The free unit you get when investing in the ICO might become very valuable in the future. Other people will have to pay for it  That was also my thought. Yust think about a place in the middel of a city. Just a few more information would make sense. I cannot belive that there will be a huge world. Should be better to chose a category and get a list with shop overview. You are very anxious about that stuff, but in reality, everything is just fine. If you want to earn some money, just do it. Learn the market and go ahead. |
|
|
|
Make screens of platform inside please. How many users registered on decstop version already? Is there any statistics?
So far, I can see only how many members are online. And when I try to search for how many members already registered, I still can find it. Maybe such feature doesn't exist yet. Im also trying the web version and was looking for similar information on the traffic as well but it seems there is none. For what do you need the information about how many people are currently using the web app?  As they also have mobile apps I assume most people are using those. Beside that the all in all user number is most important, at least for me. The only important question is how many people use it daily. The users which only logged in for one time will not bring revenue. It will be tough to start growing user numbers, they'll need some big marketing campaigns. Maybe they're waiting with it until they introduce more features to the platform, so they have more to offer to potential users. Maybe they will wait until the end of ICO when they have more money to develop these features and to start extensive marketing campaigns to attract more users. There are a lot of ways to attract people to the working platform! Therefore, now their task is to concentrate on ICO. And after the launch of the platform to connect marketing to attract users! Basically, they have to have time for both things to have good results. But at this stage, the devs should really concentrate more on how to do and afterwards for whom to do. |
|
|
|
I look at icobench just to know which ICOs are around, I just completely ignore ratings because in my opinion are useless as hell
I am not sure about it. Yes it is not %100 accurate but sometimes they are useless. I just check them to get to know about new projects which may be feasible to invest or have a future. Those may not be 100% accurate but moderate. It's probably personal choice, but as for me, the ratings there help me to understand and find out more about a new project. In the majority of cases, I agree with ratings of ICOs there. |
|
|
|
Yes, thats right and i think eHealth First has more potential than other healths projects here on bitcointalk.
This is why I fully support this project. I think that this could be very profitable investment As fas as I know there are not too many health projects in crypto and anything like this with such an experienced team and so well organized. I guess all crypto holders either big or small must pay attention to this project because wealth will be useless if we are not healthy enough to enjoy it. Thats true it doesn't matter how much money you have if you have irreparable health problems. You are absolutely right, there is no washed away making money if you can not use them.A very good example was shown in the movie "Breaking Bad". A lot of money to no avail. Yeah, I would say nothing matters if one has problems with health. It is the most valuable asset among everything that one may possess. Money, love, family - you cannot fully enjoy it with constant health problems. I believe that blockchain will make significant changes in healthcare sector. |
|
|
|
Great! MARK.SPACE ICO already raised 8,089 ETH and 204 BTC amounting approximately nearly $10 million at current price. and it now has 4 more days before the token sale ends. Congratulations! This is probably the most promising project here so far. I hope that it will be the leading one in the sphere of VR |
|
|
|
still waiting for a german translation of the whitepaper T_T" noone wants to translate? i translate it for 50 eth just pm me It just takes time. I think somebody is working at the moment on it. I think we will have to wait some more days. Haven't the devs said the whitepaper translations should come somewhere in March? not surprised since the white paper is so long. anyway it shouldn't be a problem. The translations of this whitepaper are going to take more time than usual for sure but I guess ther's going to be translated to german. You may read the brochures so far, there are 12 languages available, including German. As for the whole WP, the translations will be available soon according to their website |
|
|
|
Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.
it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around. Its not about the time actually , i think their team has a big connection in this field/sector, so it can bring this to some potential users that will say "Hey i want to user this platform once its ready." If it really happened, It would be good if they tell the community about it. Even the most patient users will forget about the platform in 5-year time, too long still to aim for customers. If there's no product, no demo, no something, you can say whatever you want about potential user amount, in reality it will still be different. I agree that 5 years is a long time to keep the interest in the project but if the promote it well when it's launch that sholudn't be a big problem. If to think about this project as the means of healthy life, it's quite easy to keep your interest for a couple of years. But short-term profit-gainers should pass by |
|
|
|
They were at any blockchain conferences? In which countries if yes? Can you share limk, please?
I don't know if they already attented some blockchain conferences. I didn't see any announcements on their twitter page regarding such events. I am sure, they will intensify their marketing once the start of the ICO comes closer. But a lot of projects have different conferences, meetUp before ICO. When ICO start? And will be there a pre-sale? What about the actual conference in Sidney, Australia. I know some ICOs are introduced there, but I'm not sure about CryptoFlix |
|
|
|
I agree but there is a fine line between censorship and snuffing out the lowlifes that live to ruin other peoples day. Moderation is a better term than censorship in these circumstances.
Such problem exists in all social networks, at places where going discourses about politics, religion, or history there always will be individuals who will try to hook up and provoke another by imposing their version of the truth. yep happens everywhere. it's up to the moderation team to discuss and implement a cohesive policy. Sure, there should be a kind of censorship in this network. However, the devs have to be cautious in terms of not being out of line in this stuff. Sphere is certainly the kind of project that requires continuous work, in all stages of Ico and after it, Team seems to me aware of realizing a platform that covers the failures of today's networks, surely it is necessary to include ways to inhibit harmful behavior to other Of course, censorship will have to be dealt with even in such a decentralized social network as the Sphere. Perhaps they could impose it on users. For example, a kind of dislike from the information, when a certain limit is reached, this information marked with dislike should be checked for compliance with the rules. Although this scheme also has drawbacks. I also think that moderation is better than cersorship. I think censorship should only be in the most extreme cases. Of course, but as for me, moderation is just a particular case of censorship in this case. Moreover, the latter can be done automatically, and for moderation we need people who will perform it. You are right. I think we will need a system, where a content will be blocked, if 51 % of the users voted to block it. So you can avoid censorship from only a few privileged members. That is a good idea but will be very hard to implement especially when the subscriber community grows by the millions. I think there should be an easy way to do just like that censorship thing. It can be done so that if the number of views of certain information reaches, for example, 10,000 views and has 51% dislike, then this information is checked for compliance with the rules. If there are no violations, then the information remains in the social network. I like this idea. The majority of users are to decide if it's ok with some moral rules and common sense. Moreover, this may be easily done automatically |
|
|
|
 !REPU Token Airdrop Announcement!To participate just follow the simple instructions below or you can find them when filling out the form: https://goo.gl/forms/t9ORTIOaicjW41mI2INSTRUCTIONS: GET 50 REPU tokens FREE! Instructions to fill out this form: 1) Subscribe to REPU Official Telegram channel: https://t.me/repu_official2) Enter your Telegram username 3) Enter your ETH (ERC-20 compatible) wallet address Referral Program — GET extra 10 REPU tokens (optional): 1) Invite your friend to join — you will get extra 10 REPU and your friend — 10 REPU. 2) State your Telegram username in the “Your Referral Telegram Username” field. (This will be used to identify you in the referral program). *You must stay subscribed to our telegram channel at least until the end of the ICO period! Don’t forget to invite your friends and get extra REPU tokens! Join our group: https://t.me/repu_official, AND Fill out this form: https://goo.gl/forms/t9ORTIOaicjW41mI2 to participate. Great, thanx. A nice thing to participate in. Investing in here is also a good idea, but free tokens are better |
|
|
|
Ah, the important issue of censorship in a decentralised environment. Without any rules/culling/censoring, social media can turn ugly very quickly. Will Sphere have staff members that will remove offensive content? One thing is certain - if people see pictures/video posted on Sphere that disgust them, they will not want to use it.
Yes there should be people who would be able to delete etc. The problem is always, something saved on the blockchain will stay on the blockchain, even if it is not visible on the front-end. Imagine someone uploaded your unwanted pic and it stays there forever. You can report and take down contents in centralized platforms like youtube and facebook. Personal data in blockchain sounds like Skynet to me Probably if blockchain will become even more widespread in the future, the most popular projects will the one that will be able to recover or delete some information from the blockchain. And removing blockchain information is another issue of concern probably If it happens, the whole blockchain technology will be compromized. The system is designed in the way so its faking is a very-very hard issue. The problem of 51% still exist, but no one proved it right or wrong so far. |
|
|
|
Health on the blockchain is always wonderful. We need more projects to care about people health rather than wealth
The sad thing is that most of the people in the crypto market are just here for the money. That's why projects like eHealth don't get that much attention. But that is not a problem just blockchain and crypto is facing. A lot of projects outside of blockchain also just get money if there is potential to make a lot of money with. Just thing about technology in general or the pharma industry. They don't do research to just help people. Big pharma concerns are just doing research for new medicine etc if they can sell it. A working eHealth platform is something that will change people's life. Investing now is smarter but also harder for most people due to the long roadmap. It's a bit sad. I think that big and institutional invests have more capacity to invest in something long-term rather than individuals, they can see the perks of a 5-year investment, they also have more disposable income. Maybe that's why eHealth has such a long privale placement round. Oh, if Ehealth will manage to cooperate with big players in terms of investments (e.g. on some special terms), it would definitely be great! I always thought here about partnerships in terms of working and acting, not of investments |
|
|
|
It is nice when I read that cryptoflix will offer free educational contents. I wish the content will have a good quality and not just the ordinary one.
It depends on what is good quality for you. Free content usually has a bit lower quality, since plagiarism is a crime. We'll see how cryptoflix will deal with it. As far as I understand, they plan to introduce educational content later, after the main platform will be ready, right? Apparently, their primary goal is video content. Of course it may contain some educational materials, but first of all they have to attract audience. This can easily be done with entertaining, not educational materials. |
|
|
|
|
The bonus is not the highest now - it's only 5%, but it is better than nothing, right? So the ones willing to invest can still jump into closed sale for several more days.
|
|
|
|
Please, help! I've never bought an ICO coin but I am interested in MRK I know that we contribute to this project by ETH or BTC ==> Can we also withdraw (in ETH and BTC) anytime that we want to? Any body has ever withdrawn (in ETH and BTC) successfully from this project? Thank you so much! I think you need to find some research before joining an ico. You put btc and eth but you get mark tokens in return. You can't withdraw eth and btc anymore unless you convert your mark in an exchange. Sounds like new users flooding into crypto investments. Maybe youtube what is an ICO ? On the bright side, it is good that new people enter the market so shortly after the big crash and apparently Mark.Space can benefit from this. Normally, now the market is overwhelmed with hamsters, because the wise guys entered it when BTC was 6k. Anyways, either hamsters' or whales', the investments are always good news for the project. |
|
|
|
I was reading the whitepaper and It seems to have an interesting business plan. It could be a good investiment!
It certainly is an interesting goal - one with multiple competitors have emerged. Repu needs to show some demo or beta to show investors why they should be the one to succeed above the rest. Right, with the project plan of Repu compaign, the future successful partnerships are just around the corner. I would say that investing here would be a middle-term profit. |
|
|
|
Great news, it's two months to ICO start date, and CryptoFlix is featured ar WCI. Additionally, by no means all ICOs appear there at even later stages of development. |
|
|
|
I agree but there is a fine line between censorship and snuffing out the lowlifes that live to ruin other peoples day. Moderation is a better term than censorship in these circumstances.
Such problem exists in all social networks, at places where going discourses about politics, religion, or history there always will be individuals who will try to hook up and provoke another by imposing their version of the truth. yep happens everywhere. it's up to the moderation team to discuss and implement a cohesive policy. Sure, there should be a kind of censorship in this network. However, the devs have to be cautious in terms of not being out of line in this stuff. Sphere is certainly the kind of project that requires continuous work, in all stages of Ico and after it, Team seems to me aware of realizing a platform that covers the failures of today's networks, surely it is necessary to include ways to inhibit harmful behavior to other Of course, censorship will have to be dealt with even in such a decentralized social network as the Sphere. Perhaps they could impose it on users. For example, a kind of dislike from the information, when a certain limit is reached, this information marked with dislike should be checked for compliance with the rules. Although this scheme also has drawbacks. I also think that moderation is better than cersorship. I think censorship should only be in the most extreme cases. Of course, but as for me, moderation is just a particular case of censorship in this case. Moreover, the latter can be done automatically, and for moderation we need people who will perform it. |
|
|
|
great found, thanks for sharing. Lets take a look. I guess we discussed that video some time ago. Anyways, I can't really understand the point of it, I just don't see its key point. |
|
|
|
I think nobody read the whole whitepaper...except the guys who participated in the bounty campaign to translate it If i were a big investor and would put some 100k's or even millions i would probably read it but for 1-2 eth (my investment budget) brochure is enough  i think so, for a small investors is probably not necessary to read all the detail about the project, in particular the very technical ones. The brochure is giving all the general information to make a decision. We are complaining about the Whitepaper being too long but we should be happy that they made it very detailed and not just like any other project's whitepaper. Actually, i'm not complaining, i am happy that they made a great effort for whitepaper and made a very detailed one. I am just not reading it I skim through whitepaper, long ones I may never open. Will just speculate on how the public reacts the public will probably react positively considering how large it is. it gives credibility to the team. Thick whitepaper can give benefit and shortage too. At one side, thicker wp can give confidence that the project will be handled in earnest ways. But at the other hand, thicker wp will make people bored. Definitely true, I would strongly recommend to make a shortened version of their WP with just keypoints - like up to 20 pages. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
