OK, so you're also lying about that:


If you gave them "$50,000+", how could you possibly be down "over $100,000"?

You're completely full of shit.

To me this is the best clear-cut guidelines for DT behavior. It seems fair and comprehensive.

However, I wanted to get additional input on these two items:


Short of concrete evidence that alts are being used to bump a thread, what constitutes as "proof" of an alt?

I look for:

- same style of writing, vocabulary, use of BBcode and general formatting of post
- registration date (suspected alts registered within minutes of each other is pretty compelling)
- concentration of posts in the same section(s)
- replies to own comments frequently

I'd like to tag some thread bumping alts, some of which are doing so for promotion and some which are doing so for the purposes of FUD. Because they are alts (or so I strongly suspect) they aren't self-bumping threads per se, so they're not breaking any forum rules.

I reported about 50 instances of spamming with alts (using my Russian bump bot ring thread as proof/evidence) and they were all marked good. Yet none of their posts were deleted, and only a couple of them were banned (and for other reasons).

So, they're not explicitly breaking forum rules, and you shouldn't tag somebody just for being an alt, but for the purposes of ceaselessly hyping a project or relentlessly trying to discredit it I think a tag is deserved.

Here's an example from the FUD side:


Annoying, right? They've done this literally hundreds of times between their 3 accounts. I actually don't care/know if Nimiq is a scam or not but that's besides the point.

What do you guys think?

So which "medical drugs" caused yours? Seems like Jesus is an even more mentally debilitating drug.

At least you are always civil, even if you're a nutbag. I'll let you have the final word.

What the hell are you blathering about? They posted 13 updates in April so far. 4 of them were today. That's hardly "dead" you imbecile.

Why do you keep resorting to saying things that aren't true?

If you ever had anything substantial to say you definitely wouldn't need to resort to this tactic, or typing in BIG BOLD RED FONT like an angry child.

You never even adequately explained what you're so butt hurt about. First you were an investor, next you were a miner, what will you be tomorrow? Likely just a butt hurt infant, again.

You didn't even mention race or religion in your OP, but I knew that's what you were thinking because you are a caricature and don't actually possess individual beliefs of your own.

Christians kill more people in America than any other religion on a daily basis. Mental illness is pervasive across all races and religions. You're just looking for a reason to villainize people who look and think differently than you.

There's lots of horrendous shit happening in America every day. To single out one particular instance because of race, religion or ethnicity proves nothing other than you are an ass.

Meanwhile the price of NIM is up 10% today.

It seems like the harder you FUD this coin, the higher it goes.

Faketoshi, of course. You wish you were best friends, admit it.


It might still have a functioning blockchain in 3 years, but it will be out of the top 20 coins by market cap. Guaranteed. Yes you can find this post and throw it in my face in 3 years if I'm wrong.


Don't know who that is, don't care. And we both know BCH is getting pumped by fork fanbois bailing on SV. Its still quite a ways below the 10% of BTC price mark that lends it the slightest shred of respectability.

Much like SV, BCH is based on a lie. The lie being that it is bitcoin. That's why neither coin will succeed.

As a reminder to everybody considering investing in this project (don't):

This project employs a cheesy bumping service to bump its thread (as can be seen by the utterly dumb conversation in this thread by newb and jr member accounts); also their white paper is heavily plagiarized from the Binance whitepaper:







This project is most likely a scam, DO NOT send money there.

The block explorer says you still have 24.6995 BTC at this address -- I'm taking it you don't have the private key to this address? If you did, the obvious thing to do would be to import it into another wallet; preferably on a device you know isn't connected to the hacking. If you don't, sorry to hear about your loss. That's truly awful and I hope you somehow recover at least some of it.

No doubt. Though now I'm suspecting CH is also Thule (is also The-One) based on the usage of the word "proofen."




Or else CH used that word after being called out on being CH in order to throw the trail off in Thule's direction.


This is obviously not true. You have at least 4, but probably more. And frankly if you really were banned, then these accounts should also be banned for ban evasion. You're not fooling anybody.

I whole heartedly endorse this application.

Mic is an upstanding netizen, has a good head on his shoulders and one of the best attitudes on the forum.

Collectibles definitely seems to be an under-merited section (though the WO thread is the opposite).

I support mic being a merit source 100%, just don't give him more sMerit per month than me  

More likely they don't really give a shit because they know this is a scam, and also their English is probably just as bad as yours. They obviously can't think of anything original to say or they wouldn't have plagiarized their white paper, or hired goons like yourself to bump their thread.

Good initiative. Maybe add the % change of replies and views (and hats) in addition to the BTC % change for easier comparison. Willing to bet there's a positive correlation between all 3.

Maybe the hats are the causative effect, as in more commenters wearing hats is a bullish indicator.

No you're right, you did post evidence, twice, and I appreciate it. And you are correct: there is something fishy going on. I think they are trying to distance themselves from the term "ICO" in order to avoid special attention from the SEC, hence their backtracking and deletion of references to ICO. It looks like they never actually called what they were doing an ICO, but that doesn't mean it wasn't an ICO.


LOL you forgot to log back into one of your "nimiq" name accounts.

This is another FUDpuppet that used to post exclusively in the Nimiq thread. Let's see how many more come out the woodwork.

no longer needed

Based on the fact that your idol dev keeps insisting on exposing himself as the retarded, amoral chump bitch that he is.


Given your track record, I'll infer that to mean its got about 3 years, tops 

This is a reminder to everybody considering investing in this garbage (don't):

This project employs a bumping service to bump its thread (as can be seen by the mindless conversation in this thread by newb and jr member accounts) and their white paper is heavily plagiarized from the Binance whitepaper:







This project is likely to be a scam, it is recommended you DO NOT send money there.

You're not even doing any advertising though. You're driving people away. People look at you and your many alt accounts posting mindless garbage in order to bump this thread and they think "wow, this looks like a scam, I better stay away."

Really this project shot themselves in the foot by hiring you.