There were originally reports of multiple shooters at different areas of the walmart/mall.
Quoting nonsense: ignored Even PBS says there were 4 shooters at walmart and PBS is by no means right wing. The false flag is completely blown apart. Fuck off anti-1st and 2nd amendment shitlibs and your Mossad false flag terrorism. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/police-warn-of-an-active-shooter-at-an-el-paso-texas-mallBesides, this is Wall Observer. We fly the swastika here m8. |
|
|
|
False.
With the power consumption of IDLE devices on the US only , you could power the bitcoin mining industry for 3.6 years
All you're doing is plagiarizing Gavin's dumb idea now. Nobody is going to CONSTANTLY change out ASICs in coffee makers and other bullshit every 3 months. Please come up with better bullshit next time. It's not like that would even eliminate idle 'waste' power in the first place. It would only add even more power usage and be culmulative WITH the idle power waste. So there would be no point doing it. You would need to be a dedicated, full-scale miner, or not a miner at all. |
|
|
|
...$600k with a cost of production of $6k post-halving. ...
How do you know future mining difficult to infere cost of production? Maybe you dont know what is it or how does it work.. No surprise, coming from a gold bug Because it already uses an enormous amount of power and it's not even really possible for mining to go up like 10x anymore or it would probably use more power than the entire United States. It's a finite planet. Do bit-tards really believe mining can expand infinitely or that it would be shocking for Bitcoin to reach peak mining an entire 10 years after release? And don't even try the lame "hurrr Bitcoin is powered by 70% renewable energy" lie. That's due to mining centralizing around two ghost city hydro power dams in China, and China does not have infinite ghost city dams to expand to. Cost of production post halving will either be $6k-ish, a negligible amount more, or possibly a large amount less if miners are forced to drop out. It's not possible to artificially rig Bitcoin to any of these astronomical numbers people claim if you can just mine a coin for $6k or less instead. |
|
|
|
Today I made 2 posts on WO and twice triggered a certain user. I am a Mexican posting lies on the Bitcoin forum in hopes of becoming slum dog millionaire.
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin exchange rate converter that's existed for 2 centuries.
|
|
|
|
Lol did they just use a ruler and measure the same distance on a log chart ?
$600k with a cost of production of $6k post-halving. Sounds totally legit, bro. Please just completely ignore the fact price trends towards cost of production unless every govt in the world suddenly adopted Bitcoin as the unit of account of everything for no reason. The odds that happens with metals is pretty high for a dying fiat system. The odds of it happening with Bitcoin = 0. Since Bitcoin is entirely a synthetic, bullshit widget based on artificial scarcity, govt would never adopt Bitcoin and would always create their own digital shitcoin instead to try and force on you. So the only two possibilities are physical metals or govtcoin. |
|
|
|
This is why we are here.
Spread the word.
Spread the knowledge.
comfortable habits of ignorance
You sound like criminal negroes from the ghetto with an IQ of 3 trying to blame the fact people don't like you on "ignorance". It's not "ignorance" people don't use Bitcoin, it's because it has zero fundamentals due to transaction validators being designed to centralize while also being a completely synthetic, Keynesian scam based on artificial scarcity inferior to physical metals. |
|
|
|
Most people are woefully uneducated about Bitcoin.
You are the epitome of that example. Any objective analysis of Bitcoin renders it having zero fundamentals since tokens are non-fungible and transaction validators designed to centralize, resulting in a permissioned ledger whose only possible endgame evolution is an exact replica of the Chinese social credit score system. And that doesn't even touch upon the issue that even if it wasn't designed to centralize and non-fungible, it would still be ridiculously inferior to physical metals and doesn't have the attributes to qualify as money in the first place. The only reason Bitcoin isn't a complete dystopia already is because the govt and legal system have a delay before they figure out how to take complete control of it and what they need to write for legislation. But the fact Bitcoin centralizes so badly that transaction validators are giant, football stadium-sized warehouses gives it such an insanely large surface attack vector it's impossible for it not to turn dystopian. They can come out and legislate any day saying that all Bitcoin transactions are required to be processed by a pool in your country of origin and all of those pools are required by law to perform AML/KYC, then it's a complete dystopian, cashless society slavery system overnight from a single legislative act. |
|
|
|
This is caused by bitcoin.
Competition pushed every market participant to put all her best effort in improving their product.
a true Hayekian dream: private actors challenge States in the money business, ultimately benefiting citizen.
while I cannot transfer a few kb to move my wealth on the same extent.
I can do only in business hours NY.
I have to pay huge commissions.
Fake news. As "money" is required to be a non-perishable, physical commodity, you cannot send "money" over a telephone line. All you can send over a telephone line are IOUs or Keynesian currencies - imaginary widgets that are nothing more than scams based on artificial scarcity. That is the Plato school of economics (the father of Keynesianism?), who wanted money to be an imaginary widget created out of thin air, but his only motivation for espousing that view was for the state to have full control of it; he was a statist. If you're not a statist or are against state control of money - the Aristotle view - then there is never a reason you would be using an imaginary widget for anything and you would be using Aristotle's definition of money which is required to be a real world, non-perishable, physical commodity. |
|
|
|
Since most people in this thread are borderline retarded scammers, I don't suppose any of you have noticed that it's not the right that is the main driver of trying to break up Facebook, it's actually the Marxist kikes. Why is that? Because Facebook turned into a giant 50-80 year old, right wing, boomer command center where boomers sit around all day espousing right wing ideology, communicating with each other about how the media is fake and creating their own narrative. They do not want any type of 'public square' where people can communicate because all of the (((media)))'s lies will be exposed then: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/08/proposed-bill-would-make-monopolies-pay-serious-fines/ |
|
|
|
Uh oh, looks like the evil cult of Judaism will be put in camps for their crimes once again:  |
|
|
|
Both are garbage. Since Bitcoin is not fungible, the govt will just claim ANY attempt to mix or obfuscate transaction history is a money laundering crime. So the default state of Bitcoin's existence will always just be a govt tracking and control system that abolishes the 5th amendment where everything you do is monitored in real-time. This is among the long lists of reasons why you should NEVER support any piece of shit, non-fungible currency and should always insist on using real, fungible, physical commodity money (gold, silver, copper, etc) that doesn't function as both a tracking system and permissioned ledger. Anything non-fungible will always be a permissioned ledger in the end. The only possible endgame evolution of craptocurrency will be identical to the Chinese social credit score system. You 3rd world Indian children scammers need to fuck off with your shilling for crypto garbage that are just trojan horses for a cashless society slavery system from (((the state))). |
|
|
|
HITLER TOOK THE GUNS
STALIN TOOK THE GUNS
TRUMP TOOK THE GUNS
|
|
|
|
|
Listen, JayJuanGee, all you really need to know is the further you abstract money away from barter the bigger a scam it is. Since humans practice specialization of labor, monetary units besides direct barter were needed.
The closest thing to barter without being barter to facilitate trade with specialization of labor is the trade of non-perishable physical commodities as money (silver, gold, copper, etc).
Craptocurrency is abstracted WAY WAY WAY the fuck past barter in a dysfunctional, Keynesian, Rube Goldberg machine based on artificial scarcity that claims to be decentralized but has transaction validators that are designed to centralize and with built-in, rent seeking middlemen in every trade that you also have to ask permission to in order to even move your "coin". Even if it was possible to create a decentralized digital currency - it's not, it's 100% impossible - it would still be so far abstracted from barter that it would be an obvious Keynesian scam to anyone regardless. Such is the case with anything classified as currency - garbage based on artificial scarcity like US dollars, Bitcoins, Chuck E Cheese tokens, instead of physical commodity money like silver, gold, copper, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
It's amazing how virtually everyone that's a lawyer is a piece of shit. From Obama to Nick Szabo. Since Ethereum imploded and became a joke, Szabo has cut back on his Eth shilling and a random newb poster might not know about it, but in the early days of Ethereum he was hardcore shilling for it, probably in order to try and profit by defrauding people with something he likely already knew was garbage. This is why anyone should be insanely skeptical of anything else he says and demonstrates why all of his economic explanations are also garbage.
|
|
|
|
Nick Szabo is one of the #1 scammers in digital shitcoins. He shills for Ethereum for fuck's sake. And all of his economic interpretations are either wrong or flat out lies. He doesn't even seem to comprehend the difference in money vs currency, or just flat out omits the two words in order to lie to his audience because they would realize all currencies (like crypto currency) are Keynesian scams based on artificial scarcity. To be money it's required to be a non-perishable, physical commodity (I.E. not an imaginary, Keynesian widget based on artificial scarcity like US dollars, Bitcoins, or Dogecoins). Aristotle knew this thousands of years ago and fly by night scammer Nick Szabo is no Aristotle.  |
|
|
|
After several years of pretending to be a right wing nationalist instead of a Jewish puppet, in the span of one day, goodbye entire Trump base:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
indeed, r0ach is a perfect example 
