K... Supporting example(s) please?


Again, not true. Not only do you not know who you are slandering (if the person is truly "random"), but somebody else (a third party) needs to be present in order for it to be considered defamatory. You can't defame somebody if you don't know who they are.

I found this from a legal blog:


This was an interesting article and in the court case mentioned it was shown that the identity of the internet pseudonym had already been previously disclosed several times, meaning chances are the defendants knew the actual name of the person they were libeling.

How much was Thule making in signature campaigns before getting red tagged for what you and he are considering to be "libel"? Like $100 a month, tops? No real lawyer is going to touch this "case."


He can probably hire QS for pretty cheap but I don't recommend it.

Well thanks for that.   There goes an hour (and a half) of my life I'll never get back. Great "research" OP.


What's "porn"?

I have a dream too
Its wealth redistribution
From assholes to us.

So you paid spammers are still bumping this garbage? That's means there's a strong chance that it's a scam. All you ever do is get paid to bump scams. No reason to think this would be an exception.

Ok so let's get to the meat of it: Why was lovesmayfamilies banned? Maybe they were rushed onto DT1 too quickly but they were great at what they did.

Edit: ok saw the meta thread. Hope he gets an unban even if no longer eligible for DT1.

I'm inclined to agree with you, however we don't know that either outcome would have happened for certain. Things can only unfold 1 way in this universe and that's the way they unfolded.

What we do know is that Bernie is way less hated than Hillary. This is evidenced by the lack of a "Never Bernie" movement. This is what leads me to believe he would have easily beaten Trump as Trumps "win" (he lost the popular vote by the largest number of voters ever for an elected president) was more of a statement of how much people disliked Hillary rather than how much they liked Trump.

The competition changes every month, week, or day. It is never static. And I'm not clicking your link to read more of your incoherent gibberish.

I was facetiously talking about WO Merits. Those are actually more rare than Regular Merits. And I am a "merit source" indeed but I get a piddly amount of monthly sMerits per month compared to you. Just as I am a piddly BTC holder when compared to you.

As was previously explained to you, the price of BTC has more than tripled since its "loss of dominance". There is some decent competition in the market but it doesn't have the word "Bitcoin" in its name.

Well lucky for you there's another fine example present already.


Ok the first part of this comment is just incorrect. Not much fun really. I mean it is shockingly incorrect and based on God knows what frame of time was floating around in his empty vessel of a brain, but the bolded part is what is really telling.

Hes basically saying, "The price of pyrite and gold have both been increasing while this turd hasn't. Thus the price of this turd should go up too. Buy turd now while still cheap."

BTW what's the decay ratio for WO Merits? If I've received 4 WO Merits does that mean I have 2 sWO Merits?

1. No.
2. In order for that to happen your trend would have to be played out for 12-16 years before all 3 coins could get to 33% dominance or less.
3. No.

The mental firepower of the average forkboi is simply astounding.

Agreed. But it's still early, anything can happen. If during the debates Biden demonstrates himself to be clearly unelectable the DNC will have no choice but to back Bernie... Or, one of the other candidates, though the chances of anyone superseding Bernie are extremely low.

Its gotta be Bernie with Tulsi as VP. That's a combination that will invigorate sidelined dems.

Yeah this convo has nothing to do with Venezuela anymore I don't blame FH for splitting it.

Lately it takes roughly a 5% rise in BTC for BCH to go up 1%, so if BTC goes up by another 15% or so, then sure, it can break $300. I find it to be incredibly overpriced at the moment ($100/coin is closer to fair value imo) but markets are irrational.

Oh look. Another newb writing in big red font with the same local time as all the other fudders. Well if it's dead (price of NIM has nearly tripled in the last 3 months) guess you should move on.


Why do you pretend to care? You've already been proven as a fraudulent non investor. You got caught in your lies about the size of your investment. Just give it up already. Youre not fooling anybody.

I came up with a new metric for measuring the price of BTC.

It's the Signature Campaign / Rent Indicator.

After I learned that Bitrefill sells AirBnB gift certificates, I've been using my sig campaign to pay for my "rent" while abroad.

Current % of rent paid by signature campaign: 117%

I've watched it climb all the way from 80% over the last month and a half and I gotta say I'm pretty stoked.

You cant put dollar values on what is considered worth leaving a trust rating. The average daily salary where I live is about $5. If you make $20 a day you're basically killing it. Sure, you can shit on people for being poor if you want but that doesn't change the fact that a dollar goes a lot farther in some places than others. Therefore, people have different standards for what is considered to be a lot of money and just because it's not significant to you doesn't mean it's not significant to billions of other people.

You can't limit trust farming to just one or two subsections - why not expand it to everything that falls under the marketplace section? Ultimately deciding whether or not somebody is trustworthy is somewhat subjective, just like it is for deciding somebody is untrustworthy.

People need to use their best judgment instead of relying upon "standards" suggested by some but that don't actually exist. And then people will be judged on their judgment, which I think is fair and pretty much mirrors the system we already have in place.

But addressing what OP is asking: yeah you shouldn't be involved in trading or lending specifically for gaining trust. That's lame.

Yep, just look for another newb that starts posting on Meta right out of the gate, just like S_Therapist did... Of course there's a good chance he's still reading this thread and may now resort to spreading his posts around different sections, but I'm always wary of new or newish accounts that have such a keen interest in Meta.

Thought this was pretty funny. Peter Todd on Twitter:


https://www.twitter.com/peterktodd/status/1126593152318676997

The problem is you were recently caught using Google Translator to do Hindi translations so I do not think the admin (can mods actually unban accounts?) is likely to consider giving you a pass.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136138.0