Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:27:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 [399] 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 ... 590 »
7961  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Nervous about migrating from Qt to Armory cold storage on: December 27, 2015, 11:28:33 PM
Questions:

(1) When I import a private key from Qt to Armory - the key (along with its funds) still also technically exists in Qt wallet.dat, right?

This way, if I make some mistake on the import to Armory, then my funds are still ok in Qt, assuming I don't lose my Qt wallet.dat file?
Yes

(2) I want to avoid "sweeping" - which I can't figure out how to do fully offline.
Actually, sweeping is recommended since when you export the private keys, you are at more risk of them being stolen. Sweeping makes sure that even if someone steals your private keys, there won't be any Bitcoin for them to steal. It won't work if you are offline.

So I want to do as follows:

(a) Import private key from Qt to a "temp" Armory wallet "TempWallet" (offline of course).

(b) Create another, separate "permanent" Armory wallet "PermWallet" (also offline).

(c) Import private key from Qt wallet.dat to Armory wallet "TempWallet".

(d) Offline-sign & online-broadcast a transaction (using the normal procedure) sending funds from Armory "TempWallet" to Armory "PermWallet".

Would this work?
It would, but it is a lot more work than necessary.

Now I know that you don't want to put the qt-wallet online again, but that may actually be the only way to get the funds from your qt wallet to armory. The problem is that bitcoin core uses compressed keys now and armory only supports uncompressed keys, so the keys from Bitcoin core won't be able to be swept or imported.
7962  Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: QR code won't scan. How can I load a private key from paper wallet to mycelium? on: December 27, 2015, 10:21:17 PM
You can just type the private key somewhere, select it and copy the entire string, then go to mycelium and import it from the clipboard.

That's the problem I'm having. I can't find that option anywhere. Where can I import it?
Go to the Accounts tab and in the upper right hand corner, there should be a button with a key and a plus sign. Tap that and scroll down to the bottom of the window that opens. Hit the button for Advanced. From there you can scan the key (were you using another scanner before? That probably wouldn't have worked, but the one in the app will) or you can import it from the clipboard. If the button for import from clipboard is grayed out, that means you copied it incorrectly.
7963  Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: QR code won't scan. How can I load a private key from paper wallet to mycelium? on: December 27, 2015, 10:13:59 PM
You can just type the private key somewhere, select it and copy the entire string, then go to mycelium and import it from the clipboard.
7964  Other / Meta / Re: You guys need to fix the ban evasion issue before making another forum. on: December 27, 2015, 07:00:12 PM
If anonymity was such a huge thing, how come people doxx people and the moderators sit back and allow it? Bitcoin is not anonymous.
Bitcoin is not anonymous, it is pseudonymous. This forum is the same, and if you have made it possible to link your forum pseudonym to your real identity, then that is your own fault. When people dox each other, they are using publicly available information, you would be able to find the exact same information if you actually spent time to look for it.
7965  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: is there anyway to send and receive bitcoin without using Bitcoin address? on: December 27, 2015, 06:34:26 PM
There isn't any way to send or receive Bitcoins without using addresses, but if you use BIP70 Payment Requests, then you won't need to give anyone an address. The address will be part of the payment request and most modern clients will do all the work for you. You just need to allow the send.

I think we should make this type of platform like i described above!
I am interested in developing it
Well I think the payment requests can already do what you describe.

You create a payment request and upload the request file to your site. If someone wants to pay, then they download that request and their client immediately recognizes it as a payment request. It will know where to send the Bitcoin and how much to send, so all the user does is enter their wallet password and hit ok. Then the client just sends the Bitcoin normally.

So, the payment request is in software form?
How about tx id?
The payment request contains all of the necessary data for a transaction, e.g. the receiving address and the amount to send. The client parses all of that information and creates a normal transaction and sends the Bitcoin. It basically removes the step of giving people addresses to correctly copy and send to. You can read more about it here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0070.mediawiki
7966  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I cannot see qt client window on: December 27, 2015, 04:35:28 PM
Sorry for necro but I don't want to open a new thread. I have the same problem. When I clicked "inputs" Core was frozen, then I closed it. After that I never see main window. I can open Debug Window but can't see main screen. I tried a lot of things, including Process Hacker mentioned in this thread but I still can't see the screen. Do you have any other ideas? Because I don't know what to do.
Try doing shift+right click on the icon in the taskbar. Then select move and just click somewhere on the screen. If you can't click the move option, then click on the desktop and make sure that no window is currently selected.
7967  Other / Meta / Re: You guys need to fix the ban evasion issue before making another forum. on: December 27, 2015, 03:27:36 PM
Somebody spamming Bitcoin is dead in speculation from a different account everytime they get banned would only prove my point. Fix the ban evasion issue and you won't have to manually delete nonsense like that.
They are getting nuked immediately by a bot. No one is manually deleting them.

There is nothing that can be done about it. You can't "fix ban evasion" for this since the guy posting is probably a bot which is using a proxy and constantly changing its ip address. There is nothing other than the account's first post that indicates that it is ban evading. You literally cannot ban them for ban evading if they haven't posted anything yet.

If you say that this can be fixed, then please, tell us.
7968  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: is there anyway to send and receive bitcoin without giving Bitcoin address? on: December 27, 2015, 03:25:58 PM
There isn't any way to send or receive Bitcoins without using addresses, but if you use BIP70 Payment Requests, then you won't need to give anyone an address. The address will be part of the payment request and most modern clients will do all the work for you. You just need to allow the send.

I think we should make this type of platform like i described above!
I am interested in developing it
Well I think the payment requests can already do what you describe.

You create a payment request and upload the request file to your site. If someone wants to pay, then they download that request and their client immediately recognizes it as a payment request. It will know where to send the Bitcoin and how much to send, so all the user does is enter their wallet password and hit ok. Then the client just sends the Bitcoin normally.
7969  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: is there anyway to send and receive bitcoin without giving Bitcoin address? on: December 27, 2015, 03:15:37 PM
There isn't any way to send or receive Bitcoins without using addresses, but if you use BIP70 Payment Requests, then you won't need to give anyone an address. The address will be part of the payment request and most modern clients will do all the work for you. You just need to allow the send.
7970  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Full node with search function??? on: December 27, 2015, 03:13:14 PM
There is, kind of. You need to use the debug console. In the debug console, you can get information about a block using
Code:
getblock <hash>

where <hash> is the hash of the block.
You can get the hash by using
Code:
getblockhashs <height>
where <height> is the block height.

You can also get transaction info by using
Code:
getrawtransaction <txid>
Where <txid> is the txid. This won't always work since Bitcoin Core doesn't index all of the transactions by default. If you want to be able to search every single transaction in the blockchain, then you will need to enable txindex by adding
Code:
txindex=1
to your bitcoin.conf file or add -txindex to the command that starts up Bitcoin Core.
7971  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Might have sent bitcoin to someone by accident on: December 27, 2015, 04:14:11 AM
ight well thatll help

Where you can check your bitcoin ballance I copied the address from their and sent it to that exact address, I checked the help forums and they say I could be using a fake Silk Road, which I highly doubt tbh because they wouldn't mention that on a fake website, they also said it could be a glitch and I'll have to wait a few hours till it shows I have the bitcoins in my account/wallet
I highly suspect that you have been scammed since both the original silk road and silk road 2 have been shutdown. See this: https://www.deepdotweb.com/marketplace-directory/listing/silk-road-3/ for some info.
7972  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Might have sent bitcoin to someone by accident on: December 27, 2015, 03:49:17 AM
Okay I'll try, also followed the address I sent it to and it's been unspent, but it doesn't say I have and bitcoins in my Silk Road account, but I'll try contacting them, have you had expire nice with buying on the deep Web? Just so I could explain where I went and sent it? It's not important if you haven't just would be even more helpful

I have a little bit of experience with stuff on the deep web, but I haven't actually bought anything. I do know how those markets typically work though.
7973  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Might have sent bitcoin to someone by accident on: December 27, 2015, 03:38:08 AM
No I didn't buy if from the dark net, sorry thst was a typing erroneous on my behalf, I bought it from Localbitcoins.com then tried to send it to my deep web account, I may have messed up when I sent it to the address for my deep web account instead of requesting if from my wallet, from the deep web page
That should be fine then. As long as you sent the Bitcoin to the correct address, then you are fine, and you should contact the darknet site's support since then it is a service problem. It is ok if you did not click any button like "request payment" since those are not necessary for sending Bitcoin.
7974  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Might have sent bitcoin to someone by accident on: December 27, 2015, 03:27:46 AM
Hey Guys!

So I'm new to this whole bitcoin buying frome the dark corners of the internet, I purchased a bitcoin and it was in my wallet, I then proceed to sent it to my account on silk road and I think that's where I've fucked up, it says delivered and confirmed by 15+ and I don't have it, what do I do!!!? Please help  Cry
Why are you buying bitcoin from the darknet? Bitcoin isn't illegal, and if you want Bitcoin, that is one of the riskiest ways to do it.

If you sent the bitcoin to the wrong address, there is absolutely nothing you can do to get it back. If you know who owns that address, then you need to contact that person and ask him to return the Bitcoin. Since you are dealing with the darknet, the chances of getting anything back is pretty low. If you are sure that you sent the Bitcoin to the right place but they aren't crediting it to your account, then it is a service problem and you should contact support. Another thing, be careful on the darknet as many sites are phishing sites, so it is possible that you have been phished.
7975  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: beginners be very carefull on: December 27, 2015, 03:00:12 AM
Mining in general is a big scam. The cloud miners are the real puppet masters of mining and they are scamming us all.
Stay away from mining is my words of advice.
How is mining a scam? Mining is the method by which transactions are included in blocks to prevent them from being double spent. Mining is an integral part of Bitcoin, without it, Bitcoin wouldn't work.

Cloud mining is different, and most of the time cloud mining doesn't actually mine, they are usually just ponzi or pyramid schemes.
7976  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: December 26, 2015, 09:37:53 PM

Or you can just make a chart or somthing to tell what percentage of post the user did in which board. This would effectivily tell the potential buyer if he wants to buy the account or not ... Moreover you can really easily pick this up from the user profile.

You can pretty much get this chart from your profile's general statistics page => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=167251;sa=statPanel

So that isn't much important either.
That and the site already tells you where they have posted and how many times they posted in each section.

@knightdk, I would rather suggest you to add a negative multiplier or a lower positive multiplier for posts in off-topic, politics and altcoin sections.
I will add that. There will be an additional positive multiplier (e.g. price*0.7) for those sections. Can you suggest me some multipliers to use?
7977  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: rcp details on: December 26, 2015, 09:13:49 PM
i forget my rcp user and password , how to find it now?
i host it in centos 6
Those details should be in the bitcoin.conf file.
7978  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: December 26, 2015, 09:09:43 PM
How about adding some multiplier for language used to post.
Like English is most preferable and therfore can have some extra multiplier...
Also, posting off topic and newbies and other local boards can also have a multiplier...
I think this will give more accurate results here.

Also I don't know but is there a way we can get a current market price by comparing what the accounts are selling right now... This might be a bit difficult..

Well these are my suggestions ... Really good survice by the way.
Although this is primarily an english forum, I don't think posting in other languages should have an effect on the price. However posting in off topic, and politics (and maybe altcoins) will have a multiplier at some point in the future.

edit: I may be able to have it tell you what languages the account has posted in, but that won't effect the price of the account.
7979  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Testnet block height 627810 (port 18333) on: December 26, 2015, 03:56:59 PM
Why is the block height 627810 on the Bitcoin Testnet? Are there information out how and why this happened?

This block height is far ahead to the Mainnet block height.

EDIT: maybe someone put large hash power on the testnet3 and solve a lot of blocks in no time before a diff adjustement happened?
Pretty much. The difficulty on the testnet is much lower than the mainnet, and it resets back to the minimum if no block was found in some time. I think a couple months ago someone was mining tons of testnet blocks trying to push it to go past the second halving for some reason.
7980  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoins 7 Transaction Per Second Limitation on: December 26, 2015, 03:58:41 AM
On the matter of transaction confirmation by individual miners, I found two sources which contradict your position. At http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/16607/if-a-block-chain-is-considered-invalid-how-about-transactions-in-this-block-cha?rq=1 look for the answer to the top question "If a block chain is considered invalid, how about transactions in this block chain?"  At http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/30452/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-transaction-with-0-fees-to-be-confirmed-or-rejected look for the statement "No transaction can be rejected though, there's just no such thing in the protocol."
How do they contradict me?

I thought they did, but since you are apparently in agreement with them, the matter is settled: the 7-transaction-per-second limitation is and will be irrelevant for many present and future users of the BTClockchain.

 
No, I never said that. How do those articles lead to your conclusion? Please explain how I those contradict me (if in fact they do, then I probably missed something or you misunderstood something) and how those lead to the conclusion that the 7tps limit is irrelevant.
Pages: « 1 ... 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 [399] 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!