Bitcoin doesn't fight corruption directly, it's a symbol of transparency and the government hates transparency because they feel the people will see everything they are doing. If the government adopt bitcoin as a means of payment, legally adopted within a country as a legal tender, the rate at which people will steal mass money will be cut down to zero. Imagine where the government allocated $4 million for a mass project, the wallet address is visible to be public and everyone else is seeing the balance, do you think they wouldn't hold public leaders accountable for missing funds, stealing will become difficult and corruption will become completely eradicated.
Corruption is not even that much hidden to be fair. I mean if you think that it is hidden, then check the bribes that US politicians get, or check your own, I am sure that you will find it everywhere in the online news world, there are a lot of people talking about corruption going on in every nation of the world. So bitcoin wouldn't really change that, like for example my own nation has a website that shows all the money spent on what, and government and cities are spending their money to friends anyway without worry, because they know that you either vote for them, or you vote for their opponents which you dislike, hence they know their fans will accept their corruption. |
|
|
|
I just checked that to be honest 1$ a day is quite good in many situations. for instance, the minimum wage here is about 17$ /month.
But that annual yield rate is quite big if you ask me, makes me wonder about risk exposition when hunting passive income on casinos, it is also interesting how USDT occupies such a importance percentage of their staking pool, I would have expected BTC to have a protagonistic place, but it seems i was wrong.
If your minimum wage is $17 per months, that investing $850 to get $1 a day is something unreal. And you will get this $1 as 0.53 USDT, 1.27 TRX, 729sat, 0.0006 BNB and 0.000073 ETH. BetFury minimum withdrawal amounts for some altcoins are quite high, so it will take time before you can withdraw them. Such investment wont be a solution for low salary as you will have to wait some time before you will be able to withdraw and loose on withdrawal fees. I do not know any nations with 17 dollars per month salary, maybe daily? That is a super low amount, I do not think that even the poorest nations would have such a thing maybe aside from Venezuela, even my nation which is doing horrible in economy, has like 250 dollars per month to 300 dollars per month minimum wage, it is still quite low of course but not 17, that is just too wild. In that regard 850 dollars investment could be found by just signature campaigns and you would be a wealthy person from the income of that alone, plus all the investments you could do. |
|
|
|
Max said (ironically) not long ago something like his car is the fastest on the straits, and on the corners too  The thing is that after the last two races he looks like the most solid option for the winner, but F1 tends to offer suprises. If we're lucky and Ferrari stops sabotaging himself, maybe we get a better chance to see some good racing either between RBR and Ferrari, either between Ferrari and Mercedes. For sure Max feels he is number 1 this year and it gives him a lot of confidence. But for bets I would prefer bigger gains, the difference between 1st and 2nd option (1.29 vs 6.28) is so huge, that I would not risk 10 sats to win 13 if I may bet 2 sats on other driver and have the same result. It just gives much more opportunities. It is a few things that went well for him that was out of his reach. I mean Mercedes is not as good as they used to be, which has nothing to do with Max but it did helped him a lot, on top of that Ferrari used to be better than them for a while in the early races, but then they screwed up as a team and now they are feeling stress every week, we may talk about how horrible the team is and how they are ruining the chances of the drivers, and you think they do not read about it? They are all very well aware of all the things we write and it puts more pressure on them and makes them do more mistakes. So, Max is of course great, but other teams are worse too. |
|
|
|
Betfury already has the system to minimize the abused it especially for FunFury competitions, players can only win this competition 7 times regardless of your rank even though you are not at number 1 but if you are already included in the leaderboards then you are already counted as a winner because you get prizes and are limited to 7 times, here is the details https://betfury.io/promo/battles?modal=FunFuryCompetitionWhat if someone opens a brand new account just for this, in fact they could open 10 accounts at the same time, let them mature, and use them one by one until they reach 7 wins and then move to next one? And start a new one when the old one finishes, that way they would always have 10 accounts to use whenever needed. Abuse is always there, it is very hard to not get abused as a casino, it would be very tough for them to not get abused. In order to do that, pre-arranged stuff won't work, they have to be manually checking every single winner and make sure that they are not cheaters, otherwise they would be pretty upset when they find out what happened. |
|
|
|
It looks like Graham potter will be the next target of sacking by Chelsea, if Graham potter can't quickly give a good performance for Chelsea then Graham potter must be prepared to be the victim of sudden dismissal. Because Chelsea basically don't want their team to keep losing and Chelsea can't appreciate a coach who has done a good job for the team so yeah, I'm not sure Graham potter will stay until his contract expires. Because from the information I got, Graham Potter has a 2-3 year contract, I believe that if Graham Potter still doesn't produce good results during that period, he will be fired. Get ready!  Even funny, I never even saw this coach. His achievements are also not many. The history of coaching is also quite minimal champion. Even for europe he doesn't seem to have enough experience. I thought Chelsea would buy Pochetino or Zidane for the next coach, but I was wrong. Hopefully this is not Chelsea's step back. This is because they buy coaches with minimal experience. This made everyone feel strange and doubtful. Dude managed about 400+ games total which over half of them were on Ostersund but still it was managing and I believe that should be counting for something, then swansea and lately Brighton which is more than enough, hell they beat United to be fair, that should be something. However, what Chelsea was looking for was an interim coach, just like how United got that guy last year after firing Ole, they were going to go with Erik, but they wanted someone in the middle, this is that guy and yes we are just in September right now but all good managers are taken, so by this summer I am %100 sure they will get someone better and it will look better too. They couldn't do proper transfers neither. |
|
|
|
It's interesting to see the current standings, but it will be more interesting if we see the current position occurs at the end of the season. Yes, it means that Bayern Munich's dominance has been stopped. But how sure is the team that is now above Bayern Munich can survive until the end of the season. I have my doubts about this, and in the end we will still see Bayern Munich lift the trophy again.
I do not think that it could be ending like this. I know that it looks like it is a different season when you look at early games, but a season where Freiburg is the winner is not something I would expect at all. It is more possible that Bayern would be winners, even Dortmund would be a better winner then Freiburg, it just doesn't make sense for them to win at all with their roster. Bayern may had some troubles for 2 games now, but they will recover from that and they will come back to the league and have a bunch of wins in a row, to make sure that nobody could get close to them. I still feel like 15 points difference by the end is quite realistic. |
|
|
|
Previously, many people could not buy BTC for the reason that it was expensive and the amount was small. Is this already on the verge of Dropping Deadline???
We are already in bear market and there is chances of Bitcoin to lower back to 12k or even more. Next two years will nkt good for crypto and we can see beat market many times. For 2025 I think it's chance that market will be recover. I think in 2025 Bitcoin will be trade above 50k. If everything will be right then it's Iilkelt to hit 100 million in 2026. I highly doubt that it could retract to 12k levels, we haven't reached those levels even during this period, last time we were there was I think in 2020, so we haven't been there for over 2 years now, why would we get there now? I get that people are scared as soon as they see bitcoin going down, but these were the levels we have seen a bit ago when Luna thing happened, this isn't some new level and I do not think that it is going to happen again. We will go above 20k and we will keep on staying at the same levels again. We weren't 50k and suddenly dropped here, we were around 19-22k range for a very long time and we will stay in those ranges again. |
|
|
|
The question is subjective. We all have our own analysis of each of those coins therefore, we have different views and conclusions at one coin to another.
I'm also confused about being considered a game-changer.
What does it mean exactly? Game-changer to what? A possible price increase, like x100, x200, etc.? If not about the price, then what?
I have something "similar" in mind when I invest into something new. The idea of "game-changer" in my mind is the fact that it adds something that others do not have. Which means it could be 100x or it could go to zero but it has to be unique and add something better to what we already have. We all know what we have in the crypto world, so when some place adds something new and better, we know that project and we are aware of it, not a different approach to same technology, not "a new way of using this awesome tech we had for 5 years" type of deal, I mean like literally something brand new in technology that they had to code into their blockchain. That's a good investment. |
|
|
|
Now in seventh round we are going to have few very exciting matches which will give more clear shape to this league table like Marseille is going to face Lille
They were consistent, 4 wins in the row show us They are more competitive to coup PSG, but usually what makes me worry is they are only good at the beginning and going to down in the middle session. We know both have the same points, Alexis Sanches is on fire, he found his performance in Marseille was just played 5 times but created 3 goals, is he getting better than was on Inter? This is a fundamental problem that has always existed with the team. They are difficult to maintain consistency, so they have to decline as the season is about to end. I don't understand why things like this always happen, maybe they are too complacent with what they get. Confidence is a must, but if it's too much then it's not good either, because if that's the case, they will definitely underestimate the opponent. It is expected of them to have a drop off for sure. I mean PSG is this great because they have that kind of amazing team, whereas when we are talking about the current lineup of Marseille, they are not that great and even though they are better than almost all the other teams, they are not better than PSG. So, it is expected for them to start losing games here and there when PSG is winning. I know that Lille once managed to win the title against PSG, but that year was outlier and we will not see that becoming more common, I feel like PSG will be easily the best team in the league again by like week 10th and claim the title by week 30 for sure. |
|
|
|
Roma's performance in this match was completely unexpected. Roma's performance has been quite good in all the previous matches. Especially their defence was very strong. But against Udinese, Roma's defence completely crumbled. Udinese didn't attack much. Even so, Roma conceded four goals.
I don't think Roma will sack Mourinho. Roma's management paid Mourinho very little to build the team. If Mourinho had underperformed after spending so much money, maybe Roma management would have considered sacking him.
As a Roma supporter, I still believe in Mourinho, thanks to him we ended our fast of winning titles in Europe. This is just one game, it's actually good to lose to Udinese at the beginning of the season, so that the Roma players are aware and can improve. Stay optimistic that you can finish in the top 4. It's fine, Mourinho is a perfect fit for Roma, there isn't a rushed "win the title now" type of deal in Roma and all he has to do is finish in UCL places, let's assume that milan-inter-juventus will be the top three in the league, that fourth position is wide open and he could bring the team there. This would mean that they would earn a good amount of money from champions league entrance, and they would keep on spending that money to get better. Mourinho is a great coach but he is a slow one, he doesn't take over a team and suddenly makes them amazing, last year he already won a cup for them, this year if he finishes 4th then I think it's a great thing for Roma. |
|
|
|
Very few people do their due diligence, they get so desperate to invest in the project fearing they are going to miss out the opportunity to make profits they simply forget about finding out if the project is legitimate, then they get scammed and that is when they finally begin to ask the questions they should have asked at the beginning, but when they finally have acquired the resolve to do so it is too late and there is nothing they can do to recover the money they have lost.
This is common with the investors. Over time they'll learn about the reality of the market and make themselves prepared for the right investment than falling to hype. Altcoins are good investment, but identifying the right ones beyond that in the top list is simply a hard task. So, when going for investment on altcoins which aren't popular it is good to invest what one can afford to lose. Putting an amount that you are willing to risk losing is definitely the number one key aspect of this. Another would be making sure that you are investing not because of any hype by anyone, not even if a million people hyped about it (like shiba) but to make sure that you are investing because you saw something in it, like in the fundamental core of it. That way you would know what you are investing into and you know you are making a profit from it as much as you can. Otherwise what is the point of investing into something that is low? Just end up getting bitcoin and you would be able to profit from it in the long run anyway, so why risk it? |
|
|
|
No more Champions League this week, but we've seen some fun and entertaining matches this week. The most striking is of course the result of Napoli against Liverpool which ended up being a 4-1 win. Chelsea also lost to Dynamo Zagreb. The Spurs struggled for a long time but managed to win in the end. The most bizarre ending of this week and perhaps of recent years was the match between Atletico Madrid and Porto. No goal for 90 minutes and then stoppage time (9 minutes) we saw 3 goals. You don't see that often. For a long time it seemed to be a boring goalless draw. Griezmann was important in the end with his substitution.
Chelsea one wasn't really shocking because they have been a bit bad this year, but Liverpool one was definitely shocking, a 1-0 loss for example would be weird but at least fine, a 4-1 loss is dominating loss and that wasn't something I really expected to be honest. In the long run, Liverpool will recover and get out of the group for sure, but until that happens they need to find the reason why they are not playing well and fix that issue. I believe it is the unwillingness of the players, Klopp could try to make sure that everyone is happy, or he could just bench them all and put younger players and subs into playing and make sure that everyone knows their place. Anyone unwilling to put 100%, could be replaced. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is appropriate , but can we just let our self gambling outside our houses? if we really wanted to Hide from playing then better play outside their sight , meaning we should deal in gambling when there isa given time or allocate time not close to them?
i never tried hiding because I am an open person that dont wanna make things complicated so instead of hiding I will tell them directly no matter how they react and decide .
Yes and why not? I think playing outside is the most appropriate way of gambling and it must be done only on a dedicated gambling places like a casino. That is to avoid our family to get influenced on this addictive activity. The main reason why this isn't followed anymore is because there are now online gambling and there are smartphones which we can carry anywhere. It's important to play only gambling when you have an extra time and the time for our family shouldn't be comprised. That is for them to feel satisfied and won't suspect you by the time you go outside. You know your family and I think you know that they won't rage once you confess your gambling habit but for others, confessing it will only give them a lot of complications so they choose to hide it instead. |
|
|
|
I never get in this act of calculating how much bonus should i get or how the bonus s calculated as it will only make me confuse. I think most of us really don't know the exact formula for the bonus calculation.
I just love to play with this free money and it is indeed good from stake that they give us bonus periodically.
That is the point, you shouldn't really "know" how you get it. The point is, you should be able to just focus on how you could make money by gambling, or at least have fun if you lose money. Those are the two options and two goals, anything extra is optional. If you are getting anything more from it, then you are doing something cool but not needed and not a must. I personally care about gambling because it is a way of spending time, like watching a movie, or playing a computer game, or reading a book. I mean this one could make you lose a ton of money if you are not careful, but you could at least make something with it and that is quite important. |
|
|
|
Don't expect more, I also have Lunac but to be honest I've converted to ETH now. Don't let greed rule you if you get x 4 in the bear market this is already a great achievement. Don't let the circulating fomo affect you, maybe soon Lunac will experience a decline.
Yeah, they better don't expect for more as that will only gave them a disappointment at the end and not the profits that they always wanted. If they want a sure profit then they better invest on a coin which has a sure future as well and not on these scam/risky tokens. Only the developers of these coins are only going to get rich if people keeps on feeding them. What you did there by the way is a good thing. You didn't wait any little longer because you know that more dumps are going to come later on. This is a great example that lunc hodlers must follow. It's better to sell at a loss (right now) than incur more losses in the future. They have been warned. |
|
|
|
The only good thing is it's an expiring contract. My guess is the Lakers start with him and deal him at the deadline to someone looking to shed players with long term contracts. Probably their best bet.
Why would they even spend 47 million to buy him out, might as well keep him because it is not the salary roster that is creating issues for them. They could keep him, and hopefully they can trade him to a team that can take the hit until the season ends, because at the end of the season the contract ends right? If that is the case then a team could take the hit on the books, pay him, but get something in return. What can Lakers offer? At this point really nothing. Everyone acts as if Westbrook is the issue, but the reality is that they have three players, Westbrook, Lebron and AD, those are it, they do not have any other good players and that is the real issue if you ask me. |
|
|
|
There are some interesting rumours relating Lewis Hamilton to Manchester United these days. The rumours are saying that Hamilton can make a bid for buying Manchester United. But Hamilton says that he hasn't gone for a move like this yet. However it would be really interesting to see a Formula 1 pilot buying one of the biggest football teams in the world. There is an example from NBA as Lebron James has a 2% share of Liverpool club as far as I know. But buying a complete football club would make tremendous impact. Manchester United really need a better management and maybe Hamilton can provide this to the club who knows.  I highly doubt that he would be able to own all of it. I mean he is a rich person for sure, and he is a "Sir" which I am not sure if comes with any money. He makes maybe like 50-60 million a year for sure, maybe a bit more. But when researched, he looks like he has maybe 300 million dollars net worth, whereas United is 4+ billion dollars team. Remember United has a name that is way more than just success, they could be 10th in the league for 10 years in a row and they would still be worth than most teams. So in the end, if he ever owns anything, it would probably be 10% at the very best case, probably 2% just like Lebron did with Liverpool, not the whole team. |
|
|
|
The League of Nations isn't taken seriously by the superstars. That competition doesn't come anywhere close to the EC and WC in regards to prestige. There have also been polls whether people remember who won the last final or participated in it and many people who usually like soccer don't even know a year later. That wouldn't happen with the big competitions. Do you think we get to see players like Mbappe or back then Ronaldo at the League of Nations play with the same motivation as the European Championship or even the World Cup? That is hard to believe.
I have to be honest, league of nations is not taken serious by anyone at all. If there is a "kid", like a young player with a potential taken there, then that kid could try his best, under 20 type of player could show their skills on international stage so that is important and I get that. But, I do not think that anything above that would make sense to anyone at all. Like any player above 23 would care even if they are bad players and not superstars. Nobody cared from viewers, no manager cared, and even tv rights were cheaper than anything I can remember. Hence, anyone who bets according to how teams were in league of nations would be upset for sure. |
|
|
|
union berlin seems to be a strong opponent for Bayern Munich and this is evidenced by the draw until the last minute. The defense of both teams was strong and both were only able to score 1 goal, starting with a goal from Union Berlin in the 12th minute by Sheraldo Becker. but not long after in the 15th minute Bayern Munich responded with 1 goal from Joshua Kimmich.
Bayern Munich has actually controlled the game with a total of 21 shots and 6 shots on goal. Bayern Munich has 75% of the ball position. But union Berlin was able to hold on well until the last minute of the game and the 1-1 score remained unchanged.
I have to say they are nothing compared to Bayern Munich, just because they got a tie doesn't mean that they are tough, it just means Bayern either had an unlucky day, or they just didn't want to deal with any of this and just didn't care at all. Let's be honest, Union Berlin is a team that has something, they are not bad at all and they could always be better and they could finish second one day, not saying it will be this year but they could. But, we are talking about Bayern as competition, not even dortmund is close to Bayern, not even Leipzig with all their money. Bayern is on another level, they are playing like a team from higher division, these are just uncommon results. |
|
|
|
It was another disastrous day for Ferrari.
What was that with Sainz's pits, man? First they forgot about one tyre and after that there was an unsafe release resulted in a 5-sec penalty. I really don't know what this team want from their drivers. How can you make this easy mistakes throughout the season? Binotto needs to change his crew completely after this season ends. Neither Ferrari nor a Ferrari driver can become champions in the future otherwise.
It was another great day for Mercedes. Russell had a great race by finishing in 2nd place. He is still the most consistent driver on the grid also. Hamilton could have been on podium also but the team made a big mistake with the tyres in pit. Leclerc couldn't even keep up with Russell in the last laps. Mercedes are really getting ahead of Ferrari slowly these days.
When is it not a terrible day for Ferrari. First of all, we are used to them not being good when it comes to strategy or pit stops and so forth, but this time they literally had a tire wheel guns laying around and Perez went over it. What people do not realize is that, nothing happened and it was all fine, but that could have been as serious as deadly, what if the tire just shot the wheel gun back to Ferrari pit and hit someone in the head? Can anyone guarantee that it wouldn't happen? Of course not. Ferrari needs to do something about their staff, they have a horrible horrible team, a good car and good drivers but a horrible team, it is unreal. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
