Hey everyone, i am looking for some suggestions for an escrow service we are launching. Drop your ideas below I guess that the first things you will need are knowledge to use 2-of-3 multisig wallets, some "trust" to get people start using your service and probably some advertising too. Also keep in mind that there are quite some people on this forum that already do escrow and you may have to work quite a lot until you'll get to match their "trust" rating.
|
|
|
The truth is that any centralized service can get hacked. My lesson from hack is to use a disposable email and a temporary address. But still I will hesitate to buy anything from Ledger any more. I guess I am done with Ledger since the hack gone out of control.
You're right. But I didn't like what they did afterwards, from trying to minimize what has happened, to various confusing e-mails to the customers, for example. Your "the hack gone out of control" wording tells it perfectly. Many others got hacked and can get hacked, but I didn't really witness such a bad handling until now. And since the competition starts coming out with cards one can use for kinda free, I see no reason to bother with whatever is Ledger going to offer.
Curiosity gets the better of me here... do you have some examples of "kinda free" bitcoin debit cards? I actually had an acquaintance ask me about this the other day... and it's not something I've ever really looked into, as I figured the fees would like be horrendous. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) I didn't want to advertise, but .. here you are: The best example for "today" is Binance. I got their card for free and the 1% default cashback covers the current 0.9% fee. The Fx rate is the Visa rate (or close). And one can use the exchange to convert to EUR/BUSD at market rate if he doesn't like, doesn't want, doesn't trust or feels like automated conversion from BTC doesn't work properly (for me it failed once and it worked 3 times, but I don't use the card that often). The so expensive Wirex is in the process of replacing the old Contis cards with their own and they are also advertising that the fees will be waived. Of course, I want to get to see that, but I think that most of the fees will be waived because they have competition now. I don't think many will spend bitcoins this year
People do spend. Always keep in mind that all the coins bought by some are spent by others. And the numbers show it's not only the miners.
|
|
|
it's a small project
Keep in mind that Electrum "discuss" with its own servers (or nodes), hence you'll probably have to also adapt ElectrumX (or electrum-server or similar) too and the project will no longer be so small. Also in order for this to work, somebody will have to host those servers... See https://github.com/spesmilo/electrumxDoes electrum broadcast the transaction to bitcoin nodes directly?
Nope, it has its server. Is there a handshake once you broadcast the transaction? I mean, can I simply change the default IP addresses of the litecoin nodes so I can put dogecoin nodes? Is it that simple?
Probably ElectrumX will be a bit different too. What other things do I have to change excluding the address' prefix?
You'll probably have to distinguish between the networks and avoid LTC/DOGE signal themselves as BTC ElectrumX servers. Although I am against BCash existence, this time it may prove itself helpful for you, since it has its own Electrum fork. https://github.com/Electron-Cash/Electron-Cash
|
|
|
There are older Win PE versions that work without swap. On the other hand Win 10 backup USB is already 8GB required, so you'll need more. And for USB the price differences until 32Gb are small (then it starts doubling). But... many voices are against Windows for mining. That's because of lower hash rate for some, automatic updates breaking configurations for others... Why don't you just use a Linux? Especially since there are a few USB sticks especially designed for mining....
|
|
|
bitcoin investment trust, links to it can be found on Tor.
A hidden investment trust, under ToR, where you send your coins,... then what? Not your keys, not your coins. For me it sounds extremely shady. I would be wary to send my coins to a new/not yet known company even if they make public info about themselves. If they are hidden, there's a very high chance you'll ... make them a donation.
|
|
|
All evidence lead to the fact that the person behind the theft is most likely Blockchain.com employee
Bitcoin can be stolen in many ways and I am almost sure that many of those people that have lost funds did so because they were clicked into phishing links and went to websites that look like blockchain.com However, I don't know what do people expect from a website. The content of the page and possibly some other features too can be changed by anybody from the company and by anybody else powerful enough to trick your browser's DNS resolving (OK, lately with forced https this will no longer happen). This means that you are never to be sure what you run there. If you look into their ToS, they're basically not liable for anything. And that's right, if one is lazy enough to use web services instead of a proper wallet then maybe he deserves his fate...
|
|
|
Since miners receive 13.7 million fresh new DOGE every day and since I don't expect the current hype last too long, my answer would be somewhere between 2 and 10 million DOGECOIN. I had my days dreaming like you did, but then I've learned about the infinite supply. Maybe I'm wrong. Sometimes I wish to be wrong. However, don't rely on DOGE too heavily for buying as Cyber Truck...
|
|
|
the couple sold personal information to more than 9,000 people for $ 160,000 in Bitcoin
Committing crime for Bitcoin is far from new. I'm surprised it still happens with Bitcoin since it gives a good chance to the agencies to track - sooner or later - those funds and seize them. But since I'm not concerned about the well-being of the criminals, this is just fine.
|
|
|
Anyway, since you're a newbie you can not use the feature I think unless you pay for the 'copper' membership.
More properly, iirc, the user cannot put there anything else than short plain text if he's newbie. In time, with more and better posts, while ranking up, the signatures are getting allowed to get bigger, nicer, colored, with links, ... Indeed, copper membership can allow some more for styling, but still not the "full package", from what it tells here: Additionally (and these might change depending on how things go), Copper Members currently have these bonuses:
- Some of the same permissions as Member-rank members, such as reduced signature styling restrictions.
|
|
|
I don't see anything positive about this
I agree. They have proven that they have no idea how to properly handle users' sensitive information. And since the competition starts coming out with cards one can use for kinda free, I see no reason to bother with whatever is Ledger going to offer.
|
|
|
With that said, while I don't blame people if they used it, as an investment though? It's a no for me dawg.
People need a learning curve. As technology and as financial thing too. I myself got hooked to crypto because of DOGE and back then I was dreaming that it will grow to this or that value (like I see people asking now if/when it will reach 5$). I got older and I've learned a lot since those days and now I know that its infinite supply makes it a poor investment. But unfortunately too many are now at the point I was in 2013-2014...
|
|
|
How long was he off twitter? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The man got a beer, got some sleep, then turned back. It was not BRB, so it was accurate ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Goodluck to these people who likes investing in a meme-coin, I guess.
Dogecoin's strength (and maybe weakness too) is its community. Back in 2014-ish, it could have been used for cheap and heavy advertising, at least. Although greatly diminished, Doge community still exists and could be used for mutual benefit. (Does Elon have such plans, who knows?) With his infinite supply, Dogecoin is much closer to what we know and expect as a currency. Its 1 minute block time makes it more appropriate for payments than most proper blockchain-based coins. It's not just a meme coin.... This guy is only playing with you and the markets. It's all fun for him, he's just trolling.
Maybe yes, maybe no. The problem imho is that people takes his tweets much too serious. Some are just desperate to find a meaning and follow him.
|
|
|
I like the Testnet idea but I would love for them to walk away having actual sats. Imagine they are in college 2-3 years from now and they can say they got their first wallet in CS class and even had it funded ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Testnet is great to learn to use the actual tools related to Bitcoin transactions, and for free (you can get easily enough coins for tests from testnet faucets). It may still be useful for you, but I can understand the idea of "earning" actual money too. Just mining pools have certain (big) minimum amounts for withdrawal and you (and the students) may get disappointed big time... Well, do some tests and you'll see for yourself. Maybe you'll have somewhat bigger chance with Dogecoin. I really hope you will... 3) Software wallets are cool but hardware wallets cost money so that would be out
SPV wallets are not hardware wallets. SPV wallets are "simple payment verification" wallets that don't require the download of the whole blockchain. Hardware wallets are by far unnecessary for the scope of your experiment and indeed you can rule them out. 4) Paper wallets are outdated but are tangible and a great way to help them make the connection between pub/priv key...I actually plan to share with them a private key of a wallet that I will fund my self with $20 or so and have them race to see who can get it first ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) OK, point taken. But please consider teaching them also about HD wallets, seeds and change addresses ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I really doubt that some scammer/criminal will be patiently waiting for those people to post a picture holding their private keys,in order to rob the satoshis,that are sitting in their wallets.What's the point of robbing a few satoshis?It doesn't make sense. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You'd be surprised. However, maybe you can find/print the paper wallets in a way they can be folded in 2 or 3 sides and the private key goes inside, hence the photo will only reveal addresses.
|
|
|
Since OP last logged in about one year ago, it may have been more useful to PM him in a hope that maybe the address linked to the forum is still active (and he has the appropriate settings). Did @lonestar1 did that? Should we do that?!
|
|
|
How accurate this data could be?
There are places here and there offering lists with addresses that contain funds, so you can test for yourself. However, this information doesn't mean absolutely anything, since some will keep all their funds in one address, while others will keep them spread in more wallets.
|
|
|
Imho it's not a good plan. The problem is that Bitcoin mining difficulty is very high and rising. That means that an old "unprofitable" ASIC will probably not get you almost any coins, or you'll need quite a number of generations of students to get to withdraw that dust.
If you want to teach students about mining, show them how mining works with any coin. You'll have to pick with every new generation a new worthless coin with low difficulty in order to show them everything, including hitting a block or at least receiving payout from the pool.
If you want to teach students about transferring Bitcoin, then imho your best bet is Bitcoin's testnet. This way they'll see the exact wallets they can use. And since Bitcoin Core needs very long initial sync and you'll probably want to have each student trying this on his computer, I think that a SPV wallet like Electrum would be more suitable, since it syncs fast and it can also work with testnet.
Paper wallets... they are kinda outdated if you want to show them in the "classic" way. Paper wallet is a nicely printed pair of private key + address. But nowadays it's easier and cleaner to introduced them to HD wallets and seed, which they can store instead of paper wallet, and with seed they'll have virtually infinite number of addresses, of which they can bookmark one or two and check on block explorers (there are also a few block explorers that can work with testnet too).
|
|
|
The other "104" list has 107 entries ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I've ran a diff between the two and for now these seem to be the 15 names you don't seem to have: Bthd Buchi-88 Coolcryptovator DaveF DrBeer gospodin hanspeter77 In the silence Koal-84 LUCKMCFLY rdluffy seek3r Stedsm Ultegra134 zasad@
|
|
|
Dogecoin needs a proper SPV wallet for many years now. There was Multidoge in 2014, but now we are in 2021... @dogemoon: your best bet would be to convince fellow Doges to get Electrum source code and modify it for Dogecoin network (or to make another SPV wallet). The problem is that also something like ElectrumX server is also needed for this (adapted and hosted), since that's the part that actually interacts with the blockchain.
|
|
|
The drawback with Binance is you need to hold a certain amount of coins
This is incorrect. You need those coins only if you want bigger cashback. Binance gains now many users for the card in Europe because it has basically no fees. Wirex is also advertising some sort of no-fees card/account, but from what I know they're not there yet, but it'll happen rather soon. And then there may be some competition.
|
|
|
|