Why do you think the value of BSV is linked to Wright being Satoshi ? Isn't it merely a piece of code, like BTC, that will garner its own support/ or not, if it is useful.
Because the recent price movements are 100% due to the actions of CSW, not anything else. BSV didn't suddenly cut a deal with Apple or Amazon or something. Wright filed a copyright claim, coingeek worded it in a way to make it seem like it proved he was Satoshi, and a bunch of illiterate investors got tricked into believing it. Like I said before, the price is never wrong, but people who bought in at $100+ are likely to experience a rude awakening in the near future. BSV is more or less a bitcoin clone (BCH fork to be precise) obviously trying to ride off the back of bitcoin's fame, just like every other coin with the word "Bitcoin" in its name. The difference in this one is that its dev is pretending to be Satoshi. Dude, don't just dismiss it right away. I think our boy is on to something here. Why don't we just make everything perfect from the start?
I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic, but I hope its the latter. |
|
|
|
If Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, then why he choose Chines name, and a huge people think that bitcoin is made by China. It is for me hilarious and confusing, and now i just quit to think who is Satoshi. Now I know bitcoin and i think it is enough that bitcoin give us profit.
-1 Merit. |
|
|
|
These papers are not for you to consume, all of his actions can be easily explained if you think of him as a man preparing a case for litigation. He's just preparing documents that he'll be submitting to court. Probably will try to trademark "Bitcoin" next.
Then why the sensational coingeek article? It was a well-timed pump job / maneuver backed by a well-written propaganda piece. It ultimately proves nothing, other than there is no apparent correlation between somebody's ability to invest and intelligence. |
|
|
|
|
Regarding SV's latest price action, its safe to say that the majority of SV's market cap value rests on the idea that Wright is Satoshi, and not much else. There was already a bigger block experiment called BCH, and its been steadily falling in price against BTC since December 2017. The market has all but rejected it. There's no logical reason to think the market will suddenly become hungry for an even bigger block experiment given BCH's past performance.
So the value of BSV lies on Wright proving himself to be Satoshi, and not much else. It doesn't have to do with the "tech" as it is admittedly an older version of bitcoin. If you believe Wright is Satoshi, by all means, pile into SV. Let's just not pretend its about exciting new tech or that it isn't a personality-driven coin. BSV did not shoot up not based on its technical merits but because of Wright's actions. One misstep from Wright or ruling not in his favor will have the opposite effect of his recent copyright filing.
|
|
|
|
@ Slow brain
Lying that noboby trusts me is not criticizing, it is blatant lying!
Signature spammers tend to lie and state any kind of nonsense because they need to make posts to get paid!
And what are you doing exactly? Posting non-stop out of your desire to be an altruist, because you really care about people? You're advertising your "service," which should be avoided at all costs, since you don't really do anything for anybody. At least bitcoin mixers serve a purpose. |
|
|
|
point is the REGISTRATION was in april.
no one contested it. thus no investigation/no verification process was needed. thus automatic rubber stamp changed
thus in may the C.O changed ownership from an anonymous pseudonym to a guy with a birth certificate.
now that certificate can be used to make many more false claim court cases and hope the defendants 'settle' early just to avoid having to prove its a false claim
lets word it another way.
it cost craig $35 to do this. but would cost someone else alot more now to contest it
The registration was filed in April. The registration was accepted in May. The copyright has NOT been granted. The only thing Wright has done is file paperwork. Nobody has awarded him a copyright, yet. |
|
|
|
Wait a second, you use the publicly proven Duckdice scam while you have the option to play with consumer protection service inclusive and after being scammed you cry? So you are the type of person who intentionally holds his hand into fire and afterwards cry?  Nobody trusts you. Your continuous, unsolicited advertisements are becoming tiresome. You have the opposite of a reputation here, and for good reason. Go peddle your "services" on a different forum. |
|
|
|
A copyright registration is NOT the same thing as a copyright.
Its really not so hard to understand.
If you read the coingeek article first on the issue, then I can see how you might be confused on the matter.
Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
Craig Wright has not applied, he did that months back. He has now been issued a fully vetted certificate of copyright by US Government Copyright office. This can not be contested unless you have standing so this is it, game over, checkmate. No, he didn't. You're referencing the coingeek article? It says nothing about that. Can you provide another source? • U.S. copyright registration no. TXu 2-136-996, effective date April 11, 2019, for the paper entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, with year of completion 2008. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
• U.S. copyright registration no. TX-8-708-058, effective date April 13, 2019, for computer program entitled Bitcoin, with year of completion 2009 and date of first publication January 3, 2009. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright wrote most of version 0.1 of the Bitcoin client software, and the registration covers the portions he authored. |
|
|
|
|
A copyright registration is NOT the same thing as a copyright.
Its really not so hard to understand.
If you read the coingeek article first on the issue, then I can see how you might be confused on the matter.
Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
|
|
|
|
-1 from a Hitler reference  It was actually a Nazi reference, but I get what you're saying... I accept the -1 willingly. I'm not taxing you, nutildah! I was just amusedly observing we are one step away (-1) FROM referencing Hitler - which in this ebullient thread happens with remarkably low frequency. Well that context makes remarkable sense which I had not considered. Probably the rum speaking on my behalf. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is open source. You cant file a copyright over it.
You can file the copyright -- anyone can. Whether or not it will be granted is a whole 'nother story. |
|
|
|
I think his slogan should be, Make America Greaterer Again I mean that's even more great, right? He should aim high.  |
|
|
|
Bitcoin and dollars are intrinsically worthless both are fiat currencies. The co-existence of two fiat currencies and its analysis is nothing new.
This account and OP were both registered less than an hour ago. Beginning some low level, cryptic (no pun intended) FUD campaign. You're supposed to read these posts and think "gee whizz, maybe bitcoin ain't so hot after all. Better invest in some shitcoin fork instead." |
|
|
|
No malware found on the website, but I'm sure its got to be a scam of some sort, trying to sucker in the greedy and the gullible. Most notably convincing was the website's listed physical address, which is: 1800 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94103 This is home to a historical building known as The Armory. It was most recently used by porno filmers kink.com and is currently unoccupied: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Armory |
|
|
|
It seems like Petro was another way for Maduro's people to get more money and enrich corruption.
They used the blockchain technology wrongly and they disrespect the cryptocurrency industry. The sad thing is that people in Venezuela trusted this system but they ended up losing more money.
During their big NEM token sale they raised about $250,000 altogether if you add up the tokens moved from their main address and multiply it by $60, roughly the price of a barrel of oil at the time. Of course, they ended up ditching the whole thing in favor of releasing their own super duper X11 Dash hybrid coin, which, by all estimates, probably never even existed and was just numbers on a database or spreadsheet. Only a handful of Venezuelans bought paper certificates representing Petro holdings, but yeah, they all got shafted. |
|
|
|
don't know what you dont understand gents, not copy, take over, and i explicit said from 1st minute. There is any scam here that's not other that the coin that you complaint that we copy paste, we archieve the idea and want to follow the project, i think is a beautiful iniciative.
About the team, i am one of those traders that almost bought this coin in the ICO [lvt] and reading above, i said that white paper and team will be l released when we release the exchange platform, that is coming within 48-72 h. There is a lot of camuflated plagiarism in the cryptoworld, i said before, we love the concept from the a-z and as announced in title, we takeover the concept, the original team is gone as far as i know.
So i would love to leave this clear to keep with the project development.
You're not taking a pre-existing coin over. You've started a new coin using information from another coin. You should be banned for plagiarism already. Don't put this same stuff in your white paper without at least crediting the original source. |
|
|
|
What they need is for them to release their BETA version to boost investors confidence during their ICO. Every investors are not aware that most ICO that selling exchange platform as their product only delivers words but never an actual exchange platform. So for now if anyone want's to gamble on an idea and promises then This project is best suited for them.
This was my stand of this project, I think the era of coming out and tell people to give you money and later develop is gone, now show us you have the capacity to deliver on your promises. STEX exchange is a new exchange and did not ICO so are more small exchanges in the space, so why are these people bent on collecting people's money and for doing nothing, Hybrid, Velic, Digitex to name a few are some of these exchange that have cause their investors to loss money because they no little to nothing on how to run exchange business I'll tell you why: because they are scammers. This is simply a cash grab. They have no plans to create a beta version because they are a scam. If they weren't a poorly thought out scam, they wouldn't need to hire a thread spamming service to bump their thread for them. |
|
|
|
~...
You basically don't have an original thought at all. You didn't credit the original authors. That's plagiarism.
No Team, No Website, plagiarized content... All they need now is a SCAM label. DOnt you think it is obvious? A project without transparency should be avoided. Yes but to tell you the truth I was just waiting for him to be banned, lol. I think a more genius way to get rid of scammers is to catch them for plagiarism in their ANN thread... Looks like you've been looking for those already but the thought just occurred to me this evening. |
|
|
|
This is another word-for-word plagiarized ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144815.msg51118548#msg51118548Took their project description from this Medium article: https://medium.com/@LivesToken/livestoken-lvt-s-pre-ico-introduction-symbiosism-economy-and-its-realization-34519614c02dHere's some examples for you, with the ANN text first and the Medium text second: 1. Today, under the increasingly fierce market competition, the market needs a new model that can benefit both business and user in order to solve the problem of product homogeneity, low customer loyalty, and high cost of user acquisition to eventually achieve the purpose of sustainable development.
Today, under the increasingly fierce market competition, the market needs a new model that can benefit both business and user in order to solve the problem of product homogeneity, low customer loyalty, and high cost of user acquisition to eventually achieve the purpose of sustainable development.
2. The key point of the B-Blocks Economy is to quantify the behavior of users in the process of using the Internet, so that users' behavior can finally generate economic value and gaining benefits for themselves. Thus, it can enhance the user loyalty and ultimately achieve the goal of mutual benefits, common and sustainable development of both businesses and users.
The key point of the Symbiosism Economy is to quantify the behavior of users in the process of using the Internet, so that users’ behavior can finally generate economic value and gaining benefits for themselves. Thus, it can enhance the user loyalty and ultimately achieve the goal of mutual benefits, common and sustainable development of both businesses and users. 3. B-Blocks(BBK) system is based on the blockchain technology, and the core is to generate an encrypted database for each node. The database consists of three parts: user general data (OpenID), user behavior data (users data generated on the network), and an encrypted book, which is used to record the contribution value, reputation value and transaction information of each terminal.
Symbiosism system is based on the blockchain technology, and the core is to generate an encrypted database for each node. The database consists of three parts: user general data (OpenID), user behavior data (users data generated on the network), and an encrypted book, which is used to record the contribution value, reputation value and transaction information of each terminal. I reported it for plagiarism already but its currently sitting unhandled. |
|
|
|
never saw this lol, we took material from their ANN. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140417.0. As you can see is not a copy paste 100% as we have adapted it to our possibilities, to a normal budget, and to a more fair and open mining system, where much more community is involved in the dream and it's development. Its not a 100% copy/paste because you had to change the word "LivesToken" for the name of your coin. Otherwise its word-for-word plagiarism of their documentation: Today, under the increasingly fierce market competition, the market needs a new model that can benefit both business and user in order to solve the problem of product homogeneity, low customer loyalty, and high cost of user acquisition to eventually achieve the purpose of sustainable development.
https://medium.com/@LivesToken/livestoken-lvt-s-pre-ico-introduction-symbiosism-economy-and-its-realization-34519614c02dToday, under the increasingly fierce market competition, the market needs a new model that can benefit both business and user in order to solve the problem of product homogeneity, low customer loyalty, and high cost of user acquisition to eventually achieve the purpose of sustainable development.
The key point of the B-Blocks Economy is to quantify the behavior of users in the process of using the Internet, so that users' behavior can finally generate economic value and gaining benefits for themselves. Thus, it can enhance the user loyalty and ultimately achieve the goal of mutual benefits, common and sustainable development of both businesses and users.
The key point of the Symbiosism Economy is to quantify the behavior of users in the process of using the Internet, so that users’ behavior can finally generate economic value and gaining benefits for themselves. Thus, it can enhance the user loyalty and ultimately achieve the goal of mutual benefits, common and sustainable development of both businesses and users. B-Blocks(BBK) system is based on the blockchain technology, and the core is to generate an encrypted database for each node. The database consists of three parts: user general data (OpenID), user behavior data (users data generated on the network), and an encrypted book, which is used to record the contribution value, reputation value and transaction information of each terminal.
Symbiosism system is based on the blockchain technology, and the core is to generate an encrypted database for each node. The database consists of three parts: user general data (OpenID), user behavior data (users data generated on the network), and an encrypted book, which is used to record the contribution value, reputation value and transaction information of each terminal. You basically don't have an original thought at all. You didn't credit the original authors. That's plagiarism. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
