The best is by far no change. Changing it to X11 will mean the death of mining to the big farms and ASICs.

As per


We are looking to move MUE onto a new Algo with lots more features  but we would like this to be a joint thing not just us telling you what we are going to do.

Theirs lot of different coins / Algos out there  that have done well and are very stable.
So with that in mine we would like your ideas / comments on this poll.
If you want us to add different Coin’s / Algos  let me know and I will add them to list

thanks
Paul

I don't have looked in the deep of mining algorithms yet.
What about the algorithm ETH uses. Sure there was problems in the past, that was to be expected from a new concept (as far as I understand it, its a new concept), but they are in the process of getting rid of it and the algorithm sure has it's fans.

Personally I do not like DASH to much. I just tried the mixing function once and it never got finished. Maybe if privacy is an factor mixing should be an automatic process.

When I think about it mixing could be a great option but currently in DASH there are to less pople doing it. I can only assume that would be an even greater problem for MUE.
My quick thoughts about (without knowing the consequences)

• Make mixing and private send the default behavior
• introduce an special transaction type for mixing that comes with no fees but got accepted by miners lets say 10 transactions per block
• make wallets respond to that transaction type by joining the mixing so that enough people for the mixing are participating
• With a view in the future and a view to the bitcoin blockchain. Find a way to give transactions a priority value based on there creation time. With bitcoins if you do a transaction it is based on your luck when a transaction is taken into the block. (Last BTC transaction took 4 days for me). With an priority system for transactions based on creation time and payed fees. you can assure that each transaction will be processed some time, it can be predicted very good.
• With an priority system for transactions the block creation algo can be changed from x transactions per block to an each block contains all transactions with priority greater x. That would lead to a very fast transaction acceptance even when there are very much transaction flying around

I hope you understand what I mean. At least that's what I would do if I ever made a coin myself. Well I would not create just a coin but a coin ecosystem of three coins and an hole new (self designed) algorithm .

There's a new update on the wrapper front. I took me a while. Planing an 20.000+ Visitor Event and writing this wrapper proofed really incompatible. However somehow I managed to make the time.

The wrapper is finished. A new Release is added to GitHub (https://github.com/swtrse/BittrexClient.net)
I still consider this a pre-release because it is not tested in the wild.

The next steps will be
1) Writing a a small documentation and add it to the GitHub (Will be done in the next hours)
2) The Wrapper is made async so a client can call the wrapper methods many times at once. I will add a flood protection so that the wrapper ensures that there are only the allowed api calls per second.
3) Starting to write a trading tool based on that wrapper.

With the first version of the Trading tool the Build state of the wrapper will switch to a non pre-release state.

If someone wants to participate or do have input. Please use the issue function on GitHub. To file a request/issue.
English is not my natural language and writing an wrapper to a (poorly) documented api is one thing understanding what the parameters are doing is an other.
If you like you can take a look at the Goldfinger.Bittrex.xml file inside the zip archive. This file contains the descriptions for all public Methods, Entities and Properties that can be used.
I tried to use the same names for the same thing all around the api planing if I ever write an other wrapper for an other exchange to use the same names, so that a developer who uses my wrappers always know that this name has this meaning regardless how the exchange names it. I have done a lot of guessing there and if someone thinks the naming is off and should be changed please file a suggestion on GitHub.
Localization of Error Messages is also possible. If someone do want to add a language I can extract the strings for translation.

Hey B, thanks for requesting a response on this.

On the one hand I always liked MUE because of the starting principles: it had a very slow mining start where block rewards were only 0.025 MUE per block. MUE had doubling events instead of halving events which resulted in the following 40 MUE per block, unto perpetuity. By design it was meant ot be an anti-instamine, low-value-per-unit currency with constant generation towards a high market cap.

But the world of crypto is very different since MUE's initial launch, so it's definitely worth revisiting these principles to see if they still hold up. MUE was a purely conceptual altcoin, like, a true conceptual alternative to Bitcoin, borne of the thought process "what if the main cryptocurrency everyone uses didn't have a PoW ASIC arms race, and doubled instead of halved so everyone could have an easy time getting some even if they were late to the party." Now the cryptocurrency environment is less focused on conceptually challenging Bitcoin for the top spot, and more focused on accomplishing specific niche goals or integrating with Bitcoin and everything else.

I definitely agree that nethash is low and it would be a good idea to consider changing it to something more sustainable. Unique CPU algorithms are relatively weak and it only takes a small botnet to 51%-attack the network via hashrate. This factor could be suppressing MUE's price or ease of adoption. Generally an easy choice for a PoW coin that wants more network security is to change to sha256 or scrypt (or even x11 now) mining algo, so it will benefit from the occasional hashrate from multipool mining attention. The problem over time is that this gets diluted as more and more PoW coins get added to the multipool.

Perhaps a change to PoW/PoS hybrid would be a good thing since it would have the benefits of allowing for multipool mining (with a PoW algo change) and also the benefits of staking. The MUEbank initiative is a centralized way of allowing MUE holders to tie up their stake, so the mere fact that this exists suggests that an implementation of PoS would be better. PoS at generative rates less than 100% reduces the available supply at any given time, which allows for a little more upward pressure on the marketplace.

It's important to note that with MUE's stable price in the 30-50 sat range, its relative value was still increasing over time due to the inflation of coins entering the market via PoW. This process just isn't as apparent as a price increase, and price increases over time are a much bigger attractor of speculation and "investment".

Honestly I've always liked MUE for the experiments it's tried on top of the original principles. I've always figured it was just a matter of time before one of the experiments paid off really well, and MUE gained its value proposition or found its niche application that way. There's always the risk that neither of those two things would ever happen, but no risk, no gain potential. I can see why the MUE team might start to get disheartened that the experiments aren't catching on after two plus years, and start wanting to go back and examine the fundamental principles to see if changing them might shake things up. But as far as I can tell, MUE is the only coin of its kind that's surviving having been based on those principles. I'm not saying those principles are the only driver of value for MUE, but perhaps it's worth pursuing new experiments and applications over simple updates to the software that could undermine the principles on which MUE was based. The hard work based on existing principles is always harder by definition, but maybe it's more worthwhile.

why web wallet can't access?

Do they mean that when you get to be a member and post on their forum, you can earn Quarks? if so then this is almost no different to steem, where blogging is somehow like mining as the y claim. allcryptotalk.com forum has ACTS as well, not sure if ACTs can be spent though.

Thanks for sharing this list of faucets for MUE. I've never thought that such faucets existed. Still, I'm looking forward for MUEGS to launch too as it may drive MUE's price all the way to the moon. I've always been a fan and good supporter of MUE, but sometimes I'm short of time due to college stuff/issues, etc. I had the dream of launching a MUE Cloud Mining Service but I guess that it will be a really big project considering that it is only me and my partner (and also the short time I have to manage things). Looking forward to see MUE become the next popular altcoin. 

Are there any good paying faucet for this long lasting coin. This coin is trading well since the beginning. Are there any future plans?