You seem to be defending this shitcoin pretty hard why?
Because i'm tired to see fud on EVERY coin launch out there. It's like being in a hairdresser place with a bunch of Womens whining constantly about everything. Whenever I am around, I reply on the forums simply. What makes it a shitcoin? Looks better than anything else we launched this week to be honest. 5000 block premine does= shitcoin? >> At least that premine isn't hidden like Elitecoin.. And premine.. they all have it. Why don't you just pass on and do something of your time. |
|
|
|
You seem to be defending this shitcoin pretty hard why?
Because i'm tired to see fud on EVERY coin launch out there. It's like being in a hairdresser place with a bunch of Womens whining constantly about everything. Whenever I am around, I reply on the forums simply. What makes it a shitcoin? Looks better than anything else we launched this week to be honest. |
|
|
|
Meh, new algo, NINJA, gonna read.
Okay, there's a lot of bounties.
I'll try to help somehow.
the cheap whore of coins wants in. im out! fuck u dev! go peddle your scam bullshit elsewhere. Seek for medical attention. +1.. People are so used to uninnovation, they go all nutsy when new stuff arises! If somebody can get us the python hash package, we might try that new algo. |
|
|
|
Honestly I don't see why the pools are jumping on this. Pushing shitcoins with 5000 block premines is something that only poolmn usually does.
Well, as you see this is not true, don't blame pool.mn again. Either way, whatever we launched and you launched during the last few weeks are all shitcoins, unfortunately. Miners need to understand we work by offer/demand.. If there are no coins to host and no miners mining, our pools won't be there.. but as long as there is a demand, we are offering! If the pools and exchanges ignore these shitcoins these shit devs will make better coins. I think the ball is in the exchanges camp.. people know any coins has a high chance to make it on bittrex, therefore will mine it. Even if we passed, that would just get all the shitty scammy pools (those that don't pay you your dues) around, and will just worsen the condition. Our service basically is to pool all your hashrate together to mine coins, regardless of what coin it is. We still do some selection, but this one seemed decent so we went for it. Exchanges need to be stricter, those are harder to replace versus replacing pools. all need laws and when the big boys get here look out, lucky if you make 2 cent an hrs I'm not sure anybody would follow any kind of regulation even if there was some. There were MANY attemps at regulating these... people were all up for it, nobody did shit, and users complained big time "let us choose what to mine". This is a free market, and from our perspective we only offer a service. Ultimately, it's your choice to mine or not.. it's that simple  U ain't liking it? Why bothering whining, just pass. |
|
|
|
Honestly I don't see why the pools are jumping on this. Pushing shitcoins with 5000 block premines is something that only poolmn usually does.
Well, as you see this is not true, don't blame pool.mn again. Either way, whatever we launched and you launched during the last few weeks are all shitcoins, unfortunately. Miners need to understand we work by offer/demand.. If there are no coins to host and no miners mining, our pools won't be there.. but as long as there is a demand, we are offering! If the pools and exchanges ignore these shitcoins these shit devs will make better coins. I think the ball is in the exchanges camp.. people know any coins has a high chance to make it on bittrex, therefore will mine it. Even if we passed, that would just get all the shitty scammy pools (those that don't pay you your dues) around, and will just worsen the condition. Our service basically is to pool all your hashrate together to mine coins, regardless of what coin it is. We still do some selection, but this one seemed decent so we went for it. Exchanges need to be stricter, those are harder to replace versus replacing pools. |
|
|
|
no not really just  the dev with pw=china will b rich im not mining anyhow I respect your opinion altho it lacks any proofs. There are so much coins on which we were up first, are they all my coins now? rofl |
|
|
|
Honestly I don't see why the pools are jumping on this. Pushing shitcoins with 5000 block premines is something that only poolmn usually does.
Well, as you see this is not true, don't blame pool.mn again. Either way, whatever we launched and you launched during the last few weeks are all shitcoins, unfortunately. Miners need to understand we work by offer/demand.. If there are no coins to host and no miners mining, our pools won't be there.. but as long as there is a demand, we are offering! |
|
|
|
Honestly I don't see why the pools are jumping on this. Pushing shitcoins with 5000 block premines is something that only poolmn usually does.
We are here to serve our miners. We go with whatever is requested... If we think this way, we wouldn't have launched any coin since months. |
|
|
|
THIS IS A SCAM COIN BY SUCHPOOL DONT MINE IT LOOK AT THE BLOCKS AT LAUNCH So its our coin because we can compile faster? haha We compile in 40 secs and we have scripts to insert the wallet address and launch the stratums, all automated. Sorry for being competent  that many block at launch at launch  U MAD BRO? Stop hating those doing their job properly. Fudders be fudding, but you can say whatever you want. Automation is the way to go  |
|
|
|
Dont be stupid and call out for dev for instamining, suchpool started really fast and there was just few blocks mined before they started...
2 blocks were mined it seems before we start! Great launch! |
|
|
|
THIS IS A SCAM COIN BY SUCHPOOL DONT MINE IT LOOK AT THE BLOCKS AT LAUNCH So its our coin because we can compile faster? haha We compile in 40 secs and we have scripts to insert the wallet address and launch the stratums, all automated. Sorry for being competent |
|
|
|
Pool is up from 3rd block? LOL. What a fail. Shame. Thank goodness I didn't want to launch the pool immediately right after the launch, although I've found the source on github early. It is better when suchpool is behind the instamining ))) i did not even look @ github when i saw that premine ^^ No its not our coin. We just have a lot of cores, and automation scripts. The source was actually posted earlier too on the thread (2 mins before) |
|
|
|
http://suchpool.pw/bt
Getting mad blocks! Come and grab yours!
1 account and 1 set of workers for all pools on our new interface
Multiple Load-Balanced Node.JS Stratums + VARDIFF
24/7 Monitoring on Stratum, MPOS, Central Wallet, Mysql and much more
Helpdesk Support System, Active team, DDoS Protected and Flood filtered
10 Dedicated Servers in Cluster, Multiple databases and frequent full database dumps
Hosted in a state of the art Datacenter using n+1
Best bandwidth carriers, excellent connectivity and latency worldwide
http://suchpool.pw/bt
To reach us:
URL: http://www.suchpool.pw
Email: admin@suchpool.pw
IRC: irc.freenode.net - #suchpool
Twitter: @SuchPool
Support: Support.SuchPool.pw
|
|
|
|
Im talking with Dedicatedpool , those guys know there shit !
Hashharder knows their stuff even more in my opinion, their whole pool has been coded by themselves. And afaik, hashrate reporting close to what it is. |
|
|
|
|
I know we shouldn't judge a book by it's cover.. but damn that has to be the ugliest pre-launch website I've ever saw..
Easy to slap some pictures together with paint.. I am eager to see them deliver, if that happens.
|
|
|
|
I was one of the first to notice and report this problem to NH. I asked for a refund on only one of the many orders that delivered about 16% of the hash I paid for. They refused to give a refund on even one small order, which I told them there were a few others as well. Then they asked for all kinds of pool information and my first born child before they would even look into a refund. Since my orders were only about .04 btc, I didn't want to bother IPO's pool owner, he does a great job and doesn't need this hassle. All I can say to Nice Hash is that whenever I have rented from Mining Rig Rentals or Betarigs, and there was a problem, I was quickly refunded for the lost hash, no questions asked. NiceHash has not been very "Nice" to it's core renters, and if this continues, I can only see a competitor sprouting up that will offer the same service, and with the same customer support and refund policies as Betarigs or MRR. I have put a trademark name on this new company, FairHash, so if any devs are interested in starting it, just let me know, and I only want a "Fair" compensation for my name.
Lol, I'm sorry, but what kind refund do you want? You pay only for valid shares. Ah, I see, "miningrentals" in signature. Direct competitors? I can confirm this issue aswell. There are a lot of users who complained about hashing at a pool, having their btc SPENT on nicehash but not getting any shares. How come are they charged for shares never submitted at the pool? Multiple users, on multiple pools. This issue is present with all the proper big pools around, including ours. This is clearly a nicehash issue, and we'd like them to improve their service. |
|
|
|
i guess nicehash doesnt work with suchpool either, btc's going down and no shares on the pool.
what do you mean? nicehash has some issues with some pools, so far suprnova, ipominer, and suchpool are what i have found. I have talked to nicehash and they are just dicks about and and claim im trying to fud them. The owner of ipominer has talked to them about it, something to do with the stratum i dont remember what exactly, and again they were just dicks about it. So just letting you guys know to pay attention, what happens is it eats your btc and everything looks like its mining and you get no shares on the pool. Not fudding suchpool, they are a great pool. its an issue with nicehash, they know about it and refuse to fix it. Good you mention it, I wasn't aware of such issue. I'll keep a close look. Could this be that they would mine with the wrong algo, therefore not producing any shares? If the pool doesn't accept the share, nicehash shouldn't be charging it to the renter since they are supposed to only charge valid shares. Usually nicehash works flawlessly as I use it on some launches to get some coins myself. I hope they address the issues on their side. no its not wrong algo, I have tested it myself on several coins and several pools and made sure the settings were all good. wuher knows the specifics of what the deal is if you want to get with him on it. And yeah I have used it on your pool before with no issues but today it chewed up a bunch of btc and zero shares on the pool. I wish they would just fix it, I hate being limited to other pools man. Just heard this was wider than Suprnova Ipominer and Such, confirmed issue on Dedicatedpool and TradeMyBit aswell.. This is clearly a nicehash issue, since all skilled top dog pools around suffer from this. |
|
|
|
A Tested and Approved MiningRigRentals Compatible Pool
Don’t Leave Your Coins at Risk on The Outdated MPOS Pools
Mine Safer With Us
Mine USBCoin with Us at 0.05% Fees
Lol this is so fud.. Most of us don't run the stock MPOS code, and coins are NOT at risk when you use cold storage. Please let me remind you this is not a possibility under nomp Also, running a proper stable MPOS pool ensures the miners skilled admins are behind it. Any dumbass can operate a NOMP pool, but that's not the case for MPOS |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
