Why people have gun primarily for self defense. But most of them abusing the use of gun for extortion and other crime related incidents. But I think, a country would find it hard to implement this kind of bill.
MOST of them? Uhh, no. Most legal gun owners are law abiding citizens. |
|
|
|
Seems like you're not. This why you shouldn't talk about things you don't have a clue about. "Our studies show that globally, volcanoes on land and under the sea release a total of about 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually. " http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/archive/2007/07_02_15.htmlthe global fossil fuel CO2 emissions for 2003 tipped the scales at 26.8 billion tonnes It means it would take 1000 years of eruption to compensate one year of human made CO2. But please, continue to show us how educated you are. So you you are telling me that they are accurately gauging every volcano on Earth including on land and under the ocean when they are only actually studying a handful of volcanoes? One of the rules in science is you need to have an appropriate sample size in order to get any kind of reasonable estimate, and they have neither. Try again comrade. |
|
|
|
|
Lets take a moment and look at the actual cause of the problem. Social justice warriors are just a symptom. The source of the problem is Marxism. It has been infiltrating western values for at least 2 generations now, coming up on 3, and it finally has enough of a foothold to start spreading like cancer. Think about it for a moment. How many values of the SJW movement perfectly align with Marxism? Quite a few. McCarthy was right, he was just a little early. In the end Marxism is just a path towards Communism. Communism is meant to be the international level antithesis if Capitalism, like a global version of Republican vs Democrat, red vs blue, us vs them. It is all a setup, an illusion for the masses. Capitalism is designed to induce production of real assets and capital, while Communism is designed to strip that wealth and tear that society down so that it can be rebuilt again. A global level pump and dump. It is right in your faces. Just look at the Communist flag, it is composed of two ancient symbols, the hammer representing building up of society, and the sickle representing tearing it down. If we don't wake up to the game that is being perpetrated on us very soon, we are all going to be "harvested" in the frothing fervor of the Communist purge in the name of "social justice".
|
|
|
|
What I don't understand is how Climate change has become a social and popular question.
We have nothing to do on that question. This is not our business.
Are people arguing in their daily life of the relevance of using ethanol as a solvant in an organic synthesis? No of course not! They don't give a fuck and even if they'd do they know they don't have the skills required to understand fully the process. They let this question for the chimists.
So why don't we just stop discussing climate change and listen to the scientists results?
I don't know about you, but I am educated enough in science to know that man made climate change is complete horse shit. One or two big volcanic eruption puts more CO2 into the atmosphere than all of humanity ever has. I don't have to believe in tinkerbell because I know it is a fairy tale. You keep clapping your hands though if it makes you feel like you are doing something. without looking it up (i'm lazy tonight) gonna state you are wrong about the comparison of man's co2 to volcanoes. However, moggie presents a different type of issue. He argues from ignorance and believes that has moral and ethical standing because of a preconceived "righteousness." Ignorance is bliss, since the devout can just take the word of the Sciencies about whatever. Think of how wonderful this is. There are no difficult issues to understand, you are simply told what to think, and if you are a good person, you obey. I know that after you think it over, you will repent of your thinkcrimes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVgl1HOxpj8I may have overstated it slightly, but the point about volcanic activity producing more greenhouse gasses than humans is quite legitimate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l5A_E3CA1http://www.livescience.com/40451-volcanic-co2-levels-are-staggering.htmlhttp://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/ |
|
|
|
fiat does not = capitalism
Your title is misleading. Sure sounds like you are promoting socialism by criticizing a flawed banking model not exclusive to capitalism, and then calling it capitalism.
No it's not. You're only misinterpreting it. My title is refering to fiat capitalistic system, simply because it's the current system and that's the one I'm criticizing. I've got no idea what a fiat socialism/communism/whateverism would do as it doesn't exist. But you see it as a criticize of capitalism, which is not here. I don't know what would give me that impression, perhaps it is because it is in the title. As far as no communist/socialist states using fiat, I would be surprised if you could show me any communist/socialist state that doesn't/didn't use fiat currency. Perhaps address the real problem, fiat and fractional reserve lending, and leave your communist/socialist bias out of it. Give me the example of a socialist or communist country with fiat! The only country which is really communist/socialist is Cuba. And they don't use fiat. Well at least they didn't. No no no, no more of that tu quoque logical fallacy bullshit from you. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoqueYOU made a claim, and I posed a challenge to YOU to prove it. You don't get to just turn the question around on me and tell me to prove it for you because you are too ignorant and lazy. Now try again comrade. |
|
|
|
What I don't understand is how Climate change has become a social and popular question.
We have nothing to do on that question. This is not our business.
Are people arguing in their daily life of the relevance of using ethanol as a solvant in an organic synthesis? No of course not! They don't give a fuck and even if they'd do they know they don't have the skills required to understand fully the process. They let this question for the chimists.
So why don't we just stop discussing climate change and listen to the scientists results?
I don't know about you, but I am educated enough in science to know that man made climate change is complete horse shit. One or two big volcanic eruption puts more CO2 into the atmosphere than all of humanity ever has. I don't have to believe in tinkerbell because I know it is a fairy tale. You keep clapping your hands though if it makes you feel like you are doing something. |
|
|
|
|
Bars of gold would never function as real tank treads, it is way too soft, it would just rip apart.
|
|
|
|
|
Except for Samuel L. Jackson, I could give a fuck less if all of those celebrities went to hell.
|
|
|
|
|
I am also not a big fan of the fact that the captcha service Cloudflare forces you to use when it is blocking IPs for VPN's is Goggle based, kind of defeating the purpose of having a VPN to begin with by forcing you to use Google products that track you everywhere you go.
|
|
|
|
The article would be more convincing if his area was climate science. It's not. His area is Psychology.
Tittles are not worth anything if you are outside your field.
Its like a dentist talking about volcano activity. He got a tittle, but its worthless when it comes to volcanoes.
#1 these are tittles:  #2 He is studying the factual knowledge of humans, not climate change, so his TITLE is perfectly appropriate. |
|
|
|
fiat does not = capitalism
Your title is misleading. Sure sounds like you are promoting socialism by criticizing a flawed banking model not exclusive to capitalism, and then calling it capitalism.
No it's not. You're only misinterpreting it. My title is refering to fiat capitalistic system, simply because it's the current system and that's the one I'm criticizing. I've got no idea what a fiat socialism/communism/whateverism would do as it doesn't exist. But you see it as a criticize of capitalism, which is not here. I don't know what would give me that impression, perhaps it is because it is in the title. As far as no communist/socialist states using fiat, I would be surprised if you could show me any communist/socialist state that doesn't/didn't use fiat currency. Perhaps address the real problem, fiat and fractional reserve lending, and leave your communist/socialist bias out of it. |
|
|
|
|
fiat does not = capitalism
Your title is misleading. Sure sounds like you are promoting socialism by criticizing a flawed banking model not exclusive to capitalism, and then calling it capitalism.
|
|
|
|
|
While I think it is a bit silly, I could see them doing this if only for purely marketing reasons, potentially trying to expand into markets targeted at children and families. Parents will not feel comfortable letting their children use a website that effectively shows their children how to find porn on the internet (not that they don't already know how, but still).
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps Obama will put Rick Ross on the $10 bill, that way people can buy dime bags of crack with a notorious drug dealer's face on it.
|
|
|
|
Anyway, if this technology became available, probably there would be criminals willing to kidnap rich people and create an "adult super-clone" out of their DNA and a "scan" of their brain. Then, kill the original person and make the clone assuming his place, in order to blackmail him, thanks to small secret changes on the DNA allowing to see he wasn't the original.
This could make a good science fiction novel or movie... probably, someone has already wrote it.
It already is a movie. "The 6th Day" starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0216216/ |
|
|
|
Why is that?
Because it's a pure BS. There is no actual difference between chanting "allahu akbar" or pushing some anti-nuclear propaganda. Both are nothing but a result of ignorance. If you do some research on the Pacific you will see it is largely a dead zone now with thousands of sea creatures washing up on beaches and almost no visible life in many areas.
If you do some research then you will see that these "elevated levels" are nothing but a joke in comparison with a natural radiation background in many populated areas of the world. And even more funny, natural radiation is provided mostly by the alpha emitters, which are dozens of times more hazardous for your health than all these anthropohenic beta- and gamma-emitters. with thousands of sea creatures washing up on beaches
Isn't connected with radiation levels. You're welcome to prove otherwise. Sorry but the threat of nuclear reactors failing and or melting down is a very real factual threat, not equivalent to believing in magic sky men. Especially so in the USA where the vast majority of reactors are way past their designed lifetime and simply keep getting a pass for economic reasons. Many of them are leaking and breaking down. Fukushima has shown us that something as simple as an extended power outage can cause a meltdown. Those same reactor designs are all over the USA, using dangerous MOX fuel which contains plutonium which is way more dangerous than any of the other materials commonly used in nuclear plants in fuel rods. I am not completely anti-nuclear energy, but we most certainly could be using newer technology which will not melt down simply because of loss of power, and can cool down on its own using the laws of physics without human intervention. As far as your point about elevated levels of radiation, that is a blanket statement which might cover some but certainly not all instances. Some are in fact quite serious and are a real threat to human life and health. As far as evidence of radiation causing the Pacific Ocean die off, that's kind of hard when they are systematically shutting down testing by the universities and independent labs, and the fact that the US government doesn't even monitor radiation levels in the ocean, only fresh water. Every nuclear disaster in history is followed by as much of a coverup as they can get away with. Nuclear energy is big money. REALLY big money. Not just that it provides cover for nuclear weapons production, so the military industrial complex has a stake in keeping it going as well. Unfortunately a lot more people are going to die for that money, probably even the psychopaths in charge of them. |
|
|
|
|
So Ozzy has ruled on this?
|
|
|
|
|
So you are willing to abandon your reputation over this rather than honor your agreements? Pretty sad. Also a huge waste of time for you. Oh well, I guess that children's hospital will just remain $700 poorer. Way to stick it to the man.
|
|
|
|
If anyone is still interested in this, I am offering escrow for a transaction with this user for a 1% fee. I will not escrow the physical bars, only the Bitcoin. Testing is your responsibility, and I expect some sort of evidence presented that the bar is a fake if you wish to have your funds returned pending it not being genuine gold.
Thanks for the offer  However I do want to question, how do I as a seller ensure the buyer presentation of the "product" is the one I sent, I mean, cant anyone just pull a fake gold and say they got fake gold? You guys think theres a good way to ensure that? This is something you would have to discuss with the buyer and agree upon beforehand. I as an escrow will simply uphold the agreement between two parties based on the standards you mutually agree upon. If there is some kind of dispute I will do my best to make sure both parties are treated equitably. On a side note, if you are able to demonstrate to multiple people you are offering a legitimate product I don't think this will be much of an issue for very long. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
