I have already mentioned here that problem was started from Alex_Sr. And its seems also solution is starting by Alex_Sr. Just noticed he is still exclude by LoyceV & Lauda, can you both reconsider of exclusion? I have seen he have changed his feedback style. After visited his feedback's I think he deserve it now. He made mistake previously and he has corrected it. I believe we can go forward to solve the issue about Russian war by adding back Alex_Sr. Thanks to TMAN for add back and open door for solution. And welcome back Alex_Sr on DT network, hope you will not abuse your DT power. |
|
|
|
|
Don't waste your time by making list. We know everyone that they abuse or somehow bought 1 merit. But it's not possible to tag them just for 1 merit if there is not clear evidence that they have bought. Theymos isn't encourage to tag merit abuser if really not some strong evidence against them. It will never end, let them do it. At least merits are not drying. Making list isn't going to stop this abuse. We have made something like that previously, but nothing changes. Spreading merit better then dry.
|
|
|
|
If I am not wrong, problem started from Alex_Sr. He was added by TMAN, but unfortunately Alex_Sr left few positive feedback. I didn't knew Alex_Sr before added on DT. Then someone mentioned about his feedback's on meta thread and TMAN remove him. Then he revised his feedback's and TMAN was re-add him but some other DT1 exclude him. Then TMAN made few investigation and he found thread on Russian board. Eventually TMAN also exclude Alex_Sr and opened a tread regarding Russian board abuse. TMAN also not wrong with his statement What I noticed from marlboroza reply, there is open discussion about inclusion and exclusion. They have exclude all reputed DT1 and publish openly which is look wrong to me. However I didn't notice that anything much wrong on Alex_Sr discussion. I don't know how this war will be end. Because they are against most of reputed current DT1 and they strongly stand against them which I noticed from this post . They also using bad language for suchmoon who is encourage to solve the issue. So how you can solve that problem? They just want manipulate DT1 from Russian board and exclude old DT1 who have tagged them, and obviously they will tag back when they will become DT1. Since adding DT1 is not possible right now, so it would be better add some DT2 from Russian board who deserve it. If we exclude all of from Russian board then war not going to stop. Part of this issue is that the majority of those guys don’t understand DT are not active in meta and don’t tag actively - what’s the point of members like that being on DT?
To be honest, they want to make their own network and tag back who have tagged them. Obviously there is no point to add them who is not active and not actively tagging scammers. |
|
|
|
|
I have tagged FIX TOKEN and sent PM to bounty manager for respons on this thread. Seems Accusation is valid to me. All investors have right to ask valid questions especially regarding ICO team. I have seen there is no profile on the website and pictures look like stock image. Something is wrong. I will remove tag if they upload a video with thier team and talk about thier ICO. If bounty manager unable to give appropriate answers then he should stop the bounty campaign.
|
|
|
|
User Ente on DT2 added by SebastianJu, Ente inactive from September 03, 2018 and he have left lot of positive feedback previously. I don't see any point to add him on DT2 since he is not active. His positive feedback will show green now to all profile. You're on DT1, so you can exclude him yourself. As of right now, actmyname and I both left exclusions so he is off DT2.
Done |
|
|
|
It is true that the screenshots were taken before the launch of the project, they ordered services from me almost 6 months ago (creation of ann and bounty) and all this time they delayed the launch in order to complete the preparation. I can provide a correspondence in which it is clear that the launch of the ANN thread occurred only after the real command was added to the site.
Be sure with your statement. I have archived your reply. If they skip with fund then I will paint your ID wit red tag. They have change their team after exposed. It doesn't make any sense that they will not scam. Why you want to go with risk ? Is it not better to leave their bounty and let them do themselves? Who will responsible if in case they scam? I will not excuse you. Because you are promoting question marked ICO. |
|
|
|
Stock photos were used , bought under a licence.
What the fucking you are talking about ? Who are behind the project ? Is it stock image owner ? You bought image from stock, does it means you are legit ? Then why are you hiding yourself ? This is the game of money. You are asking peoples to invest with stock image. Are we fool? If your intention is good then there is no reason of hide yourself. Just stop scamming peoples. As many other do and have done in the past.
That means you are exit scammer. |
|
|
|
I think source links should probably have to link to a bitcointalk thread as well because I've seen a few in the past with ref links and other suspicious dodgy sites put there.
Agree with that, but there will be few problem. Bitcointalk thread could be deleted or edit so we need to use archive link. It would be better if allow archived link and Bitcointalk link. I am not sure OP mention about which feedback. But I don't think its by any DT members. So untrusted feedback's have no value. There will be huge problem is trust system want to moderate. Then moderators will face same problem and peoples will blame them again for power abuse. |
|
|
|
Just going around tagging users without proper reasoning isn't a way to go about it. That's a misuse of the DT privileges.
I don't think any DT tag someone without proper reason. You never cared about leaving the feedback when you were not on the DT and suddenly you feel it's necessary to tag them? Illogical.
I think you had not visited my feedback page. I am not tagging now, it's from beginning......... Tag them because they're wrong and not because they left you a feedback.
Obviously! I think you missed something on my post. Just he remind me to tag by his feedback. Lol.
Without proofs, you can't tag members.
Did I said anywhere that I will tag without proof ? After that if you found someone else bumping with , great project and great team or someone defending them reply on this thread with archive link or PM me.
However your opinions not wrong and I am not tagging wrong person. You are always welcome to point me if you found. |
|
|
|
I am pretty sure you have sold your merit, but since there is no enough evidence I have tagged you for bought account or hacked account. And there is valid reason and already I have described on the thread. xaker74 send 55 merit to 6 farmer accounts. Just for reference user starting post on China local board 2015. Archived link here: http://archive.is/ixCDR and currently posting on Russian board. Most likely account hacked or bought. 9/4/2018 8:45:29 PM password changed
12/22/2018 6:57:25 AM password reset via email
12/31/2018 9:50:46 PM password changed Tagged. Exactly December 31, 2018, you have changed password and sent 10 merit to 5 people's each which is enough become member rank. After send merit you have changed password. This 5 account is your alt ? Can you sign message from : 1KX9GDZEe92PZUsFUtphtfsNwdNqMCQhWE Which was used your first post. Although edited on same date. Archived: http://archive.is/lXlAn |
|
|
|
Just come on mind when I had check my untrusted feedback. Those scammer I have tagged obviously they will leave me negative feedback. Never mind if they do. But during checking time I have noticed someone left me negative feedback but I never tagged him. Then I checked his post history and found he is a project supporter who have used fake team. Then I have visited the main ANN thread and I found 2 account they are supporting that project. So I tagged both of them. Just he remind me to tag by his feedback. Lol. Whoever will support like that after exposed fake team or plagiarized content, I will never excuse them. They try to misguide innocent investors. I am not sure other DT will tag them or not. They are bumping thread and supporting fake team / plagiarized content. Whoever exposed fake team/plagiarized content, please leave a reply on their main thread with your Accusation thread link. So that investors and others will know it. After that if you found someone else bumping with , great project and great team or someone defending them reply on this thread with archive link or PM me. I will tag them. Never mind if they are newbie or legendary. If other DT disagree with me, please feel free to share your thought. |
|
|
|
Yes Dear. We are legal and we have a great active team.
Then why used fake image from over internet sir ? Excuse is not new to us. May be you forgot to write, developers made mistake, we was not aware about it, thanks for pointing us. Lol. How you are calling legit yourself? Then proof your legitimate. Make a video with your team member those you have used on website. Talk about your project, don't change your team because we have archive copy. Let's do it instead of any further argument. Don't waste time here. |
|
|
|
xaker74 send 55 merit to 6 farmer accounts. Just for reference user starting post on China local board 2015. Archived link here: http://archive.is/ixCDR and currently posting on Russian board. Most likely account hacked or bought. 9/4/2018 8:45:29 PM password changed
12/22/2018 6:57:25 AM password reset via email
12/31/2018 9:50:46 PM password changed Tagged. |
|
|
|
Besides of DTtalk, I want to change topic. Since there are lot of DT, so I want to know some opinion about few ICO's. Also opinions from reputed members are welcome, I don't some one noticed or not but I have noticed few of ICO with fake team/plagiarized content has listed on Dex and few worst C-Ex, although we have exposed them. I will pick one of them from my Exposed scam ICO list. For example BITCOINMAX, you can see there is enough evidence for fake activity. But seems they have listed on TokenStore(not loading to me) and Etherflyer with zero volume. Current price 0.0000000089 ETH and last ICO price was 1 BMAX=0.000003 ETH. I am not sure how many % lower from ICO price. Also not listed on CMC. I can't remember now but somewhere I saw they are talking we are got listed on exchange bla bla........... Above one is just example, there many more like this case. Listed on Dex then skip. As far as I know listed on Dex is free. Even few of them ask for fee, I don't think it will be more then 0.5 ETH. But they just skip with fund after end of ICO. Problem is they called themselves legit due to listed on Dex even there is zero volume. So what is your opinions on similar case? Are they legit ? My opinions,Still they are exit scammer in my eye. Just listed on Dex or somewhere on C-Ex with zero volume or low volume doesn't mean they are legit. Reality is they listed on Dex during ICO and people's thought they are legit and invest on it. Eventually they got scam. |
|
|
|
2.) lets say you win, set aside your capital if possible. If not, take 10% of every win in your pocket. With this you can go home with money even just coins. Not bad.
Yes I strongly agree with that. It would be better take out your capital from gambling site as so as possible. But most of peoples will not unable to do it. Because of greedy nature. After all we are human. So it would be fine if possible take out your capital partially when you win a bet. Just don't be too much greedy. It might be loss full fund. |
|
|
|
Use xassa copy pasting his post and spamming all over forum with few suspicious links. |
|
|
|
|
Since you are going to add totally new people's from local board then I will suggest add one more criteria,
Rank should be Sr. Member or above.
Below Sr. Member from local board isn't going to helpful. Whoever can't earned at least 250 merit even from local board then how he will help forum to keep clean. However it's just my opinion. Totally depend on you who will be on your trust list.
Although you will not find even on current criteria, because very less people's bother to leave feedback before new DT implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
