West indies has been playing the inning but But they have only one player left to bat and the score is still 187.

Australia is the father of cricket, Australia prefromance of batting and bowling both side are well . Australia two bowler took 8 wickets Hazlewood he took 4 wickets by giving 44 run in 15 overs and P Cummins he took also 4 wickets by giving 41 run in 17 overs .

Pakistan vs New Zealand
3rd T20I

Today they are playing the 3rd match. We know that New Zealand already won the previous two matches and today again given a good target of 225 runs. In the first match they 227 runs target and won that match. Pakistan is playing well. Fakhar Zaman and Babar Azam are playing now and Pakistan made 95 runs in 10 overs. If Pakistan will hold the wickets so I think Pakistan will win this match. So let's see what they will do today. If Pakistan will lose today match so they will lose the series.

Are there any potential goals that you would like to incorporate into such a discussion, Publictalk792?

I don't think I would say that it's a split personality, because it's not just one or two gamblers who experience it but most gamblers will have the same mindset when they get into gambling, on the other hand it is true that gambling is a risk taking activity to get involved in the luck of the outcome because all gamblers take risks but maybe the difference is that each gambler takes a different amount of risk. and some choose to take big risks and some are small, but on the other hand it's very wrong if you assume and think that by taking big risks then you will be able to win, I would say "YES" if indeed luck comes in, But on the other hand it's very wrong if you assume and think that by taking a big risk then you will be able to get a win, I would say "YES" if indeed luck comes at the same time when you bet, but we must understand as a whole that the size of the risk we take has absolutely no effect on the final result, there are still only two possibilities to happen, namely winning or losing. So I don't think this is a split personality that a person applies when he enters gambling but rather someone who does not have the right understanding of what gambling is so he acts in a different way and outside of his habits in real life.

Your investment advice OP has potential, but to effectively attract investors, consider providing more comprehensive information. Elaborate on the strategy, delve into the factors influencing your coin selections, and emphasize the importance of thorough research. Furthermore, highlight the risks associated with high potential returns to ensure a balanced perspective. Constructing a detailed and well-rounded presentation will likely garner more interest and trust from potential investors, acknowledging that investment decisions involve serious financial considerations.

In the Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe ODI match, Zimbabwe's bowling did better than their batting. If Zimbabwe could have batted well they might have won the second ODI against Sri Lanka but unfortunately Sri Lanka struggled to win despite being given a target of 209 runs. Sri Lanka is not performing very well against Zimbabwe. That's because we don't see Sri Lanka's strong performance on the field against Zimbabwe. If Zimbabwe had batted well, if they had not had problems with batting, their matches against Sri Lanka might have been tight. However, before the game against Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe should be able to bat well and not lose wickets too quickly, then they will do well.

In the last minute Brisbane Heat vs Perth Scorchers the game performance of these two teams was very good but due to the fall of extra wickets Brisbane Heat was forced to lose. Their batting performance was not good in the last minute due to which they lost massive wickets due to the bowling of the opposing team. If they should have been patient and entered the field for a long time then today's game could have been won.

It sounds like you are misreading what I said.. and that is on you,.  I stick by my original comments, which are largely responding to Wind_FURY's various somewhat seemingly ongoing and persistent (subtle and sometimes not) arguments against DCA and seeming attempts to suggest that there is some kind of objective best in regards to waiting and buying on dips or also dumbedly trying to suggest, as you seem to be doing Publictalk792 that whatever BTC accumulation choices are made are all relative and blah blah blah bullshit. 

Yes.  And some ways are better than other ways, and as you know we are not really talking about trading in this thread or even proposing it as a better way for anyone (absent those who build a specialty or who want to spend time in this kind of activity - maybe like a profession), so no need to confuse matters more by suggesting that we might be talking about those kinds of things trading things as if they were even comparable or something that most normal/regular guys should be considering in terms of the bitcoin accumulation journey.
 
The most basic thing that we are talking about in this thread are the various ways to accumulate bitcoin, and so we have some agreed-to presumptions that we are considering various ways to attempt to accumulate BTC in the ways that are best tailored for each person.  So if we are talking about DCA versus buying on dip versus lump sum buying, then I still am gong to suggest that DCA tends to be the best for the newbie until he gets to a certain stash size.  However, lump sum could be equally well, if someone has a lump sum to get started with a lump sum, and then if he is a newbie and has not reached his accumulation strategy, the he should supplement the lump sum with DCA and buying on dips. 

Where we likely disagree the most, is my assertion that buying on dips is likely ONLY going to become a superior strategy after the person had already accumulated BTC, whether he did that buy DCA and/or lump buying and/or by some other way.

Metaverse or AI may just be waiting for a project moment that can create hype in the market. NFTs have been overlooked but maybe NFTs and memecoins could get hype again in the future.
Memcoin is currently quite busy again because several networks such as Solana seem to have quite a lot of memecoins currently being discussed on social media. or maybe we'll see the hype created by older altcoins like Ethereum.

The same thing made me wonder. Yes it's fast but spending 25 cents for each transaction is more expensive than BSC network. If the transaction are that expensive this early, it could be a problem to adopt it for dapps. The direct competitor for TON is Solana as they claim to be x2 better than Solana. Solana has a much lesser transaction fees.
But if they be able to maintain or decrease the fees, they could fare well considering the controversial past and risks in future for Solana.

Betting daily is not great for your mental health and it's not great for your pocket either so my personal opinion would be to gamble only on the events you like and you watch.

Also , I can't ignore the fact that there are so many people who are betting daily no matter what they are betting on ...as the only thing they want for that day is to gamble. 

yeah thats true there are some airdrop that require staking, etc. just because they require to stake doesn't mean they are scam, the one that scams usually are those random shitcoin that open up presale or ICO and then ditched.
the big project like blast that require staking and right now the TVL is touching 1 billion and more and also other project like eigenlayer and so on I don't think they are scam because they are also endorsed by big company.
its matter about selecting project to be honest, not all airdrops are scams same with not all airdrops are gonna be rewarding experiences.
but i've seen plenty that already gained significant amount of money from airdrop its just matter of luck, discipline to finish task also the ability to find some good project. otherwise you re more likely to waste time if we are just lazing around with all the airdrop only following some random airdrop.