Not relying on one source of storage is okay but it still depend on individuals, individuals in the sense that some might be creating more disaster than they think they are protecting their coin when they have it in too many storage, like I have a friend who is a very careless person and a forgetful person, managing one access to a storage has been hell for him because he keep forgetting his passwords both to his wallet and to his email most time.
Every time he wants to log in after a while, it is either he does password recovery to log in, so people like that will find it quite difficult to manage several storage, but there is still nothing bad actually in storing in a storage, it helps you to be more organized and to be able to keep an eye on your coins at once.
In this case, the joke is on your friend. This does not have anything to do with the safer or more secure manner of storing coins, whether single storage or multiple storage. This is all about an individual's responsibility or his failure to store or keep his passwords, seeds, keys, pins, and whatever important information in a safe place where he could easily access them. As for me, it is always better to store your coins in multiple storage rather than on a single one. This does not need much explanation. With a single storage, it only takes a single attack for you to lose your entire portfolio. It will not happen with multiple storage.
|
|
|
Watching TNC Pro Team vs. Keen Gaming right now. They are currently picking their heroes.
My bet goes to TNC. Let us see who will be the better team.
You are right! Keen has the lead with the net worth because of alche but the victor is still TNC. Congrats to them. The wiser moves of TNC changed the entire game. Keen's lead which started so early was not maximized.
|
|
|
Watching TNC Pro Team vs. Keen Gaming right now. They are currently picking their heroes.
My bet goes to TNC. Let us see who will be the better team.
Edit: Sweet victory for TNC! Game 1 was an easy game. Game 2 was a triumphant come-back.
|
|
|
@robelneo and @Question123:
Please specify your loan. Indicate whether the amount of the loan applied is in BTC or ETH. This is for proper recording.
I'll be taking both of your loans.
Thanks!
This is my third loan paid my last loan 4 days earlier I want to loan Ethereum Loan Amount: 0.5 Loan Purpose: Personal Loan Repay Amount: 0.5916 Loan Repay Date: August 18, 2019 or earlier Type of Collateral: None Escrow profile Link: None Ethereum Address: 0xb03C02AD21AA77dfbA24bf51AEf92cBe848e7C21 Please acknowledge receipt! And repay on this address: 0xb1f2684570af4b7aff13219d9b8f9077eedc690f. Thanks for the opportunity! Edit: For reference purposes. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x76876a60ed913601d4022c05647804d6fd6ebec54f28ceb6f4066b49ac5403caI have received the 0.05 worth of Eth and will pay before August 18 Its .5 ETH, not .05 ETH. Thanks. I'm in the process of paying what I owed you please confirm ang address kung saan ko i sesend and payment sa loan ko dito ba sa address na ito 0xb1f2684570af4b7aff13219d9b8f9077eedc690f. Please send it here: 0xAFa537D50B3d96d4e3F8b3f53F4E8C1986F898BD
|
|
|
Lomachenko is going to absolutely mop the floor with Campbell, I predict it will be absolute devestation, he is simply leagues above his opponent.
I believe Campbell would have struggled with the likes of Rigondeaux, Crolla and Linares, and would probably have lost most of these fights, so what chance does he have against Loma? So why this? My expectation is that Loma will win by either RTD or unanimous decision, probably win at least 11 out of 12 rounds too.
Campbell is going to be a student in this fight. And he is not just fighting against his teacher. He is fighting against the school principal. I am more than sure that this fight is not going to last even 11 rounds. RTD is the best that can happen to Campbell. Lomachenko looks more matured and more experienced than Campbell but I predict it's going to be a 50/50 game, youth vs experience.
Make it 90/10 for Loma. And what exactly do you mean by youth vs experience? It seems you do not know that they are of the same age.
|
|
|
Bringing Bitcoin to the level of religion would give more negative effects rather than positive ones. If you try to look at the different religions of the world today, they are mostly divisive. They tend to sow animosity between each other rather than goodwill. Religions create a body of believers who tend to be dogmatic and closed-minded. Anyone outside the group is more of a stranger rather than a fellow human. This is what is going to happen to Bitcoin if you push for it. We have to remember that Bitcoin is here as an alternative, utilized among other forms of payment. Even Satoshi himself did not call for a total replacement of fiat. The whitepaper of Bitcoin does not even talk of how the current fiat and banking system are already rotten to the core and that we need to destroy them. I suppose if there is some other cryptocurrency that becomes more effective and convenient to use and will beat Bitcoin and eventually becomes the global currency, Satoshi would be more than happy. Finally, on the contrary we are trying to get rid of religion. I hope some day you'll join us And the world will be as one -Imagine, John Lennon
|
|
|
No need to further divide such a small amount! Buy Bitcoin, be patient, and make your $2,000 a treasure! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
1) a project collected funds, 2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters) 3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically 4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
False! Although it might be contributory, it plays a very little role. You know what really killed the ICO market? It is the ICOs themselves. The ICO market used to be thriving, with a lot of investors passionately supporting crypto projects. What happened? 1. Because there were huge successes made in the market, it became a sweet target of scammers and haphazard and mediocre projects which are solely made to take a share with the pie and exit afterwards. 2. Many of the successful ICOs proved to be a crap after millions worth of investment was raised, coming out with poor to no products or partnerships at all. 3. The huge bonuses and discounts offered to attract ICO investors backfired. The investors have turned from real supporters of projects into plain profit-seekers. Just like some bounty hunters, they would dump their coins as soon as they are admitted to the exchanges.
|
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen! The third round has reached its end, the campaign is officially stopped as of now, I want to say thank you to everyone who participated, It's was a pleasure working with you guys, remember that every one of you is welcome back when the campaign restart! Payment will be sent on time after posts counting is done, you're free to remove the signature or join other campaigns. See you later ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Many thanks for trusting us to promote this promising site. On behalf of the others, I hope we have contributed something to the success of wolf.bet. Until next time. See you around!
|
|
|
ATTENTION Be extra careful of this: Instant ang nakalagay. Pero after almost 24 hours ganito pa rin:![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FfQfUApY.png%3F1&t=663&c=p7ebdOsKcFrojQ)
Ito ang nangyari. I have been monitoring the price of BTC kasi pag sa tingin ko ay umabot na sya sa dulo at medyo pababa na ulit, magcoconvert ako into PHP. Tinutukoy ko dito yung BTC na nasa coins.ph account ko. Umabot na si BTC ng halos $14,000, wala pa rin akong balak mag-convert. Pero noong nag-umpisa ng pumula at bumagsak na ng around $12,500, nagdesisyon na akong mag-convert kasi sa tingin ko baka magtuloy-tuloy pa ito pababa. Of course, gusto natin na makapag-convert tayo ng mas malaki kaysa coins.ph price kaya ginamit ko ang Coins Pro. (Basahin itong thread na ito ni GreatArkansas para sa tips https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127937.0) Buong akala ko instant talaga. Pero epic fail kasi nga almost 24 hours na hindi pa rin na-process. Ang price ni BTC ay nasa $11,000 na ngayon. Ayoko ng mag-convert kasi napakalaki na ng price difference. Too late na! Kailangan ko pa naman sana yung pera ngayon!
Kaya mga kababayan kung sa tingin nyo kailangan nyong mag-convert o baka mag-withdraw gamit ang Coins Pro, mas maiging ilipat na in advance ang inyong BTC galing sa coins.ph. Para sa tuwing gusto nyo nang mag-convert magagawa nyo kaagad. Paano na lang kung talagang bumulusok si BTC hanggang $9,000? E di posibleng maghihintay uli ako ng mahabang panahon para makabalik si BTC sa dati nyang presyo.
Napakamisleading lang nung INSTANT kasi kaya naisip kong gumawa ng thread dito. Baka sakaling may ibang matulad sa akin. Mas maiging maiwasan na lang. Maraming salamat!
Edit: Finally, after more than 24 hours, natanggap ko na rin. The advice remains though. If you guys want to withdraw or convert using Coins Pro, send your money in advance. hello po.. yung nasa cash out history ko po is 3 pending... dalawang 2ok isang 110.. pesos po yan... i choose to cash out po to bank account ko po.. tpos isang 20k na reject... so itry to cash out sya paputna coins.ph.. rejected parin.. until now pending p rin yung dalawa... nungaugust 9 ako nakapagcash out Matagal na pala yan. Mahigit 72 hours na. Create a detailed support ticket.
|
|
|
Katulad ng mga sinabi nina asu at LbtalkL, nag contact ka ba nun sa support?
Hindi na ako nag-abalang icontact pa ang support kasi huli na ako sa hinabol kung price. Hinintay ko na lang. At least $12,500 sana ang target kong selling price eh. May message sila sa coins.ph na sorry for the delay tapos ipaprocess nila ang deposit within 24 hours. In fairness, dumating naman pero a little beyond 24 hours pa.
Heads up lang to na sana pag nagbalak na magconvert gamit ang Coins Pro, mas maiging magdeposit na in advance. Yun ay kung available na sa coins.ph account ang coin na icoconvert. hi sir good eve.. sa akin sir na cash out ko papunta sa bank account ko.. tpos na rereject ako.. ano po ibig sabihin nun? Could you please give more details? Wala bang sinabi kung bakit? Try mong tingnan sa history mo, baka andun yung dahilan kung bakit rejected yung withdrawal mo. Pero you better contact support immediately.
|
|
|
Finally, another Philippine fighter taking center stage. It's been a while seeing a Filipino fight aside from Manny.
You might not know boxing if you think that only Pacquiao and Donaire is the only Filipino boxers who has a championship belt under there waist. Aside from them Donnie Nietes is also good and well-known boxer in the super fly-weight division and he is in fact the longest reigning champion of the Philippines going undefeated for 15 years in a row now. Rising stars such as Jerwin Ancajas, Jhack Tepora, and John Riel Casimero all have bouts this year all of which ended up with a win. There are lesser-known Filipino boxers out there and is only overshadowed by others because of the lack of support by their country but once they get the right break I know they'll be in the level of Pacquiao and Donaire. Sadly, the reality is that a lot of Filipinos are not really fans of Filipino boxing in its truest sense. The government most of all. They heap praises and share in the pride only when the sacrifices have paid off, sacrifices that the government has not even cared. The Philippine government fails in a lot of ways as regards support for sports. Speaking of Donaire here he is really looking good winning with a KO and a TKO in his last two fights I figured that he got his groove back on when he lost to Carl Frampton.
I don't think the last couple of fights of Donaire are something to be really proud of and celebrate. There is nothing amazing in there to be honest. The Burnett fight was not won fair and square. It was simply won due to an injury that Nonito does not even have anything to do. The one with Young was not an incredible win either. A 3-day notice fight is never a fair one.
|
|
|
My apologies for bringing this old thread back to life. I just don't think I need to create a new one for my little concern. Baka kasi meron sa inyong bibili ng either Ledger o Trezor, magpapasabay ako. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Don't worry about sa bayad, we could always use a reputable escrow. Tsaka may pang-softdrinks na rin. Maraming salamat!
|
|
|
What is certain is that only his team knows about the number of EIDOO tokens that will be burned later, and to make it clearer it's better to just keep abreast of its developments
We are planning to burn EDO forever until no EDO is left. It is theoretically possible. https://eidoo.io/edo-tokenOh, really? You are planning to burn the entire house down? That sounds funny! Well, theoritically, that is! On a more serious note though, could you guys give Eidoo a decent ANN Thread that it truly deserves? Look at our ANN here, no single info about this successful project. Only this: and this and this Even the subject still bears this old update "OVER 80k ETH RAISED." Better yet create another ANN with all the necessary info and development updates. Poor Eidoo!
|
|
|
It is worth noting that when we speak of Currency Exchange here, it does not refer to the likes of Binance, Bittrex, HitBTC, etc. Kasi madalas pag pinag-uusapan natin ang exchange o exchange platform, marahil naiisip kaagad natin yung parang trading kung saan gagawa ka ng buy and sell order. Hindi nag-iissue ang BSP ng permit o license sa mga ganitong exchanges. Yung exchange na tinutukoy dito ay yung parang money exchange lang o conversion from fiat to crypto o crypto to fiat. Kung kaya't ang license na binibigay ng BSP sa mga exchanges na ito ay para sa kanilang operasyon bilang remittance o transfer business lamang. Please take a while to read the full circular of BSP regarding virtual currency exchanges sa Pilipinas.
|
|
|
Melo's agent is really trying hard to the point that they are willing to accept:
1-year contract Minimum veteran salary Bench player or Secondary role
But still, no teams are showing interest. On what happened to Melo during his HOUSTON days make it more worst. I think if he is able to complete the whole season with HOUSTON, he might have a chance that some teams will still show interest to him.
He like to play but the Rockets are getting rid of him so the Rockets did better without him. They thought Melo is taking more shots and it has destroyed their chemistry and he has become a defensive liability to the team. Rockets are known good shooters especially in the 3 point line but with Melo having more minutes and inconsistent, that really hurts the team. Well, this might be the perfect time for Melo to finally get shelved. Perhaps the teams are thinking that even a minimum veteran salary is a waste of money. And I think it is. Why would you go for an old man whose fading talent has been shadowed by an attitude if you you could spend that money on some young ones whose potential seems infinite? Furthermore, the problem with Melo is that he doesn't feel that his stardom has since grown faint.
|
|
|
So basically it narrows down the options to BTC, BCH, LTC? As those three are the ones in the top 10 that has decent trading volume and are actually made as a currency. Anyway, sounds great then. Though the demand might not be that big, it's still a good start.
Most probably. And perhaps stablecoins? But Bitcoin more than others. I am looking more into the possible ripple effect of this giant step of a government. I am not sure if this will convert the existing companies but to those start-ups and for the ones whose owners or boards are already leaning on the adoption of crypto, this is a beautiful green light for them. If there are companies paying in Bitcoin, there will be people who are receiving Bitcoin in salaries. And if there are, there will be stores and shops that will accept it. And if these shops are accepting Bitcoin as payment, they will be spending it as well. And this is going to get wider and wider in time. Or so I hope. This is what Satoshi wanted.
|
|
|
I've known countries where Bitcoin and crypto in general are legal. In some, it is legal in the sense that it is not illegal; meaning, there are no existing laws which Bitcoin violates, nor laws which are deliberately crafted to make it illegal. While other countries consider Bitcoin legal, it is never accepted as a currency. It may be a security, an asset, a commodity, and so on but never a currency. It may be used as a medium of exchange in selected countries but these countries do not have an explicit law that backs up such set-up. And then here comes New Zealand. Starting September 1, companies in the country are allowed to pay their employees in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. There are corresponding tax laws on this as well. But here's the condition which I find amazing and encouraging. These cryptocurrencies should be a currency, meaning, that they function as such. It should be, for all its intents and purposes, a money. This is a huge step in mainstreaming the use of Bitcoin and other cryptos in the country. Sources: https://www.ft.com/content/54dd4854-bd06-11e9-b350-db00d509634ehttps://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2019/08/12/new-zealand-bitcoin-salary-regulation-bad-idea/https://cointelegraph.com/news/new-zealand-rules-receiving-income-in-bitcoin-is-legal-taxable
|
|
|
|