Firstly I am sorry about you getting scammed. You are not the first and you will not be the last person to be scammed but I really hoped you had researched about them before you sent your funds to them.

Just to let you know coinsbit, p2pb2b, exrates and whitebit are all scam exchanges that are connected with the same group of scammers that have one Ukrainian super-scammer called Valerii Solodovnyk as a common link.

In the case of exrates exchange, there is something you can do. Exrates is owned by: DexTechnologies OÜ which is registered in Estonia and has the company number as: 14499374

Estonian law, rules, regulations and policies apply to them therefore report them to the Estonian authorities.

1) Firstly, report them for tax evasion because they have filed micro accounts for their previous tax returns yet they claim to trade over $1 billion every day. For a company that claims to trade over $365 billion a year they have not paid any tax so when the Estonian authorities hear that they did not receive potential tens of millions of USD$ I am sure they will take a look fast:




2) Second, report them to the Estonian authorities for what they did to you by scamming your crypto. Give them as much detail as possible: cybercrime@politsei.ee

That should hopefully shut down their trash fake exchange website.

Any crypto having a kill switch is rather far-fetched. Why did they have it in the first place? Any centralised project can have a lot of things their way or unconventional but when I read about the whole project going off-line for those two days or so it shows exactly why IOTA should and any other centralised crypto should be avoided unless they show exactly what cards they are holding.

Back in January 2018 this project had a market capital of over $14 billion but IOTA now has just $770 million market capital and it is dropping fast. Here is yet another of many mismanaged projects that had too much talk and not enough action and development therefore it fell from massive all time highs to a fraction of that.

I will go for Tyson Fury to knock out Deontay Wilder 

Fury was hardly back in shape after a long stint out away from the sport and he won that match on a points decision but was robbed by pathetic scorecard politics. Everybody knows Fury won that fight.

This time with the correct period for training and that first bout under his belt I would say Wilder will be knocked out by rounds 4, 5 or 6 and not by TKO, I would not be surprised to see he on the floor out for the count.

I cannot argue with that


The onus is definitely on him to prove his claims but he cannot provide even one iota of evidence. That has been the regular pattern on his part all along.

As long as he keep destroying the reputation that Bitcoin has and keeps claiming to be Satoshi he continues down the road of deception. Bitcoin does not need him but he living off the Satoshi and Bitcoin name.

Does anybody know the real reasons why he split from BCH, Wu and Ver to start his own SV?

RESULTS

EPL: Manchester City 2-0 West Ham United
UEFA Champions League: Atalanta 4-1 Valencia   
UEFA Champions League: Tottenham 0-1 RB Leipzig   

Last season losing finalists Tottenham were beaten at home by Leipzig in their first ever Champions League knock-out stage match.

Manchester City beat West Ham and stay in second place ahead of Leicester City who remain third in the Premier League.

How on earth could users believe the things the OP is saying? Effectively they asking for control of your BTC to gamble. If the gamble pays off they will happily take their commission and if it fails and your funds become less in value than when they first gambled, you lose. Either way they win because they take 5% commission in advance and then hope for the best when gambling with your funds so they can take more from you.

It is not a ponzi scheme because that definition does not fit but it is a dangerous gamble when you allow an anonymous person to take control of your crypto funds and gamble using an alleged top-secret algorithm that nobody before this thread was created had ever heard of before and even still it has no name.

Ridiculous

Yes unfortunately the thread never really took off, it seems to be buried under the others. You can go ahead and start the threads, I will respond to them  

Regarding the water, I think Egypt and Ethiopia have resolved their differences but it will only be temporary - something will happen between them based around the dam, I am fairly sure of that but maybe beyond 2020. The interesting take about Tibet and the need for India to have access to parts of its water from that plateau is very interesting though.

And vegetarianism, well vegans are definitely the in thing at the moment but not sure if that means vegetarians are on their way out.

One Premier League match and two European Champions League matches taking place this evening. Here are the scores at the time of posting.

Are you now claiming to be a charity as well? You claim you want to prevent users from getting liquidated on Bitmex and want them to avoid losing all their Bitcoins in a pump and dump or ICO?

Are you saying you really care about users that much? I do not believe you.

And it makes no surprise to find you stating my reaction confuses you. As long as you remain anonymous and expect users to hand over their crypto for you to gamble you will probably continue to remain confused.

You are not trustworthy there all users are advised to avoid falling for your trap.

I am waiting for the $0.50 mark to come soon. I hope it does not fall $0.50 after it breaches that amount.

After that milestone it has to be the $1 mark - let us see how things develop for XRP.

Walls of text have never impressed me, the art of deflection is an old tactic. I never claimed you control Deribit yet that is the first line of your objection?

Instead of you listing what you claim you have or what you claim to offer, let us look at this from a different perspective:

- You do not have a website
- You do not have Terms/Conditions
- You do not have a Privacy Policy
- You do not have a list of your advisers, investors, coders
- You hide behind anonymity, you have not listed your real name
- You have no LLC/LTD
- You do not have a legal structure in place that states in which jurisdiction users who want to sue can go ahead and do it

You are not trustworthy - simple

Your promotional material is somewhat laughable because of the spelling errors

Your Telegram is operated using a bot

Your alleged screenshots of trading cannot be trusted, any 5 year old with 1 week worth of play time with photoshop could probably drum up something better than what you claim to be facts.

The whole premise of your work is based on the notion that you have some secret algorithm that makes phenomenal amounts of money. No, I do not believe it but even if everything else you say about trading/gambling with crypto that belongs to other people is true, then what cannot be denied is that you do not and will not use your commission to help reimburse those users that lost vast sums of money as a result of your algorithm causing them mass losses.

Again, I re-iterate, you are not trustworthy. I do not believe your claims and I do not trust you directly because of your claims therefore I left appropriate negative trust and advised others to keep well away from allowing you to gamble with their funds.

Feel free to use your top-secret 50% ROI making algorithm to make those massive returns for yourself instead of making them for others - that makes more sense right? And since you make so much money anyway you should be happy that you do not need the 5% upfront management fee you charge too 

I had to unIGNORE the imbecile to read exactly what he was writing in this thread with my name in the title.... and yes, just as I thought he is a complete and utter imbecile still spouting the same rubbish.

When I left negative trust for him I was the first so it showed -1 but now I see he has -5 and he has nobody to blame but himself.

Was it worth it for this imbecile buying the copper membership only to get caught out and tagged so quickly? No

In response to the title, I deservedly gave you red trust and so did the other users.


Seems like the contrary being more plausible otherwise you would be describing yourself as an unofficial part of coinsbit

Whatever... but that comment alone deserves a red tag.

Many people know that any exchange that shows inflated trading volumes and selectively scams users is  a scam (including anything that is owned or operated or controlled by Ukrainian scammer Valerii Solodovnyk)

No that is not a compulsory action on my part but when I see shills I have to call them out - I am sure you understand.

If you say so but you can always pop over to the cryptotalk forum and join the other shills and losers, please feel free to leave the forum here even after you paid for your copper membership and sign up there without making any payment.

I never had that accusation thrown at me before but thank you, I will add it to my resumé  

Your user account does not contain the coinsbit, whitebit, p2pb2b or anything Ukrainian scammer Valerii Solodovnyk related but since you created this account in honour of the protection of your favourite exchange it needs to be pointed out you never posted in their official thread even once

If you think this forum is full of baboons then jump ship and go over to the cryptotalk and post there, thank you.

Not at all. Newcomers are very much welcomed here. We all were newcomers here at one time and we received help and guidance of senior members but shills and scammers (newbie or otherwise) have no place in this fantastic forum.

As mentioned earlier, feel free to abandon ship here and swim along to cryptotalk to join people that have the same mindset as yours. Thank you.

Why are you so desperate to get your message out here in the forum? If you plan is so good go and invest your own money in it and you can reap the 50% ROI benefits for yourself because of that unique top-secret algorithm that you claim you operate  

Sooner or a later a scam accusation thread will be started listing the accusations  -I can see that coming for sure.

EDIT: after noticing there is no website, there is no information as to who bliq claim to be and they have no website, no information about anything except alleged screenshots of their work and highly suspicious activity here I have no alternative but to tag. Just because no scam has been highlighted yet does not mean a scam has not or will not take place and because I would never trust the OP (or his trash propositions or believe his alleged ROI) means that a tag is valid.

Alarm bells ringing and warning lights flashing because of that statement - appropriate feedback left for the OP.

Everybody should avoid this project like the plague, it has scam written all over it.

Two Champions League games results this evening




Athletico Madrid beat Liverpool and Dortmund beat PSG

Two Champions League games taking place this evening

Athletico Madrid vs Liverpool
Borussia Dortmund vs Paris Saint-Germain

I am not foo familiar with the issues and background politics but what several news media outlets and online chats show is that the current government was beaten in the election that took place days ago in Delhi and that was the first election of any standing that took place after the controversial law was introduced. If that is a sign of things to come then maybe they will not be too successful at the next general election and that is saying something considering the current Prime Minister and his party won by a landslide in the 2019 elections.

When to adapt is a valid question because as you mentioned moving too late would mean Bitcoin holders are in trouble and moving early or without consensus will have its own problems. Eventually all forms of technology will adapt and an example is quantum computing. If Bitcoin adapts to become quantum resistant then no doubt other form of computing will emerge and then Bitcoin will adapt, the cycle will continue.

Maybe a couple of decades from now, in the end it might be a case of Bitcoin not having a way to protect itself and it simply becomes overpowered by the threats that emerge - who knows.

I think using ~snip~ when quoting a post is a very good idea if the quote is a wall of text or very long and if you just want to highlight one part of it and reply to it rather than the whole post.

So far 9 posts in total and all of them are identical  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2763152;sa=showPosts

You copy and paste the thing in all your posts? Why?