Tolerance is not enough. The gay lobby is demanding acceptance. They demand that people accept and condone their lifestyles while not tolerating, accepting, or condoning the lifestyles of religious peoples. Everyone deserves tolerance. No one is entitled to acceptance. Attempting to force people to accept your beliefs and lifestyle is intolerant, and religious people deserve tolerance just as much as homosexuals. This behavior is very intolerant.

What makes you think I give a shit about your approval? I posted here so there is a public record of Vod's pattern of abusive behavior.



No, of course not. He just happened to create trust list exclusions right after he personally went around asking people who had me on their trust list to exclude me. The fact that I was the very first person to have trust exclusions used against them was purely coincidence. The fact that he had people remove me THEN exclude me along with Badbear effectively punitively punishing me for not removing my rating after I was removed from the default trust even though he swears up and down trust ratings are not moderated for anyone not on the default trust has zero bearing on this either. This certainly is not an exceptional amount of effort from him to moderate trust ratings at all. After all, he does these sort of things all the time right?



Absolute 100% bullshit.



I am sure you are the person to lecture me about looking bad and losing people's trust  

You are no more at risk legally buying a gun with Bitcoin than buying a gun with cash. If perhaps you are arguing buying guns is risky then maybe your cautiousness might serve a purpose, but the fact of the matter is how you pay for the gun is 100% between you and the seller. How you obtain possession of it does however interest the government.

There is no legal risk to buying firearms with Bitcoin legally via an FFL any more than buying anything else with Bitcoin. What you are talking about is just pure paranoia.

Way to read. People like you are the reason men are allowed to be abused freely. Lots of talking, no reading or thinking.

This isn't just a matter of who is physically stronger, it is about society as a whole casting men as the default perpetrators. Yeah sure maybe you can defend yourself physically against your wife, but what about the 20 cops that come when she calls the police on you for "beating her" when you defend yourself? Women have an excessive amount of power as far as that is concerned. In many states they don't even need any evidence, just the mere accusation of violence is enough to have you carted off in cuffs and lose your right to own a firearm forever.

You put my skin in the game by giving me a retaliatory negative rating dipshit. Smart move. The only reason you even have that offer from me is because you had enough sense to PM BAC to try to work something out instead of just shitslinging. Now take one more step toward reason and pay him.

A whole generation of men have been lied to and sold into the feminist narrative because their generation of mothers decided to choose their own self preferential double standards over their own blood. Now these men are growing up and realizing how full of shit their mothers are. Of course they don't want to admit to selling out their own sons to maintain their own position of privilege, and that of the next generation of women partnering with them. In order to do that they would have to examine a lifetime of lying to themselves as well as their loved ones. Chances are that is never going to happen. Cue the crying and refractory accusations and claiming of victim-hood by the perpetrators.

Don't blame BayAreaCoins for this thread, you are 120% to blame. If it was not for you private messaging me trying to slander and harm BayAreaCoin's reputation, I would have never even known about any of this or gotten involved. Furthermore if you had not doubled down on your bullshit by leaving me a retaliatory negative rating this thread would not be here. Instead of just doing what was right and what you agreed to even AFTER BAC gave you a second chance after trying to rip him off with bunk coins and then slandering him, you just decided you would rather sling shit. Now you are covered in shit too. The moral of the story: if you are full of shit don't try slinging it.

BTW the only way my negative ratings are coming off is if:
1. You pay BAC to his satisfaction.
2. You remove your retaliatory negative ratings for him.
3. You remove your retaliatory negative ratings for me.

I don't give a fuck what kind of deal you strike with BAC, not that he is interested in making one. You made this personal with me, so now you have to deal with me. I guess you should have not tried to start shit to begin with huh? This is the last chance you are getting at any sort of mutually restorative offer from me. Try not to waste it like you did with the first one. Or you could just, you know keep all your sales threads locked forever...its up to you. Time is running out. Tick-tock.

That joke BLOWS and totally BOMBED!

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=male+tears


Yea...

They attacked only one Brussle?

Maybe know what you are talking about before you make assertions.

"There are major difficulties in obtaining reliable statistics in this area but mental health studies consistently show that in heterosexual couples only about 25% of the time is domestic violence solely male-on-female. The same studies show that 25-30% of the time the violence is exclusively female-on-male, with the remainder mutual combat. However, one agreeable result emerges from these studies: The safest place for a woman is in her home with the biological father of her children."

http://www.familytx.org/research/articles/humanproblem.html

Its just like cancer... ignore it and it goes away.

If you live in a common law nation WATCH THIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIvzxK5aZs8

No, there aren't any official rules. That's why that says "unofficial list of rules". You ask off topic questions, I give reasonable answers. You don't like the answers, suddenly I am off topic. Funny how that works. The rules are for me because I say things you don't like, but lets ignore the fact that you yourself are leading this off topic discussion, and lets forget about all the other off topic posts here I reported which go ignored.  If I open a thread for each topic, then I am breaking the rules "spamming threads". What is important is you stop me from bringing these inconsistencies to light, right?

The problem is not different views and opinions. The problem is there is no uniform enforcement of any of the rules around here and not even any official rules posted. This leaves the doors wide open for abuse, nepotism, and other types of selective enforcement. There is no rule of law here at all, just might makes right, and that certainly never goes bad does it?

Perhaps because I have invested five years in building a reputation here, and the entire purpose of these actions was to use that reputation to extort me into following commands that he swears up and down he does not give. If you have no reputation you are just a "scammer" or a "troll", if you have a reputation, then you have something they can take from you. Either way they do what they want and make up the rules as they go along.

I can't tell you how many times reputable members here have told me in private they don't agree with the actions of staff or other highly ranked people here, but they refuse to get involved because it puts them at risk from being attacked and having their own reputation destroyed for doing so. I just happen to be in one of the rare circumstances where a member with an impeccable reputation has been put in this position, as a result, they can't just marginalize me as a scammer, so they have to selectively enforce the rules to stop me from speaking out about this abusive behavior and being heard. This all could be prevented by having a terms of service or officially posted rules, but then the people enforcing the rules might also have to follow them. We can't have that now can we?