a while back there was a link to a nice live btc chart/exchange.
it even had sound to it. It gave like 10 or 15 second live numbers. I can't find the book mark
does anyone have it?
The first link was given last year about this time on the wo thread I am looking but do not see it.
TIA
|
|
|
sorry for not voting yet but, god damn!!!, Sportsbet seriously giving a VIP tour to an Arsenal or Southampton match that includes accommodation and flight tickets. this year's prize really went up a notch compared to last year. Good luck to the candidates!. that being said, I am curious whether the winner would be willing to give personal information in order to receive the award.
hey I have been doxxed so I would give them the info needed. As It is already available. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) edit 1) picks; 1. Absolute Hero of Good: 2. Golden Feather: 3. Bitcointalk Ninja: 4. Bitcoin Geek: 5. Event of the Year: 6. Fail of the Year: my guarantee of BTC going to 70k in May 2021 7. Discovery of the Year: 8. Best SpamBuster: 9. Best ScamBuster: 10. Craft Master: xhomerx10 (made my hat) 11. Antihero: franky1 12. Miss Bitcointalk: 13. Best Moderator: How long to close? I need to think about this. edit 2 : end of Feb +2w ? means March 14?
|
|
|
https://www.bitrawr.com/difficulty-estimator... Latest Block: 721209 (7 minutes ago) Current Pace: 98.4820% (1498 / 1521.09 expected, 23.09 behind)Previous Difficulty: 24371874614345.62 Current Difficulty: 26643185256535.46 Next Difficulty: between 26240762953475 and 26266955884922 Next Difficulty Change: between -1.5104% and -1.4121% Previous Retarget: January 20, 2022 at 10:07 PM (+9.3194%) Next Retarget (earliest): Friday at 2:57 AM (in 3d 15h 19m 19s) Next Retarget (latest): Friday at 3:17 AM (in 3d 15h 39m 50s) Projected Epoch Length: between 14d 4h 50m 13s and 14d 5h 10m 44s ... fairly uneventful in terms of diff. A -1% would be nice and maybe a nice upwards candle the day of the next change If we drop to 26.2 it would still be over last Aprils high of 25.2
|
|
|
I've read some comments in this alt mining section where few people said they are using solar panels for mining crypto I want to know how many solar panels is needed to run 24 RTX3060ti ? I use 150watt per 3060ti so in 24 places that's 3600watts but what's your best solar config for this build?
You have 24 separate 1 card rigs? You have two 12 card rigs? It looks like you are saying 24 one card rigs. With the mobo and the fans you will be close to 200 watts. 200 x 24 = 4800 watts a day or 5 kwatts. if you have a 2kwatt solar setup grid tied. and you have net metering. It will generate 2 x 4 = 8 to 2 x 5 =10 kwatts a day So a 2000 watt setup grid tied could do a rig 24/7/365 panels are 300 to 400 watts. so 5 to 7 panels could do the 1 card rig you need an inverter and to be grid tied.
|
|
|
getting ready for the move up and over 40k Feb 1 = 40k+
|
|
|
Compare the kernel log with one of your other asics. Socket connection failed looks to me not fans related but more cpu/network related. The cpu is afaik dual core but only one seems to be working.
I do have to stress my knowledge of asics/arm cpu's is very limited.
when in doubt compared to working gear. This is a good move.
|
|
|
Thanks philipma1957! I will.
@Looper_U @sxemini After some days of testing with the 2070 I managed to get 44MH/s with 125W. I use these settings: - core: -500 - memory: +1200 - power: 71% (the lowest) With higher memory (+1300 or +1400) I got also 45MH/s but there were lots of rejected shares.
Those are good numbers. Nice work.
|
|
|
Your hashrate is so ridiculously small it will take a week for the pool to even register that you're mining. yes 333mh/s is not high ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) its just 4 fun, but still would be nice to see stats ^^ Wait a week and you might see them. hey guys look at my stats its like i'm solving a block but no ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) hashrate1m": "123T", "hashrate5m": "107T", "hashrate1hr": "105T", "hashrate1d": "103T", "hashrate7d": "49.8T", "lastshare": 1643498525, "workers": 1, "shares": 9547198887, "bestshare": 4464854725348.764, "bestever": 4464854725348, "worker": [ { "workername": "3Dt3YF9tU6YsmApvpHUJDDcCevyPzrmrr4", "hashrate1m": "123T", "hashrate5m": "107T", "hashrate1hr": "105T", "hashrate1d": "103T", "hashrate7d": "49.8T", "lastshare": 1643498525, "shares": 9547198887, "bestshare": 4,464,854,725,348.764, 4.4 trillion is too small "bestever": 4464854725348 close but not there
|
|
|
THE SOLAR is what my partners and I do.
Anyone that understands what you are showing knows that all anti BTC info in terms of power wasted is a lie.
Leaved un repaired holes in the ground for more than a century was a huge incentive for coal mining.
instead of that build solar fields with proper incentives if they mine 50% and sell power to the grid 50%
problems solved.
Meh, kind-of a red herring. Those holes can be repaired and can end up looking like pristine countryside within a couple of decades. Then there's also the fact that your solar panels require minerals that need mining. Not that I'm against solar. I'm just a cynic. Yeah of course they can be fixed but they are not and that is a subsidy. If all the filth and holes left in the world had been fixed as they dug coal would have not been cheap. Coal is not that cheap. Millions of acres have been pillaged world wide with zero spent on repair. Mean while putting an acre of panels on an empty roof not only clean air it creates more restate. Most people are clueless about the feasabilty of solar vs coal. Notice I do not say dump oil and or gas. I am in favor of proper oil and natural gas use. Even coal is okay if utilized properly buy unfortunately it is not used correctly.
|
|
|
Okay I am certain solar works. We have 3 grid tied arrays here in NJ 45k 115k 280k getting built. they will total 440k the 45k is 1 year old the 115k is from 2016 fully paid off due to the 2 runs in 2017 and 2021 the 280k is being built from profits. Good solar installs will last more than 20 years. WE grid tie because we get a good deal in the state of New Jersey. Battery do not last long 3-5 years if not lithium 6-10 years if lithium. If you do a 10k build you may well consider doing a gpu build and not a s19. Gpu's have longer warrantee and can use nice hash to earn BTC you can also use less power say 2000 watts with the build. https://minerdude.com/product/x12012022/ you can find this case in a few places. it will do 12 of these cards https://www.pny.com/nvidia-rtx-a4000or 12 of these cards https://www.pny.com/nvidia-rtx-a4500or any mixture of them. much easier for you to demonstrate if your solar idea will work. and of course you can slowly add the cards to the case. I have a few cases with mixtures of nvidia cards I am happy with them
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FFJTW8XoWQAAJgkf%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dsmall&t=663&c=8yyPfYdehWEAyA) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FFJTXPcNXoAADgDZ%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dmedium&t=663&c=YTJ0rS5moc_ZWw) Source : https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/1483046971912957952It is evident today governments have pushed the idea that Bitcoin is obviously awful for the climate when normal mining leaves scars on the earths surface and requires enormous drills. Are they telling us that Bitcoin miners when contrasted with BIG bores that require fuel and produce more heat then Bitcoin diggers are better for the climate? utilize reusable energy since it produces more benefit for them in view of power expenses it is practicable to do but the gold and iron miners are not offered an incentive for reusable energy so it will never improve. The drills have huge fuel consumption which you could not replace with batteries. Then think about the spoil which they dump which is cross contamination to the earth. I hate to see btc being known for something it is not and that affects price. Let this be a lesson that governments and companies do not care about the environment they want to look good and put restrictions on things only when it benefits them. Dammit just noticed .... Running behind the merit count with fillippone...
damn what am I gonna do? Pee, Food?, Eeeeuhm ...
Naaaah GG @fillippone.
All will be forgiven if Bitcoin hits a new ATH again this year THE SOLAR is what my partners and I do. Anyone that understands what you are showing knows that all anti BTC info in terms of power wasted is a lie. Leaved un repaired holes in the ground for more than a century was a huge incentive for coal mining. instead of that build solar fields with proper incentives if they mine 50% and sell power to the grid 50% problems solved.
|
|
|
Currently, we are in the buying phase, where we are totally confused about which miner to buy and which one not to. Please suggest to us the best one in 100/104/110/140 TH.
how many years until the above-mentioned miners die?
And one of my questions is what will be the effect of the profitability of the above miners after the bitcoin halving?
And currently, we are planning to put up the whole setup on a 10kw off-grid solar power system.
10kw solar wont run your miner. no one can tell you profits 100 days from now and you are asking for profits more than 16 months from now my best guess for miner life is a week to four years. 10 kwatts so 4 go to the miner and 6 go to the battery. If you are in a sunny part of india you will have six hours of full charge over the full day. so add 6 x 6 = 36 hours charged that is about nine hours run time once it is dark I would guess a 10kwatt off grid with really good battery setup will give you 18 to 20 hours of mining in a day. As to which on you should get. Get the one that will come to you in under 30 days time.
|
|
|
Hey guys, I run 3 DR5 miners all have run well since purchased (brand new via bitmain). One stopped working decently due to the error: Hardware Version Socket connect failed: Connection refused When I set them up at purchase, same error occurred and I fixed it by rebooting, resetting, however this will not work now. I think the issue is due to the fans due to the kernel log. My knowledge is close to none with kernel logs, would appreciate any guidance that can be provided. Kernel Log;
Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 Linux version 4.6.0-xilinx-ge7a4d3a-dirty (lzq@ubuntu) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140320 (prerelease) (Sourcery CodeBench Lite 2014.05-23) ) #38 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 24 11:14:38 CST 2018 CPU: ARMv7 Processor [413fc090] revision 0 (ARMv7), cr=18c5387d CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache Machine model: Xilinx Zynq cma: Reserved 16 MiB at 0x0e000000 Memory policy: Data cache writealloc On node 0 totalpages: 61440 free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c0938d00, node_mem_map cde10000 Normal zone: 480 pages used for memmap Normal zone: 0 pages reserved Normal zone: 61440 pages, LIFO batch:15 percpu: Embedded 12 pages/cpu @cddf1000 s19776 r8192 d21184 u49152 pcpu-alloc: s19776 r8192 d21184 u49152 alloc=12*4096 pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 [0] 1 Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 60960 Kernel command line: mem=240M console=ttyPS0,115200 ramdisk_size=33554432 root=/dev/ram rw earlyprintk PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Memory: 204552K/245760K available (5317K kernel code, 230K rwdata, 1844K rodata, 1024K init, 222K bss, 24824K reserved, 16384K cma-reserved, 0K highmem) Virtual kernel memory layout: vector : 0xffff0000 - 0xffff1000 ( 4 kB) fixmap : 0xffc00000 - 0xfff00000 (3072 kB) vmalloc : 0xcf800000 - 0xff800000 ( 768 MB) lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xcf000000 ( 240 MB) pkmap : 0xbfe00000 - 0xc0000000 ( 2 MB) modules : 0xbf000000 - 0xbfe00000 ( 14 MB) .text : 0xc0008000 - 0xc07fe410 (8154 kB) .init : 0xc0800000 - 0xc0900000 (1024 kB) .data : 0xc0900000 - 0xc0939a60 ( 231 kB) .bss : 0xc0939a60 - 0xc09713e8 ( 223 kB) Preemptible hierarchical RCU implementation. Build-time adjustment of leaf fanout to 32. RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=4 to nr_cpu_ids=2. RCU: Adjusting geometry for rcu_fanout_leaf=32, nr_cpu_ids=2 NR_IRQS:16 nr_irqs:16 16 efuse mapped to cf800000 ps7-slcr mapped to cf802000 L2C: platform modifies aux control register: 0x72360000 -> 0x72760000 L2C: DT/platform modifies aux control register: 0x72360000 -> 0x72760000 L2C-310 erratum 769419 enabled L2C-310 enabling early BRESP for Cortex-A9 L2C-310 full line of zeros enabled for Cortex-A9 L2C-310 ID prefetch enabled, offset 1 lines L2C-310 dynamic clock gating enabled, standby mode enabled L2C-310 cache controller enabled, 8 ways, 512 kB L2C-310: CACHE_ID 0x410000c8, AUX_CTRL 0x76760001 zynq_clock_init: clkc starts at cf802100 Zynq clock init sched_clock: 64 bits at 333MHz, resolution 3ns, wraps every 4398046511103ns clocksource: arm_global_timer: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x4ce07af025, max_idle_ns: 440795209040 ns Switching to timer-based delay loop, resolution 3ns clocksource: ttc_clocksource: mask: 0xffff max_cycles: 0xffff, max_idle_ns: 537538477 ns ps7-ttc #0 at cf80a000, irq=18 Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 666.66 BogoMIPS (lpj=3333333) pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000 Setting up static identity map for 0x100000 - 0x100058 CPU1: failed to boot: -1 Brought up 1 CPUs SMP: Total of 1 processors activated (666.66 BogoMIPS). CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode. devtmpfs: initialized VFP support v0.3: implementor 41 architecture 3 part 30 variant 9 rev 4 clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 19112604462750000 ns pinctrl core: initialized pinctrl subsystem NET: Registered protocol family 16 DMA: preallocated 256 KiB pool for atomic coherent allocations cpuidle: using governor menu hw-breakpoint: found 5 (+1 reserved) breakpoint and 1 watchpoint registers. hw-breakpoint: maximum watchpoint size is 4 bytes. zynq-ocm f800c000.ps7-ocmc: ZYNQ OCM pool: 256 KiB @ 0xcf880000 vgaarb: loaded SCSI subsystem initialized usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs usbcore: registered new interface driver hub usbcore: registered new device driver usb media: Linux media interface: v0.10 Linux video capture interface: v2.00 pps_core: LinuxPPS API ver. 1 registered pps_core: Software ver. 5.3.6 - Copyright 2005-2007 Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it> PTP clock support registered EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0 Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Initialized. clocksource: Switched to clocksource arm_global_timer NET: Registered protocol family 2 TCP established hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) UDP hash table entries: 256 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) UDP-Lite hash table entries: 256 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) NET: Registered protocol family 1 RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module. RPC: Registered udp transport module. RPC: Registered tcp transport module. RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module. PCI: CLS 0 bytes, default 64 Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs... rootfs image is not initramfs (no cpio magic); looks like an initrd Freeing initrd memory: 13832K (ccd7f000 - cdb01000) hw perfevents: enabled with armv7_cortex_a9 PMU driver, 7 counters available futex hash table entries: 512 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) workingset: timestamp_bits=28 max_order=16 bucket_order=0 jffs2: version 2.2. (NAND) (SUMMARY) © 2001-2006 Red Hat, Inc. io scheduler noop registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) dma-pl330 f8003000.ps7-dma: Loaded driver for PL330 DMAC-241330 dma-pl330 f8003000.ps7-dma: DBUFF-128x8bytes Num_Chans-8 Num_Peri-4 Num_Events-16 e0000000.serial: ttyPS0 at MMIO 0xe0000000 (irq = 158, base_baud = 6249999) is a xuartps console [ttyPS0] enabled xdevcfg f8007000.ps7-dev-cfg: ioremap 0xf8007000 to cf86e000 [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 brd: module loaded loop: module loaded CAN device driver interface gpiod_set_value: invalid GPIO libphy: MACB_mii_bus: probed macb e000b000.ethernet eth0: Cadence GEM rev 0x00020118 at 0xe000b000 irq 31 (00:0a:35:00:00:00) Generic PHY e000b000.etherne:00: attached PHY driver [Generic PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=e000b000.etherne:00, irq=-1) e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 3.2.6-k e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation. ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage mousedev: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice i2c /dev entries driver Xilinx Zynq CpuIdle Driver started sdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driver sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossman sdhci-pltfm: SDHCI platform and OF driver helper mmc0: SDHCI controller on e0100000.ps7-sdio [e0100000.ps7-sdio] using ADMA ledtrig-cpu: registered to indicate activity on CPUs usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid usbhid: USB HID core driver nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64 nand: NAND_ECC_HW nand: NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME mtd->writesize = 2048 ecc->strength = 1 ecc->size = 2048 mtd->writesize = 2048 chip->ecc_strength_ds = 4 chip->ecc_step_ds = 512 nand: WARNING: pl35x-nand: the ECC used on your system is too weak compared to the one required by the NAND chip Bad block table found at page 131008, version 0x01 Bad block table found at page 130944, version 0x01 nand_read_bbt: bad block at 0x000002420000 nand_read_bbt: bad block at 0x000002440000 nand_read_bbt: bad block at 0x000002460000 5 ofpart partitions found on MTD device pl35x-nand Creating 5 MTD partitions on "pl35x-nand": 0x000000000000-0x000002800000 : "BOOT.bin-env-dts-kernel" 0x000002800000-0x000004800000 : "ramfs" 0x000004800000-0x000005000000 : "configs" 0x000005000000-0x000006000000 : "reserve" 0x000006000000-0x000008000000 : "ramfs-bak" NET: Registered protocol family 10 sit: IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver NET: Registered protocol family 17 can: controller area network core (rev 20120528 abi 9) NET: Registered protocol family 29 can: raw protocol (rev 20120528) can: broadcast manager protocol (rev 20120528 t) can: netlink gateway (rev 20130117) max_hops=1 zynq_pm_ioremap: no compatible node found for 'xlnx,zynq-ddrc-a05' zynq_pm_late_init: Unable to map DDRC IO memory. Registering SWP/SWPB emulation handler hctosys: unable to open rtc device (rtc0) ALSA device list: No soundcards found. RAMDISK: gzip image found at block 0 EXT4-fs (ram0): couldn't mount as ext3 due to feature incompatibilities EXT4-fs (ram0): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null) VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) on device 1:0. devtmpfs: mounted Freeing unused kernel memory: 1024K (c0800000 - c0900000) EXT4-fs (ram0): re-mounted. Opts: block_validity,delalloc,barrier,user_xattr random: dd urandom read with 0 bits of entropy available IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready macb e000b000.ethernet eth0: unable to generate target frequency: 25000000 Hz macb e000b000.ethernet eth0: link up (100/Full) IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready In axi fpga driver! request_mem_region OK! AXI fpga dev virtual address is 0xcf99c000 *base_vir_addr = 0xab002 In fpga mem driver! request_mem_region OK! fpga mem virtual address is 0xd2000000 IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready macb e000b000.ethernet eth0: unable to generate target frequency: 25000000 Hz macb e000b000.ethernet eth0: link up (100/Full) IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready random: nonblocking pool is initialized Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.err cgminer: Miner compile time: Tue Oct 29 11:49:23 CST 2021 type: Antminer DR5 Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.warn cgminer: Started cgminer 4.9.0 Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.notice cgminer[960]: bitmain_dcr_prepare, working in low power mode. frequency 450MHz. Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.warn cgminer[960]: mmap axi_fpga_addr = 0xb6f91000 Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.warn cgminer[960]: axi_fpga_addr data = 0xb002 Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.warn cgminer[960]: mmap fpga_mem_addr = 0xb5d98000 Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.warn cgminer[960]: bitmain_dcr_init Jan 29 00:10:58 (none) local0.notice cgminer[960]: Begain check_fan_speed proper way for a long log. you asked your question in btc. it belongs in alt coin mining ⛏ I asked mods to move it. not sure 🤔 if it is the fans. as I dont see a pwm reading of zero. when you dumped the log 🪵 had it shut off? try another boot 🥾 and right away boot again like only 30 seconds after first boot 🥾. then boot 🥾 a third time let it run 35 minutes and dump the log and post it here.
|
|
|
Those are good numbers. I remember my ~80x 470s ran 3-4 years with <5% failures, but it was clean and fans ~50% also. the 5700xt fans are 85%+. I miss my 470s, but they were all 4G. They were also all Sapphires. EVGA and Sapphire is my top tier if I had a list. Nice to see you have a lot more gear, must of been fun setting it all up. I really hate wood burning - I put a MPR2200 filter on my air intake for the furnace outside the house. I bet within a week it'll be black.
Yeah the room the asics are in is very dirty even with filters. The gpu room is a lot cleaner.
|
|
|
Mining is dead. But you don't know it yet.
Tell the owners of 25 million video cards that mine Ethereum about this, Mr. Troll https://etherscan.io/chart/hashrateThe fact that the RTX 3050 is useless in mining is actually great news for other miners - there will be fewer competitors. Well my advice is mine on. But don't buy a shit ton of new cards for a while.
|
|
|
Go buddy get us up and over the top.
|
|
|
Hi everyone!!!!! i need to ask a question to the comunity. im trying with a Nvidia 2060. and im actually with CGMINER 3.7.2. but when i try to see my user statics, there is a problem "not found page" Not Found The requested URL was not found on this server. Apache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu) Server at solo.ckpool.org Port 443 And i think that i should have more HashingPower cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2022-01-27 10:04:07] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):91.22K (avg):87.35Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:73.8/m ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 18 GF: 0 RF: 0 Connected to solo.ckpool.org diff 10K with stratum as user 1vPs8gcnhKzWxp7intPB16ffV4Wvn7wMC Block: a4851aa1... Diff:26.6T Started: [10:04:07] Best share: 2.65K -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit GPU 0: | 90.16K/88.15Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU: 75.3/m I:14 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2022-01-27 10:07:40] (5s):89.94K (avg):86.79Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:72.0/m [2022-01-27 10:07:42] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:07:45] (5s):90.84K (avg):86.92Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:71.6/m [2022-01-27 10:07:47] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:07:49] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:07:50] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:07:51] (5s):91.58K (avg):87.06Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:73.9/m [2022-01-27 10:07:56] (5s):91.84K (avg):87.18Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:72.2/m [2022-01-27 10:07:57] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:07:57] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:08:01] (5s):86.42K (avg):86.98Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:73.2/m [2022-01-27 10:08:04] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:08:07] (5s):91.62K (avg):87.27Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:72.8/m [2022-01-27 10:08:09] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:08:10] Work update message received [2022-01-27 10:08:11] Share above target [2022-01-27 10:08:12] (5s):91.22K (avg):87.35Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:73.8/m [2022-01-27 10:08:13] Share above target
Thanks for the help. i'm new, joining in this new world ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
If you post back here I can teach you how to mine on ckpool very cheaply with that gpu. here is what you do. you open an account with nicehash and mine that gpu to nicehash. It will earn btc not much but it will earn it. Once your nice hash account gets to 0.001 btc or more you rent btc hash from nice hash and point it to ckpool.org I do this with an omen laptop. every 20 days it earns 0.001 btc I then point that to ckpool.org or Laurentiapool.org. Ck created both pools. My cost is under 2 kwatts a day about 25 cents USD So every 20 days I have a chance to hit big. at a low cost of 5 or 6 bucks power.
|
|
|
Just a random post about fan quality on gpus. I have a bunch of 5700xt. Here are failure rates (bad fans/total) after 18 months give or take. Area had quite a bit of dust i'm afraid to say due to people heating mainly with wood in my area, which on a sidenote, is retarded for many reasons. PM2.5 is frequently elevated depending on weather conditions. Normal dust filters do not capture micro particles. Sapphire dual : 0 % Asus dual : 25% Asrock dual: 10 % XFX triple : 15% The Sapphire Pulse dual fans are top notch, I would sell all the others and just keep those.
Yeah we have some dust issues. My msi amd tend to fail the most often So far of 200 cards all makes and models 4 evga 1080ti one is over heating a bit I have it very down clocked and it runs okay all the rest are amd 5000 and amd 6000 series. 1 failed power color 5700 1 failed ASRock 5500 mobo short. 2 failed msi 5600 fans I have about 80 of these mixed along with nvidia 3000 series = perfect about 80 for 800 not sure how to list the card below all are Nov 2021 or newer pny a2000 4 for 4 good Lenovo a4000 = 4 for 4 good pny a4000 = 40 for 40 good pny a4500 = 2 for 2 good pny a5000 = 7 for 7 good. when I mine I aways shoot for fans at 75% or lower I also try low power say 55 to 70% of tdp so I tend to always be lower than max mh/s but cards work and work and work. I am just about 9gh eth hash
|
|
|
I will show you 2 reasons at two pools as to why you can mine at loss for years. https://pool.laurentiapool.org/#/minersLook at 3rd miner 146...gx3 it mines at a loss because this pool very rarely hits blocks it may not hit a block for a year. http://mmpool.org/statisticslook at miner 8 c932f3ed 0.02207597 5,875,431,605 6,299,196 it may not hit a block for a year. but the upside is they would earn close to a btc if they do hit a block
Think of it this way I give you 1500 to 1 odds on a 3 digit number 000 to 999 you get to play 1 number for a dollar each day. A) is that gambling? B) is that playing at a loss C) or is it a deeper understanding of game theory in that you are doing a lost cost high risk high payout investment? And the answer is c. If you disagree you simply do not understand the math and are incorrect. So if you can make your mining at a daily loss into the c case example or the 2 mmpool.org and Laurentiapool.org examples you are not mining at a loss it merely looks that way.
A third example buy this laptop https://www.bestbuy.com/site/hp-omen-16-1-qhd-gaming-laptop-intel-core-i7-16gb-memory-nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070-1tb-ssd-ceramic-white/6479084.p?skuId=6479084mine it for 45 days and return it. It will earn about 0.002 btc It will cost about 110 kwatts of power that is about $15.40 usd point the 0.002 btc to ck solo pool rent at nice hash. odds of hitting a block are about 3125 to 1. 3125 x 15.40 = that is about 48125 payout maybe with fees the odds are higher and a fair payout is 55000 but what is the payout if you hit the block 6.15 x 37000 = 227550 so you are risking 15.40 usd to have a 3125-3300 shot at 227,550 when you should be paid 48125-55000 a perfect example of question c. Now anyone that thinks this is gambling simply does not understand : C) or is it a deeper understanding of game theory in that you are doing a lost cost high risk high payout investment?
|
|
|
|