so it turns out Lauda does not pay for an avatar and signature two weeks
Wrong. Have you even read this thread at all? The campaign model was weekly and it has changed to bi-weekly starting today. If you do not satisfy the criteria (minimum number of decent posts), you do not get paid. Read the rules. |
|
|
|
No Yobit is not scam, but newbie MUST stay away from it because many dead coin no updated.
This is one of the aspects from them that I truly despise. The exchange lists pretty much any utter shitcoin, even those that are dead. It is completely unmaintained in that regard. Yobit support is famous of not such responsive.
I don't understand why that is. If they have trouble keeping up, they should just hire more support staff. You are right regarding the slowness of their support staff, which is something that we've observed in the past.
As far as the OP is concerned, there is really nothing to go on here. I don't plan on tagging the exchange unless I see reasonable proof for each case of scamming. |
|
|
|
how to mine with GPU cards ?
You should take a look in the Mining section of the BitSend forum. Specifically, this thread should be able to help you.
Another merchant has started accepting BitSend! You can now purchase various hot sauces from PexPeppers: https://www.pexpeppers.com/ |
|
|
|
3. Read the white-paper and you will see that unlike Blockstream and Core, I'm advocating for the very thing that Bitcoin was designed to be from day one. Wrong. You only quote parts which suite your agenda, whilst ignoring other piece or statements by Satoshi which don't or which you do not understand. Relevant to the quote from OP, Satoshi had in mind that SPV fraud proofs were practically feasible. If they were, then you could argue that that many full nodes are not as required as they are today (or at least not for financial sovereignty). Small hint: SPV fraud proofs are not real thing yet. Even with 32mb full blocks , that's 192 megabytes per hour. Not exactly cost prohibitive for miners even with today's technology.
Heck, I can download 192 megabytes in about 20 seconds.
If we ignore the centralization effect, the absurdly higher orphan rates and the risk of a DoS, this still isn't feasible. You're talking about killing off more than half the network. I'm still not sure why you're preaching about things that you don't understand yourself? |
|
|
|
I made 7 Posts since joining the Campaign for week two. And If I read correctly (before OP was updated) 50% payout for avatars once 5 posts are reached). ? Just want to be clear on this.
I await your response.
You've joined after the period has started. I have already elaborated this in a previous post: Keep in mind that joining mid week -> no payment for said period (this was only ignored during the first round).
This means that you do not get paid this round. This is why I have manually overridden your 'minimum reached' with a 'NO'. |
|
|
|
You mean you've seen that code comment in the bitcoin source code written by Satoshi and you think it is stupid? Why would quoting code from source make me an idiot?
You're supporting this centralized attack on Bitcoin, therefore you're either delusional or a shill. Pick one. ETH is a centralized trash coin. You are comparing apples (Bitcoin) with rotten apples (ETH). Go back to your ETH shilling circle-jerk, you don't seem to want to learn anything. Roger Ver does post some shit - doesn't everyone?
Let's be both honest and frank here. Had this been stated by someone contributing to Bitcoin Core, "people" would be screaming at us wherever possible how "Bitcoin Core" is pro centralization (even though this makes sense considering it was only one individual). This statement is far beyond "some shit". |
|
|
|
This is the correct format indeed. Your entry is accepted!
I'll compile a post of accepted entries soon for an easier overview. If there is something wrong with your (already accepted) entry, you shall be notified. There are less than 4 full days left till the deadline: 20th of April, 12:00 UTC Time (forum time). |
|
|
|
I have enrolled you for the next period.
The ending post counts have been saved and the payments have been calculated. You can check everything in this sheet. The payments will be sent out by Chris soon. Don't forget, starting tomorrow the campaign is switching to a bi-weekly model. |
|
|
|
Will we be now paid tomorrow and then we start with the bi-weekly model or we are going to be paid next week?
You will get paid tonight/tomorrow for the current round if you've met the necessary criteria. I have yet to fill in that sheet. |
|
|
|
Enrolled. Nice, a bi-weekly model would be great.Thanks for the information  I think it has plenty of benefits over the weekly one.
Important news: The campaign has upgraded to a bi-weekly model. This just means that all of the numbers have doubled (payment total, minimum number of posts to 20/10 in 2 weeks). Please read the OP. |
|
|
|
Hi,
I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
It is ironic that you managed at least one campaign (specifically an avatar campaign) whilst you are a decent spammer yourself. Depending on who placed you on the ban list, you can easily find all the required information for requesting a review. Yet you still fail to read/realize this considering your statement "I hope I will soon..".
Due to the ever growing number of spammers/account farmers that are just wasting this opportunity I'm thinking of switching towards a stricter model. Specifically, 1 denied review will result in a permanent blacklist. |
|
|
|
You have plenty to do with the centralization attempt by BTU.
centralisation attempt by BTU? Yes, the centralization attempt by BTU, which you support yet claim you're pro-decentralization. You're full of lies. LMAO. You might want to rethink who's an idiot, Lauda. You just quoted me quoting the code directly from Satoshi (I guess you didn't check the link). Satoshi himself refers to nodes as miners. Not me or Roger.
You're too busy flinging poop for Core though to realize what code comments look like.
I've seen this today before I've seen your post, and I'll repeat myself. You're either an idiot or you're on a payroll. Please remind me where the practical fraud proofs that Satoshi mentioned are today?  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=286.msg2947#msg2947 The design outlines a lightweight client that does not need the full block chain. In the design PDF it's called Simplified Payment Verification. The lightweight client can send and receive transactions, it just can't generate blocks. It does not need to trust a node to verify payments, it can still verify them itself.
The lightweight client is not implemented yet, but the plan is to implement it when it's needed. For now, everyone just runs a full network node.
I anticipate there will never be more than 100K nodes, probably less. It will reach an equilibrium where it's not worth it for more nodes to join in. The rest will be lightweight clients, which could be millions.
At equilibrium size, many nodes will be server farms with one or two network nodes that feed the rest of the farm over a LAN.
|
|
|
|
lol
more empty "thats speculation"
when its your comments that are propaganda
I have asked you for the negative articles by Gmaxwell (which do not exist). Obviously you'd create a strawman like this, because you are full of bullshit. you are soo deep defending blockstream that you cannot see bitcoin as a diverse network of many varieties of software actually running on the network for years without making demands or threats.
you only see blockstream being bitcoin and even when blockstream threaten other non blockstream implementations you defend blockstream
wake up
I have nothing to do with Blockstream, my views are consistent and differ from plenty of the people that you claim I defend (which makes no sense). You have plenty to do with the centralization attempt by BTU. We all know you're a paid shill. Your attempts are futile. Roger Ver and the people he works with are a threat to Bitcoin. But this shouldn't even be news to people, why on earth would anyone even listen to this man?
Whilst a lot of people were actually attacking his statement on r/btc, jonald was defending Ver and got downvoted in the circle-jerk sub.  |
|
|
|
Some of those people are either actively harming Bitcoin (see Ver), sold themselves to the CIA (see Gavin), sold themselves to the banks (see Hearn), etc. Their latest 'evil' pretty much terminated most of their 'good' (if they ever had any).
you forgot to mention gmax sold himself to the banks too... i wonder why you left him off the list. research: blockstream-> hyperledger i now await the usual "dont troll me", "your wrong but cant explain why your wrong, but your wrong" empty replies. sometimes i laugh at the Hippocratic comments you make That is bullshit speculation and you know it. The only reason that I've put Hearn on this list is because he published (obviously a paid for) article that Bitcoin has failed just as he started working solely for the bank. Do tell me where Gmaxwell has created and published such articles? The only hypocrite here is you and the remaining centralization coin, aka. BTU propaganda group. Have we asked ourselves who the hell is controlling him.
You can only waste time speculating about this. I highly doubt that you're going to get any reasonable evidence/leads on the entity controlling him. |
|
|
|
Sounds like Roger knows what he's talking about and the rest of us are all wrong: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c0ddd32bf629bb48426b0651def497ca1a78e6b1/src/primitives/block.h/** Nodes collect new transactions into a block, hash them into a hash tree,
* and scan through nonce values to make the block's hash satisfy proof-of-work
* requirements. When they solve the proof-of-work, they broadcast the block
* to everyone and the block is added to the block chain. The first transaction
* in the block is a special one that creates a new coin owned by the creator
* of the block.
*/ You're an idiot. Possibly an even bigger idiot that Ver is. Bitcoin is nothing without the possibility of financial sovereignty. If you want an ecosystem with an ever shrinking number of user nodes, then you should look towards centralized shitcoins like ETH. He did not have any statements (AFAIK) that were completely against everything that Bitcoin stands for. He is a genuine small blocker.
i literally lol'd at this. You have a paid signature now? You know that will just put you on the ignore list of every small minded fool that doesn't have common sense enough to simply scroll to the next post. There are idiots on this forum that have 4000-5000 people on ignore and now you're one of them. I disagree with much that you say but I don't want you just ignored. That removes the one post out of ten that you might say something helpful that the "ignore fools" might benefit from. I don't like paid sigs but I don't ignore for them. He created an useless post without actually refuting anything. Looks like classic signature spam to me, which will indeed land him on ignore lists. BTC is full of "gangs". it depends of their interests what people are "good" or not Some of those people are either actively harming Bitcoin (see Ver), sold themselves to the CIA (see Gavin), sold themselves to the banks (see Hearn), etc. Their latest 'evil' pretty much terminated most of their 'good' (if they ever had any). |
|
|
|
Are you referring to Lenny? I left feedback as it was deserved. He paid me for every task I completed as promised and I feel I was honest and It doesn't matter if anyone agrees with me. I always leave feedback for business transactions, and always will be genuine on those. Sorry if you disagree with my opinion of another user, but my opinion of Lenny doesn't change because you don't agree. He has always been fair to me.
Thanks for your input though, it is valuable.
This isn't about opinions, this is about facts. It is a fact that Lenny has scammed several users of this forum and even outside of it. Look at the trusted negative ratings and their references. I omitted this detail from my post intentionally because I do not his have complete info.
I was only contacted on Twitter. I was not given any information regarding his bitcointalk.org presence and I didn't ask. Instead I opted not to communicate at all, and that account is blocked.
Then creating this thread is entirely pointless. |
|
|
|
Anyone defending Ver or this statement at this point is really delusional or paid. I don't see any other possible explanations.
I feel the exact same way about those defending people like Luke Jr. He did not have any statements (AFAIK) that were completely against everything that Bitcoin stands for. He is a genuine small blocker. So Roger thinks that BTC is now BTCBitmain coin and no longer p2p currency.
I don't know how he have brain washed but he is getting worse shape EVERY day.
He's either compromised by some corporation or agency, or he is brainwashed. Correct.
This is archived just in case that he backtracks from it: https://archive.fo/54Mln |
|
|
|
Love the project.
running 1.2.7.1. Wallet was crashing so I deleted data and started sync from beginning now wallet crashes each time i try to open.
Windows7 64
-snip-
Thanks,
john
Could you please open up an issue on our Github page or join our Slack tea so that we can try to assist you? As I'm in sage like mood for giving advice, one last thing I've learnt. Walls are for BUYING not staring at with wobbly knees worried the price will drop. Paying 10% more for a nice bag of a coin with huge potential might not be a short term good trade but big picture long term that 10% won't matter and the same people who stare at walls terrified instantly regret not buying them once the price moves past it a day later. If you look closely, the user in question is actually FUD-ing several coins which leads me to believe that he or she is invested in a coin which is poorly performing. FUD should be ignored unless it is based on factual statements.
There should be some interesting news within April I'd say.  |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/853250894162350080Only a node that is mining is a true full node. The rest are just slowing down the propagation of blocks between the real full nodes. At this point, I am convinced Roger Ver is compromised and is posting absurd shit like this to tip us off. There you have it folks. One of the stupidest statements that I have ever heard in my life within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. What is Bitcoin if users can't attain financial sovereignty by running their own fully validating client? Did you get tired of being a shill for BUgcoin and joined signature campaign? did Jihan fired you?
Anyone defending Ver or this statement at this point is really delusional or paid. I don't see any other possible explanations. without knowing the context of the tweet. its hard to tell.
There is no context, he was not responding to anyone. He just put it out there. |
|
|
|
You both have been enrolled.
It is highly likely that I will switch this campaign to a bi-weekly model (after this or the following round). This means that you'd get paid every two weeks. It is also possible that the payout rates get increased. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
