There are one thousand, one hundred and seventy-three pages of members with the "website" in their profile... ((1,172 X 30) + 22 = 35,182 ) Thirty-Two thousand, one hundred and eighty-two members all with the same "Web Site" in their profile page's listing. We have just ticked over profile number https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=912093Name: nensalmendela
Posts: 0
Activity: 0
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: Today at 15:09:30
Last Active: Today at 15:09:30 That's 3.85% of *all* users of BitCoin Talk have MMM Global in their profile. |
|
|
|
There are one thousand, one hundred and seventy-three pages of members with the "website" in their profile... ((1,172 X 30) + 22 = 35,182 ) Thirty-Two thousand, one hundred and eighty-two members all with the same "Web Site" in their profile page's listing. *edit* Removed quoted samples |
|
|
|
|
*edit* moved to Spambots thread - will remove this post in a few days time.
|
|
|
|
Allredy passed two months without any activity from xetsr side.
I'm starting to consider it appropriate to move topic to scam section...
Honestly I'm sure there's a legitimate reason (health or otherwise) but I'd have to agree, it's time to move this to the scam accusation thread. At the very least it will get you some more exposure and maybe he'll hear about it somehow to come pay you back or explain himself. Agreed. Time to escalate - two months is definitely time enough for the benefit of the doubt to be given and a person to at the very least look in and say "Hey there!" and give an explanation as to why they are away. I would like to think xetsr has a reasonable explanation, however, zazarb needs to be repaid. |
|
|
|
I've never seen this before: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=RV01
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- but on both http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1C680D74DB714D40 and http://pgp.surfnet.nl:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&fingerprint=on&search=0x1C680D74DB714D40the key looks like this: Public Key Server -- Get "0x1c680d74db714d40 "
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: SKS 1.1.5
Comment: Hostname: pgp.mit.edu
mQENBFV1TmgBCACfIm6BbEhCJEugWPFLNWpKOXYJ1tS8a0tENuLnO0HZ3JTIg6z9mixmXsIL
qgfhSNl6dfw5B8Swz3S5a3ceJV3OrbeBfHg0tTKz0drAiyhnwE857Jaq3LjnMEVS0UT4MeKO
NpNosENekOa788jbAN/FhucmU+SvFQtT8S9PvLt8ArAzA7/eOTbLZFhJTrD62fJoDKqPyMtN
3H8CALVHHBX1IzbLlc7jXxgh8QknuCpYy9Te161xD2nmcPX/IrdoUNrtztRFJ2qvCpCiSkvy
IAz73CYlC2mXduAklE5i4BnjVsnqLkK6vfKI1WkrlyQx9KWMxVN8dp8r0gOaEChDMw3vABEB
AAG0R0FHRCBCSVRDT0lOVEFMSyAoMTVLZzczUXZiQjlOWnFmamNuV3dnSEg5Qm1hYUpLeVgz
SCkgPEFHREBpbnRlcm5ldC5jb20+iQE5BBMBAgAjBQJVdU5oAhsPBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoL
BBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQHGgNdNtxTUCangf6AhEZj9YKMiaYwpJMf1RHQ3HbQ7ggdQeUyq6l
ShV7QKc6AHFmoM72WiMfffdIP4nBS/w0kTFzzj14a5thoAWCaJyIUaGIMqfppj3SOVC5eSB9
Dzom2IRHhOe/aKiaxy7A2eTuEfWsL6GQ4w4tQUWUIbprdycroWDeSS76GWmokvFU8n9bAIC4
xWA8icFTwieeFEydWC7IEZ/vw6FOZHx9CiXw7t3AkRrei/7cro3L0ehsZVB/n/ueBZO2ePtB
t7C7F/ik3tXKlawrlUmcFjuMutUfS54TJIfOb2kQCv4qNyCo7I/sJ9amT0PCWGEwYGjFn5Ql
k9YAnzhRr+l8oInhOw==
=RV01
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Starts the same, ends the same. It's just the width that makes them look totally different, yet both PGP and Kleopatra both say they are the same key. You have to look very closely to see they are the same text, just word wrapped differently. Has anyone else encountered this? |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=RV01
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
This is AGD on Bitcointalk on 22nd of Oct 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYCyVVAAoJEBxoDXTbcU1A6FYH/1oBfxp9u4Ej5CAOupgp43++
OT+B69jLoze52dthhBcju5bhaHXui2s9XeOQcWS0GgYfAegQNmRRyGj6UJtNqLe/
YTFJKKMCWZFw3ivmpPHkyq9jtS5OOkMt2rtzRZO5WlG/ZqvVXDvj3Ru/l1O+Kt/u
XE87/GNzY5KpXF6DMJZVmzFnhvN1trfYSWHuQw9zba/J4GspsoUCjQLf+rbSd+LJ
DKKAkhZTzsKcFcCtq0PoqDlnnC53mmzH7RVL7zX7IqCOj3YQCAKs5IZBnzs5Oj0y
4N/CMa4gqfUQiuV+3Kv83Hr5HBgDxds06ayz90VV4S6JfLWFqbyoSmFlOB4xM/Y=
=5kBy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Quoted but there is no bitcoin address, in this topic it is good to post a bitcoin address. On the other thread: The BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database: Stake Your PGP Key Here to stake your PGP key and the fingerprint. Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/2YNPz#selection-4360.1-4795.43I get the following information: Key (PGP first, Kleopatra second) AGD BITCOINTALK (15Kg73QvbB9NZqfjcnWwgHH9BmaaJKyX3H) <AGD@internet.com>
0xDB714D40
8/06/2015
FFBD 756C 24B5 4962 E6A7 72EA 1C68 0D74 DB71 4D40
User-ID:
AGD BITCOINTALK (15Kg73QvbB9NZqfjcnWwgHH9BmaaJKyX3H) <AGD@internet.com>
Validity:
from 2015-06-08 18:12 until forever
Certificate type:
2,048-bit RSA
Certificate usage:
Signing EMails and Files, Encrypting EMails and Files, Certifying other Certificates
Key-ID:
DB714D40
Fingerprint:
FFBD756C24B54962E6A772EA1C680D74DB714D40
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=RV01
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Signed message: (PGP first, Kleopatra second) *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ***
*** Status: Good Signature from Invalid Key
*** Alert: Please verify signer's key before trusting signature.
*** Signer: AGD BITCOINTALK (15Kg73QvbB9NZqfjcnWwgHH9BmaaJKyX3H) <AGD@internet.com> (0xDB714D40)
*** Signed: 22/10/2016 6:37:41 PM
*** Verified: 22/10/2016 10:02:35 PM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
This is AGD on Bitcointalk on 22nd of Oct 2016
*** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
Signed on 2016-10-22 18:37 by AGD@internet.com (Key ID: 0xDB714D40).
The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
This is AGD on Bitcointalk on 22nd of Oct 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYCyVVAAoJEBxoDXTbcU1A6FYH/1oBfxp9u4Ej5CAOupgp43++
OT+B69jLoze52dthhBcju5bhaHXui2s9XeOQcWS0GgYfAegQNmRRyGj6UJtNqLe/
YTFJKKMCWZFw3ivmpPHkyq9jtS5OOkMt2rtzRZO5WlG/ZqvVXDvj3Ru/l1O+Kt/u
XE87/GNzY5KpXF6DMJZVmzFnhvN1trfYSWHuQw9zba/J4GspsoUCjQLf+rbSd+LJ
DKKAkhZTzsKcFcCtq0PoqDlnnC53mmzH7RVL7zX7IqCOj3YQCAKs5IZBnzs5Oj0y
4N/CMa4gqfUQiuV+3Kv83Hr5HBgDxds06ayz90VV4S6JfLWFqbyoSmFlOB4xM/Y=
=5kBy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Search results for '0xdb714d40'
Type bits/keyID cr. time exp time key expir
pub 2048R/DB714D40 2015-06-08
Fingerprint=FFBD 756C 24B5 4962 E6A7 72EA 1C68 0D74 DB71 4D40
uid AGD BITCOINTALK (15Kg73QvbB9NZqfjcnWwgHH9BmaaJKyX3H) <AGD@internet.com>
sig sig3 DB714D40 2015-06-08 __________ __________ [selfsig]
Public Key Server -- Get "0x1c680d74db714d40 "
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: SKS 1.1.5
Comment: Hostname: pgp.surfnet.nl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=RV01
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
how to calculate it ? the last number 6+4=7? not 6+4=a?
No one helping? Might have something to do with the fact we have lives and don't monitor ever thread all day. Did you try multiplying the two values together? |
|
|
|
Since the OP has not been updated for the last 7 months, wouldn't it be advisable to start a new thread? While multiple threads on the same topic are not ideal, a summary of the reports made so far would definitely be helpful.
That would only make sense if someone actually reviewed all the reports.The thread was suppose to be a sticky but was removed later due to lack of strong connections between the accounts posted by members.They maybe correct but since accounts are sold you can never be sure if the connected person still holds that account. That is true. We could have a disclaimer which states that ownership might have changed after these addresses have been posted. But people continue to post links of shared address in this thread. If somebody else is ready to invest his time in maintaining a summary of the linked accounts posted, what is the harm in that? There is no harm in that.Why don't you take the initiative and start adding up all the posted accounts ? Also,the table breaks after a particular number of entries have updated.You might as well want to reverse 4-5 comments if the table can't take anymore entries.You could check the first page of this thread.I don't mind helping you out if you can take responsibility of maintain it here after. I would like to make a modified suggestion, the OP has links to a weekly / monthly break down contained in the thread? You could have a serial pest post, or some other categories, not just "October 2016", "Nov 2016", Dec 2016" etc.
Also, by red flagging the UID's they become increasingly unsaleable as opposed to just listing the offending UID's here.
Supposedly the table is done externally and is called from the forum from another site - if I understand it correctly. Plus what's to say the next person to start a thread doesn't just up and go MIA also? |
|
|
|
Dude really? Your translator broken? Taking something from another is theft including designs/images, etc. In what world do you live in where its ok to just take someone else's shit? Cuz I'll move right next door.  I'm gonna sit and make something then have someone click copy paste without even an acknowledgement fuck you Fool me once shame on you Fool me twice shame on me  It's amazing how you can trip over something sometimes... http://archive.is/TNGb8#selection-1139.0-624.138Full Credits to Quickseller for allowing me to use the forms and contact details section from his thread as a template.
http://archive.is/FBeR6#selection-3041.0-3044.4Feedback from other members who have used my escrow service (2015): escrow help us lot. to kick scammers.
fast op. and trusted.
|
|
|
|
Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/Ft4Jo#selection-1777.0-1855.288 -<snip>-
Dude really? Your translator broken? Taking something from another is theft including designs/images, etc. In what world do you live in where its ok to just take someone else's shit? Cuz I'll move right next door. I'm gonna sit and make something then have someone click copy paste without even an acknowledgement fuck you Fool me once shame on you Fool me twice shame on me A quick check of QuickSeller's latest posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020;sa=showPosts http://archive.is/UZv6a shows they are only posting a bare one or two posts per fortnight to limp towards "Legendary" status, they are at 1,006 posts (the max required to atain "Legendary" is 1,008 - coincidence?) As a previous poster has noticed, Lutpin has taken an image from a TV series and used it as their profile image (while my profile picture isn't actually from a TV series, or promotional material) - so by your strict definition, has Lutpin stolen? Just showing how somethings can be grey.
|
|
|
|
Will a new version of the wallet be released for Mac as well?  Yep - looks like it! UPDATE on the New Client:- We will be providing pre-compiled versions for Win32, Win64 and OSX at a minimum.
- The Android version will also be availble shortly after the new Core release to take advantage of the new blockchain features.
|
|
|
|
Can this guy get banned or not?
No. Why the actual fuck not? Literally here it is him scamming me out of money. All the proof. The management and staff of this Forum have chosen not to ban anyone in a very long time, *IF* my understanding of the way this forum is being run is correct. You'll have to join the rest of us who've been burned by scammers and track them down, one scam at a time. |
|
|
|
|
Make no mistake girlbtc.com - I am not on your side. I simply wanted to say something and so I have.
|
|
|
|
While I agree that Girlbtc.com has copied your work, this would be better suited to be put into the Reputation thread, not the scam, unless you are making the allegation that GirlBTC.com is scamming users? I can't recall off the top of my head where I've seen it recently, but other UID's have used other UID's works as templates for their own and attributed the original work which GirlBTC.com hasn't done. Because you are on the DT, your red flag has been copy-catted by others, which I guess you are ok with / what you set out to achieve - copying of your work. As with any "scam accusation", the obvious question is "Did you contact this person first?" Are there any screen shots / text of these conversations? Did GirlBTC.com make an admission of copying your work? When you say intellectual property, how did you create your own work? If you review this trust wall https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=663403 you will see both myself and -Oxygen u=877812 have left neutral trust on their trust wall for what can only truly be described as "PLAGIARISM" - I can do the same here - that is to say leave neutral trust for plagiarism, if you like? Thanks for reading. |
|
|
|
how to run two cards in one terminal?
c:\oclvanitygen64.exe -f work.txt -o dump.txt -D 0:0 -D 0:1 Or something very similar. (read the thread...) |
|
|
|
So what is so special?? Go to the modlog, pick any user who has been nuked. All of them will have some details on the General Statistics page. This section probably doesn't get updated when users' posts are deleted. What's the link? I'll have a look. In the meantime: Activity one: Name: nor9886
Posts: 1
Activity: 1
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 19 June 2012, 21:55:29
Last Active: 22 September 2013, 21:59:03 Is able to post in two separate hours 8 (or 16) hours apart... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=60364;sa=statPanel |
|
|
|
|
*edit* post moved to the Spambots thread - will remove this post in a few days time.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
