In this past few days, I have been looking and wanting to join any good IEO or an ICO project, But I need to invest with a promising project that maybe profitable in the future.
Any suggestions are accepted, Thank you!
Currently ICOs are no where to be found, that is, I haven't seen any project running ICO for a while now. However, IEOs are still coming up with each passing day thus making it a herculean task knowing the good ones from the hype ones. My little advice is, if you are seeking to invest in any IEO, let it be on top exchanges so you can stand a chance of making something profitable, and if after your due diligence you trust the project, you can hold but if you don't you can sell and move on. |
|
|
|
|
The key point is decentralization, I think that's the reason why DAI is a bit better than other stablecoins. It has maintained a fair position over time and with decentralization growing more, I think it will hold a vital position in the future. However, when compared with other stablecoins like USDT, USDC etc it shows that they are topping the charts as well as popularity more than DAI but I still hold my stance and that is, decentralization matters thus giving DAI an edge in the near future.
|
|
|
|
|
ANN thread for a new startup company or project is very important, although most projects don't do it but still succeeds. The reason why ANN thread is important is that, it will give the project more exposure, and also create an avenue where members can ask questions, compare questions, answers, ideas etc through this way educating everyone. You might say, telegram group can do it, yes it can, but this forum is basically the largest crypto forum duly moderated and it is where you will find brilliant minds, smart investors etc who will challenge you thus making you to offer efficient services while growing your project. So I think it's wise you get started by creating the ANN thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy coins are really needed in this space as it brings in more anonymity and privacy to users transactions. Also, I think the future of privacy coins are threatened owing to what Okex did and thus other exchanges might decide to follow suit. What am trying to say is, there is need for plan B and just like someone stated here, there is need for advanced decentralized exchanges which can list these privacy coins thus helping to maintain the reason for their creation.
|
|
|
|
|
You stated the obvious fact and that's the truth and nothing more. IEOs rushed in and was embraced but it all turned to a game of exchanges making money and investor pursuing profit and not what the coin is offering; this act and many more has led to many altcoins coming up which are just a retwist of what is existing. Top altcoins like ETH and its likes will keep maintaining their competitive advantage while others will keep dying off. Lastly, Bitcoin holds a great portion of the future of the crypto space while other genuine altcoins contributes as well, one coin can't do it alone because there are more horizons to be explored.
|
|
|
|
Good day everyone, I've been back here and now there is a lot of new things here. Also about the funds raising strategy. Nowadays IEO is the most very effective fund raising today. Also because the exchange holds the token and they distributed after the token sale. And also this kind of token sale is favor to an exchange. But I saw some errors or false about IEO. There is token sale for example on LATOKEN exchange, That exchange (LATOKEN) sell the token (IEO) but in the end they will not list on their exchange so for me that is not good. What if the token is sold out? And its not listed on that exchange mentioned. So how the traders/investors will get the profit? Also very risky right? What do you think guys?
Yes and am of the notion that IEO is more effective and a superior option than ICOs not after what we have passed through. However, the only condition I think should be taken care of during participating in any IEO is the exchange; that is, top exchanges makes IEO worth it, because in addition to security, good return is assured. Talking about a project having its IEO in an exchange and didn't later list happen in time past not nowadays; even if it is done on different exchange it will still get listed on both exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
You are right and believe you but to an extent; to me the issue isn't holding altcoins but instead it is the type of altcoins we are holding. Some of these new coins nowadays are not worth holding, some are just a product of profit; that is the team will cause the neccessary hype then cash out and the project will be on a downturn, now the issue isn't the downturn but the effort of the team to ensure the platform keeps standing. Most team lacks what it takes to maintain a project and the current nature of the market is exposing them one after the other. Furthermore, holding good altcoins is worth it such as ETH and its likes.
|
|
|
|
|
That's more like it. A shady team or project hates it when community members asks challenging questions which can lead to more members asking too, so what they do is to ignore the question, but if it becomes persistent they will remove the person. Also, another turn off you clearly stated is lack of updates to the community; as sad as it sounds this hugely takes place after public sale, they will just go blank. Nevertheless, all these you stated should be carried out first and foremost to know the credibility of the team etc, if possible provoke them to see how they will react.
|
|
|
|
Why is no one talking about price listing of exchanges? exchanges listing is becoming a huge problem for many start up projects, how can an exchange be demanding for 8btc to list? how will the projects have enough money to work on their roadmap? i think exchange problem is what many of us are not seeing and talking about...it would have been a different story for some projects that lacks funds
I think no one is talking about it because it will have little or no effect neither will it make the exchange reduce the listing fee. However, irrespective of the fact I like upcoming projects to list on a good exhange, but am not a party to paying huge fees for first listing in any exchange. That is, i think it's better to list on a normal exchange with good liquidity first, build up the platform then consider listing on other exchanges, in this way the team won't be caught up with lack of funds to run the platform. |
|
|
|
The way they usually work is they give you some string and you sign it to prove you own the address.
Could a malicious air drop make a transaction sending all your BTC to them, and then you sign it, and then they broadcast it to the network?
Or is signing a message different than signing a transaction?
Airdrops are meant to be safe because they entails simple tasks to create awareness about the project in different ways , but nowadays scammers have looked for ways to exploit it so as to scam participants. Any airdrop that asked for your private keys or tell you to sign a certain message by providing you with a link to follow is highly fraudulent. Also, any Airdrop asking you to send a certain amount of ETH or as the case maybe looks questionable too. |
|
|
|
|
That's the reality on ground, no volume on exchange means no one is buying thus a dead coin. Now since it's already on exchange that is to say, it's either a pump and dump coin which ran out of luck, or a coin whose team listed and exit scam; to be frank, if its on most exchanges it will be delisted. As for the coins you are holding, i thinks it best you accept your fate while hoping for something to turn out since they are already listed.
|
|
|
|
|
Most of these ICO rating websites can't be trusted, some can collect funds and give whatsoever rating they want so as to attract investors for the project. I have seen some projects which had good ratings or so we thought but ended up failing. I think the main issue is, studying and knowing if the project is worth it or not, and if it does , whether its listed on any ICO rating websites or not participating in it. It is our duty to know the legitimacy of a project not a group of people telling us based on their own opinion (although it might count atimes).
|
|
|
|
Most profitable bounty projects from 2018 are all mostly dead now which means they are profitable back then because of the altcoin bullrun, it doesn't mean they are good projects because they are bring high profits and i bet if altcoin season is out now many failed project won't fail just like that, they will still bring profits due to the altcoin season, bear market of altcoin is really killing off bad project if you ask me
This is true, during the last bull run they looked like they are offering something but ever since the market took a different turn, their true colour has been exposed. Like you said, the bear market is helping to kill off bad project and with the level of awareness currently on, in the near future many of them will die off. Soon, this space will be highly competitive that if any project can't keep up, it will be overtaken by others. Let's endeavour to be holding the right and valuable coins. |
|
|
|
|
The key word is hype, hype is a very strong force which if adequately harnessed has the potential to lead a project to success; the the reason most projects takes time to create enough hype before going for public sale. In addition, most projects creates hype with their MVP while some create hype through other means; those with MVP always tends to last while does without always tend to become worthless sooner than later. Therefore it is very important for us to know where and how we invest our funds so as to be on the safer side.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you right, risk is part of the things to bear in mind in any Investment, even also, most teams will add risk assessment in their whitepaper to educate their investors but sadly enough most don't read the whitepaper and will also be quick to say all sorts of things. On the other hand, most times investors can be right too when the team aren't doing anything to assure them they are working; imagine after listing and the team goes mute, no development, I have seen cases like this and it's what leads investors into badmouthing the project they once supported. Some that did ICO last year are yet to list while they keep saying they are working and yet nothing to show for.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
