Maybe the TI9 aegis is really for them. Let's see! My bet is on their team from quarter finals to championship, if they will reach that stage. They haven't been a champion despite their excellent team and individual performances and consistently high DPC. Well, Puppey has already been a champion. He might manage to carry the name Secret with him this time with his leadership. 


Yeah, the catch here is that there never was a TI team who won the championship twice. Perhaps the condition is there to break the curse.   

What do you mean run out? That there wouldn't be enough Bitcoin in the world? That is simply impossible to happen.

When all the 21 million Bitcoins have been mined, it means the miners will only be depending on the transaction fees. Meaning to say, business as usual. Everything goes on smoothly. If you are bothered by the billions of people in the world and the very limited Bitcoin supply at 21 million BTC maximum, don't be. There are 8 decimals points in the value of BTC. If we divide all the 21 million BTC supply to the total world population at 7.7 billion people, everyone would have 0.00272727 BTC. That is still a large amount considering that the smallest value would be 0.00000001.

The obstacles that huge or developed countries are facing are a lot different than the ones that small or underdeveloped countries are facing. Bitcoin payment in advanced countries is not much hard to implement given the fact that the perfect technological circumstances are already there. It only needs a nod by the government authorities and everything will go fine. In small and underdeveloped countries, the problem is much deeper and basic such electricity, internet, lack of smartphones, and even the lack of capacity to use smartphones.

Yes, there are online casino sites that do not have a minimum bet button. But perhaps it would be more convenient to bettors to have a minimum button. Usually, after I go all in and win, I would go back to the minimum, back to step 1. I guess there are also other bettors out there who do it this way.

Actually, it would even be better if the x2, minimum, and maximum buttons can also be used in the winning chance and payout. Just an idea.

Here's mine: $14,321.

There's still a couple of months left before the 3rd quarter comes to a close, enough time for BTCTC to break the 2019 ATH in $13,000+. The price will break the 2019 ATH and climb up higher even hitting $16,000. The correction takes place right after that, hitting my prediction price by end of Sept. 

Yep yep! I am waiting for someone who could rebuff what I have understood so far para maliwanagan ako rito. I am far from being an expert kaya alam ko somewhere may mali siguro ako sa aking pagkakaintindi.


I've read a good number of articles about LN and so far yun yung nakuha kong mga impormasyon. Pero gaya nga ng sabi ko kay Bttzed03, I might be wrong somewhere. Kaya don't take my words as authority. 

4- Darker45

Lot 2: 0.0019BTC

I will have to side with Ethereum. Bitcoin Cash has of course the technology to even match that of Bitcoin. They are claiming that they are the real Bitcoin. They have a lower fee and even addressed scalability more than Bitcoin. They have a higher TPS than Bitcoin itself. But since I don't like the way they present themselves as the real Bitcoin, I am with Ethereum.  Kidding aside, Ethereum is the number one altcoin and since BCC is an altcoin, it follows that it is subservient to Ethereum.

And yet you are still wearing their signature. Are you not even hurt that you will only receive a couple of dollars for your effort? Why is it that you are still promoting their brand?

Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0. Create a thread here about your accusation. Please detail everything clearly so that the DT members will get your point and perhaps even give a red tag to the persons involved with this project.

Please note, however, that this is not the first time someone accuses a project of being a scam. I can even say that majority of the projects in the altcoin section are scam.

Lot 2: 0.0015BTC
Lot 6: 0.0006BTC

It seems no one wants to. LOL! Let me be the first one, then. In gambling, the rule is simple. You don't gamble, you take no profit. Well, that's not even a heckle. 

Anyway, I have actually given my couple of cents here already but I think I have changed my mind. The easiest profitable strategy perhaps is to to do a little tweaking of the codes, at least in online gambling sites where it could possible be done. 

Who's made for gambling, anyway? Well, except for those genius individuals who could read cards and make the house edge look silly, we are gambling for the fun of it. It's just sad that you will have to go through all these unfortunate events to make you realize about gambling and yourself.

Greed will not only take away your money. A more intense one could also take away your family, your future and theirs, and even your life and sanity. Thanks god, you've made your realization earlier and handled everything from there pretty well.

By the way, how's gambling today? Have you left it for good?

LOL! Bull's eye! Of all the users here, it is Satoshi's that the OP wanted to be released to the public. Such betrayal of Satoshi's advocacy for anonymity. Bitcoin is designed to protect personal information and now we're trying to dig deeper, releasing sensitive information in the process, to compromise the identity behind the pseudonym.


How much?  Kidding! Perhaps it is about time the Nobel Prize be given to one who is beyond the physical human individual, and make history. Satoshi is an idea. Let the prize be given to it as it is.

Ugh, gambling has gobbled you up, mate. That is a sad story, although you are fortunate enough to still end up whole and very able to stand up and start again from zero. I have watched more morbid news about how gamblers handle huge losses.

I love gambling, although I am not really the online type. But gambling has not affected me to the point that my lifestyle has changed because of it. I only gamble a strict amount I can easily do away with. The only weird thing about me is that I would rather get out of the gambling house lost than break-even.

Actually, market speculators are not these: "people are mainly speculating and not doing the real job which was buying or selling." I think you are wrong about this. Speculators do not just idly speculate and do nothing about their speculation, not even gaining from it. The people you might be referring to are those mere shills who just release statements after statements trying to affect the market. Market speculators are actually traders and investors who are sophisticated and brilliant enough to compute and take huge risks and earn profit from it. And so they affect the prices.

Shills are pure nuisance most of the time, if not all the time. Speculators, on the contrary, are very much needed in the market.

Which information? Baka ako rin yung nagkamali.   That is why it would be best if other locals here would join the discussion to make light on all these.

Ang alam ko kasi if the channel between Juan at Karim has no or not enough balance, it cannot by used by Pedro to be able to pay Maria. Pedro => Juan => Karim => Maria. Dapat may enough balance ang nodes. So Pedro has to find another channel to be able to reach Maria. But since there are so many available channels in the network, it is impossible for any transaction not to succeed. Makakahanap at makakahanap pa rin ng ruta sa LN.

Most of the time naman kasi we, end-users, do not bother to get familiar with the nitty-gritty parts behind the technologies we conveniently use. For as long as, sabi mo nga, practical, we appreciate and make use of it. Kahit naman sa fiat that we use every single day. We do not anymore bother to ask how much is being printed in a day, how is the purchasing value determined, on what basis does the central bank create more bills or coins, and so on.

That is precisely the reason why Martingale is used. If possible, you do not use Martingale if you are on a winning streak or generally gaining in your bets. I only use Martingale when I have to recover the loss I got in the previous roll. And if successful, you will go back to your normal bet.

But there might be some people who are really into Martingale despite having successive wins. They are those who are risk-takers enough to either go home afterwards with nothing or with a huge win.


That is all what this is all about. But at least you get to enjoy more rolls before packing up.

Let us be very careful about this in terms of improving Bitcoin. It might be in our too much pursuit of practicality that the ideas of Satoshi Nakamoto might die. Sa LN design pa lang, posibleng makapasok na ang mga banks and other huge companies eh.


Ang SegWit hindi layer 2 solution yan. It is a layer 1 solution. It is an improvement done within the main protocol of Bitcoin. Dahil sa SegWit mejo lumaki ng kaunti yung capacity ng blocks. Pero the size of the blocks remain the same. My support for SegWit is all out of course. Wala naman dinagdag na third party kumbaga. 


Before Satoshi left, he entrusted Bitcoin to this man Gavin Andresen, with the instruction na kapag kinakailangan, since darating din talaga ang araw na dadami ang users ng Bitcoin and therefore ang transactions din, maaaring lakihan ang block size.

Dumating na nga ang araw, we are now trying to target a million TPS capacity or even unlimited pa nga kasi we are looking at the global market, ala Visa or Mastercard style. But instead of increasing the block size, ang ginawa dinagdagan na lang ng isa pang network alongside doon sa existing network.

Ang pangamba ko rito is that LN by design needs networks of channels na dapat may lamang BTC kasi nga ang takbo ng isang transaction ay parang utang at once wala o kulang ang laman ng isang channel na dadaanan, hindi mangyayari yung transaction. So kailangan laging fluid para tuloy-tuloy ang transactions. At dahil millions ang target ng transactions per second, ang maaaring makapagpondo lamang ng malaki sa kanilang mga channels ay ang mga mayayaman. Posibleng mga bangko o mayayamang kumpanya.

So ganito ang magiging itsura:

(Taken from: https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-the-lightning-network-cannot-be-a-decentralized-bitcoin-scaling-solution-1b8147650800)


Ganito kasi ang takbo. Halimbawa, si Pedro ay magbabayad kay Maria ng 1BTC worth of goods. Gamit ang ruta ng Lightning Network, madadaanan si Juan at Karim bago kay Maria. Kailangang si Juan at Karim ay may 1BTC din. Otherwise, hindi maeexecute yung transaction. Kasi nga parang utang, yung 1BTC ni Juan ay mapupunta kay Karim at yung kay Karim naman mapupunta kay Maria. Pag natanggap na ni Maria, saka pa lamang aabot yung 1BTC ni Pedro kay Juan.

Aside from the amazing support for importing wallets, this is perhaps the best feature of this mobile wallet.

Since you said you made a research as to the best available iOS wallet, have you encountered other wallets that are also open-sourced? When I did my little research, every wallet that is available to iPhone that I encountered was closed-sourced.

Thanks, OP!