i guess nicehash doesnt work with suchpool either, btc's going down and no shares on the pool.
what do you mean? nicehash has some issues with some pools, so far suprnova, ipominer, and suchpool are what i have found. I have talked to nicehash and they are just dicks about and and claim im trying to fud them. The owner of ipominer has talked to them about it, something to do with the stratum i dont remember what exactly, and again they were just dicks about it. So just letting you guys know to pay attention, what happens is it eats your btc and everything looks like its mining and you get no shares on the pool. Not fudding suchpool, they are a great pool. its an issue with nicehash, they know about it and refuse to fix it. Good you mention it, I wasn't aware of such issue. I'll keep a close look. Could this be that they would mine with the wrong algo, therefore not producing any shares? If the pool doesn't accept the share, nicehash shouldn't be charging it to the renter since they are supposed to only charge valid shares. Usually nicehash works flawlessly as I use it on some launches to get some coins myself. I hope they address the issues on their side.
|
|
|
Why choose a NOMP pool? 1) It's Safer than a normal Pool. Cause you do not need to give any personal info such email or passwords. 2) It's faster: point your miners, set your address in your miner config and earn coind immediately with auto payouts every 30 seconds! 3) It's lighter for your internet connection than normal MPOS pool.
Let me point out a few things; 1) I wouldn't consider this safer, as most users use throw away e-mails on regular MPOS pools. Also, 90% of nomp pools fail to secure their redis databases. It's not safer and anybody can wipe or modify payout addresses from a simple device such as an iPhone. 2) Faster? People need to download and install the wallet to pickup an address to start mining, this is not faster at all.3) The amount of bandwidth "saved" is negectable, therefore not a great advantage compared to MPOS This ^^ Though HashHarder managed to figure a way out around this with their One Address thingy Yep, using deterministic addresses is faster. The feature is actually available in NOMP, but from a pool owner standpoint, 75% of the miners wouldn't be able to import the linked addresses in their wallet. The market wants to just set up workers, mine on them, then dump the shitcoins str8 from the pool to bittrex.
|
|
|
At least we do not get stuck with cronjobs, mysql , and many others every hour ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If you are able to crack our Redis database, please do it, and i will reward you. Btw, wanna talk about sql-injections, DDOS, and more that every dam MPOS pool has? If what you say about NOMP would be so evident, there would not be any reason "to point out a few things." Nice try to throw some sh*t against other pool owners. Nice try ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Learn how to vardiff, because you terribly failed it. I didn't say YOUR database was vulnerable, rather 90% of them. In your case I have no idea, and I haven't tested and I don't intend to. Sql injection happens, that's life, heh. Any decent sysadmin will master a MPOS pool and make it reliable like ours. Not my problem if you are lacking skills and get stuck using NOMP front-end. DDoS? You can get some on a NOMP pool aswell, pointless argument. Cronjobs? Well actually, we have control over our payouts, can stop them and limit the damage of forks and other disruptions. Any skilled admin will do just fine with the cronjobs dude. Either way, look at the hashrates, they speak for themselves. Please go on with your pool having a total lack of informations to the miners. PS: I think miners like to know which block they are mining aswell as it's difficulty. This is the MAIN reason why NOMP sucks as a front-end.
|
|
|
Why choose a NOMP pool? 1) It's Safer than a normal Pool. Cause you do not need to give any personal info such email or passwords. 2) It's faster: point your miners, set your address in your miner config and earn coind immediately with auto payouts every 30 seconds! 3) It's lighter for your internet connection than normal MPOS pool.
Let me point out a few things; 1) I wouldn't consider this safer, as most users use throw away e-mails on regular MPOS pools. Also, 90% of nomp pools fail to secure their redis databases. It's not safer and anybody can wipe or modify payout addresses from a simple device such as an iPhone. 2) Faster? People need to download and install the wallet to pickup an address to start mining, this is not faster at all. 3) The amount of bandwidth "saved" is negectable, therefore not a great advantage compared to MPOS. Let me point out.. NOMP does not display on which block you are, therefore you have no idea if you are forked or not. It also doesn't show the current difficulty, nor block history or block finder. I wonder why you think it's still better than a classical MPOS pool... URL (difficulty 1): stratum+tcp://cryptoskills.com:3006 URL (Vardiff 128): stratum+tcp://cryptoskills.com:3034 URL (difficulty 1024): stratum+tcp://cryptoskills.com:3254
The target diff should be of .01 and .1 at the most for x11, whoever mining at vardiff 128 of 1024 won't EVER get a single share, and those mining at diff 1 won't get much either.
|
|
|
mine pit not working as usual!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Suchpool is working, as usual! Join us up! www.suchpool.pw/usb
|
|
|
And here come the next scamcoin
yep. disabled wallet etc etc I asked all exchanges to disable wallets, within minutes of the attack, to protect Rubycoin users. That's the complete opposite of a scam. That's me saving your ass and doing my job. For once, we can benefit from a skilled dev on a coin. Why users are failing to realise that you have been here for months, not going anywhere and dedicated your time 100% on Rubycoin preserving the health of the network and innovating around Ruby? Keep up the good work!
|
|
|
next conceal and vast coin ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) +1 +1 +1, people are really out of ideas
|
|
|
There we aaaare !! :-)))
Expected! ahha
|
|
|
No IPO, No premine and no instamine, sounds alright to me. Some of our miners requested it, so we deliver! Glad these guys are onboard :-)
|
|
|
Please IPO I will buy 10 btc worth
|
|
|
0.01 on Dedicated is way too much
i have 50 Mh/s rig, and i have 0.05 till now, started from beggining. What others has to say with 3 gpus and 10 mhs ? They need to mine 24h just for fee.
Fees are 17 elitoshi on suchpool! 0.00000017 / tx ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Talking about efficiency? We are doing pretty well, we got in 3 mins in at 340 diff ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FlJJQBlV.png&t=663&c=_i7xy3O-MVMvPw) Get more coins for your hash www.suchpool.pw/elc
|
|
|
Dedicated not working T_T
i had fkin worker added 15 min before launch, and he started mining 5 min after all -,-
Dedicate was the first ~6+ mins after launch. Nope, suprnova was probably the last.. I did not know the source was on github early.. Sorry ! Next time ! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) According to their timer, source was on github about 10 seconds b4
|
|
|
Compiling, soon to be dne!
|
|
|
Also
 { "blocks" : 101, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 1.06434639, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414, "search-interval" : 1 }, "blockvalue" : 6000000000, "netmhashps" : 67.22548408, "netstakeweight" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "", "pooledtx" : 0, "stakeweight" : { "minimum" : 0, "maximum" : 0, "combined" : 0 }, "stakeinterest" : 1000000, "testnet" : false }
Dev says it's from 1 to 500.
|
|
|
|