I'm sure it happens, but it's probably not very common. At least we don't hear much about women beating men in the news.
Of course it is not in the news. That would not fit the feminist narrative of men always being the aggressor and women always being the victim. Statistics show that domestic violence is largely a MUTUAL act, IE women act with violence against men just as often as men engage in violence against women.
|
|
|
Of course, because of pride, no man will confess that women beat him up It is way beyond pride. In the majority of circumstances any man reporting physical violence from a women will himself be arrested and charged just by default.
|
|
|
2001 you fucking retards.
9/11/01 9/11/2001 11/09/2001 - European form ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Yeah, 9/11 stands for September 2011...
So Europeans add 10 years? That explains everything.
|
|
|
In a lot of places if you call the police for a woman assaulting you as a man, you go to jail. You could be drenched in blood and swollen with a knife sticking out of you some times and it makes no difference.
|
|
|
2001 you fucking retards.
|
|
|
You thought local police were corrupt now? Just wait until they get access to the the largest blackmail machine that ever existed. "Washington, D.C. – The Obama administration has moved to allow the National Security Agency to begin sharing private intercepted communications with other governmental agencies, without any type of privacy protections, despite the fact that the information was collected without a warrant. The change will effectively allow domestic law enforcement access to the massive amounts of digital data caught up in the web of U.S. global and domestic surveillance; including contents of phone calls and emails, bulk collection of metadata, satellite transmissions and all international communications..." http://thefreethoughtproject.com/official-obama-moves-nsa-data-shared-domestic-law-enforcement/
|
|
|
Techshare was removed from the DT network because he was abusing someone with a fake/invalid negative trust rating. However that does not mean that others have the right to leave fake/invalid trust ratings against him, nor does it mean that others have the right to harass/troll him.
Get with it. Don't you know I don't have a right to have an opinion any more because Theymos decided he wanted to make an example out of me by having people remove me from their trust THEN creating exclusions just so he could get me off the trust list because he couldn't achieve this voluntarily? If you can't get something done by the rules, just make up new rules! That's the Theymos way. That is also why there are no official rules anywhere because he might have to follow them. The only thing invalid about my rating was the Bitcoin value, which I removed, but that was not good enough, Theymos demanded full capitulation to his commands. When he didn't get it he created a whole new feature of the trust system just to make sure I was not on any level of the default trust. But "trust isn't moderated" they say! Not if Theymos wants to get involved, then it most certainly is. Of course lets all forget the fact that the reason that user got that negative rating was for repeatedly harassing me via my sales threads, completely instigated by him, with me never even seeing him before that point. This was all because he didn't like the fact I was selling a gift card at face value. Additionally I would have been glad not to "abuse" the trust if there were posted rules on what trust abuse was defined as, but there aren't. All I had to go by was looking at the examples of people like Vod. And based on that example what I did was perfectly acceptable. Who knew there are one set of rules for me and one set of rules for him. I didn't, and that's why I was used as an example so they could cast blame aside while people like Vod ACTUALLY abuse the trust system repeatedly.
|
|
|
This is very impresive. If they can make voice2voice too
Voice emulation technology has been around for quite a while. It is very effective.
|
|
|
cough.... osama... cough cough
|
|
|
I have a cheap violin for this guy, but I only ship within the USA. Is anyone willing to reship it to him within the US?
|
|
|
I read parts of "Das kommunistische Manifest" from Marx and Engels and i cant remember that division of people was their goal - indeed it was the opposite: The communist goal was to unite the "Proletariat" against the "Bourgeoisie" and finally to create a one class society.
Real communism is a whole different animal though...
You need to read more "parts". Before they can achieve their "Utopian paradise" of Communism in the West, they must first destroy the current society. One of the main themes and stated goals stated by Marx was the destruction of the family unit. Another repeatedly stated goal was the destruction of religious institutions. The idea was to destroy western society from within by eroding its foundational properties so that it would be thrown into chaos, therefore making way for Socialism as a means to bring in Communism. Regardless of Marx explicitly talking about using many minority groups and subcultures to divide and destroy Western society or not, it falls in line with his stated goals to do so, and is very clearly practiced today by modern Marxists, Socialists, and Communists.
|
|
|
Techshare was removed from DT after ONE accusation of trust abuse.
Fixed that for you.
|
|
|
IMHO I feel like most of this stuff is government propaganda . Most of us have some form of racial bias against other races and it's pretty easy to exploit them.
Examples:
1. Black people think white people are crazy.
propaganda: Show nothing but crazy white people .
Result : Blacks will never trust whites
2. White's think blacks are violent.
propaganda: show nothing but violent blacks.
Result :White will never trust black
Ultimate Goal: Species separation and a far more loyal public to keep our politicians making money sitting on their ass in government funded building. While sending the public's children to be cannon fodder and sheeple.
Note: These are just my opinions .
You have pretty much nailed it. One of Marxism's primary goals is to divide the population into as many minority groups and subcultures as possible and have them all fight each other resulting in the destruction of western society in order to make way for socialism and then communism. Meanwhile the bankers sit back and use the chaos to strip all of the wealth from the masses free from the fear of the serfs fighting them or resisting.
|
|
|
I keep answering you and clearly you aren't reading what I am posting so I will just start quoting myself and hope you actually read it this time instead of just jumping to reply. I am not currently accusing Vod of trust abuse (against me personally anyway), understand? He IN THE PAST had abused the trust system against me and was forced by BadBear to remove his negative rating or be excluded by him
Okay, so he may or may have not abused trust in some point of time. Why are you rambling on about his posting behavior (current) then? I don't see this as an abuse of anything. You are allowed to post pretty much anything as long as it doesn't break the rules. Anyone could follow you around and try to insult you/troll you or whatever. Additionally, if he really did abuse his position I think he would have been removed by now. He might overreact sometimes, but you're all humans. I didn't want to start a new thread, and this one already has a complete record of his abusive behavior towards me. My latest post in this thread was just to have a public record that as a result of being forced to stand down by BadBear, he has a grudge and is now stalking me by following me to my other threads, posting off topic, and just plain making shit up about me.
He feels he has a right to do this because I DARED mention his name in a topic with his name in the subject line. Considering that his negative rating for me originally was an attempt to silence and punish me for openly discussing his abusive behavior, I am not about to let his harassment silence me on this matter, because that was his goal all along. The ONLY reason I posted it here was so others could have a record of his obsessive behavior. I don't expect you or anyone else will do a damned thing about it, but hopefully it can help some other poor schmoe who does not have any reputation to stand on which he can easily just marginalize as being a scammer. He failed to do that to me, so now he is on a mission to harass and slander me otherwise for not bowing to his insane dictates and abuse.
|
|
|
Now I know for a fact you aren't even reading anything here before posting, just coming here to go "bla bla bla drama".
1) You can't possibly know this 'as a fact'. 2) This is not the case. This thread has been on my watch list for a long time now, however you can't expect me to remember 28 pages of nonsense either. 3) I asked for concrete examples because of number 2. My latest post in this thread was just to have a public record that as a result of being forced to stand down by BadBear, he has a grudge and is now stalking me by following me to my other threads, posting off topic, and just plain making shit up about me.
Do you know the meaning of the words "trust abuse"? Following you around the forum and posting in the same threads is "trust abuse" in your world? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Either you didn't read my latest post or you have a serious reading comprehension problem, as exhibited by your reply. I am not currently accusing Vod of trust abuse (against me personally anyway), understand? He IN THE PAST had abused the trust system against me and was forced by BadBear to remove his negative rating or be excluded by him. You don't have to read 28 pages, just one post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg14231598#msg14231598There you will find your concrete example of trust abuse because BadBear agreed enough to threaten Vod with exclusion, but again that is not the point of my recent post, only to document his harassment as a result of being forced to remove his abusive rating.
|
|
|
I know no one gives a fuck about harassment on this forum, so please refrain from the no one gives a fuck comments, trust me I am well aware this forum is a shithole with no one willing to stand for anything unless it serves them personally.
See, this is completely wrong. I definitely did not post because a "I don't give a fuck" attitude. Trust is not moderated and there's only so much that can be done. However, I usually don't post in conflicts and just watch them from a distance. If there were clear examples of trust abuse, I'd like to see them. Now I know for a fact you aren't even reading anything here before posting, just coming here to go "bla bla bla drama". Just because the OP title was regarding Vods original abusive rating that he was forced to remove by Badbear (see the PM from Badbear I quoted), does not automatically mean any post forever after is about that. I didn't want to start a new thread, and this one already has a complete record of his abusive behavior towards me. My latest post in this thread was just to have a public record that as a result of being forced to stand down by BadBear, he has a grudge and is now stalking me by following me to my other threads, posting off topic, and just plain making shit up about me. He feels he has a right to do this because I DARED mention his name in a topic with his name in the subject line. Considering that his negative rating for me originally was an attempt to silence and punish me for openly discussing his abusive behavior, I am not about to let his harassment silence me on this matter, because that was his goal all along. The ONLY reason I posted it here was so others could have a record of his obsessive behavior. I don't expect you or anyone else will do a damned thing about it, but hopefully it can help some other poor schmoe who does not have any reputation to stand on which he can easily just marginalize as being a scammer. He failed to do that to me, so now he is on a mission to harass and slander me otherwise for not bowing to his insane dictates and abuse.
|
|
|
|