But if the masses participate in the LN and keep their own hubs online, then the banks will at least have some competition, keeping the network in check
So would you let a total stranger borrow $1 from you even if you know you are 100% guaranteed to get it back
which you are in this case like
Me ----------$1.00 -------> You ------$500 ----->Bank One.........>
if you act as a hub/bank for me then your deposit at the banks goes down to $499 which is not a big deal and you could even swap banks
without any trouble if another bank offered you lower fees or the old bank kept going off-line without upsetting me as shown below
Me ----------$1.00 -------> You ------$155 ----->Bank Two.........>
Just opening yourself up as free hub would have you flooded in seconds so it would have to be some type of manual
process you would need to use when deciding who to let people in but yes it works but what if this then happens
Me <----------$49.00 ------- You <------$205 -----Bank Two
<------ $50 --------- My MumYour balance with the banks goes up to $205 and now your balance with me becomes a credit of $49 to me
and I then close the channel and your left holding the baby and having to pay the $30 transactions costs
Do you think a bank is going to let you pump 100 transactions a hour through them given that they too are
forced to pay fees and won't charge you this fee plus a profit margin and you might be nice and don't mind
lending your BTC out in the private ledger with me for free but banks don't work like that so in effect deposits of
opening a channel do not pass up the chain so even if I deposited $1000 with you then it does not mean that
you can spend $1499 with bank one.
Forget the development team programming and testing this "thing" because they have not even put out a document
that crosses all the dots and signs the tee's that anyone can understand so all we get is wishful thinking and visual
propaganda from Lightning being fast and yes it could speed it up but this is no racing car that's for sure