Itu board setahu saya memang untuk nge-reputasi member di sini, jadi kalau semisal sampeyan komen dan menjurus ke sock puppet-nya yang diomongin, sampeyan juga bakal kecipratan. Jadi seenggaknya paham atas yang kamu sampaikan. Sudahlah, jangan cari gara-gara, di sana itu kalau kemampuanmu hanya setengah-setengah bakal dibully orang, jangan bikin malu kita orang indonesia-lah.
Hahaha... Tapi disana diskusinya asik gan. Tapi dah kapok lah, gatau mau di thread mana lagi yang menarik. Ane udah PM si JG juga kaga di respon tentang tag netral ane. Dah lah biarin aja Abisnya penasan gan, masa iya si si satoshi tiba-tiba ngilang gitu. Ga ada jejak sama sekali. Tapi ya sudahlah itu tidak penting juga. Ane lagi bingung gan, mau diskusi dimana sejak tidak nimbung di reputasi. Ada saran kah? Ane PM boleh ga gan? |
|
|
|
Kepanikan ini menunjukan kalau ente itu typikal pemain baru cryptocurrency. Kalau sudah lama tentu tidak bakal panik dan bahkan biasa-biasa saja kayak ane. Berita bitcoin itu kalau lagi longsor pasti jelek, begitu juga sebaliknya, jika harga naik pasti beritanya bagus. Ane gak terkejut lagi karena sudah pengalaman. Jadi biasa saja, mungkin kalau di bawah $10K kayak post pak abih di atas baru ane panik. Kalau sebatas $20 k sih biasa saja, karena fase halving sebelum sekian bulan selalu begitu.
Iya gan, ane baru mulai mengetahui crypto ahir tahun lalu dari airdrop dan tesnet. Padahal kemaren pas beli kirain udah murah pas di 29k. Kok susah ya menganalisa bitcoin. Udah drop 300rb ini aset bitcoin ane gan, berhubung ane beli bitcoin dari nabung jadi cukup kerasa gan, mungkin kalo udah bisa kayak agan-agan disini yang dapet bitcoin dari signature bisa lebih nyaman hold-nya Apakah menurut agan ini bisa sampe longsor ke 20k? ane rencana mau nabung lagi gajian bulan depan, tapi gatau mau masuk di harga berapa yang pass |
|
|
|
|
Ini ada badai apa gan?? Kirain ga ada isu-isu yang panas terkait bitcoin kok bisa longsor gini si gan? Hadeh.. ane udah beli pas di 29k malahan malahan.. ini kira-kira longsong mpe range brp ya gan?
|
|
|
|
Those aren't prerequisites for merit sources handing out merits, just so you know. I'd be happy to merit posts in that thread provided they were good and they were in English (which they're not). I'm not sure why OP is making an appeal for help to merit sources anyway--it seems kind of odd to me, especially since there haven't been that many posts made in his linked thread so far.
I'd love it if you occasionally took a look at the thread for the next few days. I just created this thread so no one has commented yet. here's no rule against it that I know of; I just think it's odd personally, not that it's against forum rules or even that it's shady. Does the Indonesian section not have at least one merit source?
Yes there is, I've PMed him to help me out, but he's not online yet. But he already distributed a lot of sMerit a few days ago, I don't know how much sMerit each source of merit has
I beg for advice, should I close this thread? The @OP is greedy, he want more merit especially in his thread. Maybe he want to create a shitty merit festival like pizza contest where people just posting a picture about something rounded with BTC letter and get a lot merit.
Yes, that's right, I saw about a pizza contest, and it was a lot of fun. no..no, actually I want support from merit sources to give just 1, and that's for interesting photos, not for every photo. |
|
|
|
No activities relate to Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies so that merit sources actually have reasons to support if support means distributing merit in that thread.
By the way, congratulate for your national Indonesian Independence Day.
Yes you're right. This is an activity on a local scale in our country. But I think it can increase member participation if there is support from merit sources. Am I not allowed to ask for support from merit sources for such activities? sorry I don't know about that |
|
|
|
17 August 2023 is the independence day of the Republic of Indonesia. In our country, in order to welcome independence day, we usually carry out various activities to celebrate independence activities. Such as competitions, carnivals, thanksgiving, and others. I see a lot of activities supported by merit source so that many members are enthusiastic to take part. I request support from merit source in this activity created in thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5463180.0You can monitor this thread to see photos of activities and festivities commemorating the independence of the Republic of Indonesia or in our regional language it is often called "tujuhbelasan" ('tujuhbelasan' is the term for the number 17 in the local language) If there is a merit source willing to support, I would be grateful |
|
|
|
 Latihan sampe jam 24.00 buat lomba karnaval Team lomba gerak jalan dalam persiapan Pildacil, alhamdullah juara 1   Ibu-ibu PKK juga ga mau ketinggalan sabet gelar juaraBersambung.... Ada banyak kegiatan di hari-hari berikutnya..Merdekaaa |
|
|
|
Merdeka.. Merdeka.. Merdeka..
 DIRGAHAYU REPUBLIK INDONESIA KE-78 'Terus Melaju Untuk Indonesia Maju' Dalam rangka memperingati HUT RI ke-78, ane ingin berbagi kegiatan dan perlombaan dalam rangka menyambut dan memeriahkan agenda peringatan kemerdekaan Republik Indonesia. Semoga teman-teman disini juga berkenan untuk berbagi kemeriahan di daerahnya masing-masing untuk meramaikan kegiatan ini di forum Note:- Mengingat privacy, harap berbagi foto yang tidak memuat informasi khusus seperti lokasi dan lainnnya, kecuali agan tidak bermasalah tentang hal itu
- Dilarang mengambil konten milik orang lain tanpa izin, atau ambil di Internet, mohon hanya foto kegiatan lokal di masing-masing domisini agan
- Catatan yang belum tercantum dan sekiranya perlu akan menyusul
- Gunakan 'height' pada gambar 300 dengan 'width' menyesuaikan gambar
|
|
|
|
Harga stabil di kisaran $29k berarti Bitcoin sedang dalam fase sideways. Titik $29k belum bisa dikatakan resisten karena harga masih sempat turun di bawah $29k. Jika BTC terus-terusan gagal untuk melewati $30k dan mencapai $31k, akan selalu ada potensi untuk turun lagi ke kisaran $28k atau $27k. Tapi jika ke depannya berita-berita yang muncul adalah berita-berita positif terkait BTC atau crypto, maka potensinya lebih ke arah uptrend.
Jadi masih perlu menunggu ya gan? kayaknya si bakalan bisa ke $28k tapi ane nunggu ga sampe-sampe ke $28k, ga beli sekarang nanti mapah up, beli sekarang nanti malah down.. Kok susah ya? Oya gan kok kalo modalnya kecil ga kerasa ya gan untungnya. Modal sejutaan juga profitnya tipis-tipis gitu, ada trik ga gan biar bisa lebih profit dalam mainan trading crypto? |
|
|
|
|
BTC harganya sepertinya stabil di $29.000. Apa ini sudah masuk resisten bawah gan? Apa masih ada kemungkinan turun lagi gan? Mohon analisanya
|
|
|
|
Not at all, the entire NATO hasn't even been able to handle the one war they started. Based on the official stats and the news in mainstream media weapon storages are mostly empty. Specially the "strategic weapons" like guided missiles. Worst of all is that the production has not been able to keep up with the consumption speed to even refill a small portion of what was used already. But in my opinion, even though America hasn't won anything, America and NATO are still considered a great power and capable of intimidating other countries. America's strong military power and the large number of nuclear weapons it possesses is enough to frighten small and developing countries and will keep American interests running smoothly. Although such threats do not work for China and Russia. The only remaining path in front of US regime is either to start wars to weaken everyone else or accept no longer being the solo world power.
If the choice is like that, I'm sure America will prefer to go to war and will not be willing if the dollar is no longer the world's currency. If the dollar ceases to be the world's currency, at least the countries that disagree with it will have to seize dominance of the dollar through war. If BlackRock alone leaves US for China, that is $13 trillion leaving US economy in a blinking of an eye. And BlackRock is not alone...
I never thought this far. But according to the global conspiracy, America is overshadowed by a greater power, they are the owners of capital (maybe there is blackrock in it). Maybe if America doesn't support them anymore and doesn't have good power, the global capitalist elite will leave America and move to China, because China has good power. But I'm not sure because China adheres to the ideology of communism and is against the interests of global elites. What about the illuminati? do you have analysis up to them? |
|
|
|
Food issues over the past year have been present in every single country around the world, the type and degree of the issues are different per country bug generally so far it has been small enough for the governments to manage it. For example in EU we had the fertilizer crisis followed by decreased output followed by higher food prices and in some cases small shortages like the cooking oil shortage over a year ago in Europe. Our country is prohibited from exporting CPO to Europe, even though our country is the biggest CPO exporter in the world. In addition, Europe also banned the export of coffee, cocoa and soybeans. I don't know why the EU is doing this, even though they are in a food crisis. Things are changing a lot and sometimes very fast so we can't make long term predictions but unless something major changes I don't think we are about to see any major food shortage in Europe. Specially since every country has found a way to handle the crisis to some extent for example IIRC it was UK that started changing its import policies to handle the shortage by no longer enforcing certain "standards" for stuff they import like the pesticides used in those products; so that they can avert the crisis in short term despite the health health problems it'll cause in long run.
It seems that the UK was quite responsive to the food crisis in Europe, and after the UK left the EU it was easier for them to make global trade decisions. They recently sent more troops to the region too which many are predicting an upcoming war. I summarized it in the last part of this comment and this with the effects it can have on energy prices. Is America on the verge of invading Syria? looks like i missed the news. I'm going to study first and I can't comment on this The problem is United States and what the regime sees as a "threat". Basically if you are familiar with USA and read their national security documents like the NSS I mentioned above, they see any country that is growing in any way as a threat. That's absurd, isn't it? But that's US!
For example they see China as a threat only because the Chinese economy has been growing and getting stronger lol.
I have never read American security documents, to be honest I have poor English skills so knowledge of reading English literacy is not good. But can you give me the links for these documents? This is why United States sees 3 major threats, ie. 3 growing countries as it is also outlined in NSS: Russia, China and Iran.
Now the issue is that US military can not face any of them since it is nowhere near strong enough. So instead their strategy is the Nixon Doctrine which is basically to create proxies to fight their so called "threats".
These proxies are commonly known as the 3 NATOs:
- The regular NATO we all know as the one including Europe to counter Russia.
- The Arabic NATO that consists of Arabic countries in West Asia and small to medium militia and terrorist groups to counter Iran
- The Asian NATO that consists of Taiwan, Japan, Australia and a couple of other Asian countries to counter China
Nice analysis. I agree with you on this. You managed to make it look simple. But do you think America is capable of handling so many wars? We have seen the history of Germany, where in the past Germany had good military strength and almost won the second world war if Germany was not arrogant. Germany was too ambitious with the Dunkrick tragedy and the Barbosa operation being carried out simultaneously. But America has an accurate strategy because those 3 wars used NATO power, America always has a way not to be directly involved in the war, even though everyone knows that America is behind it. |
|
|
|
And El Salvador government has not fully used or distributed the bitcoin they have bought, they still stored them in their wallets so bitcoin has not really flow to the masses in the country because the coins are still under the government reserve wallet. And it is only some of the individual that using the coin in their daily businesses. And let see what they will do in the next bull market. If they open the treasury of bitcoin then the coins will be circulated to all the regions and the uses will be higher.
So El Salvador uses bitcoin as their financial reserve? unlike other countries that use gold as a reserve asset. Interestingly enough, maybe if bitcoin had a price of $100,000, El Salvador would have a pretty good economy. Do you know how much bitcoin cost when El Salvador bought bitcoin?
A little tip: It might be easier to read if you use a new paragraph for every 3 or 4 lines. Paragraphs that are too long make my eyes tired reading your writing |
|
|
|
Most country that has poor economy is based on mismanagement of public funds, instead of using this borrowed money to put into the country's development by building infrastructures and to produce goods for export. Tey embezzle the funds and when they are out of the office,the debt will still be on the country. Inflation is part of the world economy but how to tackle inflation relies on each country's government. Bitcoin isn't a magical coins that will stop inflation instantly or change a poor economy to a stable one instantly.
It may be easy to talk about exports to other countries, but I'm sure big countries will make things difficult for them. Maybe it can be described in more detail so that the discussion develops more ...
Sorry I deleted, your comment is too general and does not have a clear analysis flow To answer the question you have to understand the difference between Fiat currency and Crypto currency. Fiat is backed up/controlled by a central government. It's price could be easily manipulated. Also there are problems like Counterfeit. The central bank can also issue order to print more fiat currency hence the cause of inflation. Yes, I am quite suspicious that big countries are deliberately manipulating exchange rates in a sneaky way. If a country has a lot of money, it is not difficult for a small country's security stability to be disrupted so that its economy deteriorates and the value of its currency drops sharply. I think not just Bitcoin I think crypto is the answer. How much would you earn if you were in a middle economy country? You have to give bribe to have a job and even you get a job how many years would it take to pay the debt. But developed country the situation is different but for country I mentioned crypto is the key. I have been maintaining my whole family ever since covid broke out. (No job, only with the power of crypto). Nobody knows what I do or my income source, all they know I'm always sitting behind my laptop and typing. So if you have enough knowledge and have the curiosity to learn, then why not. I'll surely give it a chance to prove itself. p.s: I really liked your location, Gryffindor  I think it's just earning for yourself. And it cannot be a reference that bitcoin/crypto is a solution. According to what I found out, despite the warning from IMF to El Salvador, bitcoin adoption in El Salvador helps. It helps in tourism. Most El Salvadorans prefer fiat and most of them do not hold bitcoin. Bitcoin help in remittance, but most of them convert the coin to USD and people that sell accept bitcoin in USD in the country (they automatically convert the coin to USD when they accept bitcoin payment). I have not seen any negative neffect of bitcoin in El Salvador than its positive effect.
I think it's only a small part, and it doesn't make a big difference to El Salvador. Do you have a more detailed analysis of bitcoin and El Salvador? How Bitcoin works and contributes to the economic development of El Salvador. Mind you, Inflation is internal, meaning that the economy might still be good despite an increase in it, this is just as the government looks for ways to tackle it. The issue of those countries is that their governments misappropriated public funds through corruption, and their careless management of the country's resources and issuance of bad policies destroy the economy.
Yes, corruption is indeed a serious problem and difficult to eradicate. Talking about resources, sometimes big countries already control the natural resources of small countries and it cannot be nationalized easily so that sometimes countries that have lots of natural resources do not prosper their country but bring prosperity to foreign companies that already have contracts to manage these natural resources. . And that happens a lot in small and developing countries. Perhaps in its history, only Cuba was the last country that dared to nationalize its country's natural resources which were controlled by foreign countries under the leadership of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, but that also did not end well.
Sorry for comments that are too general and don't have a clear analysis, I deleted it |
|
|
|
Next word war is already taking place as we speak but this time because the world powers own nuclear weapons that can vaporize the human race the shape of the war is different. It is taking place through proxies like US-Russia fighting through the proxy of Ukraine, US-China fighting through the proxy of Taiwan, US-Iran fighting through the proxy of ISIS. Yeah right, to be honest it was in the early stages of the war now. This is the way to come to the gun war. Both America and Russia still don't want to be open and use weapons, because in my opinion they are still considering the risks. Although I also don't believe that World War 3 will happen, it is likely that nukes will not be used, because it is useless to be victorious in a war if the world has been destroyed by nukes. No economic benefits As I said before, it is in multiple types of battle fields. For example the one that is currently "hot" in the media is the food war and everyone is participating in it too. From Russia with grain deals to Turkey with the sea blockade and Europe stealing shipments to other countries stopping exports and disrupting supply chains. When it comes to food, my country has a terrible deal with the EU. It looks like the EU will be the first continent to be hit by food shortages. There are more than just the two but that's another discussion. I want to point out that the war you mentioned is already happening in Europe with the armed conflict in the westernmost part of Europe and energy, economic and food wars in the rest of it. We see that in the ongoing deindustrialization of Europe.
P.S. This is not WWII because WWII was Europeans fighting amongst themselves then bringing that war to the rest of the world. Yes, I know. But now these two ideologies are at odds. Countries with Islamic ideology seem to have been a bit forgotten by America because they are no longer too dangerous after the collapse of Iraq and Iran, and Arab countries are friendly enough to America so they are not considered a threat. Yes, indeed the second world war took place in the European Union and spread to Japan, Russia and America. And it seems that America succeeded in taking advantage of this situation, because America was the last country to join the second world war, so that when other countries had run out of ammunition and logistical supplies, America came with new troops and logistical supplies so that they were able to win the war quite easily. The food crisis in the EU and the tension between America and Russia could make the 3rd world war happen again in the EU. Or do you have other thoughts?
If you study history, you will discover an amazing fact. All world wars have been started by outcast countries or countries with a grudge against the whole world.
Maybe that's what the history books write, but the reality is not like that. The colonial system carried out by the British, Portuguese and Dutch empires was for the economy. Columbus sailed around the world and discovered the Americas not for research and mapmaking, but for logistical and economic resources. Maybe if there was a war that was started not for economic reasons, maybe Germany under Hitler's leadership could be like that. Hitler went to war because he considered the German race superior because of the blood of the Aryan race and Hitler's hatred of the Jews. Honestly I have not found any economic interest in the war waged by Hitler |
|
|
|
When I first joined, signature campaigns weren't really a thing. When I joined, I didn't know signature campaigns exist. The problem as I see it is the dynamics of the forum have shifted completely to the point where the only reason people sign up anymore is to join a campaign, or a bounty, or a second campaign or bounty (or 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.). I'm pretty sure there are still people who sign up without knowing about signature campaigns, but it is indeed a very small minority nowadays. It's still better than before the Merit system, at least they can't get away with only spamming. Maybe me too, I didn't know that accounts can be buggy and unable to participate in signature campaigns when getting negative tags. I thought at first it would not be a serious problem. Oya, you signed up for a very long time. May I ask, have signature campaigns that pay with bitcoin been around since 2015? |
|
|
|
|
Oh no, I'm sorry. I was planning to quote the comments from Charles Tim and Victor, but I ended up hitting the wrong button and I hit delete. Sorry, this is my first thread using self moderator. We hope you are willing to come back to discuss here.
@Charles-Tim
@EarnOnVictor
|
|
|
|
If you study history, you will discover an amazing fact. All world wars have been started by outcast countries or countries with a grudge against the whole world.
Theoretically it is possible to imagine a picture of the USA in such a status, but it is from the realm of fiction, and not even scientific.
Now, for more than a year, ALL the world is threatened with nuclear war by the new world "offended", loser and pariah - Russia. Or can you give an example where the USA, NATO countries, EU countries, China or India threatened the world and many neighbors with a nuclear strike? The only place where you can find such references is again in the corrupt Kremlin media, but they make up "news", "statements" - putting their fantasies in the mouths of other people and passing it off as "truth". Therefore, the only author of a new world war can only be Russia.
PS Yes, there is also Iran with its manic craving for nuclear weapons, and the clown from North Korea - but it will not be difficult to "buy" the world community.
When talking about Iran and Iraq, America accuses them of having nuclear weapons so it is necessary to carry out an invasion of these Middle Eastern countries, but is Iraq proven to have nuclear weapons? it turns out that after sadam husein was hanged, there are no nuclear weapons in iraq, just bullshit taking over oil refineries, yes, iraq has huge oil reserves. So, it's an economic problem with the scapegoat of nuclear weapons Let's talk about having nuclear weapons, America has the most nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers, followed by Russia. On the one hand, America and Russia are opposites. Both are competing for interests, hegemony, and influence. Neither America nor Russia dared to attack each other, the victim was Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine to have a border between NATO countries and Russia, NATO wants Ukraine to be closer to Russia and to make Ukraine a NATO base so that it can easily spy on Russia. Currently, there are two major ideologies seeking influence and hegemony. America with EU/NATO countries with democratic ideology, Russia with China and North Korea with communism ideology. I'm sure that sooner or later America and Russia will go to war, and what I'm afraid of is the location of their war not in Russia and America but in the EU, just like the 2nd world war, and it must be bad for the EU |
|
|
|
Europe has broken all 20 years' records, in both the lowest unemployment level and in the percentage of citizens employed. And it doesn't stop here, from 10 years ago in 2013 the number of people with a job has grown from 181 million to 197 million, that's 18 million more workers and jobs in a decade! On top of that, we have to add to this 3.5 million work permits issued this year for foreigners that want to work in this craphole called EU. Can't wait to see the usual Russian muppets trying to twist this as being bad! It's data that can be seen. Can you verify data validity? in some cases, this is very easy to do. Enter data on people who got new jobs, and don't enter data on people who were laid off. Thus, the unemployment data will be reduced I think the EU is not okay. Hopefully the EU can overcome the crisis that haunts it, if it fails, and the battlefield again occurs in the EU, like the 2nd world war then it can be very bad. |
|
|
|
...
Although economy is not the only battlefield (we have energy, food and actual armed conflict between proxies) but it is affecting us the most
...
Global conspiracies are endless, but it's always interesting to talk about. I believe that world war 3 will happen sooner or later. I think America will also not remain silent if the world's currency is replaced, and does not use USD anymore. I think that's reason enough for America to start World War 3 In my opinion, there is no more logical reason to start a war than economic reasons. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
