since updown has a lot complains (about not confirmed member, not pay right amount of payment, and bad communication with campaign member), i said fxopen is the best pay per post campaign for now, in term of rates. (and better communication) They are full, so joining them is not possible. I already added the * to the UpDown.BT campaign, not much more that I can do. little correction in your table :
updown term : post/weekly -> post/monthly Thank you, will change that now. |
|
|
|
The system I described doesn't double the bet, because it doesn't need to; it's not betting at 49.5%. But it does increase the bet such that winning the 2nd bet will make up for the loss of the 1st bet and cause you to end up with exactly the same profit as if you had won the first bet.
Maybe it's only strictly martingale if you're playing for a 2x multiplier, and double your stake on a loss, I don't know the script definition. But the system I'm proposing is very martingale-ish in that it has the "making up for losses" part. Hmmm, well you are right, it is very martingale-ish, but since it doesn't match the description of a martingale betting system (can be found here) I wouldn't call it that way, even though it's quite similar. But oh well, it doesn't matter. The technique described by you is amazing and I really enjoy reading about it in this thread, even though I fail to see how this is possible. |
|
|
|
|
I really like the second idea you pitch. I have no idea if it's possible, but if it is, I would love to have something like that. Keep 0.1BTC on the first one, keep the rest on the other, safe and sound. That would be an amazing security feature.
|
|
|
|
|
What is considered constructive within this campaign? Would my last 20 posts (excluding this one) count as constructive and if not, why not? That kind of information would be really useful to me.
|
|
|
|
It might take a week but we'll find a way to make it beautiful
I can't wait! Could you please keep me posted? Thank you so much for all the effort that you will be putting into this. By the way, could you give me an estimate of the price? Always handy to know.  |
|
|
|
is updown.bt full then or not? he said he was putting a cap on the max number of participants, but who has any idea how many are participating? i suggested to someone that they join, but then realized it wasn't clear. I have no idea. I have asked them but I haven't received an answer for now. Will try to contact him on Monday/Tuesday. He/them aren't online in the weekend. |
|
|
|
Interesting. I've had my keychain in use for almost a year, and haven't had that happen. Glad it's just the ring!
Thanks for the pic! Well, stuff like that can happen so don't worry about it  No problem! |
|
|
|
That is one amazing picture! Looks great! I did notice that a piece of the brass layer broke of on my keychain. Will take a picture later on, don't feel like getting up right now, haha.
Mine did that too, but also only the ring, you don't really see that. Yup, that's why I don't care. Here is the picture by the way (ignore the dirty towel, haha):
 |
|
|
|
|
I won't switch since I have gotten paid every single week. Not always the full 100%, but I don't care about that. Doesn't mean that I don't understand why people switch to other campaigns after not getting paid, confirmed or not paid everything. I fully understand that.
|
|
|
|
I would be interested in the electrum thing!
Yeah! Two customers that want it! I have received an email from woodwallets.io, by the way. They are trying to find a good way to encrypt the seed. I have suggested them to look into GPG or SHA512. |
|
|
|
That is one amazing picture! Looks great! I did notice that a piece of the brass layer broke of on my keychain. Will take a picture later on, don't feel like getting up right now, haha.
That's the first I've ever heard of that happening (in about a year of selling these); my only guess is that there must have been a subtle defect in yours. Please do post or send me a photo at your convenience. I can swap it out for a new one, if you'd like. Will do and don't worry about it. It's a part on the keychain ring itself that chipped off. Not very noticeable. |
|
|
|
|
That is one amazing picture! Looks great! I did notice that a piece of the brass layer broke of on my keychain. Will take a picture later on, don't feel like getting up right now, haha.
|
|
|
|
Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
Yeah, they're really shady bro. They are, but I always got paid so I am sticking with them because their rates are great. I would join FXO if possible, but since they are full I can't. |
|
|
|
This is true, have noticed payments when people did 25 posts. Changed it in OP, thanks for telling that it's incorrect |
|
|
|
|
Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
|
|
|
|
Don't you hate it when btt says that your last post was within blahblahblah and don't let you post
I thought that was only on newbie rank accounts. Are you still getting them? Even I still get them if I am really fast with posting. Everybody has a posting thingy, but it decreases in time when your activity rises. |
|
|
|
Well, what you guys are talking about isn't really marginale, since that is about doubling your bet after each losing bet so that your next bet will 'make up' for all of your losses to that point. I think that "Risk Spreading" is a better name for the method described by dooglus. Correct me if I am wrong |
|
|
|
Nah, the most logical explanation is that he didn't calculate what he should be paying people right, but if you're ok with telling yourself it's for bad posts then that's fine for you, but not for everyone else who feels they've been cheated. Not really to be honest. If he states something in the OP, he can (and most likely will) use it. But that is what I think and I can be wrong of course. And how many posts did you make that wern't 'quality/constructive/on-topic/contributing' exactly? Around 10 or 15 and I don't mind at all. I can understand it with the thing that I am assuming. And the scam accusation doesn't require his response, but it might force him to stop being incompetent or ignoring people when the reputation of his business is being tarnished by accusations of scams/non-payment. Well, that is a bit harsh, but I agree with you. |
|
|
|
Also, I got paid just fine. Not for all my posts, but that's because he reduces your post count for bad posts.
I think you're just assuming that it's for bad posts or he's just using it as an excuse. I suspect he just didn't add or count the posts properly. He said to one user the posts will be carried over to the next period which he didn't get paid for and they never were. There are still several people from what I can gather who didn't get what they were owed. One user has opened a scam accusation thread because he apparently didn't get anything and not a single message was answerd. Well, it's quite clear in the opening post that he doesn't pay for posts that aren't quality/constructive/on-topic/contributing. So yes, I am going to assume that I didn't get paid for certain posts, since it's the most logical assumption. I can understand why someone would open such a topic, but I doubt he will get a faster answer because of that, haha. If someone is busy, that person is busy. Not much you can do about it. |
|
|
|
|
Well, UpDown.BT said that it was a hectic week with a lot of changes to their website. New features and all. That takes a lot of time, so I can understand why he isn't on Bitcointalk all the time. I still think that he should get a 3rd party to keep track of everything, but he doesn't want help, so there isn't much that I, or someone else, can do about it.
Also, I got paid just fine. Not for all my posts, but that's because he reduces your post count for bad posts. I don't know if the 60 participants is hit already. I have asked him in the thread, but haven't gotten a response yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
