poor choice of words to say the least, it's more like like " The Majority of foreign countries" |
|
|
|
Ha-ha. You are serious? 100/100 What about 6000/100? Once upon a time antpool find 1 block with 1 share Randomnesss I think luck increases significantly when -ck connect 60GH Avalon  what's funny? luck is by default is 100/100 aka 100% aka flat aka not random ! randomness and luck decrease as your shares increase, why do you think many pools are able to pay in PPS? simply because they know that in the course of x period of time ,every share you submit has a luck of 100/100 therefore they afford to pay you flat for every share. small pools can't do that as their 100/100 could be months/years and they can't afford to pay you till they hit a block. while large pools say those who have 33.333% percent of the total hash know for sure they will get something very close to 33.333% of blocks per day/week/month/year. just because antopool found 1 block with 1 share does not mean you have the same chances. |
|
|
|
|
forget about the last active or any other status, it ca be as irrelevant as it is ! , you can find tons of similarities between theymos and newbies for that matter.
quoting the signed message is indeed sketchy.
looking at the "Xal0le" last post on "stak your btc address" (August 24, 2018) " before the deleted post"
and when this happens only 2 minutes after the account was created , it get's more sketchy.
but the funny thing is, why would he sign a message with his alt? it's a newbie account that worth nothing, why bother stake his address then quote it?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
