With this approach, you can blame any crypto project that has a master node in the fact that the team is a scammers, and their project is a scam.
Yeah, pretty much. However, this one is made even more blatant of a scam by the fact that it hired a cheesy bump bot ring to promote it. |
|
|
|
This is logical. If there is no working product (in particular the platform), then the GFR coin and, accordingly, the masternodes will not be needed by anyone.
I think you hit the nail on the head. The masternodes indeed are not needed by anyone. It was simply a moneymaking scheme, aka scam. Pretty cool that you can get paid to bump a thread and expose it as a scam at the same time, isn't it? |
|
|
|
What happened to this account? Doesn't look like its been banned: You posted in the same bounty using 2 different accounts, maybe that has to do with it: |
|
|
|
guy has 2 different accounts posting in this bounty, the second has been banned |
|
|
|
You have outdated data. Project GoldenFever has not 91 masternodes in the network, but 107 masternodes. The network is growing very actively!
Your data is out of date. According to the information in the GoldenFever network today 113 masternodes. So we can say that the network is developing very actively. To date, the GoldenFever network has 119 masternodes. The number of nodes increases every day. The GoldenFever project is really quite popular among users. I really don't understand why you haven't been banned yet. You're obviously part of a bumping service which is disingenuous at best and fraudulent at worst. What kind of a crap project would be lazy enough to have to hire morons such as yourself to spam for them? This project is in all likelihood a scam. If you can't see whats going on here, there's a bunch of accounts all controlled by the same person that are endlessly gibbering to themselves about nothing. One of the telltale signs of a scam. |
|
|
|
bitstars is real projects, you guy use fake comments, with fake pictures, means you hate real project. who you are? you are Haters ... SHAME SHAME SHAME
DON'T SPREAD Fake comments, because you lost your trust.
show better real proofs , Only real
This is as real as it gets: https://web.archive.org/web/20190317174412/https://www.bitstars.io/There's no way to falsify this archive besides linking to a different website where somebody recreated yours but added two fake team members (didn't happen). It clearly has the same URL as yours. If you had nothing to hide, why remove the two fake team members from your current website? |
|
|
|
It's almost as if the whole thing was satire... |
|
|
|
|
So lets get this straight, the project head hired untrustworthy
- content / wp writers
- graphics designers
- blockchain developers
Sounds like he doesn't give a Flying V about his project!
I just mention it because commenting began anew in the ANN thread.
|
|
|
|
I know you aren't, that's why you are trying to slide the topic to something else.
Unless if you specifically say otherwise, I'm just going to assume you believe Sandy Hook didn't happen.. Most people would just say "of course it fucking happened," but you couldn't do this, which explains a lot concerning your current attitude toward the Christchurch shooting. And I will take your lack of a logical reply and your insistence of trying to take the discussion off topic to mean "I am incapable of forming a logical reply to your comments, and I should probably stop attempting to debate subjects I am poorly informed on." You mean like your understanding of New Zealand's gun laws?  The shooters weapons were obtained legally. So much for gun control working. How does this even make sense? If the weapons were obtained legally, how does that reflect "gun control"? What is your solution to the problem anyway? More guns to more crazies? You were probably confusing New Zealand with Australia, which pretty much banned guns in 1996 after their last massacre, and hasn't had one since. Nobody in Australia (besides a few psychos) seems to mind. Nobody is afraid of government tyranny or oppression there, it never comes up as a seriously entertained issue. As usual, unable to form a cogent reply, you need to shift the topic YET AGAIN in order to make a desperate attempt to appear as if you have any idea what you are talking about rather than reply to my previous response. What planet are you living on? The previous subject was "I don't know what I'm talking about" -- not much of a subject. You begin every single reply with a variation of this belief; its getting old and ineffective. Which you brought up after I corrected you. The link you give proves you didn't know what you were talking about, don't know why you'd quote it here. Gun laws only stop law abiding people from having guns. This is a fact. If you are a criminal, by definition you have no regard for the law. The weapons the shooter used were obtained on the black market, and were of a very restricted variety within New Zealand. It is good to know you speak for all of Australia when you say no one is worried about government tyranny and oppression. I guess I can ignore all the real Australians I have talked to who have said otherwise since Nutilduuh is on the scene.
You don't think that gun violence would decline if it were harder to get guns? Why are there so many more gun deaths in America compared to all other western countries? Of course you're going to reply by saying - I don't know what I'm talking about - I'm changing the subject This is basically all you ever do -- don't know how you can consider that a debate tactic. I think its pretty classless to attribute the senseless deaths of innocent people as being part of a grand state-level conspiracy. At least you referenced admission that it actually happened, that's a step in the right direction. |
|
|
|
MARC MN currently has a 514.37% annual ROI  CryptoHashTank POS/MN Service
- Low minimum deposit - Daily Payouts - Auto-Reinvestment available - 4% Commission - Secure Logins - 24 hr active admins GET STAKING Pretty standard for a Ponzi scheme. |
|
|
|
I know you aren't, that's why you are trying to slide the topic to something else.
Unless if you specifically say otherwise, I'm just going to assume you believe Sandy Hook didn't happen.. Most people would just say "of course it fucking happened," but you couldn't do this, which explains a lot concerning your current attitude toward the Christchurch shooting. And I will take your lack of a logical reply and your insistence of trying to take the discussion off topic to mean "I am incapable of forming a logical reply to your comments, and I should probably stop attempting to debate subjects I am poorly informed on." You mean like your understanding of New Zealand's gun laws? The shooters weapons were obtained legally. So much for gun control working. How does this even make sense? If the weapons were obtained legally, how does that reflect "gun control"? What is your solution to the problem anyway? More guns to more crazies? You were probably confusing New Zealand with Australia, which pretty much banned guns in 1996 after their last massacre, and hasn't had one since. Nobody in Australia (besides a few psychos) seems to mind. Nobody is afraid of government tyranny or oppression there, it never comes up as a seriously entertained issue. |
|
|
|
Also "suspended": twitter.com/DrCSWright Nuked for plagiarism would be my guess |
|
|
|
What a suprise.   This should be measured in Bitcoin and Ethereum, not in USD. And also be revisited during the next Bitcoin bull run. Point is; ICO's are scams. For my real job I've researched all of the top 100-110 coins by market cap, though some come and go on a regular basis, and not all coins have ICOs. Out of the ones that did, I would say, in the top 100: - 10% are outright scams, mainly got to the top 100 through careful manipulation of CMC - 70% are genuine ideas that "threw the blockchain at a problem," and probably won't be around 2 years from now - 20% are legitimate, interesting projects that are really on the forefront of combining cutting edge technology with the blockchain Even though a lot of ICOs are scams, most of them are just moneymaking ideas that aren't scams but don't have the legs to go do the distance... Then every once in a while there is a really smart project with a dedicated team; those also get rekt by prevailing market conditions quite frequently, however. This is not investment advice, and I'm not invested in any of them, but a few projects I found to be unique and have potential include: Holo (HOT) Endor Protocol (EDR) Decentraland (MANA) SingularityNET (AGI) OneRoot Network (RNT) Having said that, yeah, the ICO market is still completely oversaturated, and I'm just as pessimistic about it as anybody. |
|
|
|
If you need at some point a fair share of data that you see on the Merit Dashboard, but that would like to have in a more "mass" treatable format (i.e. google sheets), tell me and I’ll retrieve it from the DB itself, hopefully thus avoiding quite a bit of manual work.
Cool, thanks for the offer. I'm good for the moment but in the future I might have a more specific query. |
|
|
|
Whats that? I can't hear you over the sound of you being off topic and having no logical argument.
I'm not trying to "argue" with you. I just wanted to know if you believe Sandy Hook actually happened or not. |
|
|
|
long-winded circular rant about nothing
I just asked asked you if you believed Sandy Hook was a hoax or not. Do you believe it happened, or not? |
|
|
|
There are a couple of ways to use the Merit Dashboard to derive the data. I’m not exactly sure which one you used, but likely the “Potential Merit Sources” tab, filtering by Section “Deleted”.
-> Doing so we can retrieve how many people we have merited on deleted posts (SentNetworkSize), the amount of sMerits, the amount of TXs involved, and a few other ratios.
Actually I got it from the "Section Subsection" tab and filtered by "Deleted." Then I copied that data to a PDF, then to an Excel spreadsheet, which is why it was a bit messy and not 100% accurate. Then I subtotaled everybody and cross-referenced it with what was in the Potential Merit Sources tab. |
|
|
|
People would change profile pics, light candles, form a circle and pray, rinse, repeat. Same with Orlando, Paris, etc.
They'll make these gestures but people never learn. They still allow mentally unstable people to have easy access to guns. They still allow fundamentalist groups of every flavor platform for propagating their message.
Congratulations on reacting exactly the way the shooter hoped you would by pushing censorship and gun control. That's not what the shooter hoped. Things the shooter "pushed:" - White supremacy - Immigrants as invaders - War on all Muslims Selective censorship and gun control are a sensible reaction to the shooting. Despite your earlier claims otherwise, New Zealand had relatively lax restrictions on gun ownership up until a few days ago. They will likely follow in the footsteps of Australia, which banned guns after their last massacre, and hasn't had one since. As usual you claim authority on subjects you know nothing about. Quotes from the shooter's manifesto: " Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from Whites in the United states?Yes, that is the plan all along, you said you would fight to protect your rights and the constitution, well soon will come the time.
Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights in the New Zealand?The gun owners of New Zealand are a beaten, miserable bunch of baby boomers, who have long since given up the fight. When was the last time they won increased rights? Their loss was inevitable. I just accelerated things a bit. They had long since lost their cities, take a look at Auckland. Did you really expect they would not also lose their rights?" "With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty. This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines." "The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China. Won't happen in the U.S. as I said earlier, and the guy is only talking about "increased rights" in New Zealand. If a mass shooting happens on this scale, it is only natural to re-evaluate gun a nation's gun laws. He sure did push them along, you and him are right about that. As for censorship, it seems you are completely mistaken and pulled that out of your ass. Don't let me get in the way of standing between reality and beliefs you already held before the shooting happened, however. Also it sounds like you largely agree with the shooter in his manifesto by quoting it in the manner which you did. If not, why would you quote the bits about "they had long lost their cities"...? Only a dangerous fringe actually believe in that sort of talk. These victims aren't even in the ground and you are already chalking their deaths up to a great conspiracy that only exists in the minds of the severely deluded. By any chance, are you one of those "Sandy Hook was a hoax" guys? |
|
|
|
People would change profile pics, light candles, form a circle and pray, rinse, repeat. Same with Orlando, Paris, etc.
They'll make these gestures but people never learn. They still allow mentally unstable people to have easy access to guns. They still allow fundamentalist groups of every flavor platform for propagating their message.
Congratulations on reacting exactly the way the shooter hoped you would by pushing censorship and gun control. That's not what the shooter hoped. Things the shooter "pushed:" - White supremacy - Immigrants as invaders - War on all Muslims Selective censorship and gun control are a sensible reaction to the shooting. Despite your earlier claims otherwise, New Zealand had relatively lax restrictions on gun ownership up until a few days ago. They will likely follow in the footsteps of Australia, which banned guns after their last massacre, and hasn't had one since. This whole thing is completely fake. They are all actors, you got duped and just watched another bullshit hollywood scene so they can put in laws to take our guns away.
You sure what you're saying? No, he's not. And he should relax: nobody is taking America's guns away, even if they should. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
reeeeeeeeeee
