You need to edit title, as I understand that you are searching for all phishing links for Iceriver or you want to search for all phishing sites for ASIC Miners. If what I understood is correct, the answer is easy. Any link other than the official link, which is https://www.iceriver.io/, is a phishing link, or you need to create a list of reliable ASIC Miners. There should not be a list of scam sites because any site other than the official site is a scam. you can make a list of trusted sites. |
|
|
|
You are now not comparing hardware wallets, but rather between decentralized cross-chain swap aka bridge, and these bridges have a bad reputation, as most of the hackers in recent years were from these bridges, so I do not advise you to use them if you intend to exchange thousands of dollars for the high fees, limited liquidity, and the possibility of hacking the bridge and lose your money. Onekey use swftbridge If you download the application from https://www.swft.pro/#Download and use it with any wallet, you will get the same results, but Onekey provides a built-in interface as shown here https://help.onekey.so/hc/en-us/articles/4910514476303-Use-App-to-swap-and-DeFi. you can compare Onekey and Bitbox in other things related to hardware wallets. |
|
|
|
From what I see on review thread I'll say the possibility of those users using those platforms they review are far less than the percentage you gave them. Most of the reviews remarks are similar which just goes to show people are copying from what others above them have said to write theirs.
review campaign is supposed to be from people with a good technical background in order to explain the strengths and weaknesses of the service, but in the forum, review campaigns are closer to testing campaigns and giving a general feedback of the service or customer feedback than to being a detailed review, so there is no need for more than one review campaign at the end of the service except with profound changes occurring in the backend. |
|
|
|
|
If your country's economy is linked to interest rates and debt, shipping and supply chains, oil and gas, or geopolitical determinations, then the current year will inevitably have a severe impact on the local economy due to raising interest rates, fluctuations in the price of the dollar, the slowdown of the Chinese economy, and global problems and challenges.
The agricultural, service, and tourism-based economies are less affected. Therefore, I believe that the countries of Southeast Asia are the least affected by what is happening in the global economies and the economic damage to them is less, in addition to the countries of South America, which do not have a large exposure to debt. I do not know where Bangladesh is located, but look at your economy, its nature, and the factors you mentioned, and you will know whether there is an impact or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't the social media team who published false articles from Cointelegraph be held accountable? The argument that the X account is a scam and the platform has followers is considered flimsy. Can an article writer not distinguish between Twitter accounts, and can this be considered manipulation?
If we were in the stock market, things would be more serious, but it is a lesson to verify the source of the news, especially since most of the news sites that cover Bitcoin news are transmitted from each other.
|
|
|
|
|
Bisq is your best option, but the problem is always finding the necessary liquidity or having someone to do the deal with you. If you are prepared to wait, it is the best solution. Otherwise, searching through several P2P sites would be the best. The advantage of Binance is the presence of a large number of user base, which makes executing transactions faster.
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction 2: $26,415.77
bech32 address:bc1qgt35kdx373y6f7ng4dc0awctwgygc7nch9w38z
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptocurrencies have not reached the extent of being competitive with paper money and the economies of countries. All fears come from investors losing their money due to the bankruptcy of platforms or purchasing altcoins of low value, and from here some countries are tightening regulatory restrictions.
Imposing taxes is beneficial to governments, not individuals, and regulatory cover will not benefit you except that your money will be more money in platforms after they are licensed, but in any case, withdraw your profits from exchanges as soon as they occur.
|
|
|
|
But I would like to add here for the sake of completeness that you don't need to think about writing an arbitrage bot yourself. In the meantime, a battle has broken out on the arbitrage market for the fastest bots and algorithms, where companies with tens of employees are sitting behind them and perfecting the bots. You don't stand a chance with self-written software, because speed is what counts in arbitrage.
Speed is required in Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies with high liquidity, but if you want to carry out arbitrage with some altcoins in which liquidity may differ, you can simply make a good profit without using a fast bot. with arbitrage here is that the value of the currency may fall quickly or it may not. You find sufficient liquidity to execute your order quickly and you need to use a market order (it will eliminate all your profits) although arbitrage in altcoins is profitable and without additional bot costs, I prefer a fast bot with Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for sharing your experience. It is difficult to believe that you will continue to use this service. Not discovering buy and sell orders, paid UI buys, and slow trading are all indicators of technical or software problems, both of which are due to limited funding, so at any time they may either stop or turn into fraud, or There is an insider attack or any other form that will lead to the loss of your money.
|
|
|
|
|
If there is a guaranteed way to make an automatic profit, the developer of that method will not need to make it paid or available to everyone. You have got a gold mine and can borrow any amount and make thousands of dollars in profits.
Arbitrage is possible if there is a fast trading bot. You can obtain an API for central platforms after completing verification of your identity and knowing how to do it correctly, but even this arbitrage is not profitable, especially with bots that have begun to correct the price quickly and not as it was in the past.
Telegram is the worst place to get investment advice.
|
|
|
|
I will return to a basic question. You mentioned that you want to mine Bitcoin, but based on the subsequent replies that you received, your knowledge of Bitcoin is limited. Did you buy mining devices, or is it a type of cloud mining, or those sites that ask you to invest in mining farms and get the profits for your wallet? If it is cloud mining or any form of mining without purchasing hardware, you will most likely be exposed to scam. If you are thinking about purchasing hardware, I advise you to learn more beforehand. The price on Amazon.ca is in CAD, whereas the prices on the trezor site are in USD, hence the difference.
On Amazon.ca it is actually cheaper than on the Trezor site. 69USD on Trezor site = 109CAD with the today course, OK?
Thank you
It is true that the difference is several dollars, but the risks are greater, especially since its components may be compromised. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk username: Yamane_Keto
Bitcointalk Rank: Sr. Member
Lifetime earned merit: 309
Bech32 address: bc1qgt35kdx373y6f7ng4dc0awctwgygc7nch9w38z
|
|
|
|
We cannot base analyzes on something that has not happened, and we cannot predict its effects because we do not know to what extent it may affect the economy and whether its effect on the economy will affect Bitcoin. Bitcoin did not show high sensitivity to global events and variables, and even these variables were part of the historical pattern of Bitcoin cycles, so Bitcoin is even less affected by events not related to cryptocurrencies. I read this article a while ago, titled The effect of political and economic uncertainty on the cryptocurrency market, and its summary says: find that the cryptocurrency market can serve as a strong hedge against geopolitical risks in most cases, but it could be considered a weak hedge and safe haven against economic policy uncertainty during a bull market. Our problem is more with economic policy uncertainty during a bull market than with geopolitical risks. Link of Scientific paper for those who want to read: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1544612320301707 |
|
|
|
Personally, I feel that review campaign brings more results to the project owners because the participants of the review campaign will surely use the project and there is the possibility than more than 30% of the campaign participants will continue to use the project if it is a good project.
Whereas, we can say that upto 5% of signature campaign participants doesn't use the project they promote.
1) campaign manager's perspective, managing the reviews campaign will be easier, and the number of posts he will read will be fewer. 2) Users: it is less valuable as you can get $50 from the reviews campaign, but signatures campaigns pay more. as a user, if the choice is between a reviews campaign and a signatures campaign, you will choose the signatures campaign because it means more payments to you. 3) project owner, the number of people who visit the forum without logging in is large, and in the reviews campaign you lose all these potential users, which is possible in the signature campaign. The campaign manager does less work on review campaigns, users get paid less and the project gets fewer views and therefore fewer clicks. |
|
|
|
atlos.io has a nice interface, low fees of around 1% per transaction, no withdrawal fees, and they claim to be a non-custodial crypto payment gateway so everything seems perfect unless you find these stats:  1,796,906 Transactions 236,435 Users served It's a lot for an unpopular service. I searched the internet and didn't find any reviews. How can more than 236,435 users leave any comments? They have a poor rating here https://cryptwerk.com/company/atlos-crypto-payments/They have a GitHub link, but it seems that the code is closed source, as the link contains example of web integration https://github.com/atlos-io/It's not a service I would trust. |
|
|
|
|
Investment is always cowardly. It is true that some believe in centralization and that you should not trust banking systems, but many will not risk investing 99% of their money in Bitcoin, especially if there is the possibility of any other investments. Profits are what motivate the vast majority to invest, and as long as there are profits, more will continue. In investing, when profits disappear, very few people will think about investing.
Bitcoin is now at less than its value because it can make a profit from interest and treasury bonds, so liquidity is drying up from these investments, otherwise we would now be above $50,000.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder when they will sell the bitcoins that were seized from chipMixer. Thousands of bitcoins were seized on March 15 and we have not heard any news from them. Such influence will give the United States leverage, as they can classify some currencies as bad because of their connection to some activities, confiscate them and sell them again to make them clean.
I read before about a person who bought Bitcoin from an auction in which coins confiscated from one of the mixers were sold at a price lower than the price of Bitcoin at that time.
|
|
|
|
If the co-signers know each other's private key, there is no benefit from a multi-signature wallet. The weak point is that all of these signatures are created in one device, which means that if there is a virus or side doors in this computer, all the money will be lost. One of the signatures could be a hardware wallet, and the second is a different software. This is an explanation of how to set up a Passport-Sparrow-multisig wallet. Passport is a hardware wallet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5468930.msg62935342#msg62935342 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
